Goldman Sachs Forecasts an 11% Return for Global Markets Over the Next 12 Months

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

The global bull market could continue in 2026, supported by growth in corporate earnings and resilient economic activity, although equity gains are unlikely to match the strong advance seen in 2025, according to Goldman Sachs Research. The firm expects continued global economic expansion across all regions and further moderate rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve.

“Given this macroeconomic backdrop, it would be unusual to see a significant equity pullback or a bear market without a recession, even starting from elevated valuations,” writes Peter Oppenheimer, Chief Global Equity Strategist at Goldman Sachs Research, in the report Global Equity Strategy 2026 Outlook: Tech Tonic—A Broadening Bull Market.

Looking back, diversification was a central theme for Goldman Sachs Research last year. “Investors who diversified across regions in 2025 were rewarded for the first time in many years, and analysts expect diversification to continue in 2026, extending to investment factors such as growth and value, as well as across different sectors,” they explain.

Outlook for Global Equities in 2026

“We believe that returns in 2026 will be driven more by earnings growth than by rising valuations,” says Oppenheimer. The 12-month global forecast suggests that stock prices, weighted by regional market capitalization, could rise by 9% and deliver a total return of 11% including dividends, in U.S. dollars. “Most of these returns are driven by earnings,” he adds. Commodity indexes could also advance this year, with gains in precious metals once again offsetting declines in energy, as was the case in 2025, according to Goldman Sachs.

Diversification and Market Cycle

Oppenheimer’s team analyzes the typical phases of market cycles: despair during bear markets, a brief phase of hope after the initial rebound, a longer period of growth driven by rising earnings, and finally, a phase of optimism as investor confidence builds.

According to this analysis, equities are currently in the optimism phase of a cycle that began with the 2020 bear market during the pandemic. This stage is typically accompanied by rising valuations, suggesting some upside risks to baseline forecasts.

Should Investors Diversify in 2026?

Geographic diversification benefited investors in 2025, an unusual outcome, as the United States underperformed other major markets for the first time in nearly 15 years. Equity returns in Europe, China, and Asia were nearly double those of the S&P 500 in dollar terms, supported by the weakness of the U.S. currency.

While U.S. equities were driven primarily by earnings growth, especially among large tech companies, markets outside the U.S. showed a more balanced mix of improving corporate results and rising valuations. The growth-adjusted valuation gap between the U.S. and the rest of the world narrowed last year.

“We expect this convergence in growth-adjusted valuation ratios to continue in 2026, even though absolute valuations in the U.S. are likely to remain higher,” notes Oppenheimer’s team.

Diversification is expected to continue offering potential to enhance risk-adjusted returns in 2026. Investors may consider broad geographic exposure, including a greater focus on emerging markets, while combining growth and value stocks and diversifying across sectors.

Elevated Valuations and Sector Opportunities

Although equities performed strongly in 2025, outperforming both commodities and bonds, gains were not linear. The S&P 500 saw a nearly 20% correction between mid-February and April before rebounding. The sharp recovery that followed has left valuations at historically high levels across all regions, including Japan, Europe, and emerging markets.

Oppenheimer notes that non-technology sectors could perform well this year, and investors may benefit from companies that indirectly gain from capital investment by tech firms. Interest is also expected to grow in companies outside the tech sector as new capabilities related to artificial intelligence begin to materialize.

Is There a Bubble in Artificial Intelligence?

Market interest in artificial intelligence remains intense, though this does not necessarily signal a bubble. The dominance of the tech sector began after the financial crisis and has been supported by stronger-than-average earnings growth.

While the share prices of major tech companies have risen sharply, valuations are not as extreme as in past cycles, such as the peak of the tech bubble in 2000.

Labor Market in U.S.: Superficial Stability and Underlying Pressures

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Unsplash

The year begins with few surprises on the macroeconomic front. The U.S. labor market remains in a gray area: hiring appears sluggish, yet there are no significant increases in layoffs. The December ADP private employment report came in below expectations (41,000 vs. the expected 50,000), although it confirms a trend of stability since mid-2025. For Friday’s payroll report, an increase of around 60,000 jobs is anticipated, along with a slight improvement in the unemployment rate from 4.6% to 4.5%.

The November JOLTS survey reinforced this mixed picture: job openings declined from 7.67 to 7.15 million, but voluntary quits rose, typically a sign of worker confidence. Layoffs remain stable. The message? A fragile balance, with no clear signs of acceleration or systemic deterioration. Even so, the divergence between public and private employment could distort the broader interpretation. The BLS’s upcoming methodological revision in February could mark a turning point in how labor data is assessed.

In this context, the Fed maintains its “wait and see” approach, with growing attention on employment trends as a key variable for adjusting monetary policy. The possibility of an additional rate cut by mid-2026 will largely depend on how the labor market evolves in the second quarter.

Growth, CAPEX, and Focus on the Tech Sector

The Atlanta Fed’s GDP model projects above-potential growth. The recovery remains concentrated in specific sectors, such as technology, which generate little direct employment. Focus will turn to fourth-quarter results from hyperscalers to assess whether investment momentum is holding. However, BEA data shows that tech CAPEX has lost traction in recent months.

The potential slowdown in tech investment comes at a time when the market is beginning to demand concrete results. Investors are no longer rewarding narratives alone, they are starting to penalize models without clear profitability. This could lead to a rotation toward sectors with more visible fundamentals.

ISM Services and Favorable Signals for Risk Assets

The ISM services index exceeded expectations (54.4) and showed improvements in the new orders and employment components (the latter rising to 52, entering expansion territory), while the prices subindex declined. This combination of easing inflationary pressure and modest gains in activity and employment is favorable for risk assets, helping to keep the 10-year Treasury yield below 4.2%. That, in turn, supports equity valuations and strengthens expectations that the Fed could cut rates more than markets had anticipated after its last meeting.

The composite ISM and JOLTS indicators support the case for wage moderation. Layoffs are at a six-month low, and the Challenger index fell from +23.5% to -8.3% in December. This environment reinforces the post-pandemic normalization narrative, with a soft landing increasingly gaining traction as the baseline scenario.

AI, Productivity, and Pressure on Wages

The accelerated adoption of AI tools is beginning to show effects on productivity and labor structure. While it enhances efficiency, it also reduces employees’ bargaining power, contributing to further moderation of real wages in 2026.

Although large-scale AI investment began in 2024, its impact on productivity remains uneven. Some major companies have achieved tangible improvements, while others are still in the exploratory phase. The market is beginning to differentiate between those with a clear monetization strategy and those without.

This shift in focus will also have implications for the labor market. Sectors such as financial services, marketing, and administrative technology could see workforce adjustments in favor of leaner structures.

Energy, Housing, and the Electoral Agenda

On the geopolitical front, U.S. control of Venezuela’s oil sector, with a projected release of 30 to 50 million barrels, could stabilize crude prices between $50 and $60. This aligns with Trump’s goals of protecting the purchasing power of his electoral base.

President Trump is also seeking to improve housing access. His proposals include limiting the role of institutional investors in the residential market, allowing retirement savings to be used for home purchases, and promoting mortgage portability. In addition, he is pressuring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to acquire up to $200 billion in MBS, which would lower real estate financing costs. If fully implemented, the 30-year mortgage rate could fall below 6%, compared to the historical average spread of 1.76% over the 10-year Treasury (currently at 2.03%).

These measures carry a strong electoral component. The early 2025 ResiClub survey suggests they could help revive the housing market. Understanding the behavior of the “lower leg” of the K-shaped economy will be key to sector allocation in portfolios.

Political Stimulus and Inflation Expectations

With limited fiscal space (debt-to-GDP above 120%), Republicans may intensify the use of alternative policies: deregulation, tax cuts, selective tariff reductions, and access to cheaper financing. The OBBBA plan will play a key role in catalyzing investment during the first half of the year.

At the same time, inflation could ease more than expected in the second half of 2026. The impact of tariffs is likely to fade, and productivity gains from AI may have a meaningful disinflationary effect. Trump may also choose to ease certain trade sanctions (including those on China), aiming to support growth and broaden his electoral base.

In addition, private consumption could rebound if direct transfer mechanisms, such as checks or temporary subsidies, are activated. The conditions for a more expansive second half in terms of consumption are in place, as long as external shocks do not materialize.

Sector Rotation and a Rally Beyond Technology

While AI-related CAPEX and productivity gains are expected to remain in the spotlight, the rally could extend to previously lagging sectors such as industrials and consumer goods. Active sector selection will be key in 2026 to capture shifts in the composition of growth. Valuations continue to show exploitable dispersion.

In this environment, maintaining a balanced exposure across technology, advanced manufacturing, and services could be a prudent strategy. Additionally, cyclical sectors may benefit from an extended economic cycle if consumption holds and inflation continues to ease.

Tactically, the combination of contained interest rates, disinflationary pressure, and active policy measures could create a favorable backdrop for maintaining exposure to risk assets during the first half of the year. However, we anticipate increased volatility and will be monitoring historical parallels with U.S. midterm election periods.

How to Transition Smoothly From the Transactional Model to the Advisory Model Without Disrupting the Client

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyFrom left to right: Michael Averett, Chief Revenue Officer for Insigneo; Mariano Huidobro, SVP Financial Advisor at Insigneo; Edward Varona, Insigneo advisor; Juan Carlos Amado, Financial Advisor at Insigneo; and Andres Brik, Senior Vice President at Insigneo.

During Insigneo’s triennial event held in Seville in November 2025, several of the firm’s financial advisors shared their vision on how they are guiding their clients through the transition toward advisory services, moving away from the more traditional transactional model common among broker-dealers in the region. Far from framing it as a simple “account change,” the panelists agreed that the shift to the advisory model is driven by a combination of good timing, financial education, transparency, and client connection. Above all, they recognize that this change stems from the advisor’s ability to deliver excellence to their clients.

“For me, in a broad sense, excellence is about giving more of yourself—something similar to what happens in sports. For example, Kobe Bryant used to do something different; he didn’t have extraordinary talent. His team was willing to give more, just like we want to give more to our clients every day, and that’s why I believe excellence is built when no one is watching. Working late nights, training hard, improving 1% in every small thing 1,000 times, it’s a process of hard work, not a single performance. We aspire to excellence as a team, and I believe we have the best team,” said Juan Carlos Amado, Financial Advisor at Insigneo.

In the view of Edward Varona, Insigneo advisor, excellence is achieved by adopting a different mindset. “If we analyze a problem, for example, how to manage volatility, we need to step back and figure out where we might fail so we can avoid it. The key is, if we can prevent volatility by explaining to clients that it’s not about constantly watching the screen, then that kind of proposal and way of thinking will add value,” Varona explained during the panel discussion.

A Transition Built on Experience

Advisors are confident in their ability to provide excellence and added value to clients; now comes the more complex part: transitioning to a model of explicitly paid advisory services. Along this path, one of the concepts most often mentioned by advisors was the use of so-called “natural transition moments.” Situations such as a platform shutting down or structural changes in a firm, for example, the closure of Wells Fargo Advisors, force clients to move their assets. Rather than replicating the old setup, advisors use this moment to reframe the relationship and focus on becoming more efficient and improving client service.

That was the case in the experience shared by Varona, a former Wells Fargo advisor, during the panel. “In my case, I was quite lucky, it was like being in the right place at the right time. We built our business from our branch with a synergy-focused approach and a solid team. So, when the shutdown happened, I almost saw it as my own ‘Liberation Day,’ because I was able to continue working within a model where advisory is a key and integral part of the business and your frontline operations,” Varona recalled.

For Andres Brik, Senior Vice President at Insigneo, the journey was a mix of conviction and passion, culminating in a single proposition: the advisory model. “We like to take the reins of investment, even in more complex assets like alternatives and private markets. I do believe that, as markets evolve, clients need to understand that financial education is extremely important, especially for private assets. This is work we do by combining education, the technology from various providers, and quarterly reviews. The result is that when something happens in the market, like last year’s ‘Liberation Day’, we don’t get calls from clients asking what’s going on, because they know exactly what they have in their portfolios and how those assets behave. They’re fully aware of what they hold,” he explained.

Making the Case to Clients and the Next Generation

When it comes to knowledge, advisors aren’t just referring to how assets or portfolios work, but also to the cost of investment, of advisory services, and the margins involved. As Varona acknowledged, that was one of his strongest arguments when guiding clients through this transition. “I showed clients, openly and transparently, the fees—so they could decide for themselves. We were also lucky because, right in the middle of the transition, we saw that Insigneo’s IMAPS program was available. The other thing we did was, for every new client opening an account, I’d set up a dual scheme: a transactional account and an advisory account. And I’d explain: ‘Look, we have these mutual funds. And math doesn’t lie; it comes down to that, math doesn’t lie. There’s an internal expense ratio. These firms need to keep the lights on, you know. So, if we move from here to here, from this share class to that one, you’re going to save money.’ That’s basically it,” Varona recalled during the event.

Beyond transparency with the client, advisors emphasized that the advisory model is better aligned with today’s expectations, and especially with those of the next generation. “One of the common and key factors is listening to what your client has to say. We have two ears, two eyes, and only one mouth, there’s a reason for that. To connect with the client and understand their needs, you have to listen: what is their body language telling you, what is their attitude saying? It’s essential to earning their trust. And having younger professionals on the team also helps improve that empathy, especially with younger generations,” noted Mariano Huidobro, SVP Financial Advisor at Insigneo, who shared his experience on the panel.

Among other conclusions presented by the advisors regarding the advisory model were the importance of professional and ongoing management, consistency with goals and risk profile, long-term planning, and a clear fee structure, all of which are increasingly valued by heirs and younger clients. These elements become especially relevant when navigating uncertain cycles and environments, as in 2025. In this regard, Amado emphasized that advisors must prepare clients for volatility. “Volatility is the price you pay to stay in the game. But then comes the question of how you can reduce volatility with the range of products we have. And I firmly believe that Insigneo has a platform that gives clients access to an unmatched range of products. For me, private infrastructure plays a very important role in reducing volatility without sacrificing returns, taking fees into account. When you go through those storms with the client, explaining why something is happening now and how their portfolio is positioned for it, and show them that every time we’ve been through this before, the market recovered and so did the portfolio, then the transition becomes much more manageable,” he pointed out.

The Value of Advisory

Up to this point, Insigneo’s advisors are clear on the value they deliver, but as they themselves admit, it’s difficult to price their service. “The transactional part of the business is like a commodity: it’s very hard to prove your value if you’re not adding any. That’s why, among brokers, we do a lot of non-discretionary advisory. But I also think it’s important to move forward and start developing the advisory business. IMAPS is a very good solution because you have the entire senior team, strong performance, and it’s a way to start building an advisory business. Another path is through the technology we have, Orion, which integrates accounts and lets you access other parts of the client’s wealth held on other platforms. That way, you can provide real advisory on their true asset allocation,” concluded Huidobro.

Trends in ETFs: The Good, the Bad, and the Too Early to Judge

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In the early 1990s, the world’s first exchange-traded fund (ETF) was launched on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Just three years later, the first U.S. ETF debuted: the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. From those humble beginnings, ETFs have come a long way. The industry likely closed 2025 with record levels of assets under management, both in the United States and other regions around the world. This scenario is not without underlying trends that are poised to continue transforming the sector. Morningstar analysts have weighed in on the positives and negatives ahead, as well as which trends are still too early to judge.

Active ETFs

Active ETFs are currently in the spotlight, with assets under management likely reaching record levels in both the U.S. and Europe. While active ETFs have existed for nearly two decades, they’ve recently gained momentum thanks to regulatory changes, for instance, in 2029, the U.S. SEC introduced Rule 6c-11, also known as the “ETF Rule.” This regulatory shift “streamlined the ETF approval process and allowed all funds subject to the rule to use custom creation and redemption baskets to enhance their prospective tax efficiency,” according to Morningstar.

In this area, Morningstar analysts believe that active ETFs “can be a lifeline for active managers.” As a group, actively managed funds have generally failed to outperform their benchmarks significantly, as the firm notes, although some active managers have delivered strong relative results.

Active ETFs are more established in the U.S. and are growing in Europe. Overall, the market is still young, and many active ETFs have launched during a bull market, but Morningstar analysts expect them to grow in both size and number. “The availability of more options can benefit investors but will likely lead to a more complex and competitive environment,” they admit.

While the ETF structure can often provide transparency, lower costs, and, in some countries, tax efficiency, the firm emphasizes that there’s no guarantee active management will deliver positive relative returns. “It’s essential that investors and advisors conduct a rigorous due diligence process to select the right manager,” they conclude.

Are Private Markets and ETFs Compatible?

As public and private markets converge, new ways of accessing private investments are emerging. In 2025, State Street and Apollo launched the world’s first private credit ETF: the SPDR SSGA IG Public & Private Credit ETF.

This product aims to invest in both public and private credit through an ETF. The public portion includes fixed income securities such as corporate bonds and syndicated bank loans, “nothing out of the ordinary in the ETF space.” The private portion, however, is the more interesting element. Traditionally, private credit has been out of reach for most investors, but this ETF seeks to change that. While this unprecedented ETF could mark the beginning of a new era in private market investing, significant concerns remain, especially regarding liquidity and redemptions, since private credit is difficult to trade.

With that in mind, Morningstar analysts’ verdict on this emerging trend is that while the convergence of public and private markets is underway, “like the SEC, we have reservations about the structure, it’s still too early to determine whether it will succeed or be short-lived.”

The Rise of Defined Outcome ETFs

Defined outcome ETFs use options to limit a portfolio’s losses over a given period in exchange for capping gains. They fall under the category of actively managed instruments and are designed to be bought and held at the beginning and end of a set period. So far, they’ve proven very popular with investors, particularly those with a strong aversion to risk or shorter investment horizons.

According to Morningstar analysts, defined outcome ETFs have worked…so far. Their analysis shows that the average amount invested in these products has delivered annual returns of around 10.7%, outperforming the aggregate total return of 9.4% for ETFs. However, they warn investors that defined outcome ETFs come with higher fees, a complex structure, partial exposure to market losses, and no dividend payouts.

Generating Income Through Income-Oriented ETFs

Income-generating ETFs seek to provide income through derivatives and often use strategies such as writing or selling options, entering into futures contracts, and other derivative-based trades to enhance income. These products have gained popularity thanks to their potential for delivering higher yields compared to traditional income-generating investments like bonds or dividend-paying stocks.

But Morningstar cautions that, over the long term, “these ETFs are unlikely to outperform the market as a buy-and-hold strategy, and for investors with significant short-term liquidity needs, they could drain liquidity from their portfolios.”

ESG and Thematic ETFs

While many of the ETF categories mentioned above are on the rise, the same cannot be said for ESG or thematic ETFs. Key factors driving this decline include prevailing attitudes toward ESG considerations and regulatory uncertainty.

Morningstar analysts cite several interconnected factors contributing to the drop in ESG ETFs. Among them: a complex geopolitical environment that has led Europe to deprioritize sustainability goals in favor of economic growth, competitiveness, and defense. Additionally, ongoing uncertainty around regulation, especially the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), has made firms hesitant to launch ESG products and strategies.

In the U.S., former President Donald Trump’s anti-climate and anti-ESG policies have also led American asset managers to be more cautious in promoting their ESG credentials.

Strategic Beta Products: The Best of Both Worlds

While active ETFs are on the rise, ETFs have historically been associated with passive investment strategies. However, there is a third investment approach worth noting: strategic beta, also known as smart beta, which “seeks to combine the advantages of both passive and active investment strategies.”

Although they’ve existed since the mid-2000s, they gained traction after the 2008 financial crisis and surged throughout the 2010s.

“They represent a sophisticated approach to achieving alpha, selecting and weighting positions based on specific factor criteria,” the firm notes. They track an index, like a passive fund, but instead of being weighted by market capitalization, they follow a factor-based index.

These ETFs are designed to capture academically proven factors linked to success, such as value, volatility, and quality, which have historically been favored by active managers and have shown superior performance over longer periods.

Morningstar analysts conclude that “while many fund innovations fail, strategic beta has avoided that fate by being passive, inexpensive, and delivering predictable returns.” They explain that compared to actively managed rivals, “strategic beta funds don’t ‘drift’ from their investment approaches.”

Janus Henderson Signs a Distribution Agreement with HSBC to Launch a Thematic Global Equity Fund

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

Janus Henderson Investors has announced the launch of the Janus Henderson Horizon Discovering New Alpha Fund (DNA), a global equity fund available exclusively to HSBC Private Bank and Premier clients in Asia, Europe, US Offshore, and the Middle East for an initial six-month period.

DNA is a globally diversified portfolio comprising approximately 50 high-conviction stocks aligned with structural trends that are expected to shape future markets. It was designed as a solution to address investors’ growing concern that performance is increasingly being driven by a small group of companies.

The fund employs a dynamic and innovative approach to global equities, going beyond traditional funds and indices to identify emerging opportunities and companies with long-term growth potential. A proprietary optimization process is used to minimize biases and enhance diversification.

Led by experienced portfolio managers Richard Clode and Nick Harper, DNA leverages Janus Henderson’s global team of experts across technology, healthcare, financials, real estate, emerging markets, sustainability, and natural resources, providing access to a wide range of exposures across sectors, market capitalizations, and geographies. This approach reflects Janus Henderson’s commitment to delivering innovative solutions that help clients discover new sources of alpha amid evolving global dynamics.

DNA uses themes to guide idea generation, focusing on seven areas of transformation, smarter automation, mobility, lifestyle shifts, longevity, biotechnology, sovereignty, and net zero 2.0, to identify companies with long-term growth potential. The fund is built on the best ideas of Janus Henderson’s seasoned stock pickers, combined to create a balanced global equity portfolio.

“When we set out to create the DNA fund, we wanted to tap into the true DNA of Janus Henderson, which is the differentiated and proven expertise of our teams in stock selection. Our goal is to identify today the winners of tomorrow,” said Richard Clode, Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson.

For his part, Ali Dibadj, CEO of Janus Henderson, commented that this agreement with HSBC “reflects our shared commitment to putting clients first and delivering a differentiated proposition that helps investors navigate the evolving market landscape.” Likewise, Lavanya Chari, Global Head of Wealth and Premier Solutions at HSBC, added that this collaboration with Janus Henderson “enables our clients to uncover new investment opportunities beyond AI, while mitigating portfolio concentration risk.”

Secondaries and Evergreen Funds: Venture Capital Strategies to Revive the Unicorn Market

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

From 2005 to the First Half of 2025, Preqin Has Tracked Nearly 2,000 Global Unicorns, privately held companies backed by venture capital (VC) firms that reached a valuation above $1 billion. The number of unicorns created by venture capital rose from just two in 2005 to more than 500 in 2021, the peak year for this market. In fact, from early 2019 to the end of 2022, more than five companies per week reached a valuation of $1 billion or more. Currently, the number of unicorns recorded since 2005 stands at 1,908.

Much of the global coverage of the unicorn boom has focused on the entrepreneurial stories of the founders of these companies or on the vision and risk appetite of the most renowned venture capital investors. The latest Preqin report, “Unicorns: The Private Capital Take,” analyzes private equity data and the ecosystem in which unicorn companies are born, grow, develop, and go to market.

For example, the number of venture capital funds closed in 2024, the last full year with available data, was the lowest since 2015. In addition, the total capital raised, amounting to $122.5 billion, was also the lowest since that year. Both venture capital deal volume and total deal value have been declining since 2021. Moreover, the exit market is practically closed for VC-backed companies, though there are signs of improvement. Likewise, dry powder began to decline in 2024, in line with a slight uptick in the number of new unicorns created.

Sola Akinola, Managing Director at Preqin, states in the report that the era of “easy unicorn creation” is over. In a context of delayed exits by VC funds, down rounds, and more difficult liquidity, investors “can no longer rely on headlines alone.” According to the expert, what now matters is “clarity: distinguishing lasting companies from those inflated by the era of 0% interest rates.” To do this, she says, “reliable, documented information is needed to track these companies beyond the $1 billion threshold, through secondary deals, continuation funds, and real-world outcomes.” Ultimately, she concludes that in a market defined by uncertainty, “the edge lies in connecting the dots faster and more transparently than anyone else.”

X-Ray of the Unicorn Market

The global landscape of unicorn creation since 2005 has been dominated by the United States. More than half of all companies that reach a valuation of over $1 billion fly the American flag: the United States has accounted for 1,020 unicorns over the past 20 years. However, two fast-growing economies are following close behind: China already counts 252 companies with valuations above $1 billion, and India, 152. Europe, for its part, has a total of 539 unicorns.

One theory circulating in the markets about the reasons for this trend is that the brilliance of U.S. unicorn companies is not the key factor in their success. The Preqin report includes remarks by Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, at a New York Times event, where he stated that the United States has a better “venture capital system.” In his view, the availability of $15 million in seed capital for opportunities with just a 10% chance of success in the U.S. sets it apart from Europe, where many financial features, such as the banking system, are otherwise comparable.

Deal data collected by Preqin from 2005 to the first half of 2025 shows 29,890 early-stage deals in the U.S., worth $81 billion, compared to 14,943 deals worth $31 billion in all of Europe during the same period. Additionally, it takes less capital in the U.S. to reach unicorn status: $158 million compared to $198 million in Europe. It also takes less time, an average of 60.9 months in the U.S. versus 65.2 months in Europe. However, reaching a $1 billion valuation involves nearly the same number of funding rounds in both regions: an average of 5.3 in the U.S. and 5.4 in Europe.

In Asia, according to the report, reaching unicorn status requires raising an average of $243 million across 4.8 funding rounds over an average period of 45.7 months. Globally, the average to become a unicorn is $182 million and 59.4 months from the first funding round.

The report reveals that Information Technology (IT) accounts for more than half of all unicorns created since 2005. Healthcare and Financial & Insurance Services follow, though at a much lower volume. It also shows that secondary share sales, IPOs, and trade sales have been the most common exit routes for unicorns, representing nearly 80% of all exits since 2005. Since 2006, 57 unicorns have been written off, falling from valuations above $1 billion to $0.

The Future Challenges of Unicorns

The venture capital landscape has changed over the past 20 years, and its shape for the next 20 years is beginning to take form. The Preqin report notes that secondary markets can provide liquidity when needed. It also raises the possibility that evergreen funds could replace IPOs as a way to ensure long-term value. Moreover, hybrid managers could emerge, with diverse networks to manage risk across asset classes and “even bridge the gap between public and private investments.”

The study emphasizes that private equity has often found ways to adapt. “The shift toward larger growth-stage investments with direct operational involvement, adapting to fewer IPO opportunities and operating with even longer time horizons, will help strengthen venture capital and improve its ability to smooth returns amid changing interest rates and economic downturns,” the report states.

As venture capital adapts, so too will the instruments most influential to its success. Unicorn companies, once mythical and now plentiful, may increasingly approach the realm of private equity. Continuation funds, often focused solely on growth, are just one way that, according to the report, the cultures and practices of venture capital and private equity are converging.

The first unicorn company in Preqin’s Company Intelligence database was Vonage Holdings, a U.S.-based cloud computing platform, which reached a $1.1 billion valuation in May 2005 after a Series E funding round led by Bain Capital Ventures, 3i, and Institutional Venture Partners.

The most recent unicorn, as of June 2025, is Jumbotail Technologies, a retail platform and B2B food and grocery marketplace based in India, founded in 2015. VC investors in its Series D funding round included Artal Asia Pte. Ltd. and SC Ventures.

What to Expect from Central Banks in 2026?

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

After a 2025 that clearly demonstrated the diverging paths taken by various central banks around the world, all signs point to somewhat more stability in monetary policy in 2026. That said, attention remains on whether the recent arrest of Nicolás Maduro by the United States will have repercussions on oil prices and, consequently, on inflation and the actions of central banks.

Without a doubt, the focus will be on the U.S. Federal Reserve. Its chair, Jerome Powell, reaches the end of his term in April, amid doubts about the future independence of the institution and with a member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), Lisa Cook, entangled in legal proceedings. “The Fed has many factors at play in 2026. Not only will a new chair take over, but the macroeconomic outlook remains uncertain. The labor market appears to be cooling without collapsing, while inflation remains stable,” notes Bret Kenwell, Market Analyst at eToro in the U.S., who questions whether the U.S. monetary authority “will be able to adopt a dovish tone if these factors persist in 2026, or whether its dual mandate will keep moderate measures in check.”

A similar view is held by Ray Sharma-Ong, Deputy Global Head of Bespoke Multi-Asset Solutions at Aberdeen Investments, who believes that “the Fed is between a rock and a hard place, with inflation remaining high despite a weakening labor market.” This disconnect “has widened the divisions within the Committee.”

That said, following the rate cuts in 2025 and the current context of the institution, “the Fed’s monetary policy is no longer a catalyst for the markets,” according to the expert. The reason is that with federal funds interest rates between 3.5% and 3.75%, the Committee considers that monetary policy is within the effective range of neutrality. Therefore, “the bar for new cuts is very high, implying that the monetary policy outlook is likely to remain static for some time.” As a result, with official interest rates on hold, “we no longer expect a broad-based beta rally in equities; market correlations may decrease, and fundamentals may gain greater importance.”

For Paolo Zanghieri, Senior Economist at Generali AM, part of Generali Investments, the economy continues to enjoy a solid foundation, but downside risks to employment remain more important to the FOMC than upside risks to inflation.

Now, following the December rate cut, “it can now wait for more data before deciding on the extent and pace of further rate cuts.” Here, Zanghieri‘s outlook is clear: the projected path for the official interest rate has not changed since September, with two more cuts of 25 basis points, one next year and another in 2027. “Our forecast of another rate cut next year aligns with what the Fed expects, but we believe the easing will stop there,” he notes, admitting that this forecast would only be modified in terms of timing, with a possible delay of the next cut to mid-year.

Europe
Nachu Chockalingam, Head of Credit at Federated Hermes, highlights the work done by central banks in recent years to reduce global inflation. From this point, she expects official interest rates to fall, but in general, “to remain slightly above pre-pandemic levels, especially in developed market economies.”

Her view is that the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England will continue cutting rates, “but the direction the European Central Bank (ECB) will take, having started to ease policy earlier, is a bit less clear.” Mainly because inflation in the eurozone is nearing the 2% target, “but the outlook remains uncertain due to global trade disputes and geopolitical tensions.”

The expert explains that short-term risks to the interest rate outlook persist, but she believes the situation would have to deteriorate significantly for the ECB to cut rates again in 2026. Some of these downside risks she mentions include any delayed adverse impact from U.S. tariffs, a stronger euro, the impact of Chinese imports, or delays in Germany’s fiscal stimulus. Political unrest in France, within the context of worsening fiscal conditions, is another potential risk, according to Chockalingam.

The Bank of England (BoE) will also generate market attention throughout 2026. David A. Meier, Economist at Julius Baer, expects two rate cuts from the BoE and a wait-and-see approach from Scandinavian monetary authorities. The BoE, the expert recalls, cut rates to 3.75% at its last meeting amid slowing inflation and weak growth but remained cautious about further easing. “We forecast two more cuts in 2026 and maintain a neutral outlook for the pound sterling,” he notes.

Meier also outlines his expectations for the Nordic central banks: Sweden’s Riksbank kept the policy rate at 1.75% at its last meeting, “with outlooks pointing to possible hikes in late 2026, supporting a bullish scenario for the Swedish krona.” Meanwhile, the Norges Bank, keeping rates at 4% due to persistent inflation, “strengthens the Norwegian krone as the highest-yielding G10 currency.”

Japan
Regarding Japan, Álvaro Peró, Fixed Income Investment Director at Capital Group, reveals that reflation continues amid positive economic growth and inflation above target. The expert explains that although the election of the new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi—who campaigned on a platform of fiscal stimulus, state investment, and financial repression—has raised market expectations for more flexible policy, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has reiterated the need for further hikes in a context of yen weakness and reflationary pressures.

This view is shared by Homin Lee, Senior Macro Strategist at Lombard Odier. The expert expects interest rates in Japan to continue rising in 2026. “After having shielded Japan from deflation through years of accommodative monetary policy, we expect the BoJ to welcome signs of reflationary success with two interest rate hikes in 2026, the first likely in January,” he notes.

Latin America
Forecasts also extend to the largest Latin American economy: Brazil. At DWS, they suggest that the Central Bank of Brazil “appears willing to maintain its aggressive stance” and indicate that structural reforms, following next year’s elections, “could help unlock the country’s potential.”

This is the view of Yi Li-Hantzsche, Emerging Markets Analyst at DWS, who acknowledges that so far, Brazil’s central bank has shown an unwavering commitment to bringing inflation back to target, “despite pressure from the government and the close ties between Governor Galípolo and President Lula.” The expert believes that with a constructive electoral outcome and the prospect of credible reforms, “Brazil could finally unlock lower rates without putting its credibility at risk.”

Venezuela, From the Richest Country in Latin America to a Collapsing Economy

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

WIKIPEDIA
Wikimedia CommonsNicolás Maduro, President of Venezuela

The oil boom positioned Venezuela as one of the richest countries in the world between the 1950s and 1980s. Today, it resembles a post-war economy. What happened? A combination of factors brought to its knees what was once one of the greatest Latin American powers, leading to the most recent milestone: the capture of the—controversial—Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, by the United States. Now, global and Latin American investors are closely watching the evolution of this story, which features an economy that the financial market sees as “on pause” and that has generated a diaspora of 7.9 million people.

According to figures from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Venezuela once ranked as the fourth nation with the highest GDP per capita in the world, alongside France. The country was nicknamed “Saudi Venezuela” and “The Millionaire of the Americas,” and not without reason. To this day, it holds the largest proven oil reserves on the planet, with around 303 billion barrels of the hydrocarbon, according to OPEC figures updated as of June last year.

Oil wealth, for example, made gasoline in Venezuela still considered the cheapest in the world, thanks to massive government subsidies. It is practically given away, since a liter of gasoline in Venezuela costs 0.097 centimos of a bolívar at current prices—a figure so low that currency converters do not even register it, showing an absolute zero in parity with the U.S. dollar.

However, this oil wealth created a rentier economy, nearly 100% dependent on oil, which collapsed due to two factors that explain the current situation. One is the drop in international oil prices in the 1980s. The other is the rise to power, through democratic means, of Hugo Chávez, who later centralized the economy and dismantled the checks and balances that allowed him to accumulate power and impose a statist economic model.

In this article, we will focus only on the first point.

The collapse of Venezuela

According to data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Venezuela’s GDP in 2024 stood at $82 billion, with three consecutive years of growth (8% in 2022, 4.4% in 2023, and 5.3% in 2024). These may seem like very positive figures, but they hide a devastating reality.

The same data show that Venezuela’s GDP in 2012 reached a historic peak of $372 billion. In other words, the most recently known GDP is 78% below the highest in the country’s history. Only European countries and Japan during World War II have seen such a sharp decline in GDP, yet Venezuela did not experience even an internal armed conflict during this period, despite its political instability.

IMF economists warned that, when measured between 2013 and 2020, Venezuela’s GDP fell by 88%, surpassing by three years the duration of the U.S. collapse during the Great Depression. There is no similar precedent.

And while the country was “swimming” in cheap gasoline, hyperinflation took a massive toll that contributed to the current devastation.

In 2018, hyperinflation reached a historic figure of 130,000%, which moderated to “only” 548% in 2024 and may have dropped to just over 300% last year, thanks to orthodox “neoliberal” monetary policies such as reducing public spending and lifting currency controls, along with a de facto dollarization.

However, the damage is done. A decade of ongoing hyperinflation (from 2014 to 2024) led to the most dramatic erosion of purchasing power ever seen in modern times. IMF figures indicate that between 1998 and 2018, the Venezuelan currency lost 99.999997% of its value.

But perhaps the economic collapse could have been avoided or mitigated if the country, with its immense oil wealth, had properly managed that bonanza. The problem, many voices from the economic front argue, is that statist public policies turned the Venezuelan oil industry into one of the most inefficient in the world.

The Erosion of Oil Production
OPEC data show that between 2008 and 2013, Venezuela’s oil production averaged 2.8 million barrels per day, before collapsing to 337,000 barrels in 2020 and recovering to 921,000 in 2024. Even so, the most recently known annual figure is still 67% lower than during the period when the country was considered one of the world’s top oil producers.

Venezuela’s oil paradox is dramatic. Despite being the country with the largest proven oil reserves in the world, it ranks between 20th and 22nd among oil-producing nations. This is due to investment in the industry collapsing by more than 80% starting in 2003—one year after the attempted coup against President Hugo Chávez, who in response purged the top ranks of the state oil company PDVSA and virtually shut the industry off to new investment. The argument was that the country’s oil wealth required nothing more than state regulation.

In conclusion, Venezuela’s economic collapse is now the most dramatic for any country in modern history without a war.

Analyses indicate that the maximum 88% decline in Venezuela’s GDP surpasses the U.S. collapse during the Great Depression, the shock of World War II, and even exceeds the 70% economic collapse experienced by Syria during its civil war in the last century and the 62% GDP drop in that Middle Eastern country during its more recent internal conflict.

According to economists who have studied this phenomenon, there are three main causes that explain it all—unfortunately tied to political decisions: the destruction of property rights, resource plundering, and destructive economic policies even during times of economic boom.

And the worst part is that the solution for this country, despite its oil wealth, is not just around the corner. Recovery—with the right economic policies—is estimated to take about 20 to 30 years, especially considering that in the last five years Venezuela lost its greatest wealth, and that of any country: 25% of its population.

In Its Own World, Yet Within the Region
After more than a decade of economic crisis, Venezuela is relatively isolated from other Latin American countries, living its own reality with its own market distortions. But the country that was once one of the region’s main powers does not go unnoticed.

Just a few months ago, one advantage market players saw for Latin American investments was a relative geopolitical calm that other regions couldn’t boast. With the situation evolving, it is difficult to know what direction the oil-producing country will take and what implications it may have on the global—and Latin American—stage, especially if tensions escalate with China and Russia, two major allies of the Chavista regime. In any case, investors will be watching developments closely.

The economic connections of neighboring countries with Venezuela have diminished over the years, and there is a perception that it is a market “on pause,” both in terms of foreign investment and international trade. However, the country maintains commercial ties with several of the region’s major economies.

Figures from the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) show that the country’s main partners in the region are Brazil and Colombia. In recent years—the latest data from the organization is from 2023—Brazil ranked as the fourth-largest buyer of Venezuelan exports (after the U.S., China, and Spain) and the third-largest seller to that market. Colombia, another neighboring country, ranks second among Latin American countries in both categories, and Ecuador is the third-largest buyer of Venezuelan exports in the region. All these markets, however, represent only single-digit shares of Venezuela’s foreign trade.

Unlike the U.S. and Spain, which primarily purchase crude oil, and China, which favors petroleum coke, according to the OEC, the Latin American countries that buy the most Venezuelan products mainly purchase nitrogen-based fertilizers and, in the case of Ecuador, unstuffed frozen fish.

Millions of Expatriates Watching From Abroad
Another strong link between Venezuela and the rest of the region is the massive diaspora that has settled in other Latin American countries. Millions have left the country over the past 15 years, fleeing a collapsed economy in search of opportunities in more stable nations in the region, especially neighboring ones. Many of these individuals leave to find work and send remittances back to Venezuela, injecting some capital into struggling local households.

Venezuelan migration, which accelerated after 2014, has expanded across the continent. According to UNHCR, the United Nations refugee agency, around 7.9 million people have left the country in search of opportunities, with 6.7 million settling in other Latin American and Caribbean countries.

The most popular destinations for Venezuelan migrants are Colombia and Peru, with 2.8 million and 1.7 million Venezuelan citizens, respectively, according to data from the Inter-Agency Coordination Platform for Refugees and Migrants (R4V), an initiative led by UNHCR and the International Organization for Migration (IOM). They are followed by Brazil, with about 626,900 Venezuelans; the U.S., with 545,200; and Chile, with 532,700.

Maduro’s Arrest: For Now, Attention Remains on Market Fundamentals

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

The arrest of Nicolás Maduro by the United States adds a new focal point to global geopolitics. The detention “confirms the idea that there are no zero-probability events: all scenarios become possible once the rules no longer exist,” explains Philippe Waechter, Chief Economist at Ostrum (an affiliate of Natixis IM). According to the expert, the key question now will revolve around Russia and China’s responses, both of which support Maduro. Waechter recalls that the United States and Venezuela have had tension since Hugo Chávez came to power in Venezuela in the late 1990s. Previously, the country was a U.S. “preserve,” specifically through oil and chemical industry exploitation. “As a reflection of this, baseball is the country’s favorite sport, just as it is in the United States,” he notes.

Waechter now emphasizes that the United States under President Donald Trump “wants to get its hands on Venezuelan oil.” While it is low-quality crude, it represents 17.5% of global reserves, “the largest in the world.” For this reason, and given the White House’s strong pro-oil bias, combined with the stagnation of the U.S. shale oil exploration and production industry, “Venezuela is a good alternative,” according to the expert.

In conclusion, Waechter points out that if the United States takes control of Venezuela, “sanctions on oil exports would be lifted and crude production in the country would resume, thereby increasing oil supply in the global market.” This would therefore be a favorable factor for a decline in the price of black gold. However, “the final question is whether, once again, an intervention of this kind will be destabilizing for the region. There is no shortage of examples,” adds the Ostrum expert.

Oil takes center stage

This geopolitical event therefore brings oil back into the spotlight. Energy prices reacted lower in the first relevant session following the arrest of Nicolás Maduro: oil fell by around 1% and natural gas dropped nearly 4%, “a move that draws attention given the geopolitical context, but which the market is reading, for now, as a political event with no immediate physical impact,” explains Diego Albuja, ATFX LATAM market analyst.

The expert adds that the key driver behind price movements in major energy commodities is the fact that no production disruptions or damage to Venezuelan oil infrastructure have been reported. As a result, “without a real supply shock, the geopolitical risk premium quickly fades and prices return to responding to global market fundamentals.” He notes that the market is looking more toward the medium term, potential political changes and normalization scenarios, rather than an immediate impact on crude flows. The sharper drop in natural gas prices is mainly due to factors specific to the U.S. market, such as high storage levels, more benign weather expectations, and technical adjustments in speculative positions, rather than the situation in Venezuela.

“The market is sending a very clear message: as long as there is no real supply disruption, fundamentals prevail. However, this balance is fragile and can change quickly if signs of operational damage, logistical blockages, or abrupt changes in the sanctions regime emerge,” Albuja concludes.

From his perspective, Raphaël Thuin, Head of Capital Markets Strategies at Tikehau Capital, notes that in recent years investors and markets have learned to look beyond recurring geopolitical risks and focus on the fundamental factors that drive long-term market performance. Recent developments in Venezuela “appear to fit this pattern,” as the country’s global economic impact “remains limited, with relatively low exposure for most international companies.”

As a result, the expert considers it likely that long-term market prospects “will not be affected.” He also does not rule out the possibility of positive catalysts. For example, he notes that one of the objectives of the current U.S. administration is to facilitate the flow of more Venezuelan oil to global markets. That said, Thuin acknowledges that geopolitical and regime changes “inevitably introduce new uncertainties,” and therefore concedes that in 2026, as in 2025, “geopolitics will be a factor investors and market performance will need to take into account.”

Other assets: gold and equities

While oil is now in the spotlight, there may be other spillover effects. For example, Ned Naylor-Leyland, Investment Manager for Gold and Silver at Jupiter AM, points out that precious metals, in this environment of market volatility, geopolitical tensions, and macroeconomic uncertainty, once again reinforce their historic role as a store of value, behaving differently from equities and bonds. Gold has already surpassed the $4,400-per-ounce level, rising by around 2% amid the arrest of Nicolás Maduro.

Similarly, Javier Molina, Senior Market Analyst at eToro, says that the situation in Venezuela “adds immediate noise.” While the expert places emphasis on the oil market, he also adds that these types of episodes “tend to result in tactical moves and spikes in volatility, but rarely alter the structural trend of risk assets on their own.” Ultimately, it serves as a reminder that the short term “can be uncomfortable, even within a bullish cycle.”

Currently, Molina stresses that the underlying trend remains upward and that staying invested “continues to make sense, especially in companies with visible earnings and positive momentum.” However, he acknowledges that “this is no longer a market for complacency,” as geopolitics, the fragility of the macroeconomic cycle, and high concentration levels “require heightened risk management, position-size adjustments, and acceptance that volatility is part of the journey.” For now, and ahead of the opening of U.S. equity markets, European stock indices were trading slightly higher by mid-session.

Can Bitcoin Be Considered a Reliable Measure of Market Liquidity?

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

For many experts, there is a strong correlation between Bitcoin and digital assets with global liquidity. According to Yves Bonzon, CIO of Julius Baer, we are facing one of the “most liquidity-sensitive segments in financial markets,” which has led some analysts to interpret the cryptocurrency’s price drop as an early warning of monetary contraction. In his latest analysis, Bonzon raises this debate by posing fundamental questions.

Have investors found the key to measuring liquidity fluctuations in the financial system?

Bonzon points out that recent market dynamics have intensified these questions. He recalls that recently, U.S. stocks experienced a sharp intraday drop after the initial rally triggered by Nvidia’s results was unwound. Although this type of movement is uncommon, he emphasizes that “they are usually followed by strong rebounds.”

In the digital asset space, Bitcoin has entered a marked bearish phase: “It has experienced a sustained downtrend, falling more than 30% from its recent peak.” The price evolution, along with its decoupling from gold, has reopened the debate about its ability to act as a digital equivalent of the precious metal. Bonzon insists that investors must differentiate between short- and long-term correlations, as in the short term the relationship can fluctuate from “significantly positive to significantly negative,” a behavior that intensifies when Bitcoin “trades like a high-beta technology stock” during periods of excessive leverage or deleveraging.

In the long term, however, the CIO asserts that both gold and Bitcoin will tend to move “largely in tandem” as long as Western governments continue to use capital markets for sanctions, an environment that favors “greater structural demand for external assets that hedge against the consequences of such actions.”

Bonzon adds that although Bitcoin and digital assets are among the most sensitive segments to global liquidity, it does not necessarily make the cryptocurrency a reliable leading indicator. He explains that its relatively short history already shows a recognizable pattern: after its halving events, it tends to enter a sustained consolidation phase. Despite this, and in the context of the firm’s Secular Outlook, Julius Baer continues to consider Bitcoin “a viable long-term hedge against fiscal dominance and fiat currency devaluation.”

NVIDIA earnings trigger a rollercoaster in U.S. stock markets

The report contextualizes the recent behavior of traditional markets. U.S. stocks recently suffered an exceptionally volatile session: after a start driven by Nvidia’s results, the S&P 500 “opened more than 1% higher,” only to experience “a massive intraday reversal” and close in negative territory.

The Nasdaq 100 experienced an even more extreme move, with “an unusually wide intraday trading range of more than 4%.” These are very uncommon episodes: “Since 2000, only eight such episodes have occurred,” Bonzon recalls. However, all of them have historically been followed by average rebounds of 16% in the 100 days afterward. Since that session, both benchmark indices have recorded three consecutive days of recovery.

Other indicators also showed signs of stability, such as the NYSE Securities Broker/Dealer Index, which recently rebounded at its 200-day moving average, and the VIX, which, according to the expert, has calmed, trading only slightly above its long-term average of 20.

In fixed income markets, Bonzon notes that the Merrill Lynch Option Volatility Estimate (MOVE) Index, which reflects implied volatility in the U.S. Treasury market, “is behaving well,” staying below 80 points. He also notes that neither nominal nor real U.S. Treasury yields have shown significant movements in recent sessions, while inflation expectations remain stable. A similar stability is observed in the U.S. dollar index, which remains around 100 points, and in gold prices, which continue moving sideways within a range of $4,000 to $4,200 per ounce.

Digital gold or Nasdaq on steroids?

Regarding Bitcoin, Bonzon details that the cryptocurrency “has lost more than 30% of its value from its previous all-time high in early October,” after touching a provisional low of $80,553. At the same time, Bitcoin ETFs are heading toward a record month of outflows.

The CIO mentions that in a recent Financial Times opinion piece titled “The Warning Signal from Bitcoin’s Drop,” Katie Martin wrote that the evolution of Bitcoin and digital asset prices in general is becoming an early warning that markets feel unstable, giving investors, especially leveraged ones, an early signal of liquidity contraction.

The divergence between gold and Bitcoin has led some analysts to conclude that the cryptocurrency is not really digital gold. But Bonzon qualifies that statement as potentially premature: gold investors usually operate without leverage, while a large portion of Bitcoin investors, especially retail, do use leverage. This mismatch explains why, in certain periods, “investing in Bitcoin resembles investing in high-beta IT stocks.”

He also warns that the theory of Bitcoin as a leading liquidity indicator has limits: “If Bitcoin became the new U.S. liquidity indicator followed by everyone, the signal would stop working.”

The argument for long-term co-movement between gold and its digital equivalent remains valid

During his recent trip to Singapore and Hong Kong, Bonzon received numerous questions about the crypto market’s future. He notes that despite the asset’s short history, there is “a distinctive pattern” that usually repeats after each halving, marking the start of “a sustained consolidation phase.”

In the long term, Bonzon expects both gold and Bitcoin “to continue rising as long as Western governments keep instrumentalizing their capital markets for sanctions.” This dynamic would extend the structural demand for external assets that protect against geopolitical intervention.

As a tail risk, the CIO warns that a potential peace agreement in Ukraine that includes the unfreezing of Russian assets could trigger a “sudden profit-taking” in off-system assets.

In the coming months, the high correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. tech stocks is expected to decrease, as it is a phenomenon linked to the current phase of stock market consolidation. Meanwhile, sentiment indicators are “in depressed territory,” and overbought/oversold indicators point to “advanced selling pressure,” leaving room for short-term rebounds.

Structurally, Bonzon states: “Bitcoin should continue to be the original ‘native token,’ the only digital asset capable, in principle, of fulfilling the function of digital gold.” However, he rules out replacing fiat currencies, as it is “embedded in a deflationary monetary system by design and therefore suboptimal as a medium of exchange.”

Nevertheless, Julius Baer maintains its central thesis: “We continue to consider Bitcoin a viable long-term hedge against fiscal dominance and fiat currency devaluation.” The CIO concludes by noting that the next halving is scheduled for mid-2028