Tariffs, Speculators, and Shrinking Supply: What is Behind the Surge in Copper Prices

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Commodity markets have long been in the spotlight for investors. Recently, attention has focused on metals—specifically copper. At the root of this is the recent surge in its market price driven by the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) ban on copper concentrate exports, “which exacerbated an already tight market situation,” according to UBS.

The firm highlights another destabilizing factor: copper production in Chile and Peru has continued to be “disappointing,” with cumulative year-to-date output down 4% compared to the same period last year, despite a 2% year-over-year uptick in June. “Weather-related disruptions in Chile and slow project ramp-ups have weighed on supply,” the firm notes.

Adding to these supply-side issues are pressures on the demand side. In this regard, UBS points to an increase in shipments to the United States ahead of a potential decision on refined copper imports as an additional source of tension, “which has drawn metal into the country, reshaped global trade flows, and drawn down inventories in other regions.”

Carsten Menke, Head of Next Generation Research at Julius Baer, notes that the White House “has remained very quiet on the topic of copper import tariffs, and President Trump’s apparent strategy of doing nothing is becoming increasingly evident to the market.” In this environment, the US “continues to import refined metal, depleting stocks in other regions and thereby pushing prices to historic highs.” On this point, Menke emphasizes that since there is no deadline for President Donald Trump to make a decision, “the trend is expected to continue in the short term.”

Is the Situation Sustainable?

Menke argues that the current market shortage “is artificial, not real,” suggesting that “prices should return to levels more justified by fundamentals over the medium term.” He explains that the US copper market review related to tariffs “should have been carried out nearly two months ago.” Until now, Menke continues, “the White House has maintained silence on the matter, suggesting that President Donald Trump has not yet made up his mind about imposing tariffs on refined metal imports.” The US is a major net importer of refined copper, primarily from Canada, Chile, and Peru. At the same time, it is a net exporter of ores and concentrates due to a lack of domestic smelting and refining capacity.

“Trump has the following options: import tariffs of 15% starting in January 2027 and/or 30% starting in January 2028; imposing no tariffs; or doing nothing. Doing nothing means leaving the copper market in limbo, which appears to be the president’s strategy right now. The result is that the US continues importing refined metal, which continues to accumulate as inventory,” Menke argues.

This situation drives price increases, which are further accelerated by very bullish positioning from short-term and speculative traders in US futures markets. “For once, Chinese traders appear to be sitting on the sidelines of the speculation,” says Menke, adding that because Donald Trump faces no deadline to act, “copper prices are expected to remain elevated, at least in the short term,” even though they should return to fundamentally justified levels over the medium term.

At UBS, analysts believe global copper demand remains supported by resilient economic activity, steady growth in China, and artificial intelligence-related investment across Asia—as copper, among other commodities, is used in cables, power systems for vehicles, and electrical grids, as noted by Aneeka Gupta, Director of Macroeconomic Research at WisdomTree. Therefore, “given that the market is likely to remain in deficit through the end of the year, price weakness should be limited,” leading the firm to maintain a constructive outlook on copper, expecting prices to hit their target of $15,500/MT in the coming quarters and recommending long exposure.

However, other firms see risks in this scenario. Bank of America notes that while investments in energy resilience will accelerate and supply constraints are expected to keep the market in deficit through 2026 and 2027, they also point out that metals demand in China has slowed and could grow by just 0.5% year-over-year in 2026—the weakest growth since 1988. Additionally, demand in Europe and the United States is slowing down due to the war with Iran.

As downside risks to copper prices, the firm points to the impact of trade wars on confidence, potential re-exports from China, and a “drastic slowdown” in global demand next year.

Javier Villegas (Franklin Templeton): “A Leader Must Back Their Opinions with Knowledge, Experience, and Proven Results”

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyJavier Villegas, Head of Latam and Iberia de Franklin Templeton.

In an environment of hyperconnection and overinformation, social networks and digital platforms play a leading role, including within the financial world. Industry professionals are aware that access to financial and investment information has been democratized, but they warn that it is necessary to properly distinguish those profiles that provide accurate, verified, and serious information.

Javier Villegas, Head of LatAm and Iberia at Franklin Templeton, is clear about who his financial role models are, but he also recognizes that greater access to financial information presents an opportunity to foster investor education. We spoke in this interview about his vision regarding so-called finfluencers.

Who Do You Consider a Finfluencer in the Industry?

If I had to point to two role models, I would choose Jenny Johnson, CEO of Franklin Templeton, and Sandy Kaul, Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at our company. Both combine a solid track record, a global vision, and the ability to analyze and even anticipate, to a certain extent, the evolution of the industry. Regarding Jenny, I would highlight her strategic perspective on the major trends that will define the future of asset management, always focused on promoting financial education and, ultimately, achieving better results for investors. Sandy, for her part, has become one of the most recognized voices in financial innovation and digital assets due to her deep knowledge and pedagogical ability to explain complex concepts in a simple manner, both to investors and to the general public.

What Do You Believe Someone Must Have to Be a Benchmark for You?

For me, influence does not depend on the number of followers, but on credibility. A role model, especially in the financial field, must back their opinions with knowledge, experience, and proven results. I also value having a long-term vision, far removed from the short-term noise that predominates on social networks and in financial conversations. Keeping one’s eyes on the future and promoting education to help investors make informed, well-reasoned decisions are also essential qualities.

What Do You Look for Someone to Provide When You Seek a Reference Point in the Sector or Industry?

Above all, I look for analytical capability and a vision of the future. In an environment of overinformation, which often generates misinformation, it is especially valuable to have role models capable of separating what is relevant from the noise, interpreting structural changes, and anticipating their impact on the markets.

Taking into Account Your Conversations with Clients, How Are They Perceiving the World of Finfluencers?

Professional investors are increasingly demanding and selective. They value voices that offer rigorous analysis, experience, and a global perspective. In a complex and constantly evolving environment, they seek benchmarks that help them understand the markets and make well-founded decisions, not profiles that merely follow trends.

Historically, Who Were the Influencers of the Industry?

In essence, the qualities of what I consider a true role model have barely changed: they must have credibility based on knowledge, experience, a solid track record, and the ability to offer well-grounded analysis. What has evolved is the way messages are disseminated. Immediacy and a constant flow of information on social media require great pedagogical skill and synthesis to explain complex concepts with clarity and rigor. In this context, the best finfluencers are those who help interpret current events, quiet the noise, and provide a practical perspective—and forward-looking vision—that facilitates better investment decisions.

How Do You Think This Figure Has Evolved?

Today, any professional with knowledge and communication skills can participate in the conversation. This has democratized access to financial information and fostered investor education. It is a positive evolution as long as it is backed by rigor and responsibility, since, as I mentioned in previous answers, true influence continues to be based on credibility, experience, and the ability to offer a useful perspective on the future.

The United States Will Have to Share AI Leadership With China, According to Global Investors

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

The United States will have to share global leadership in AI with China in five years as the gap between both countries narrows, according to a new global study conducted among institutional investors and wealth managers handling $513 billion in assets by fund manager Robocap. The study, conducted among senior executives at insurance asset managers, pension funds, family offices, and wealth managers, revealed that 56% believe the U.S. and China will be joint leaders in the global AI race, while only a third expect the U.S. to maintain its current market leadership position. Barely 2% believe China will surpass the United States.

As detailed by the manager in a statement, China already leads the AI race in specific areas such as patent volume, research talent generation, and some physical applications of AI in robotics. However, the U.S. is widely considered the leader due to its dominance in private investment, high-end semiconductor design, and the world’s most powerful frontier models.

Interestingly, the study by Robocap—a firm dedicated to investing in robotics, automation, and AI—found that around one in twelve respondents (8%) believe another country or group of countries could surpass both the United States and China.

Almost all (99%) expect the value of the AI market in the UK—currently the third largest by value—to increase over the next five years, according to the study conducted among firms based in the UK, U.S., UAE, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Germany, and Switzerland. About 28% foresee a dramatic increase.

Furthermore, all expect the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia to succeed in their goals of becoming global AI hubs for research and data centers over the next five years. Approximately 60% believe they will be very successful.

However, all agree that AI regulation in the UK and the European Union is too strict and, as a result, has limited creativity and innovation, including 30% who strongly agree with this statement. Virtually all (96%) believe they are following the right energy policy to meet their ESG (environmental, social, and governance) goals and AI ambitions.

Nonetheless, a majority (60%) believe that energy policy should prioritize AI sovereignty, compared to 40% who believe the focus should be on limiting energy production.

BNP Paribas AM Names Four Chief Investment Officers to Lead Its Platform

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyTop: Guy Davies, Deputy Global Head of Investments, Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Fundamental Active Equity and Olivier de Larouzière, Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Fixed Income. Bottom: Laurent Clavel, Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Multi-Asset and Robinson Rouchié, Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Systematic & Quantitative Investments.

BNP Paribas Asset Management (BNP Paribas AM) has announced the appointment of four new Chief Investment Officers, effective September 1, 2026, to lead its investment platform reporting to Rob Gambi, Global Head of Investments. These appointments reinforce the firm’s fund management and solutions capabilities as it enters its next growth phase and accelerates the execution of its AMplify 2030 strategic plan.

“These appointments represent a significant milestone,” notes Gambi, adding that the firm is implementing “an organization designed to leverage the scale and breadth of BNP Paribas AM’s fund management and solutions capabilities across the entire risk and client spectrum. These appointments allow us to better position our global platform for the future, reinforce our client focus, and accelerate innovation.”

Guy Davies will be the new Deputy Global Head of Investments, Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Fundamental Active Equity. Until now, Davies was Chief Investment Officer (CIO) and Global Head of Fundamental Active Equity at BNP Paribas Asset Management since 2016. In addition, he has served as Deputy Global Head of Investments since March 2022. Davies joined BNP Paribas AM in 2008 through the acquisition of IMS Limited. Previously, he was a founding partner and co-Chief Executive of MM Asset Management. He began his career at Mercer Investment Consulting.

Olivier de Larouzière will hold the position of Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Fixed Income. De Larouzière joined BNP Paribas Asset Management in 2019. Previously, he was co-CIO of Fixed Income at Ostrum Asset Management (Natixis Asset Management) and held various portfolio manager positions at Crédit Lyonnais Asset Management and Écureuil Gestion (Caisse d’Épargne).

Laurent Clavel assumes responsibility as Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Multi-Asset. He joined BNP Paribas Asset Management following the acquisition of AXA IM in 2025. He held several leadership roles at AXA IM, including Global Head of Multi-Asset and, previously, Head of Quant Lab and Head of Macroeconomic Research. He began his career at the French Ministry of Finance (INSEE, Treasury, Budget).

Robinson Rouchié has been named new Chief Investment Officer and Global Head of Systematic & Quantitative Investments. He joined BNP Paribas Asset Management in 2020 as Chief of Staff to the Chief Investment Officer (CIO). Previously, he held several positions across various divisions of the BNP Paribas Group, including Investment Banking, Wealth Management, and CIB, where he served as Chief of Staff to the CEO of CIB Americas, leading and executing key strategic projects across the region (U.S., Canada, Latin America).

Singapore, Zurich, and Monaco, the Most Expensive Cities for a Premium Lifestyle

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Singapore has reaffirmed its leadership for the fourth consecutive year as the world’s most expensive city for maintaining a premium lifestyle, followed by Zurich and Monaco, according to Julius Baer’s Global Wealth and Lifestyle Report 2026.

Zurich’s rise, which placed it three spots higher, was due to the strengthening of the Swiss franc, backed by the country’s reputation for stability and the currency’s role as a “store of value” in times of uncertainty, according to the wealth manager. Singapore’s long-held leadership is due to high housing and automobile prices, the two categories with the highest weighting in the index, along with the strength of the Singapore dollar, the report added. The index compares prices in U.S. dollars.

As Christian Gattiker, Head of Research at Julius Baer, summarizes: “Currencies are once again taking center stage, but the real key lies in how currencies, assets, and investor decisions interact.” In his view, “what is clear in 2026 is that the world remains a complex place and uncertainty stays at a very high level.” In this context, “stable cities and countries become even more attractive,” emphasizes Julius Baer’s head of research.

The bank’s Lifestyle Index ranks 25 cities by analyzing price inflation for 20 luxury items and services, such as housing, automobiles, business class flights, school tuition, and tasting dinners. The survey interviewed 360 high-net-worth individuals with family bankable assets of $1 million or more between February and March 2026.

For high-net-worth individuals, the cost of maintaining a high standard of living has increased “significantly” over the past 12 months, with an average increase of 10.2% in this year’s index in U.S. dollars, according to the report. The rise in gold prices is reflected in the index, with a 16.4% increase in jewelry and 15.5% in watches.

Barcelona consolidates its stability within international luxury

The Catalan capital, the only Spanish city in the ranking, retains 15th position worldwide; exactly the same position it occupied in the 2025 edition. Far from representing a lack of dynamism, this stability reflects the city’s ability to maintain a competitive positioning in a particularly volatile year for major economies.

The analysis prepared by Julius Baer shows a city with a balanced profile. Barcelona excels in categories linked to premium consumption, such as watchmaking, jewelry, and private healthcare, while maintaining relatively more moderate costs in housing, automobiles, and air travel, which helps contain the total cost of a high-net-worth lifestyle.

The report concludes that the concept of wealth is evolving toward a broader, more strategic vision. The ability to preserve purchasing power, access different jurisdictions, maintain a high quality of life, and diversify risks is consolidating as one of the main assets for major international fortunes.

Other relevant positions in the study

Dubai fell to 14th place in the ranking, although Julius Baer indicated that this decline reflects rising costs in other cities rather than increased affordability in the financial hub. The Swiss bank also noted that “much has changed” in the Middle East in the months since the index data collection, which took place before the conflict with Iran. As a result, the outlook for residents and internationally mobile individuals and families “is now less clear,” it stated.

Sydney recorded the biggest climb in this year’s ranking, moving up six spots to eighth place. Julius Baer attributed this partly to the strength of the Australian dollar and the country’s “geographic isolation”; the cost of importing high-end products significantly boosted Sydney’s position on the list, according to the bank.

For the first time in three years, no city in the Americas appeared in the top 10. This is mainly due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against other major currencies, despite strong local price increases. Even so, North America recorded significant wealth accumulation over the past year, with an astounding 47% of high-net-worth individuals reporting a significant increase in the value of their assets.

The report concludes that wealth can no longer be measured solely in financial terms: today it also integrates mobility, security, health, resilience, and adaptability—elements that will define the assets of the future.

Capital Group Names Guillermo Veiga as New Chief Information Officer

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyGuillermo Veiga, Chief Information Officer at Capital Group

Capital Group, a global active investment management firm, has announced the appointment of Guillermo Veiga as Chief Information Officer. He will join the firm in November to replace Marta Zarraga, who will retire at the end of the year. Veiga will relocate to California from Singapore, where he currently serves as Group Chief Information & Operating Officer at Standard Chartered Bank.

“Technology, data, and artificial intelligence play an increasingly important role in how we deliver investment excellence, serve our clients globally, and grow our business,” said Rob Klausner, Chief Operating Officer at Capital Group. “Guillermo brings an exceptional combination of deep technological expertise, operational leadership, and a track record in global transformation. His journey leading large, complex organizations makes him the ideal leader to drive Capital’s long-term strategy and position us for the opportunities ahead.”

Born in Uruguay and raised in Spain, Guillermo began his career as a hands-on technician and has held senior management positions in Europe and Asia at Amazon Web Services, Cisco, and Banco Santander, combining deep technical mastery with solid operational experience.

“I was drawn to Capital Group’s long-term commitment to its people and culture, as well as its client-focused mindset,” said Veiga, adding that “Capital Group is at the forefront of technology, and I am excited about the opportunity to help lead the company through a period of global expansion, at a time when data and artificial intelligence have an increasing capacity to transform how we work.”

Thematic Investing Grows, but Investors Hesitate to Pick the Next Big Trend

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

European thematic investing is growing at a record pace, yet according to the latest study by WisdomTree, retail investors lack confidence in their own ability to navigate this space. Assets in European thematic funds and ETFs reached $422.4 billion in June, but fewer than four out of ten savers or investors feel confident in their ability to identify which theme might outperform over the next five years, according to WisdomTree.

In the view of Pierre Debru, Head of Research, Europe, WisdomTree, that uncertainty appears well founded. “Half of those surveyed believe that themes will take turns performing well, reflecting the reality that thematic leadership rotates over time. This is evident in recent years’ performance, where this rotation has been observed. In 2024, the top-performing theme was ‘Heightened Tensions,’ driven by rising geopolitical friction and increased defense spending,” WisdomTree adds.

In 2025, it was “Strategic Metal Mining Companies,” fueled by the imbalance between stagnant critical mineral supply and rapidly accelerating demand linked to artificial intelligence developments, rising defense investments, and power grid infrastructure upgrades. Furthermore, the firm highlights that in the first half of 2026, “Semiconductors” took the top spot, demonstrating how quickly thematic leadership can shift.

With more than 50 themes available to invest in, choosing the right one is inherently difficult, as explained by the firm, since the issue does not necessarily stem from a lack of understanding or conviction. The survey suggests that European savers already recognize many of the structural trends shaping the global economy, with renewable energy leading as the most likely investment option to hold over the next five years, while one in three believes AI software will gain importance as an investment theme during that period.

Diversification Could Help Uncover the Mega-Caps of the Future

If investors struggle to identify tomorrow’s winning theme, WisdomTree suggests that the solution may not be picking just one. “In the 1990s, it was clear that the Internet would change the world. What was much harder to predict was that Amazon would survive while Yahoo did not. The same dynamic applies to thematic investing today. Identifying a theme with long-term potential is one thing. Knowing how to access those themes through a diversified approach is entirely another, and it increases the chances of landing on tomorrow’s ‘Amazon,'” the company explains. They add that investing in a multi-thematic ETF or fund could reduce the likelihood of missing out on future mega-cap companies, which might emerge from undervalued themes such as quantum computing, the space economy, or physical AI.

The growth of thematic funds is encouraging, but it tells only part of the story in Europe, according to WisdomTree. Retail investors believe in certain themes, yet many still lack the confidence required to act on them. As thematic investing continues to evolve, a diversified, multi-thematic approach could help bridge that gap.

Warren Buffett Turns 96: Why His Legacy Continues to Shape Fund Managers Worldwide

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo: Fortune Live Media. The Most Important Investment Lesson in the World for Warren Buffett is...

Warren Buffett’s 96th birthday, this August 30, comes at a symbolic moment: after handing executive leadership of Berkshire Hathaway to Greg Abel in early 2026 while remaining as chairman, the market is asking how much of his legacy survives beyond his direct management. The answer, to a large extent, is already written: for more than seven decades, Buffett not only generated historic returns, but also trained—directly or indirectly, through his annual shareholder letters—entire generations of fund managers who today oversee portfolios around the world.

Buffett learned to invest from Benjamin Graham, his professor at Columbia and later his boss at Graham-Newman. Graham’s school—enshrined in The Intelligent Investor—was based on buying companies trading well below their book or liquidation value, almost regardless of the quality of the business. He applied that approach in his early years managing his partnership, but over time—and under the influence of Charlie Munger—he evolved toward what he himself described as preferring a wonderful company at a fair price over a fair company at a wonderful price.

Characteristics of the “Buffett Touch”

Durable competitive advantages (moats). It is not enough for a stock to trade cheap; the company must have a barrier that protects it from long-term competition, such as a brand or a patent.

Pricing power. Buffett repeated on more than one occasion that the most important question in evaluating a business is whether it can raise prices without losing customers to competitors. It is the thermometer he uses to measure the strength of a moat.

Consistent and predictable earnings. He prefers “boring” and understandable businesses with stable profitability track records over high-growth but unpredictable bets.

Capital protection above all. His two most cited rules—”Rule No. 1: Never lose money” and “Rule No. 2: Never forget rule No. 1″—summarize an obsession with the margin of safety: buying at a sufficient discount so that a miscalculation does not destroy capital.

A horizon of at least a decade. According to Buffett, his “favorite holding period is forever.” In practice, he evaluates each investment as if he were going to hold the entire company for ten years or more, forcing him to think like an owner rather than a short-term speculator.

An Exported Model: From Omaha to the Rest of the World

Buffett’s influence, and his approach, directly inspired the birth of the European and Latin American value school. Spain, for instance, is the market with the highest concentration of value management firms outside the U.S. Speaking with Funds Society, Javier Ruiz, Chief Investment Officer at Horos AM, addressed a fundamental question: when choosing a company, what do you look for first, the price or the business?

“We do not believe they can be separated from one another. There are optically cheap companies that are not investable because they do not meet our core investment principles. For us, it is essential to understand a business and the sector in which it operates, that it has a solid and sustainable competitive position, a healthy financial profile, and a management team that performs well, both operationally and in managing the capital generated by the company. If all this is not met, we will not invest in a company no matter how cheap it is trading,” he noted.

Asked about holding periods in the portfolio, the manager indicated: “At Horos, investments coexist where we have never fully divested alongside others that have been in the portfolio for ten years, together with others from which we might divest in a few months because their share price has reflected our investment thesis very quickly. Logically, the primary reason to divest from a company is a reduction in its potential relative to other alternatives.”

Regarding the most common mistake for novice investors, Ruiz pointed out: “Possibly placing an excessive focus on valuation and not as much on understanding what lies behind that valuation. To know if we are buying cheap, a lot of time must be spent understanding the qualitative side of the investment.”

In Mexico, the most literal name in the local segment is Value Operadora de Fondos. But the Buffett philosophy also permeates larger firms like GBM (Grupo Bursátil Mexicano), which, without defining itself as a pure value manager, applies it as a guiding principle of the firm. As Andrés Olea, Financial Product Sales VP at GBM, explained to Funds Society, the search for value is in the company’s DNA: “At the firm level, it is indeed with a very long-term vision and looking for value: caution, good people, values, ethics, expanding its competitive advantage, but ensuring it is durable and not ephemeral due to haste.”

That logic translates explicitly to the wealth management unit: “In advisory, we have a methodology called ‘Invierte con Propósito’ (Invest with Purpose), which aligns closely with creating value over time and staying invested over time, rather than jumping in and out and executing tactical moves.”

As a concrete example in the Mexican market, Olea mentioned Grupo Aeropuertos del Sureste (ASUR) and highlighted that although it is experiencing short-term noise due to lower tourism and fleet renewals, “the quality of the company, its management, and the valuation at which it trades present a very good opportunity for those willing to wait a bit longer.”

Regarding the most common error for beginner investors, Olea is emphatic: “The worst mistake is overconfidence and thinking one can get rich quickly. The best way to build wealth, as Buffett did, is with compound interest on your side and the discipline to save. If you want to get rich off the next AI stock or the next bitcoin, you can make mistakes. So, I would say be patient and let working capital do its magic. Rather than trying to get rich through asset selection, trying to get rich through a long-term methodology with discipline is the path.”

In Argentina, meanwhile, there is no dedicated value boutique like in Spain or Brazil, partly due to the limited depth of the local equity market. The most common route for an Argentine investor wishing to replicate the Buffett philosophy remains indirect: buying CEDEARs of Berkshire Hathaway or companies within its portfolio, trading in pesos on the BYMA. This was explained by Sergio González, CFA, Head of the Investment Office at Cohen Aliados Financieros, and Martín Mejía, Analyst at the Investment Office at Cohen.

The choice of this route, more than a preference, responds to a regulatory constraint: “We do not consider setting up a local fund with that criteria because regulatory issues make it impossible. In Argentina, mutual funds (FCIs) cannot hold more than 25% of the fund in CEDEARs. For that reason, it is not possible to construct a local fund with the same criteria as the portfolio to invest toward the same objective as Warren Buffett,” they told Funds Society.

On the feasibility of sustaining a position “forever” in a context of high macroeconomic and exchange rate volatility, González and Mejía nuanced the literal application of that doctrine: “When talking about local companies, it is very difficult to have a client stay invested or hold a position for a long time. Logically, there are cases where it can be successful, but at the same time, the multiple variables affecting the Argentine market make it very risky.”

The solution again lies in CEDEARs: “We do believe we can build long-term positions through the purchase of CEDEARs under the logic of value investing. In this way, the investor hedges against exchange rate shifts and maintains long-term investments in international market companies,” they concluded.

Alternative Investment Firms Still Lag in Managing Compensation and Carry

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Alternative investment firms are underinvesting in the management of compensation and carry programs at a time when competition to attract and retain specialized talent is intensifying, according to the 2026 Alternatives Compensation & Carry Survey conducted by Allvue Systems in collaboration with Major, Lindsey & Africa (MLA).

The report reveals a growing gap between the strategic importance firms place on talent and their operational readiness to manage compensation and long-term incentive programs. Half of the surveyed companies admit that they do not administer compensation with the same level of rigor applied to other critical business functions, a situation that could put the retention of experienced professionals at risk.

Only 11% of firms state that their carry administration capabilities are ahead of their peers, even as investment professionals increasingly demand greater transparency regarding how their contributions translate into economic incentives.

“This year’s survey highlights a growing risk for private market firms. The management of carry and compensation is not receiving the necessary attention at a time when talent is increasingly mobile and demanding,” noted Richard Change, Head of FirmView at Allvue Systems.

According to Change, asset managers and general partners seek to understand the relationship between their contribution and their remuneration, and firms that fail to communicate this clearly will lose ground to those that do. “Integrating compensation and carry into a single, transparent view is a key factor in attracting talent and enhancing performance,” he added.

For her part, Allison Rosner, Managing Director in MLA’s In-House Counsel Recruiting Practice, emphasized that in hiring processes for senior executives in the alternative assets sector, compensation goes far beyond salary and bonus.

“Candidates increasingly evaluate how firms structure, communicate, and align long-term incentives with the value they contribute to creating,” Rosner explained.

A Growing Gap in Employee Experience

The study shows that many firms have yet to achieve the level of transparency, education, and visibility that employees expect regarding compensation and carry programs.

Fewer than half of the surveyed companies provide Total Rewards Statements (TRS)—documents that consolidate information on salary, bonuses, carry, and co-investments.

Furthermore, only 36% admit to investing in education and training programs on carried interest-linked compensation, while barely 24% offer formal mechanisms to gather feedback on their carry programs.

The study also points out that merely 16% of firms consider employee feedback a relevant factor in compensation decisions.

Another challenge is the widespread use of discretionary carry: 56% of firms acknowledge relying on this mechanism to some degree. This implies that, for many participants, outcomes depend largely on individual judgment rather than clearly defined parameters, which can raise concerns about the consistency and fairness of allocations.

Manual Processes and Lack of Data Limit Program Evolution

The research identifies major operational shortfalls that hinder the modernization of compensation and incentive systems.

58% of firms still use Excel spreadsheets to manage carry, a practice that can limit their ability to deliver consolidated, up-to-date information to employees. In terms of compensation planning, only 18% of companies consider themselves leaders relative to their competitors, while more than half cannot confirm that their practices are data-driven. Likewise, 42% admit they do not have clearly defined salary bands by function or professional level.

As firms expand participation in carry programs and develop more complex compensation structures, these operational limitations become harder to manage. Reliance on manual processes reduces the ability to make transparent, consistent, and well-founded decisions.

Competition for Talent Will Shape Incentive Trends in 2026

Alternative investment firms anticipate that several factors will continue to shape their compensation and carry programs over the coming year.

  • Among the primary challenges identified are:
  • Intensifying competition for talent across firms and investment strategies.
  • Rising expectations among professionals regarding communication and transparency.
  • The difficulty of generating returns and aligning incentives with effort and performance achieved.

The report concludes that, in an environment marked by higher labor mobility and growing professional expectations, firms that enhance their compensation, communication, and carry administration processes will gain a competitive edge in attracting, motivating, and retaining key talent.