ABN AMRO Sells its Private Banking Operations in Asia and the Middle East

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

In line with the strategic update as announced on 16 November 2016, ABN AMRO has decided to sell its private banking operations in Asia and the Middle East to LGT, a leading international private banking and asset management group.

Jeroen Rijpkema, CEO of ABN AMRO Private Banking International said: ‘Private banking is a core activity of ABN AMRO. After a strategic review, we have decided to focus on further strengthening and growing our private banking activities in Northwest Europe. The transfer of our private banking business in Asia and the Middle East is the logical next step in implementing this strategy. We are happy to have found in LGT a strong and solid partner to ensure continuity of service in the best interest of our clients and staff involved’.

ABN AMRO Private Banking manages around USD 20 billion (EUR 18.5 billion) of client assets in Singapore, Hong Kong and Dubai, representing about 10% of ABN AMRO Private Banking client assets worldwide. The transaction is subject to approvals from the relevant authorities and closing is expected in Q2 2017. ABN AMRO expects to realise a substantial book gain.

In the region, ABN AMRO will continue to offer financial services to its Corporate Banking clients active in amongst others Energy, Commodities & Transportation, the Diamond & Jewellery sector and Clearing.

BrightGate Capital SGIIC SA

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Untitled Design_2
. BrightGate Capital SGIIC SA

Fundada en diciembre de 2008, BrightGate Capital SGIIC es una gestora especializada en producto alternativo (donde mantiene un acuerdo con la gestora EnTrustPermal). En 2009 lanzó el fondo BrightGate Absolute Return FIL y más recientemente en 2013, a través del Fondo Andbank BrightGate 5 Year Buy&Hold Fixed Income Fund, arrancó su estrategia de Renta Fija Corporativa Global.

Asimismo, BrightGate lleva a cabo la distribución de fondos internacionales, donde tiene la vocación de representar a un reducido grupo de gestoras de calidad en distintas áreas de especialización. A día de hoy las gestoras distribuidas son FORT IM, Rubrics AM y Sky Harbor además de distribuir el fondo Permal Alternative Income Strategy (PAIS), único producto UCITS con liquidez diaria de Permal.

El proyecto está liderado por Bertrand de Montauzon, Jacobo Arteaga y Jaime Gortázar, y cuenta con diez profesionales con dilatada experiencia en gestión, banca de inversión, banca privada, mercado de capitales y análisis de bolsa y mercados. 

Dirección: Génova 11, 4ºIZQ – 28004

Teléfono: +34 91 441 0011

Email: brightgate@brightgatecapital.com

Web: www.brightgatecapital.com

Most Banks Don’t Need More Capital, But More Flexibility To Use It

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Despite having much stronger capital bases than before the financial crisis, banks around the world remain exposed to capital-related confidence shocks, according to S&P Global RatingsMost Banks Don’t Need More Capital, But The Flexibility To Use It In Times Of Stress.

«This apparent paradox reflects the effectiveness of the significant increase in minimum regulatory capital requirements in ensuring that systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) have enough bail-in-able resources to absorb stress losses in a resolution,» said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Bernard De Longevialle. «However, at the same time, the higher requirements have also lead to a parallel shift in what the market believes are the minimum capital levels banks should permanently respect to keep its confidence.»

As a result, in period of stress, banks might react with many of the same procyclical behaviors that we’ve seen in the past. Current considerations by Europe’s Single Supervisory Mechanism to split Tier 1 Pillar II requirements into a hard «requirement» and a softer «guidance» component may give welcome additional flexibility to Europe’s large banks to absorb unexpected shocks without triggering confidence-sensitive coupon suspension.

Regulators have been successful in forcing the banking system to build a much stronger capital base than before the crisis.

This achievement should not, however, hide the fact that most of these capital resources would be available only as part of a resolution. Over the past six years, new forms of concurrent regulatory requirements have emerged in addition to going-concern risk-sensitive metrics. In assessing where large banks in Europe and the U.S. stand according to these metrics, we observe that their effective loss-absorbing margins above regulatory requirements have not improved on average since before the crisis. 
 
International standard setters didn’t intend for these regulatory buffers to be viewed as establishing new minimum capital requirements. However, as seen earlier this year, the perceived risk of restrictions on distributions to shareholders or hybrid instrument holders can spread to the wider credit markets.

A further increase in regulatory minimum capital requirements could have unintended consequences, but flexibility to use capital buffers when needed would in our opinion benefit the resilience of the world’s banking system.   

Taking Stock of the U.S.

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Stronger GDP growth is the key to sustaining U.S. equity momentum.

As we enter December, the market continues to chew over the implications of a Donald Trump presidency. Last week, my colleague, Erik Knutzen, CIO of Multi-Asset Class, examined the outlook for emerging markets debt and equities. This week, we take a look at the prospects for U.S. equities.

There’s been a lot of noise and excitement about the so-called “Trump Bounce” in equities, but I want to dig a little deeper and look at some of the factors that are likely to sustain it. The most important element in equities’ continued recovery is a pickup in expectations for stronger GDP growth. Indeed, this may already be in the works.

The most recent figures, for example, show an upwards revision in Q3 GDP—up from 2.4% to 2.9%1, largely driven by consumer spending. This was better than anticipated, and although estimates tend to fluctuate throughout a quarter, the Atlanta Fed is projecting Q4 GDP to be over 3%. So, if this plays out, it represents a 2.25% increase in GDP for the whole year. That’s a pretty decent tick up from the 1.5% the U.S. economy experienced throughout 2015 and much of 2016.

Fiscal Boost?

Next, you need to factor in the new administration’s plans for meaningful fiscal stimulus. Indeed, Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary designate, made a case for greater fiscal policy intervention only last week. This included much talk about tax cuts, both corporate and personal, together with the long-heralded increase in infrastructure spend. Taken together, and if implemented, these initiatives should provide the tailwind that will drive U.S. GDP growth above the levels we’ve seen in recent years.

With a stronger level of growth, earnings should improve. Back in the spring, this was an area of concern for us. Accelerating earnings growth would be the strong foundation for further improvement in U.S. equity markets and support the higher P/E multiples that, for the first half of 2016, were driven by lower bond yields.

Industry Sectors a Mixed Bag

So, which areas of the U.S. stock market are most likely to benefit under this new environment and which ones will be left out in the cold? On the positive side of the ledger, financials should do well because of the expectation of interest rate increases and less rigorous bank regulation. Domestic cyclicals and energy companies should also be among the beneficiaries of faster domestic growth.

The small-cap space is also enjoying a strong rally. Since its November 3 low point, the Russell 2000 Index is up nearly 15% through the end of November. In contrast, the S&P 500 has posted a return of around 6%.

Health care, however, is a mixed bag. Tom Price, the proposed Secretary of Health and Human Services, is a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act. In fact, he’s likely to try to do away with “Obamacare” altogether and replace it with a more market-based system. As a result, investors are struggling to figure out who’ll be the winners and losers if the current system begins to unravel.
Risks?

Trade and the Dollar

So what are the risks to this more optimistic scenario? One is that trade becomes an issue. There was a lot of anti-trade rhetoric during the recent U.S. election, although things have quieted down a bit since then. But tensions could reignite next year when Trump takes office. A trade “war” of sorts could be a meaningful drag on global GDP growth. Trade has in fact already been slowing over the past three years due, in part, to protectionist measures implemented in many countries.

The stronger U.S. dollar is making life increasingly uncomfortable for many large-cap exporters. Growing dollar strength has major implications for large international companies and, by association, their earnings growth. Since the U.S. election, the greenback has already risen by 4% and looks set to rise higher. And there’s near-universal agreement that the Fed will increase rates later this month, which will put additional upward pressure on the currency and, therefore, on big global exporters.

Net-Net, We have a Positive Outlook

But despite these concerns, the prospects for U.S. equities look far healthier than they did a month ago. So the decision of our Asset Allocation Committee just over a week ago to raise our 12-month outlook for U.S. equities to slightly above normal has, so far, proved to be the right one. Stay tuned to see whether this remains the case.

Neuberger Berman’s CIO insight by Joseph V. Amato

Safra National Bank of New York adquiere el negocio de banca privada de Bank Hapoalim en Miami

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Safra National Bank of New York Acquires Bank Hapoalim's Private Banking Business in Miami
Foto: Javi. Safra National Bank of New York adquiere el negocio de banca privada de Bank Hapoalim en Miami

Safra National Bank of New York ha anunciado la firma de un acuerdo para la adquisición del negocio de banca privada de Bank Hapoalim en Miami. El acuerdo afecta a clientes cualificados y a sus banqueros, especializados en el asesoramiento de grandes patrimonios latinoamericanos.

Esta operación es una extensión lógica del negocio de banca privada de Safra National Bank of New York hacia Latinoamérica, donde lleva más de 30 años prestando servicios de banca privada y financieros a clientes con grandes patrimonios. Con esta transacción, tanto el banco como su filial -Safra Securities- refuerzan su negocio de banca privada y las capacidades globales de wealth management del grupo.

«Estamos decididos a ocupar un rol líder en la consolidación del mercado de la banca privada. Nuestro sólido capital, propiedad familiar y nuestros 175 años de experiencia nos confieren una gran flexibilidad para realizar estas operaciones», declara Jacob J. Safra, vicepresidente de Safra National Bank.

«Estamos deseando dar la bienvenida a nuestros clientes y empleados de Bank Hapoalim en Miami. La banca privada de Bank Hapoalim en Miami encaja perfectamente con la visión estratégica del Grupo J. Safra y el Safra National Bank of New York, y estamos seguros de que agregaremos un valor inconmensurable a los clientes», añade Simoni Morato, CEO de la entidad neoyorquina.

Se espera que la operación, cuyos términos no han sido publicados, se complete durante el primer trimestre de 2017, tras las aprobaciones regulatorias pertinentes.

El Pérez Art Museum Miami recibe una donación de 15 millones de dólares del filántropo Jorge M. Pérez

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Pérez Art Museum Miami Receives $15 Million Gift from Philanthropist and Patron of the Arts Jorge M. Pérez
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto cedida- PAMM. El Pérez Art Museum Miami recibe una donación de 15 millones de dólares del filántropo Jorge M. Pérez

Pérez Art Museum Miami (PAMM) ha anunciado esta semana que el empresario y partrono -desde hace años- del museo Jorge M. Pérez renovará su apoyo económico al museo mediante una nueva donación de 15 millones de dólares. La contribución, que será dotada en los próximos 10 años, consistirá en 5 millones en efectivo para la adquisición de obras de artistas latinoamericanos, otros 5 millones en fondos patrimoniales para la consecución de obras adicionales y la concesión inmediata de más de 200 piezas de la colección personal de arte cubano de Pérez. Las obras donadas serán presentadas en la exposición con que se celebrará esta donación en otoño de 2017.

«Este tremendo regalo es otra muestra del compromiso de Jorge y Darlene Pérez con el museo de Miami», declaró el director PAMM Franklin Sirmans. «Este regalo mejora de forma significativa los fondos del museo y añade profundidad a un área de vital importancia para la colección que Pérez siempre ha defendido desde que llegó a la junta del museo hace más de 20 años».

Pérez ha sido uno de los principales defensores del arte contemporáneo en la ciudad. Este nuevo regalo hará de PAMM el hogar de una de las mayores colecciones de arte cubano contemporáneo en Estados Unidos. Donaciones anteriores de Pérez incluyeron obras de los artistas modernistas cubanos Amelia Peláez, Wifredo Lam y Mario Carreño, junto con obras de otros modernistas latinoamericanos.

Como buque insignia del arte contemporáneo en Miami, la recopilación del trabajo de los artistas cubanos y documentación de la diáspora forma parte de la misión de PAMM de representar su lugar en el mundo -geográfica, conceptual e intelectualmente-. Cuba, que es tanto parte de América Latina como del Caribe, ha sido siempre un área de interés del PAMM que se remonta a sus inicios. Con los años, el museo ha presentado exposiciones y proyectos en solitario de muchos artistas cubanos como Amelia Peláez, Wifredo Lam, Ana Mendieta, Glexis Novoa, Enrique Martínez Celaya, José Bedia y Quisqueya Henríquez.

UBS Wealth Management Merges its Subsidiaries in Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Spain

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

UBS has combined most of its Wealth Management businesses in Europe into one legal entity, UBS Europe SE. The new European subsidiary is headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany and will operate in European markets through a network of branches.

According to a press release, the choice of a societas Europaea as the corporate structure for the entity provides UBS with strategic flexibility.

By merging its subsidiaries in Germany, Italy, Luxembourg (which already includes the branches in Austria, Denmark and Sweden), the Netherlands and Spain into one legal entity, UBS has taken an important step to simplify its governance structure and increase operational efficiency across its European operations. This move allows UBS to more effectively invest in its European wealth management business and enhance the offerings and services it provides to clients in these important markets.

UBS Europe SE will be led by a management board whose members are: Birgit Dietl-Benzin, Chief Risk Officer, Fabio Innocenzi, Market Representative (Wealth Management), René Mottas, Market Representative (Wealth Management), Andreas Przewloka, Chief Operating Officer, Thomas Rodermann, Market Representative (Wealth Management), Stefan Winter, Market Representative (Investment Bank). Thomas Rodermann, who has headed UBS’s German business for the past two years, will assume the role of spokesman of the UBS Europe SE Management Board. The UBS Europe SE Supervisory Board will be chaired by Roland Koch, who has been Chairman of UBS Deutschland AG since 2011. The Market Representatives will lead the branches in their respective country.

Why is the Italian Referendum Important?

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

On December 4th, a constitutional referendum is to be held in Italy to vote on amending the Italian constitution. The referendum poses the question:

Do you approve the constitutional bill concerning the dispositions to overcome the perfect bicameralism, the reduction of the number of members of the Parliament, the restraint of the institutions’ operating costs, the abolition of CNEL and the revision of Titolo V of the 2nd part of the Constitution, which was approved by the Parliament and published on the Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 88, on April 15, 2016?

According to Columbia Threadneedle’s Philip Dicken and Andrea Carzana, over the longer term, reform in Italy is critical for increased economic growth and the ultimate well-being of the Italian people, but it is also important to the economy of Europe and the political stability of the EU.

Columbia Threadneedle believes investors should be very aware of the political risks as, in many parts of Europe they see dissatisfaction with globalisation, the rise of populism (and in some cases nationalism) and a frustration with incumbent politicians. Political risk is on the rise and investors need to get used to it they state. «Italy has many fine attributes but has struggled with low growth and political instability. Indeed, Renzi is the third Prime Minister in four years and his government is the 63rd in the past 70 years. If the referendum succeeds the hope is that Italy will have more stability in its political structure, opening the way to economic reforms which could allow the government to tackle several serious structural issues hindering economic growth.»

There are three areas of the economy which they believe need to be addressed:

  1. Labour and demographics – an ageing population with high unemployment amongst the young.
  2. Productivity – persistently low growth and productivity.
  3. Debt and leverage – high public sector debt and a poorly capitalised banking system, but a wealthy population.

They believe the consequences are:

YES VOTE

  • We believe that this will be received positively by markets, at least in the short term. Renzi would have a mandate for his reforms and would probably seek to amend the Italicum law to head off a possible Five Star win in the expected 2018 general election.
  • However, if Renzi is not able the change the Italicum law and Five Star continue to gain in popularity from their around 30% in the polls today, then there is an increased risk of a populist, anti-EU, anti-euro government in 2018.

NO VOTE

  • This would be negatively received in the short term, in our view, but the longer-term impact would be less clear.
  • Renzi could resign and a technocratic government be formed by the President, Sergio Mattarella. The new PM could again be Renzi who would continue to argue for reform, not least because the Italicum law would be neutered by the unreformed Senate retaining its power.
  • A technocratic government could be led by others or a general election could be called, both leading to periods of uncertainty.
  • Or, Renzi may not resign as threatened and simply continue as PM, albeit with reduced political capital.

 

Evaluación de los riesgos políticos en Europa

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Gauging Europe’s Political Risks
Wikimedia CommonsFoto: Niccolò Caranti. Evaluación de los riesgos políticos en Europa

Los acontecimientos políticos clave en Europa ahora están en la mira, dado que los inversionistas esperan otra posible reacción negativa a favor del populismo. En Francia, terminan las primarias del partido conservador para elegir al candidato de las elecciones presidenciales del próximo año y, en Italia, se llevará a cabo el referéndum constitucional el próximo 4 de diciembre.

Los desafíos políticos de Europa tienen como trasfondo problemas estructurales más profundos. Como muestra el gráfico, los inversionistas evitaron los bancos de la eurozona en comparación con otros bancos a nivel mundial. Antes del referéndum, aumentó la rentabilidad de los bonos italianos en comparación con la rentabilidad de los bonos alemanes. Sin embargo, el margen estrecho también destaca el esfuerzo del Banco Central Europeo (BCE) por apaciguar la crisis de la deuda de 2010/2012 y revivir el crecimiento.

El estancamiento alimenta al populismo

El referéndum de Italia, junto con las elecciones presidenciales en Austria y Francia, deberían demostrar si los partidos populistas van ejerciendo cada vez más influencia. Las encuestas electorales de este año han confundido a los inversionistas, pero observamos que hay poco riesgo de que surjan gobiernos populistas.

Las encuestas sugieren que es probable que los italianos voten no en el referéndum, respaldado por el primer ministro Matteo Renzi. Si Renzi renuncia posteriormente, el poder quedará en manos de un gobierno provisional, y es muy probable que éste se enfoque en la reforma de la ley electoral de Italia. Si el pueblo italiano vota a favor del sí, esto podría impulsar una breve recuperación de los bonos regionales y de las acciones de los bancos, según nuestro punto de vista. Consideramos que un voto negativo categórico retrasaría la implementación de soluciones para el dañado sistema bancario de Italia e incentivaría el auge de los partidos populistas. En Francia, las encuestas muestran que el candidato conservador es el favorito en cualquier contienda contra la populista de extrema derecha Marine Le Pen, en la vuelta final del próximo mes de mayo para definir la presidencia.

Aún cuando los populistas no ganen estas elecciones, el estancamiento económico y las frustraciones políticas que los impulsan todavía están vigentes. Los líderes de Europa enfrentan otros grandes desafíos: cómo manejar la salida del Reino Unido de la UE, la reacción antagónica al comercio exterior y la crisis migratoria.

Prevemos que los inversionistas mantendrán su opinión negativa sobre Europa en relación con la perspectiva positiva de reflación de Estados Unidos. Tenemos una posición neutra sobre los bonos de gobiernos europeos y favorecemos la deuda de grado inversión debido a las compras constantes del BCE. Optamos por la subinversión en las acciones europeas debido a las preocupaciones sobre la perspectiva de crecimiento.

Build on Insight, de BlackRock, por Richard Turnill

BlackRock: “Flexible Income Strategies Have Never Made more Sense than They Do in the Present Environment”

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

According to Rick Rieder, BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officer of Global Fixed Income, investing in flexible fixed income strategies has never made more sense than it does in the present environment. In a world in which developed market interest rates are extraordinarily low or even negative, and where monetary policy regimes diverge across the globe, Rieder believes that maintaining investment flexibility is vital to successfully navigating markets. In an interview with Funds Society, he talks about the lack of utility of the extraordinarily low interest rate levels for stimulating real economic growth, and the anticipation of a rate hike as the Fed to continue its path of slow interest rate normalization. Hereunder, his answers:

What does the most recent payroll growth slowdown mean for the timing of an interest rate hike?

Without question, payrolls growth in recent months has slowed from its extraordinary pace of recent years, but in our view, that has more to do with the economy’s approach toward full employment and the diminished ranks of qualified applicants searching for positions. Interestingly, this has also resulted in the improvement of wage levels, which are now running at an impressive 2.8% year-over-year, which is a clear representation of growing tightness in the labor markets. Overall, payrolls are fairly strong for this stage in the economic cycle, so with firming wages, and the modest increase in inflation that should follow, we think the Fed should be able to continue on its path of slow interest rate normalization.

Do you think a December rate hike is imminent and what would that mean for the broader economic outlook?

Understandably, the Fed held off from raising policy rates at its recent meeting, coming nearly a week before a highly contested general election in the U.S., but we do anticipate the Committee will make a quarter-point move in December. Still, we believe bond markets have largely priced in such a move, and the gradual rise in interest rates should have only a modest impact on the overall economic outlook. Indeed, as we have argued many times in the past, the utility of extraordinarily low interest rate levels has long since passed in stimulating real economic growth and for some time now has solely been influencing the financial economy as a price-supporting mechanism.

Does a flexible fixed income strategy still make sense in today’s environment?

In our view, flexible fixed income strategies have never made more sense than they do in the present environment. Indeed, we live in a world in which developed market interest rates are extraordinarily low (and in some cases, are negative), monetary policy regimes are continuing to diverge across the globe, a monetary-to-fiscal policy transition is potentially in the cards, and the inflation outlook is evolving globally. And that is to say nothing of the political and event risks that abound in the world today, or the fact that the sources of global growth are rapidly shifting by region. In this environment, we believe that maintaining investment flexibility is vital to successfully navigating markets, and within that framework, the critical importance of “globalizing” ones’ view of fixed income cannot be overstated.

What elements differentiate the BGF Fixed Income Global Opportunities Fund’s strategy from its peers?

For this strategy, we focus on generating consistent, attractive risk-adjusted returns through various market cycles while maintaining the risk profile of traditional fixed income investments. To do this, we invest in a diversified portfolio of beta and alpha sources, and aims to lower absolute risk while achieving attractive risk-adjusted returns. The fund employs BlackRock’s best ideas to identify attractive opportunities across global fixed income markets and is supported by the firm’s vast risk management platform and resources.