Geopolitical conflicts: Tools to benefit from market volatility in investment portfolios

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

geopolitical conflict market volatility
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainAutor: sergeitokmakov

Tensions between the United States, Israel, and Iran are once again placing geopolitics at the center of financial markets. For asset managers, the challenge is not only to react to volatility, but to design portfolios capable of withstanding energy shocks, unexpected inflation, and recurring episodes of global uncertainty.

For years, institutional investors operated under an implicit assumption: geopolitics could trigger episodes of volatility but rarely altered the long-term functioning of global markets. That paradigm is now changing.

The conflict in the Middle East serves as a reminder that geopolitical risks can directly affect energy markets, inflation dynamics, and the behavior of financial assets.

The critical point lies in the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important energy corridor, through which approximately 20% of global oil consumption flows. Any disruption in this strategic route could trigger sharp movements in energy prices, inflationary pressures, and greater volatility across financial markets.

For asset managers, the key question is clear: how to construct portfolios capable of withstanding and adapting to a more volatile geopolitical environment.

This geopolitical context arrives at a time when the asset management industry was already undergoing structural changes.

The world’s largest asset managers currently oversee nearly $140 trillion in assets, intensifying competition to generate alpha, innovate in product offerings, and expand distribution channels.

At the same time, several analyses point to clear trends shaping the industry:

  • accelerated growth of private markets
  • fee pressure in traditional products
  • greater use of technology and artificial intelligence in portfolio management
  • increasing demand for alternative strategies

In this environment, reports such as Northern Trust’s Global Investment Outlook 2026 warn that markets may face greater dispersion among assets, more persistent inflation, and recurring episodes of volatility—factors that reinforce the importance of active management.

Another important transformation is the growing convergence between public and private markets. Increasingly, traditional asset managers are incorporating private market strategies, while alternative firms are seeking structures that allow them to broaden their investor base.

The result is a new asset management model in which public and private markets begin to integrate within a single investment architecture.

Portfolio resilience in the new geopolitical era

In this new environment, portfolio resilience no longer depends solely on diversification between equities and bonds. It increasingly relies on a combination of structural factors and the architecture of the investment vehicle itself.

How markets typically react to geopolitical shocks

Although geopolitical conflicts often trigger initial episodes of volatility, they can also create temporary dislocations across financial markets. Historically, such events tend to affect asset classes and economic sectors in different ways.

In the case of tensions in the Middle East, markets usually react through four primary channels:

  • Energy and commodities: risk to strategic routes such as the Strait of Hormuz can push oil and natural gas prices higher.
  • Safe-haven assets: during periods of heightened risk aversion, assets such as gold, the U.S. dollar, and U.S. Treasury bonds often attract stronger inflows.
  • Defense and security: geopolitical conflicts are often accompanied by increased defense and national security spending.
  • Market volatility: rising uncertainty tends to increase volatility and dispersion across asset classes.

From strategy to investment vehicle

In this context, the structure of the investment vehicle becomes almost as important as the underlying strategy itself.

Asset securitization allows investment strategies or portfolios to be transformed into more efficient and scalable vehicles, offering several advantages for asset managers:

  • facilitating access to international capital
  • consolidating institutional track records
  • improving transparency and distribution
  • providing flexibility in the selection of underlying assets and enhancing diversification 
  • connecting private market opportunities with the liquidity of public markets

These solutions are gaining traction precisely because they address one of the industry’s biggest challenges today: how to expand access to new investment strategies in an increasingly competitive environment.

Geopolitical crises generate uncertainty, but they also tend to create new investment opportunities.

In this environment, institutional asset managers are paying greater attention to risk diversification, exposure to real-economy assets, and the use of more flexible investment structures.

In a world where geopolitics once again plays a decisive role in financial markets, firms that successfully combine structural innovation, genuine diversification, and global access to capital will be better positioned to transform volatility into a competitive advantage.

In line with this evolution in the industry, solutions such as those offered by FlexFunds enable asset managers and investment firms to transform strategies into efficient and scalable investment vehicles, facilitating access to international markets and distribution to a global investor base. For more information, please contact our experts at info@flexfunds.com

Blackstone Appoints Rashmi Madan as Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Private Wealth

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyRashmi Madan, Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Private Wealth

Blackstone has announced significant changes to accelerate the growth of its Private Wealth business. With more than $300 billion in assets under management from the global private banking channel, the business has been a pioneer in serving individual investors for more than two decades.

After overseeing the development of the private wealth business in EMEA, Rashmi Madan, a Blackstone veteran with 15 years at the firm, has been promoted to the newly created role of Global Head of Portfolio Solutions. According to the firm, in this new position, Madan will lead the expansion of Blackstone’s multi-strategy solutions, leveraging her extensive experience across asset classes and long-standing client relationships. The firm plans to develop several investment solutions within this new initiative.

As a result, Simona Maellare will join Blackstone as Head of EMEA for Private Wealth, where she will lead the firm’s efforts to expand and strengthen its private banking business in Europe and the Middle East. Maellare most recently served as Global Co-Head of the Alternative Capital Group at UBS, as well as Co-Head of EMEA for OneUBS, and brings more than 30 years of experience advising and partnering with alternative asset managers on capital raising and strategic growth in the EMEA region. With a long track record advising some of the world’s leading asset managers on their expansion in EMEA, Maellare brings to Blackstone exceptional expertise, trusted relationships, and a proven ability to build and scale businesses at the highest level.

The firm explains that these appointments strengthen Blackstone’s leadership in two priority areas for its next phase of growth and will help expand multi-strategy investment solutions for advisors and their clients, as well as accelerate the international expansion of the Private Wealth business.

“We have built this business by investing in exceptional talent with a deep commitment to clients. Rashmi and Simona each bring experience and relationships that are difficult to replicate: Rashmi in multi-strategy solutions, which we see as a powerful growth frontier, and Simona in the markets of Europe and the Middle East, where the opportunity for individual investors is significant. Simona’s arrival and Rashmi’s new role will be key as we continue to develop differentiated solutions for our clients globally. I look forward to working closely with both,” said Joan Solotar, Global Head of Blackstone Private Wealth.

For her part, Rashmi Madan, Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Blackstone Private Wealth, stated: “Multi-asset investing allows clients to access the breadth of Blackstone’s platform within a single strategy. As private markets continue to expand and advisor toolkits become more sophisticated, Blackstone Portfolio Solutions will help deliver integrated, investor-focused portfolios built on the firm’s flagship perpetual strategies. I am excited to lead this business and capitalize on the opportunities ahead.”

More Population, Multinationals, and International Investors Behind the Transformation of Miami Real Estate

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyPilar Lecha, Real Estate Broker.

The transformation that Miami’s real estate market is undergoing is a clear example of what is happening across Florida, where two major trends converge: population movements and its appeal to investors. According to Pilar Lecha, a real estate broker with more than a decade of experience in the luxury market, the strong population growth in the state is reshaping cities, and Miami is the clearest expression of this broader shift.

“More than 1,350 people a day are moving to the state of Florida, and a third of them are arriving in Miami. Florida has become the second state in receiving Americans who decide to relocate. This is a trend we began to see after the COVID-19 pandemic, but it has persisted over time. In addition, this movement has been reinforced by the fact that numerous multinationals have also decided to move their headquarters to Miami, attracted by the city’s potential in terms of location, business strength, and economic level,” explains Lecha.

In this regard, Citadel — Ken Griffin’s hedge fund — Blackstone, and Inter&Co are among the latest examples of major financial firms that have set up in the city. As Lecha notes, “many of these firms have moved to Brickell, which has come to be known as the Wall Street of the South, due to its strategic location and the financial community that has developed there.”

Investment opportunities

As a result, Lecha explains that these trends have transformed the real estate market, increasing its value and making it more attractive as an investment. “When investors arrive in Miami, what they want to know is whether they are too late or still on time to invest in this market. In my view, there are still interesting opportunities, but above all, it is an investment with significant growth potential. One figure that illustrates this opportunity is that there are currently 153 buildings under construction. What we are seeing is that residential supply is growing, particularly in segments aimed at short-term rentals,” she notes.

A key factor supporting demand for real estate in Miami, according to Lecha, is that the market facilitates leverage, “which allows investors to enter with smaller tickets and ultimately make significant investments.” In her view, two other factors that make this market attractive are a more favorable tax framework for investors and an environment with a somewhat weaker dollar, “as both increase investors’ purchasing power.” Finally, she highlights that the strong presence of international investors means the local market is more sensitive to mortgage rates and global uncertainty.

Investor profile

But who is leading investment? According to MIAMI Realtors, in 2025 foreign buyers accounted for 15% of residential purchases in South Florida, seven times the national average (2%). In addition, nearly half of all international purchases in Florida are concentrated in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach; more than half of these transactions are made in cash, and most properties are acquired for investment or vacation use.

Latin America is the driving force behind this international flow: Colombia leads with 15% of total foreign buyers in Miami, followed by Argentina (11%), Mexico (7%), Brazil (7%), and Venezuela (5%). “Latin American investors have always shown interest in Miami, and real estate is a way to bring their capital. Beyond returns, this type of investor finds legal certainty here, and that holds great value. Brazilians and Colombians are currently the most active investors,” she explains.

Finally, Lecha adds that she has also observed growing interest from European investors, particularly Spaniards: “They tend to be entrepreneurs — both large and small — as well as family offices. They enter with smaller tickets and are also investing in smaller properties.”

A young city with a future

One aspect that Lecha emphasizes is that this transformation in real estate is occurring alongside the evolution of the city itself. “Miami has managed to break its seasonality. We cannot forget that, in addition to being a business and financial hub, it receives 17 million tourists a year, with its port being the busiest in the United States. To that reality driven by tourism, we now add all these large companies, business activity, and population inflows. This translates into a dynamic, young city full of events — such as the World Cup — that further place it on the global map,” she highlights.

The city’s character is relevant because, according to Lecha’s experience, its evolving features also influence investment trends. “The clearest example is the crypto asset ecosystem. Miami has positioned itself as a benchmark in this space, thanks to the firms that have established themselves here, and as a result we are seeing many real estate transactions carried out in crypto,” she says. She adds: “We see two profiles buying real estate with crypto. One is an older buyer, over 50, who holds crypto and, being more cautious, moves it into property. The other is a younger profile, more familiar with this asset, who either takes out loans in crypto or completes transactions in crypto to maintain their position in cryptocurrencies.”

Her conclusion, after years living in the city and working in the real estate market, is that all these “energies” coexist in Miami and give it a unique vitality.

Professionalization, Holistic Vision, and Impact: The Three Trends Shaping Philanthropy

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

state street etf listed private abs
Canva

As philanthropy and impact investing take on a more strategic role in how families manage their wealth, and as the great wealth transfer accelerates, family offices are not only adapting but are also beginning to influence how capital is deployed to address social and environmental challenges.

In this regard, the UBS Global Family Office Report 2025 identifies three clear trends in how these high-net-worth entities approach philanthropy: greater professionalization of these services, a stronger role for family offices within philanthropy, and a shift from isolated impact toward integration across the entire family asset portfolio.

According to the report’s conclusions, the family office landscape is not changing in a single direction, nor at the same pace for everyone. Rather, we are seeing a global trend in which different factors point to a shift toward more integrated ways of organizing capital and aligning wealth, business, and philanthropy.

Response of family offices

“For some family offices, this has meant looking beyond mere portfolio construction and thinking more deliberately about alignment between governance structures, investment strategies, and operating businesses. Others are placing greater emphasis on internal coordination, with the family office increasingly acting as the connective tissue between entities, advisors, and decision-makers,” explain UBS.

In their view, in practice this has less to do with adopting a specific ideology and more with responding to increasing complexity through better governance, clearer mandates, and stronger execution.

On the other hand, the report finds that collaboration has become another common theme: “Whether working with peers, co-investors, public institutions, or philanthropic partners, family offices are seeking to operate in more interconnected ways. The ability to convene and contribute within partnerships is becoming just as important as financial expertise.”

In this context, a relevant aspect is the role being played by technology and AI, which are not yet widely integrated into philanthropy or family office governance. “Many firms recognize their longer-term potential, especially for improving transparency, comparability, and insight in increasingly complex structures. Over time, digital capability will likely become an important support for decision-making, alongside judgment and experience,” the report notes as a trend.

According to its conclusions, the family offices best positioned for what lies ahead will be those that combine disciplined execution with openness to new ways of working; those that view alignment, collaboration, and continuous learning as essential capabilities. “For those seeking to manage their wealth with purpose and influence, this moment offers an opportunity: to shape their own legacy and, equally important, the broader systems in which their capital operates,” the report concludes.

How UCITS Corporate Bond Funds Behave in the Face of Financial Shocks

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

obstaculos inversor minorista esma

International investors consider UCITS funds to be a solid, reliable vehicle with very clear regulation. Achieving this success has required the commitment of European authorities, which, following recent financial crises, have intensified scrutiny over the role of redemptions in bond funds as a potential amplifier of market stress. In particular, they have emphasized the need to strengthen liquidity management tools and market-wide stress testing frameworks. But have they succeeded?

According to the latest study published by the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), although there were periods of higher redemptions, the magnitude of outflows in corporate bond funds remained relatively contained during three recent and clearly distinct financial shocks. For EFAMA, the results of the study contradict concerns expressed by financial regulators and international institutions, such as the FSB, the ECB, and the ESRB, which have argued that corporate bond funds — especially those offering daily liquidity — may amplify market stress during periods of turbulence.

“These concerns are based on the theoretical belief that a potential mismatch between the liquidity of fund assets and investors’ redemption rights could trigger forced asset sales (fire sales) and greater financial instability. However, our data indicate that such scenarios did not materialize in practice. Even during periods of high market volatility, fund managers appeared able to meet investor redemptions without resorting to disruptive asset sales or experiencing severe liquidity stress,” states the latest Market Insights report titled “Fund redemptions in periods of shock: evidence from outflows in UCITS corporate bond funds.”

EFAMA’s experts reached this conclusion after conducting a comprehensive analysis of daily and monthly redemption patterns of listed European corporate bond funds during the three most recent financial shocks — COVID-19 in 2020, the interest rate hikes of 2022, and the tariff shock of 2025 — assessing whether the observed redemption levels could pose a material threat to financial stability.

“This analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” highlighted Federico Cupelli, Deputy Director of Regulatory Policy at EFAMA.

Following the evidence
The organization explains that the evidence suggests that, at least in the cases analyzed, corporate bond funds acted as relatively stable investment vehicles rather than becoming sources of systemic risk. For example, although the analysis shows that the largest monthly fund redemptions ranged between 3% and 6% of the previous month’s net assets across all observations, ESMA’s stress test scenarios assume redemptions of 22% in a single week. “These results invite a more nuanced view of the role of corporate bond funds in financial stability debates and suggest that current liquidity management practices are more robust than sometimes assumed,” EFAMA notes.

In fact, they argue that the entire debate about the role of bond funds should be framed within a broader context, as investment funds are not the only holders of bonds. “Other key players, such as central banks, banks, pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds — among others — represent a much larger share of fixed income holdings compared to investment funds,” they point out.

Finally, they emphasize that this analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than broad-based regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. “Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” they argue.

EFAMA’s proposal
Based on its previous analysis, EFAMA has identified several principles that supervisors should take into account when overseeing funds:

  1. The notion of liquidity mismatch used by supervisors to identify vulnerabilities in the fund sector is inappropriate. In their view, rather than examining how much investors can redeem over a given period according to the fund’s rules, supervisors should consider how much outflow volume a fund can reasonably expect based on its historical behavior.
  2. Fund subcategories, such as investment grade and high-yield corporate bond funds, are not homogeneous categories. Therefore, they do not consider it appropriate to limit the analysis to their aggregate behavior (for example, by stating that “high-yield corporate bond funds exhibit structural liquidity mismatches”). “A more granular analysis is needed to identify those funds that are more vulnerable to liquidity shocks. Similarly, in top-down stress test scenarios, it is not appropriate to assume that all funds within a category will face similar levels of redemptions. Stress test exercises based on these assumptions are unlikely to accurately identify where vulnerabilities truly lie, if they exist,” they argue.

    3. It is relatively rare for a fund to experience daily outflows exceeding 3%. “This means that, in most cases, asset managers do not face sudden and significant outflows that could trigger forced asset sales. Moreover, large outflows are usually driven by the exit of an institutional investor from the fund,” they explain. In such cases, they note that the investor is typically required to provide sufficient advance notice to the manager so that preparations can be made for the withdrawal. For this reason, persistent daily outflows above 3% could be an indication of stress in a fund and may warrant closer supervisory attention.

Chilean and Colombian Peso, the Latin American Currencies With the Greatest Resilience

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

private bdcs united states
Canva

The Brazilian real and the Colombian peso should be the currencies that show the greatest resilience during the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, as they are net exporters of oil. Even so, the most notable movement for Ebury is the appreciation of the dollar of between 1% and 4% against the Latin American currencies that they usually cover, “given the shift that has taken place in global markets toward safe-haven assets.”

In its latest report, the firm’s experts highlight that the Chilean peso appears especially vulnerable as it is one of the largest net importers of oil among emerging markets. “In addition, the weight of energy in the national CPI is relatively higher than in other countries,” they add. By contrast, the second key conclusion of the report is that in Peru, local disruptions in the supply of natural gas have further worsened the situation.

The Brazilian real (BRL)

According to Ebury’s report, the Brazilian real has corrected some of its losses, but it has still depreciated by 1.5% against the greenback since the conflict in the Middle East escalated. “As a net exporter of oil, the Brazilian real should be less impacted than other emerging market currencies by the recent rise in oil prices. However, it has not emerged completely unscathed from the generalized flight toward safe-haven assets and currencies such as the dollar,” they note.

As for economic data, which have been completely overshadowed by the geopolitical conflict, Brazil’s fourth-quarter GDP growth came in line with expectations, registering a modest expansion of 0.1% quarter-on-quarter. According to their analysis, this clearly reflects the high interest rates set in Brazil, which they also believe have recently caused some slowdown in the labor market: the unemployment rate rose to 5.4%, although it remains close to historical lows. “Looking ahead, we still believe that Brazil’s central bank will begin its rate-cutting cycle this year, but it may act more cautiously while the conflict in the Middle East persists,” they conclude.

The Chilean peso (CLP)

As indicated in the previously mentioned conclusions of the report, the Chilean peso is one of the currencies most affected by the conflict in the Middle East, and not only at the regional level. “Chile’s position as a net importer of oil, together with the fall in copper prices amid the possibility of weaker global demand, have been the main factors behind the depreciation of the peso, which exceeded 4% last week. Given the risk of an inflationary rebound if the conflict drags on and if oil prices remain elevated, swap markets have drastically adjusted their expectations for rate cuts by the Central Bank of Chile this year,” Ebury argues.

They also highlight that just a few weeks ago markets were pricing in a rate cut at the next meeting with a probability close to 70%; now that figure has fallen to around 25%. “As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate a cautious BCCh at its next Monetary Policy Meeting, despite the recent slowdown in inflation observed in February. As long as geopolitical uncertainty persists and clear signs of de-escalation do not appear, the Chilean peso, like other emerging market currencies, will remain under downward pressure,” the report notes.

The Colombian peso (COP)

In the case of the Colombian peso, Ebury’s analysis indicates that it has also been one of the most resilient currencies in Latin America since the conflict in Iran broke out, as it is a net exporter of oil. That said, the document notes that it has also lost ground against the greenback (just over 1%) amid the generalized flight from risk assets and currencies.

In addition, the parliamentary elections do not appear to have had a significant impact on the exchange rate, with the expected political fragmentation taking place. “Pacto Histórico emerged as the political force with the greatest representation in Congress, while the strong result of Paloma Valencia puts her in a good position to compete with De la Espriella for the right-wing vote. Given the high percentage of undecided voters, the potential outcome of the presidential election continues to generate uncertainty in the local market, which could add a risk premium to the peso,” they note.

The Mexican peso (MXN)

For its part, the Mexican peso has fallen by more than 3% against the greenback since the outbreak of the conflict. According to the report, amid the possibility of higher inflation, markets have stopped pricing in rate cuts by Banxico. “In addition to developments in oil prices and geopolitical tensions, markets will closely monitor the negotiations over the USMCA, which are scheduled to begin next week,” they note.

In part, according to their view, this could be positive news for the Mexican economy, as trade uncertainty could dissipate sooner than expected. However, they believe that the net impact on the economy and the Mexican peso will depend largely on the content of the agreement that is ultimately ratified. In this sense, Ebury’s forecast is clear: additional volatility around the Mexican peso can be expected in the coming weeks.

The Peruvian sol (PEN)

Finally, the report highlights the performance of the Peruvian sol, which has fallen almost 4% since the first attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran, depreciating to levels not seen since late September. It is worth recalling that, as a net importer of oil, Peru is vulnerable to this energy shock.

“Although it started from more favorable inflation levels than other countries, a leak in a gas pipeline in the south of the country is causing a severe shortage, leading to energy rationing across different sectors. A significant rebound in inflation is expected in upcoming readings, which will partially correct once the leak is repaired. This is believed to take approximately two weeks. In this regard, it will be interesting to analyze how the BCRP responds to these developments at this week’s meeting,” Ebury concludes.

Bond Market: An Unusual Behavior to Watch

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

kevin warsh economic debate
Canva

Rising oil prices and adjustments in global equity markets are capturing investors’ attention; however, investment firms are urging investors to watch what is happening in the fixed income market, especially with bonds. Since the start of the war between the U.S. and Iran at the end of February, the bond market has behaved in an unusual way for a geopolitical conflict.

According to experts, it is striking that instead of clearly acting as a safe haven, bonds have experienced selling pressure and their yields have risen. For example, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury exceeded 4%, driven by rising oil prices and inflation expectations. Normally, during geopolitical episodes there is a “flight to quality,” meaning investors buy sovereign bonds as safe-haven assets. However, this time the opposite has happened because inflation risk has weighed more heavily than the safe-haven effect. Some analysts have even noted that the bond market “is not functioning as a safe haven” in this episode.

Bond Market Behavior

“In the case of sovereign bonds, the most common pattern during periods of geopolitical tension has been a decline in yields due to demand for safe-haven assets. This was the initial reaction following the announcement of the military operation. However, yields subsequently rose throughout the week. With the exception of Japan, the main government debt markets have experienced a bear flattening so far this month, with short-term yields showing significantly worse performance. The so-called ‘bond vigilantes’ could argue that this reflects the increasingly fragile state of public balance sheets, given the high level of debt and ongoing fiscal expansion, which could undermine the traditional role of sovereign bonds as a store of value during periods of global uncertainty,” explain experts at Muzinich & Co.

Daniel Loughney, Head of Fixed Income at Mediolanum International Funds (MIFL), agrees that, so far, sovereign debt has shown the weakest performance, as inflation concerns have led to the dismantling of expectations for interest rate cuts. “In fact, the ECB is now expected to tighten monetary policy by around 50 basis points. As a result, short-term bonds have been the most affected, while longer-maturity bonds have suffered less,” he notes.

In the view of Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, the reason for this behavior is that the bond market is highly focused on the problems that could arise from rising hydrocarbon prices, particularly the impact of natural gas prices in Europe and the United Kingdom. “U.K. government bonds have performed very poorly during this period, with the yield on 10-year bonds rising by around 0.5% during this conflict, and shorter-dated bonds are now moving to price in an interest rate hike by the Bank of England in June.”

For their part, Adam Hetts, Global Head of Multi-Asset, and Oliver Blackbourn, Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson, explain that concerns about rising European inflation—or simply prolonged stickiness in the United States—would explain why bond yields have increased. “Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds have risen as markets have priced out one of the interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve that had been expected for the end of the year. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have moved less than their European counterparts, as Friday’s U.S. employment figures helped offset part of the upward pressure on yields stemming from expected inflation,” they note.

A Look at the Credit Market

In contrast, since the conflict between the U.S. and Iran began, investment grade credit has not significantly reflected economic tensions in prices. According to market reports, spreads have moved slightly but continue to reflect the excellent fundamental quality of most large companies in this environment.

“That is likely where the risk lies in the coming weeks: if oil and gas supply issues persist, which have a lasting negative impact on corporate quality, corporate credit is likely to underperform expectations. In recent months we have favored higher quality in credit markets, reducing risk and holding more cash than we normally would. It is not yet time to put that cash to work,” explains Hickmore.

Muzinich & Co acknowledges that total returns in credit markets are lower so far this month, although, interestingly, high yield has slightly outperformed investment grade credit. “In fact, a European investor positioned in U.S. high yield without currency hedging would probably be quite satisfied with that investment decision so far this month.” As for riskier assets, the U.S. asset manager expects credit spreads to widen.

The Conclusions

After this quick analysis of both markets, according to Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, what is happening is clear: “The increase in government bond yields is doing part of the heavy lifting and has prevented credit spreads from widening as much as we might have expected before the conflict began.”

Despite these unusual dynamics, Loughney argues in favor of staying invested and says conservative investors should not overreact. “Much of the downside risk has already been priced in under the assumption of a prolonged conflict. Any sign of resolution in the coming week could trigger some reversal of last week’s moves, from which investors could benefit,” he says.

Investment firms argue that the escalation of geopolitical risks has occurred at a time when inflationary pressures have been steadily moderating worldwide. As a result, they explain, over the past 12 months there have been more signs that fixed income can act as a counterweight to weakness in equity markets. “Central banks are likely to look through the brief spike in energy and commodity prices in general. However, a prolonged conflict that increases the likelihood of a sustained rise in oil prices will raise concerns about increasingly entrenched inflation. It is this secondary effect—if inflation expectations become unanchored—that could worry central banks. For now, we see some short-term upside risk for yields, but still within the recent trading range. Recent developments reiterate the need to actively manage fixed income portfolios, not only to take advantage of opportunities but also to protect against downside risks. As always, diversification remains key,” argues James Ringer, fund manager at Schroders.

Why Do We Still Have to Talk About Kevin Warsh?

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

snowden lane partners msci wealth manager
LinkedIn

One week before the meeting of the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed), and with attention focused on the effect that rising oil prices may have on inflation, it is necessary to bring the name of Kevin Warsh back into focus if we want to analyze what we can expect from U.S. monetary policy this year.

Warsh has been noted for his extensive experience, credibility, and strong reputation in the markets, as well as his leadership capacity and firm stance on inflation. In terms of monetary policy, experts consider him hawkish, as he has openly supported interest rate cuts under certain circumstances, although they add that he has a flexible attitude.

According to Raphael Olszyna-Marzys, international economist at J. Safra Sarasin Sustainable AM, the reasons why he was chosen are clear: “He is seen as politically loyal. In addition, he is the son-in-law of Ronald Lauder, a close friend and ally of Trump for many years. He is also a longstanding critic of what he considers the Fed’s overreach, such as financial regulation, consumer protection, the focus on inequality, and quantitative easing (QE). Finally, he has a reputation as a hawk due to his public opposition to the second round of QE, which ultimately led him to resign as a Fed governor in 2011. All of this should give him some credibility with the markets and potentially greater influence within the FOMC than other candidates.”

Robeco: A Genuine “Hawk”?

For experts at Robeco, although he has been portrayed as an “inflation hawk,” some nuances are necessary in the current context. They recall that during his time as a Federal Reserve governor, Warsh expressed concern about the inflationary risks stemming from quantitative easing (QE) and became one of its most outspoken internal critics. “Today we mainly know QE as a policy that has expanded the Fed’s balance sheet. For that reason, it is not surprising that, in an opinion article published in The Wall Street Journal in November 2025, he argued that ‘the Fed’s swollen balance sheet… can be significantly reduced.’ This stance has reinforced his recent portrayal as an ‘inflation hawk,’” they acknowledge.

However, the European asset manager believes that the image of Kevin Warsh as a “hawk” is exaggerated and expects him to support another reduction in official interest rates by June, which would likely be his first meeting as chairman. “In reality, his views suggest room for lower interest rates, not higher ones, and his goal of reducing the Fed’s balance sheet may prove to be more of a desire than a reality. As for his view that the Fed’s balance sheet may be excessively large, we believe that, in practice, it will be difficult to reduce it significantly without regulatory adjustments to the ‘abundant reserves’ regime of the banking system,” they argue.

MFS IM: Non-Traditional Monetary Easing

Regarding what to expect from him, Benoit Anne, Senior Managing Director of the Strategy and Insights Group at MFS Investment Management, believes that the “new Fed chairman” thinks there is room for monetary policy easing, but perhaps not in the most traditional way. “Warsh believes that the United States is experiencing a productivity miracle that will not only boost the country’s long-term growth potential but will also generate significant disinflationary pressures. As inflation moves lower, the Fed will have more room to continue cutting rates, which will please the White House. However, this is where a possible contradiction arises,” notes Anne.

According to the asset manager’s chief economist, Erik Weisman, a trajectory of stronger growth driven by productivity would normally tend to be associated with an increase in the neutral rate. This means that, on this basis, the room for maneuver for the Fed’s monetary policy in that macroeconomic scenario would be smaller, not greater, in the long term.

“Turning to Kevin Warsh’s view of the Fed’s balance sheet, it is clear to everyone that the new Fed chairman favors a certain degree of moderation. But if implemented, a reduction of the balance sheet could affect liquidity and interest rate volatility in a way that might be seen as contradictory to the initial goal of lowering rates,” adds Anne.

Something for Everyone, According to Wellington Management

At Wellington Management, they believe that Warsh could take a step toward reducing the Fed’s power with respect to its current broad mandate and could also play a key role in changing the Fed’s structure and in closer collaboration with the Treasury in managing the Fed’s balance sheet.

“The level of control that the Trump administration has over interest rates, as well as broader regulatory and supervisory decisions, will depend on the final composition of the Fed’s Board, including whether Jerome Powell decides to remain in his position. It will take some time before these decisions are made and before they matter to the markets, but in the medium term I expect them to be significant for the conduct of both monetary and broader policies,” explains Juhi Dhawan, macro strategist at Wellington Management.

Finally, the expert adds that the choice of Warsh, who has advocated restrictive monetary policies throughout his career, should somewhat ease concerns that managing inflation might take a back seat to political priorities. “Markets will be more willing to believe that economic data will dictate how monetary policy is conducted, which should stabilize the dollar from the perspective of devaluation risk,” Dhawan acknowledges.

Snowden Lane Partners Adds MSCI Wealth Manager to Its Advisory Ecosystem

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

mapfre gestora activos nuevo ceo
Canva

Snowden Lane Partners has announced that it will integrate MSCI Wealth Manager into its advisory ecosystem. It is a technological platform focused on portfolio management for the analysis of public and private assets, as well as tax optimization and the ability for advisors to generate responses for clients.

Specifically, MSCI Wealth Manager was designed to support advisors’ efforts when providing personalized financial advice, quickly showing the risks of each portfolio, as it is based on modeling technology that identifies those assets that deviate from clients’ investment objectives. The platform also integrates risk analysis with proposal-generation and model management tools, which supports a unified advisory experience.

Strategic Vision

In line with Snowden Lane’s commitment to offering comprehensive, personalized, and client-focused advice that supports that growth, the firm adopted MSCI Wealth Manager to equip its team of advisors with tools to differentiate their clients’ experience; compare, align, and customize clients’ portfolios around recommended asset allocations; identify new opportunities; and analyze portfolio data from the investment statements of current and prospective clients, which can be uploaded directly to the platform.

According to Snowden Lane Partners, the alliance follows a successful 2025, during which the firm expanded its capabilities in alternative assets, added senior profiles to further strengthen business development and talent acquisition operations, and continued expanding its advisory team, with new offices in the northeastern and southeastern United States.

“We are delighted to partner with MSCI, as we share a dedication to providing clients with best-in-class tools that enhance their advisory experience. Equally important is that our advisors now have a broader set of tools to continue putting our values into practice, offering clients transparent and individualized solutions for their specific needs. As our firm continues to grow, continuing to reinvest in technological capabilities that enhance the experience of our advisors and clients is essential, and this alliance with MSCI is the most recent example of that,” said Alison Burkett, Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate Development at Snowden Lane Partners.

For his part, Alex Kokolis, Global Head of Wealth at MSCI, said: “MSCI Wealth and Snowden Lane share a vision of advancing portfolio management technology to better respond to the evolving needs of end investors. We are proud to provide Snowden Lane’s advisors with the tools they need to align their clients’ portfolios with their goals, values, and evolving view of risk in today’s complex market environment. MSCI Wealth Manager can help Snowden Lane manage their clients’ specific investment needs efficiently, consistently, transparently, and with confidence.”

“We Will End Up Having Fewer and Fewer Government Bonds in Our Portfolios Because We Will Consider Them Increasingly Risky Assets”

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ma in asset management alternatives
Photo courtesyPaul Jackson, Global Head of Asset Allocation Research at Invesco for EMEA.

Paul Jackson, Global Head of Asset Allocation Research at Invesco for EMEA, recently outlined his outlook and favorite assets for the year during a meeting held in Miami, as part of the presentation of the partnership between Invesco and LarrainVial.

Jackson expects 2026 to be “just as good” as 2025 and believes that the strong market performance this year will be driven, first, by the continued easing of monetary policy by several central banks, including the Federal Reserve, for which he forecasts between two and three interest rate cuts in 2026. According to Jackson, the Bank of England will follow a similar path. This easing, “after a couple of years of very aggressive rate cuts by almost all central banks around the world,” has led to an acceleration in money supply and “normally this is associated with stronger economic growth and perhaps higher inflation over the long term.”

There are exceptions to this scenario. Here Jackson points to the Bank of Japan, which will raise rates for some time. He also mentions Australia, following its recent rate hike. However, this will not prevent a boost to global economic growth.

Another factor that will accelerate economies is the increase in real wages across most regions, which “should boost consumer spending,” especially in areas such as Europe, where savings rates are “unusually high.” In the United States, that momentum will come from wage inflation exceeding price inflation.

Third, economic growth will also be supported by selective fiscal stimulus. Jackson mentions the expected increase in military spending in many European countries, alongside Germany’s “significant” infrastructure spending program. He also points to Sweden which, given its proximity to Russia, “feels the need to increase military spending.” Japan is an “interesting” case for Jackson, as Prime Minister Sanei Takeuchi is “very interested” in increasing fiscal stimulus in Japan.

Asset Allocation for the Year

Jackson notes that, in general, stronger economic growth benefits cyclical assets such as industrial commodities and equities, as well as higher-risk assets overall. However, he sees factors that could prove destabilizing.

The main one is the U.S. midterm elections, which “usually trigger a shift against the president’s party.” The consensus view is that Democrats will win the House of Representatives, but not the Senate, although Jackson has the “slight suspicion” that Democrats could win both chambers. “It will be difficult, because they need to gain four seats from the 22 Republican seats up for election, but I suspect they could achieve it.”

He also sees few opportunities in duration. Jackson points to the numbers: short-duration assets still offer low yields, while longer-duration assets—such as government bonds, investment-grade and high-yield bonds, as well as equities and real estate—offer returns similar to or even below historical averages.

For example, he expects the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury to rise to at least 4.3% by the end of the year. “That’s why when I think about government bonds, investment grade and high yield, my stance is, at best, neutral, with a bias toward underweight.” Jackson prefers assets such as leveraged loans and believes AAA-rated CLOs “are a cash-like asset, but enhanced,” while generating the same return as high-yield bonds “but with much lower volatility.”

Regarding equity markets, he holds a very underweight position in the U.S. market, as he considers it “too expensive.” One alternative would be “to buy a nuclear-energy-weighted index, or focus on the banking sector.”

Jackson acknowledges that several Latin American markets offer value, although within global equities he particularly highlights China, which remains “cheaper than usual” relative to its historical average and “much cheaper” than the United States. His conviction is strong: “I have maximum exposure to Chinese equities,” he said. In fact, he is overweight emerging markets, Europe, Japan, and the United Kingdom, which offer “interesting returns.”

He is also interested in industrial metals—copper, aluminum, lead, etc.—because they are sensitive to the economic cycle. Even energy appeals to him, “where valuations are more reasonable,” and which should benefit from his scenario of an expansionary economic cycle.

In currencies, he highlights the Japanese yen, which he believes “is very cheap.” The Bank of Japan “needs to raise rates,” and as long as it continues to do so while the Fed eases monetary policy, “the yen will strengthen considerably.” As a complement, in Japan it is now possible “to obtain yields above 3.5% on 30- or 40-year bonds in a very cheap currency.”

Risks to Watch

Jackson believes it is always important to consider what could go wrong. The first obvious risk is being wrong about the economic cycle—namely a slowdown or mild recession. In that case, defensive instruments would be needed: “Bank loans and CLOs would work, but government bonds would also be very good.”

The second risk would be a rebound in inflation, which “is no longer declining steadily around the world.” He acknowledges that many investors believe gold could be useful in those circumstances, although it does not always work as such.

The third risk would be the implications of Kevin Walsh being appointed chair of the Federal Reserve. “Walsh’s track record is not that moderate,” Jackson notes, recalling that recent statements by the new Fed chair contain elements suggesting the Federal Reserve could be more restrictive than Donald Trump would like. “We could face some unpleasant surprises,” he said.

Fourth is the concentration of the U.S. equity market, although Jackson clarifies that he sees this factor as “a risk not only for the U.S. market but also for global equity markets.”

The fifth risk he highlights is a resurgence of debt problems. “If governments do not do the right thing, we will probably end up talking about the return of the gold standard, and then we could become very optimistic about gold. My gold standard calculation suggests gold should be at $9,300,” the expert predicted. Strategically, he concludes, over time “we will end up having fewer and fewer government bonds in our portfolios because we will consider them increasingly risky assets.”

Aristotle’s List of 10 Surprises for 2026

Jackson also used the Miami event to present his “Aristotle List,” a compilation of ten major surprises for the year inspired by the list Byron Wee used to publish at Morgan Stanley. In a relaxed setting, the expert shared ideas that diverge from market consensus and that, if confirmed, could deliver strong gains for investors.

The first prediction refers to Democrats controlling both chambers of Congress after the midterm elections. Next comes the possibility that the Russell 3000 index will outperform the group of the Magnificent Seven. The podium is completed by the prediction that the yen will appreciate to 140 yen per dollar, from more than 150 currently.

The list also includes the expectation that the yield on the 30-year UK government bond will end the year below its U.S. counterpart, and that Argentine bonds will outperform global indices. In addition, European CO₂ allowances could surge above $100, compared with around $70 currently.

He also expressed confidence that the Kenya stock market will perform well for a third consecutive year. “It’s a small market and I doubt anyone has analyzed it,” Jackson said. Each year he tries to highlight a frontier market “where valuations are really attractive and fundamentals remain good. And I think Kenya is the ideal candidate.”

He also predicts that gold could fall below $3,500. “Gold is expensive. It is trading between five and six standard deviations above its historical real value. Everyone loves a rising asset, but I have the slight suspicion that it won’t last the whole year,” he concluded.

Outside the economic sphere, Jackson sees it as likely that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will still be in office by the end of 2026. Finally, his sporting prediction—after correctly forecasting last year that Europe would beat the United States in the Ryder Cup—is that Spain and England will play in the final of the FIFA World Cup hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Panama. England will reach the final after defeating Argentina in the semifinals, but Jackson’s prediction is that Spain will lift the trophy.

Jackson’s final message to attendees at the event was an invitation to be happy: “Academic studies show that being kind to others makes you feel better. So don’t be selfish, and don’t trust anyone who is addicted,” he said.