Francisco Badiola Joins Pinvest as CIO

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

LinkedIn Francisco Badiola, Pinvest, Pichincha
Photo courtesy

Two new professionals have joined Pinvest, the investment advisory arm of Ecuadorian financial group Pichincha in Miami. Francisco Badiola and Diana Zumaran were added to the firm’s roster this week, according to sources familiar with the matter who spoke with Funds Society.

Badiola comes from Citi, where he spent nearly eight years, according to his LinkedIn profile. During his time at Citi, he held several positions, including Investment Counselor—his last role before moving to Pinvest—and VP Investment Associate at Citi Private Bank.

Previously, he worked at Mercantil Bank as a Wealth Management Operations Specialist and at Ocean Bank, where he rose to the position of Treasury Specialist. In total, he has a decade of experience in the financial industry.

Also coming from Citi, where she worked as an AML Compliance Analyst, Zumaran has joined the Miami-based firm as operations & compliance officer. She spent nearly four years at the investment bank, following her role as a personal banker at Wells Fargo. Before that, she worked in various non-financial industries.

Both professionals will report directly to Esteban Zorrilla, CEO of Pinvest. Zorrilla leads the Miami-based firm and also serves as head of private banking at Pichincha Corp.

Pinvest is a SEC-registered investment advisory firm. Its parent company, Grupo Financiero Pichincha, operates in the United States, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, and Spain.

To Seek Financial Advice, Women Rely on Recommendations From Other Women

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Financial advice women rely on recommendations
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

72% of female clients of U.S. financial advisors specifically sought recommendations from other women, and 64% of advisors understand that their ability to provide personalized and tailored financial advice is one of the main reasons clients choose to work with them.

These findings come from a new survey of 405 financial advisors from the financial services firm Edward Jones, conducted in collaboration with Morning Consult between August 22 and September 6, 2024.

“Considering that two-thirds of American women see themselves as the Chief Financial Officers of their families, it’s clear that women are taking an increasingly important role in their financial future, and there is a growing opportunity for financial advisors to serve them,” the report states.

According to the Edward Jones study, when looking for a financial advisor, women turn to their networks. To establish a genuine connection with clients, financial advisors report that they focus primarily on being transparent and honest about outcomes, fees, and services (72%), actively listening to their needs and concerns (68%), and regularly following up to track progress and involve them in every step of the decision-making process (66%).

“Authenticity and transparency are essential for building meaningful client relationships. All investors value a financial advisor who takes the time to understand their unique financial needs,” said Jasmine Butler, a financial advisor at Edward Jones.

When it comes to converting women investors into clients, financial advisors highlight three key factors: providing clear communication and education (65%), being empathetic toward their financial situations (64%), and maintaining regular and transparent communication (63%).

According to the surveyed financial advisors, more than three-quarters of female clients prioritize long-term investing over short-term investing (77%). Their top financial goals include contributing to their retirement plan (63%), working toward financial independence (61%), and building personal retirement savings (56%).

Mexican Financial Analysts Were Wrong: Tariffs Take Effect

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Mexican analysts tariffs
Wikimedia Commons

Mexican financial analysts lost their bet. Virtually all of them believed that tariffs would not be imposed. They expected a last-minute announcement from the White House that never came. The most “pessimistic” among them thought that, at worst, there would be selective tariffs lasting only a few weeks. The reality is that today, we have entered uncharted territory.

As of 11:01 PM (Central Mexico Time) and midnight in Washington, D.C., on March 4, 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian exports to the United States took effect.

The measure became imminent hours earlier when the White House announced that President Donald Trump would invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) starting at 12:01 AM Tuesday to address what it called an extraordinary threat to U.S. national security, thereby imposing tariffs on its neighbors and trade partners.

Earlier that same Monday afternoon, Trump told reporters that there was “no room” to avoid tariffs on Mexico and Canada, which he had initially imposed on February 3 before pausing them for a month following phone calls with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Mexican markets have absorbed past periods of volatility linked to the possibility of tariffs, largely ignoring worst-case scenarios that warned of a recession if tariffs lasted beyond a quarter.

That skepticism persisted until the last moment, though expectations are now beginning to shift in line with Mexico’s currency performance. The peso has depreciated in a relatively orderly manner. On Monday, it started at 20.40 per dollar in the interbank market and ended the session at 20.65, a 1.22% drop. However, by midnight in Mexico City, as the tariffs took effect, the peso had fallen further to 20.76 per dollar, marking a 1.76% decline since the start of Monday’s trading.

“The economic impact of the tariffs will depend on their duration. If the 25% general tariffs on Mexican exports to the U.S. remain in place, Mexico’s GDP could contract by 4% in 2025, which would align with a severe recession,” said Gabriela Siller Pagaza, director of analysis at Banco Base.

Yet, Siller had previously dismissed the likelihood of broad tariffs on Mexico: “I don’t think the general tariffs will take effect. At the last minute, Trump will announce a delay. In the highly unlikely event that they do take effect, they won’t last long.”

This sentiment was nearly universal in the Mexican financial sector. A few weeks ago, at a Franklin Templeton conference, Luis Gonzali, co-chief investment officer, suggested that in an extreme scenario, the U.S. might impose selective tariffs on Mexico. However, he warned that if broad tariffs were enacted and lasted several months, the entire macroeconomic outlook for Mexico would need to be revised.

It wasn’t just financial experts who dismissed the possibility of tariffs. Jorge Gordillo Arias, from CI Banco, argued that the economic damage to both nations would be too great for the tariffs to be enforced.

Even a seasoned expert in Mexico-U.S. trade negotiations misjudged the situation. Ildefonso Guajardo, former Mexican Secretary of Economy under President Enrique Peña Nieto and lead negotiator for the USMCA, confidently stated in a television interview over the weekend that there would be no general tariffs on Mexico this Tuesday. Instead, he predicted “specific tariffs” on steel, aluminum, and vehicles outside of existing trade agreements. He, too, was wrong.

Similarly, in a weekend report for investors, BBVA México acknowledged that tariffs could negatively impact Mexico’s economy but deemed the probability of long-term enforcement low.

The reality is that broad 25% tariffs on Mexican and Canadian exports are now in effect. The expectations of Mexican financial analysts did not match reality. Now, the hope is that tariffs won’t last long, but confidence in that assumption is shaken. The biggest concern is that as weeks pass, they may have to revise Mexico’s growth outlook downward, which was already weak at an average of 0.8% for 2025, lower than the 1.3% recorded last year. In the worst-case scenario, Mexico could enter a recession in 2025.

The Peso Falls on the First Day of Tariffs

The Mexican peso immediately reflected heightened trade tensions between Mexico and the U.S.. The currency also reacted negatively to the announcement that President Sheinbaum would wait until Sunday to outline her administration’s response at a public rally in Mexico City’s Zócalo, the country’s main public square.

“The imposition of tariffs has put significant pressure on the Mexican peso, pushing it above 20.9 per dollar, a substantial depreciation in early 2025. This increase of up to 1.5% at the highest point of the trading session reflects the uncertainty surrounding Mexico’s economic and trade outlook—especially considering that more than 80% of Mexico’s exports go to the U.S. A deterioration in the trade relationship between the two countries could have profound consequences for Mexico’s economic development and financial stability,” said Quasar Elizundia, market research strategist at Pepperstone.

Mexico’s Response to Come Sunday

Canada responded immediately, imposing tariffs on U.S. goods worth $107 billion. Meanwhile, President Claudia Sheinbaum has scheduled a public rally on Sunday, March 9, to announce Mexico’s official response. However, she has already hinted that her government will take both tariff and non-tariff measures.

Analysts expect that volatility and uncertainty will persist in the coming days.

There are also rumors of a possible phone call between Sheinbaum and Trump on Thursday to discuss the issue directly, though nothing has been confirmed.

“With the measures imposed on Mexico and Canada, in practice, there is no free trade agreement between the three countries. This creates uncertainty about the future of Mexico’s trade relationship with its northern neighbors if tariffs remain in place for an extended period,” stated Banco Base in a report to investors on Tuesday.

Equities Outperformed Bonds, Treasury Bills, and Inflation in All Countries Over the Last 125 Years

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Equities outperform bonds
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Financial markets and the industrial landscape have changed enormously since 1900, and these changes can be observed in the evolution of the composition of publicly traded companies in global markets. As depicted by UBS Global Investment in its report Global Investment Returns Yearbook, at the beginning of the 20th century, markets were dominated by railroads, which accounted for 63% of the stock market value in the U.S. and nearly 50% in the U.K.

In fact, nearly 80% of the total value of U.S. publicly traded companies in 1900 came from sectors that are now small or have even disappeared. This percentage stands at 65% in the case of the U.K. Additionally, a large proportion of companies currently listed on the stock market come from sectors that were either small or nonexistent in 1900, now representing 63% of market value in the U.S. and 44% in the U.K. “Some of the largest industries in 2025, such as energy (excluding coal), technology, and healthcare (including pharmaceuticals and biotechnology), were practically absent in 1900. Likewise, the telecommunications and media sectors, at least as we know them today, are also relatively new industries,” the report notes in its conclusions.

Among the key findings of this report, which analyzes historical data from the past 125 years, one standout conclusion is that long-term equity returns have been remarkable. According to the document, equities have outperformed bonds, Treasury bills, and inflation in all countries. An initial investment of 1 dollar in U.S. stocks in 1900 had grown to 107,409 dollars in nominal terms by the end of 2024.

Concentration, Synchronization, and Inflation: Three Clear Warnings

Throughout this historical evolution, the report’s authors have identified concentration as a growing concern. “Although the global equity market was relatively balanced in 1900, the United States now accounts for 64% of global market capitalization, largely due to the superior performance of major technology stocks. The concentration of the U.S. market is at its highest level in the past 92 years,” they warn.

In contrast, diversification has clearly helped manage this concentration and, more importantly, volatility. According to the report’s conclusions, while globalization has increased the degree of market synchronization, the potential benefits of international diversification in reducing risks remain significant. For investors in developed markets, emerging markets continue to offer better diversification prospects than other developed markets.

Finally, the conclusions emphasize that inflation is a key factor to consider in long-term returns. In this regard, the authors’ analysis shows that asset returns have been lower during periods of rising interest rates and higher during cycles of monetary easing. “Similarly, real returns have also been lower during periods of high inflation and higher during periods of low inflation. Gold and commodities stand out among the few effective hedges against inflation. Since 1972, gold price fluctuations have shown a positive correlation of 0.34 with inflation,” the report states.

Key Insights from the Report’s Authors

Following the release of this report, Dan Dowd, Head of Global Research at UBS Investment Bank, commented: “I am pleased to once again collaborate with professors Dimson, Marsh, and Staunton, as well as our colleagues from Global Wealth Management, in presenting the 2025 edition of the Global Investment Returns Yearbook. The 2025 edition marks an important milestone. With 125 years of data, it provides our clients across the firm with a valuable framework for addressing contemporary challenges through the lens of financial history.”

Meanwhile, Mark Haefele, Chief Investment Officer of UBS Global Wealth Management, highlights that the Global Investment Returns Yearbook can help us understand the long-term impacts of following principles such as diversification, asset allocation, and the relationship between return and risk. “Once again, it teaches us that having a long-term perspective is crucial and that we should not underestimate the value of a disciplined investment approach,” Haefele states.

Finally, Professor Paul Marsh of the London Business School notes that “equity returns in the 21st century have been lower than in the 20th century, while fixed income returns have been higher. However, equities continue to outperform inflation, fixed income, and cash. The global stock market has delivered an annualized real return of 3.5% and a 4.3% premium over cash. The ‘law’ of risk and return remains valid in the 21st century.”

FlexFunds Strengthens Its Securitization Program With the Addition of Morningstar

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Flexfunds Morningstar securitization
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In an environment where accurate and accessible information is key to decision-making, FlexFunds continues to strengthen its service offerings for asset managers through platforms recognized at the institutional level. Now, Morningstar joins a group of top-tier providers, further enhancing the visibility and reach of investment vehicles (ETPs) under FlexFunds’ securitization program, the firm announced in a statement.

Starting in March 2025, qualitative and quantitative data on ETPs will be available on Morningstar Direct, an essential tool for institutional investors, as well as on Morningstar’s public website. This integration increases the exposure of investment vehicles, strengthens transparency, and provides access to advanced analytics on one of the most trusted platforms in the industry.

The combination of pricing providers offered by the FlexFunds program, including Morningstar, Bloomberg, LSEG Refinitiv, and SIX Financial, provides a comprehensive market view and helps asset managers build a public track record, enabling informed and strategic decision-making.

DWS Launches Its First Euro-Denominated High-Yield Bond ETF With a Specific Maturity

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

DWS high-yield bond ETF
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

DWS has expanded its Xtrackers product range, enabling investment in a broadly diversified selection of bonds with similar maturities, by adjusting the investment objectives and names of two existing fixed-income ETFs. The new Xtrackers II Rolling Target Maturity Sept 2027 EUR High Yield UCITS ETF invests for the first time in high-yield corporate bonds with a specific maturity.

According to the asset manager, since the bonds remain in the ETF portfolio until maturity, price fluctuations are reduced for investors who stay invested until September 2027. To achieve this, the ETF now tracks the iBoxx EUR Liquid High Yield 2027 3-Year Rolling Index. This index includes around 80 liquid high-yield corporate bonds denominated in euros, with credit ratings below Investment Grade, according to major rating agencies. As a result, investors bear a higher credit and default risk compared to investing in Investment Grade bonds. In return, according to the firm, “there is an opportunity to achieve a significantly higher aggregate yield at maturity, estimated at around 5.3% as of February 17, 2025, for the ETF’s portfolio.”

They also state that all bonds in the index have an initial maturity date between October 1, 2026, and September 30, 2027. Additionally, to provide greater flexibility, the ETF’s target maturity will be “extended” in the future. This means that the ETF will not be liquidated at the end of its term in September 2027, and the fund’s assets will be paid out to shareholders. Instead, the assets will be reinvested in bonds with a maturity of approximately three years.

“By expanding our current range of target maturity ETFs with an innovative product in the high-yield bond segment, we aim to offer investors the opportunity to generate attractive mid-term returns in the current environment of declining interest rates,” says Simon Klein, Global Head of Sales for Xtrackers at DWS.

The asset manager also highlights that they offer the Xtrackers II Target Maturity Sept 2029 Italy and Spain Government Bond UCITS ETF. In this case, the underlying index has also been modified for this ETF. “It now provides access to Italian and Spanish government bonds maturing between October 2028 and September 2029. Like all Xtrackers target maturity ETFs, these new products combine the advantages of fixed-income securities—predictable redemption at maturity—with the benefits of ETFs, such as broad diversification, liquidity, and ease of trading,” they state.

Trump’s Order on English as the Official Language: What Does It Mean for Hispanic Marketing?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Trump English official language
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

President Donald Trump signed an executive order this week declaring English as the official language of the United States. While English has always been the dominant language, the country had never had an official language at the federal level—until now. This decision, aimed at promoting national unity while saving federal funds, could have far-reaching effects, especially in Hispanic marketing, digital content production, and Spanish-language SEO.

With the potential reduction or elimination of Spanish-language content on government websites, businesses that serve Spanish-speaking consumers must prepare for a shift in the digital landscape.

The Hispanic marketing agency Hispanic Market Advisors analyzes the impact of this measure and the opportunities it creates for brands looking to connect with the Latino community.

Will the Government Remove Spanish-Language Content?

Currently, government agencies such as the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provide resources in Spanish. However, with the officialization of English as the primary language, the government may stop translating and maintaining Spanish-language versions of its websites. This would make it harder for millions of Spanish speakers to access critical information about taxes, immigration, social benefits, and other essential services.

An Opportunity for Businesses

If Spanish-language government websites disappear from search results, businesses and nonprofit organizations have the opportunity to fill that gap. The absence of government pages in Spanish search engine results pages (SERPs) will allow businesses that invest in Spanish SEO and content marketing to gain greater visibility.

“Companies that offer legal, financial, and healthcare services can now position themselves as key sources of information in Spanish,” said Sebastian Aroca, MIB, president of Hispanic Market Advisors.

Key Strategies to Reach the Hispanic Audience

To attract and retain Spanish-speaking audiences in this new digital landscape, Hispanic Market Advisors recommends:

  • Investing in Spanish SEO – Businesses should optimize their content with relevant keywords such as immigration lawyer, health insurance for Hispanics, and how to file taxes in the U.S. to attract high-quality traffic.
  • Creating Spanish-language content – Publishing blogs, guides, and videos in Spanish will help brands establish themselves as industry leaders.
  • Having a bilingual website – Ensuring that a website is available in both English and Spanish enhances the user experience for Spanish speakers and increases customer conversions.
  • Leveraging Spanish-language social media – Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok have a large Latino community. Companies can boost engagement with Spanish-language posts, ads, and videos.
  • Using paid advertising for Spanish speakers – With fewer free government resources in Spanish, Hispanic consumers will turn to commercial services. Businesses that invest in Google Ads and Facebook Ads in Spanish can effectively capture this audience.

A New Era for Hispanic Marketing

Trump’s executive order could present challenges for the Hispanic community, but it also opens new opportunities for businesses that know how to adapt.

Mexican Fund Assets Reach a New All-Time High in January

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Wikimedia Commons

Investment fund assets in Mexico started the year on the right foot, reaching a new historic figure along with double-digit annual growth.

According to data from the Mexican Association of Securities Intermediaries (AMIB), as of the end of January, the total net assets of investment funds in Mexico reached a value of 4.335 trillion pesos (210.372 billion dollars), based on an average exchange rate of 20.60 pesos per dollar. This represents a 1.87% increase compared to the end of December last year and an annual growth of 24.43%, meaning compared to January 2024.

The financial assets of investment funds now rank third among the largest in the Mexican financial system, equivalent to 12.62% of the country’s GDP. They are only behind the assets managed by Afores, which account for nearly 21%, and banks, whose total assets represent 48% of the country’s GDP.

Promotional efforts within Mexico’s investment fund industry by authorized asset managers, along with the strengthening of a retirement savings system, continue to yield results in the Mexican market and are a key factor explaining this market growth.

Exponential Increase in Clients

Perhaps the most striking result is the number of clients in the system, which has skyrocketed exponentially over the past year.

According to AMIB figures, by the end of January, a total of 12.13 million clients were reported, reflecting a monthly increase of 4.35% and an annual growth of 78.92%. Since recordkeeping began, there had never been such a significant increase in the number of clients within a 12-month period.

This exponential growth is also evident over the past decade, as demand for investment funds has surged. Comparing the number of clients registered at the end of 2019, there are now 4.81 times more than in that year. Some analysts consider the pandemic to be the turning point that sparked this exponential rise in clients in the Mexican funds market, reinforcing the idea that crises also create opportunities.

The Leadership of GBM and BBVA

Out of the total 12.13 million clients in Mexico’s investment fund market, GBM stands out as a key player, with 5.55 million clients. This means the firm accounts for 45.34% of all investment fund accounts in the country.

However, despite GBM‘s dominance in the number of clients investing in funds, the largest fund manager in terms of assets is not GBM, but rather the Mexican subsidiary of the Spanish bank BBVA.

According to official figures, BBVA México manages assets totaling 1.054 trillion pesos, equivalent to 51.165 billion dollars. These amounts, both in pesos and dollars, represent 24.32% of the total assets in the system—nearly a quarter of the market.

The Challenge of Diversification

Despite the rapid increase in demand, fund diversification remains a major challenge for financial intermediaries in the coming months and years. This is because Mexican funds remain highly concentrated in the debt segment.

AMIB figures show that of the 636 investment funds in Mexico, 255 (40%) are debt instrument funds. While they do not constitute the majority in terms of number, they hold a dominant 74.14% of the total net asset volume. The security of these investments—reflecting a highly conservative investor profile—is a key factor in the dominance of debt funds in the Mexican market.

Global X Bets on Growth Themes Linked to U.S. Competitiveness

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

U.S. competitiveness themes
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

The 21st century is nearing its first quarter, and Global X has already drawn key lessons from this period: the U.S. economy and markets tend to be resilient.

The firm highlights several examples—the dot-com bubble, the global financial crisis, and COVID-19—all of which occurred since the turn of the century, yet the S&P 500 has quadrupled in value. “We keep this lesson in mind as we enter 2025 with a mix of optimism and uncertainty,” says Global X, noting that investor confidence and consumer expectations are improving, even as questions persist about economic policy and GDP growth is expected to slow.

Just like last year, Global X believes economic growth may once again surprise to the upside, supporting further market gains. However, the key drivers of growth this time will likely be different. “Some market participants argue that broad equity valuations look stretched, but in our view, fund flows suggest that investors remain willing to embrace risk assets,” they state. They add that broader market participation, improving profit margins, and continued earnings growth “could further lift equity valuations.” Conversely, they see fixed income as potentially “stuck in limbo due to interest rate volatility, which may force investors to be more creative and seek differentiated strategies.”

The strength of the services sector and corporate investment from large tech firms helped drive stronger-than-expected economic growth in 2024. However, Global X warns that economic uncertainty is likely to remain high, given the trade-offs and net effects of lower taxes, higher tariffs, reduced immigration, increased stimulus, and lighter regulation. That said, a manufacturing sector recovery, combined with renewed investment in small and mid-cap companies, could extend the mid-cycle expansion, leading to broader market participation and higher valuation multiples.

As a result, Global X will focus in 2025 on growth themes tied to U.S. competitiveness that still appear reasonably priced.

Building Portfolio Resilience in 2025

Equities and risk assets may be poised for another strong year, according to Global X. However, “the unique set of economic and political circumstances will likely warrant a more targeted approach in 2025.” A portfolio strategy aligned with key themes related to U.S. competitiveness “can provide reasonable upside and a degree of insulation from potential volatility.” The firm’s top investment themes include:

1. Infrastructure Development

A core part of the U.S. competitiveness narrative is the ongoing infrastructure renaissance. Construction, equipment, and materials companies have benefited from infrastructure-related policies and are positioned to gain from approximately $700 billion in additional spending over the coming years. Despite strong performance in recent years, these companies still trade at valuation multiples below the S&P 500. Moreover, traditionally rigid industries are adopting new technologies and practices, which could help expand profit margins.

2. Defense and Global Security

A series of interconnected global conflicts is creating new challenges for the U.S. and its allies. These evolving threats are expected to be persistent and unconventional, driving demand for new tactics, techniques, and technologies. Global defense spending, which reached $2.24 trillion in 2022, is projected to grow 5% in 2025, while defense company revenues are expected to rise nearly 10%, with profit margins improving from 5.2% to 7.6%. Compared to traditional defense platforms—such as battleships and fighter jets—lower-cost solutions like AI-driven defense systems and drones are expected to boost profitability, alongside greater automation in production processes.

3. Energy Independence and Nuclear Power

Even before AI-driven growth, energy demand was expected to rise sharply—and those forecasts have only increased. Fossil fuels will remain an essential part of the energy mix, but cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives will be critical to meeting surging demand. The tech sector has turned its attention to nuclear power, with many major companies announcing plans to utilize existing facilities or build small modular reactors (SMRs). Beyond the U.S., Japan, Germany, and Australia are expected to expand nuclear capacity, driving strong demand for uranium.

Selective Income Strategies for 2025

Income-focused investors may need to adopt a more selective approach in 2025, according to Global X, “given political uncertainty and potential interest rate volatility.” Many fixed-income instruments may underperform in a volatile rate environment, particularly long-duration assets. To minimize interest rate risk, Global X suggests equity-based strategies that could provide income with less sensitivity to rate fluctuations:

1. Covered Options Strategies

Equity-based covered options strategies can generate stable income while limiting direct exposure to interest rate movements. While the underlying asset may still fluctuate with the overall market (and indirectly with rate volatility), these strategies are not directly impacted by interest rate risk like traditional fixed income. Additionally, when rate volatility increases equity market volatility, option premiums tend to rise, maximizing income potential.

2. Energy Infrastructure Investments

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)—which own energy infrastructure assets such as pipelines—can generate steady income without direct exposure to interest rate movements. These assets typically pay consistent dividends and have long-term supply contracts that stabilize cash flows. While their values can fluctuate with oil prices, their correlation to commodities is generally modest, as they do not extract or own the raw materials—they simply transport them. Additionally, real assets like commodities and energy infrastructure are often viewed as inflation hedges.

3. Preferred Stocks

Preferred stocks sit above common equity but below fixed income in the capital structure. They trade at par value and pay fixed or floating dividends. While investors are not guaranteed payments, preferred shareholders receive dividends before common stockholders. Since they are issued at par with a predetermined payout structure, they can be sensitive to interest rates. However, because they carry more risk than bonds, they tend to offer higher yields.

Most preferred shares are issued by banks, which generate steady cash flows from net interest income. With potential financial sector deregulation and increased small-business lending, preferred stocks could become an attractive income option in 2025.

Shedding Light on the Sticky, Rigid, and Persistent Inflation

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Persistent inflation in focus

The latest report on the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) showed that core inflation rose 0.4% month-over-month, surpassing consensus expectations. This pushed annual inflation to 3% in January 2025, up from 2.9% in December 2024. Additionally, the report detailed price spikes in categories that typically increase at the start of the year, including auto insurance, internet/TV subscriptions, and prescription drugs.

According to analysts at Banca March, the data presented a mixed picture: “The increase was mainly due to energy prices contributing to inflation (+0.06%) for the first time since last July, as well as a weaker downward drag from goods prices, which fell -0.13% year-over-year in January, marking their smallest decline since December 2023.”

They note that this shift in goods prices was driven largely by two components—used cars and prescription drugs—which together contributed +0.3% to January’s inflation, whereas in December, they had subtracted three-tenths from the CPI.

On a more positive note, service prices continued their gradual moderation trend, though not enough to prevent the inflation uptick. Service inflation rose at a 4.3% annual rate—one-tenth lower than in December—marking the slowest increase in service prices since January 2022. “Notably, the largest component, imputed rents, moderated to +4.4% year-over-year, down from +6% a year ago, supporting the gradual ‘normalization’ of inflation. However, upward pressure came from transportation services such as insurance and vehicle maintenance,” explain Banca March experts.

What Does This Mean?

According to Tiffany Wilding, U.S. economist at PIMCO, these figures do not change the broader narrative that the U.S. economy remained strong at the turn of the year while inflation progress stalled. “If anything, this reinforces the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) stance of keeping rates steady for some time. We believe inflation is likely to remain uncomfortably high through 2025 (with core CPI at 3%), despite growing risks of a more pronounced slowdown in the labor market and real GDP growth, stemming from Trump’s recent immigration policy announcements and broader political uncertainty,” explains Wilding.

She adds that Trump’s policies put the Fed in a difficult position: “Sticky inflation raises questions about whether the Fed will ultimately deliver the two 25-basis-point rate cuts implied in its December Summary of Economic Projections (SEP). At the same time, a more significant slowdown in real GDP growth and labor markets—both of which have been buoyed by strong immigration trends—could increase downside risks to the economy,” she says.

Uncertainty for Central Banks

Experts agree that this situation puts the spotlight on the Fed and other monetary institutions. “Central banks are no longer a source of stability, as they are caught between the need to control inflation and the desire to avoid an economic slowdown that may be necessary to bring inflation sustainably back in line with targets. This dilemma could worsen if the U.S. tariff threat materializes, as governments may have no choice but to loosen fiscal policies. Monetary policy decisions could take investors by surprise, as central banks may take very different paths,” note Marco Giordano, Chief Investment Officer at Wellington Management, and Martin Harvey, fixed income portfolio manager at Wellington Management.

Trump and Inflation

Benjamin Melman, Global CIO at Edmond de Rothschild AM, warns that global inflation no longer seems to be retreating, especially in the U.S. services sector, while rising oil, gas, commodity, and agricultural prices have added further inflationary pressures in recent months. In this context, he argues that Trump’s administration has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty regarding future inflation trends with its tariff and deportation policies.

“While it may be tempting to downplay these concerns by suggesting that tariffs are merely a negotiation tool to extract concessions from affected countries, and that large-scale deportations are technically difficult to implement, it would be a mistake to draw conclusions just one week into Trump’s second term,” Melman points out.

However, he clarifies that even if Trump does not fully implement these inflationary measures, or does so on a limited scale, the unleashing of so-called ‘animal spirits’ in the U.S.—driven by expectations of deregulation and tax cuts—cannot be ruled out. “This is likely to stimulate the economy and inflation through more traditional channels, particularly given that the output gap is already positive,” he concludes.