Véronique Weill to Leave the AXA Group

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

After 10 years at AXA, Véronique Weill, CEO of AXA Global Asset Management, Group Chief Customer Officer and a Member of the Management Committee of the AXA Group, has decided to leave the Group.

Thomas Burberl, CEO of AXA Group said «I would like to very warmly thank Véronique for her many contributions to the Group since she joined in 2006, including her energy and leadership to strengthen AXA’s position as a leading global brand. I am personally grateful to have benefitted from her support during the leadership transition through 2016 and, with the other members of the Management Committee, I wish her the best in her future professional endeavors.»

Weill commented «It is now time for me to focus on new professional challenges. I know I will be inspired by 10 fantastic years with AXA, and I feel proud of what we have built together with my teams. I wish them all the best.»

Véronique Weill joined AXA in 2006, as Chief Executive Officer of AXA Business Services and Group Executive Vice President of Operational Excellence. In 2009, she became Group Chief Operating Officer, in charge of Group Marketing, Distribution, Data Innovation Lab, IT, Operational Excellence and Procurement. In 2013, she joined the Management Committee of the AXA Group. As of July 2016, she was appointed Group Chief Customer Officer, in charge of Customer, Brand and Digital and CEO of AXA Global Asset Management.

Véronique Weill executive responsibilities are reassigned to other members of the Management Committee, including Customer, Marketing and Digital teams, who will report directly to Thomas Buberl, and AXA Global Asset Management, which will now report to Paul Evans, CEO of AXA Global Life & Savings and Health.

Hasenstab Anticipates Continued Strengthening of the US Dollar against the Euro and Japanese Yen

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Throughout much of 2016, bond markets held onto stretched valuations in US Treasuries, largely ignoring the undercurrents of rising inflation and resilient strength in the US labor market. During the first half of the year, there were even a number of market participants arguing that inflation had become structurally lower and that deflationary risks were of great concern.

The research conducted by the Templeton Global Macro team indicated just the opposite, and they warned investors of what they believed were exceptional vulnerabilities in US Treasury valuations and asymmetric risks in longer duration exposures.

Markets began to incrementally trend toward that viewpoint in October as the 10-year US Treasury note’s yield modestly rose. By November, a sharp correction in US Treasury valuations was fully underway, manifesting very quickly after the results of the US election as markets appeared to rapidly move toward their long-held view that inflation pressures were rising. Once those corrections to yields began, they were quite severe in a very short period of time, demonstrating just how extreme those valuations had become. Rising yields in the US were accompanied by depreciations of the Japanese yen and the euro.

As Michael Hasenstab, Ph.D., Executive Vice President, Portfolio Manager and Chief Investment Officer at Templeton Global Macro, looks toward 2017, he expects many of the underlying conditions in developed economies that were rapidly driven back into market pricing in late 2016 to only deepen and extend.

Hasenstab anticipates increasing inflation in the US as wage pressures rise and the economy continues to expand, while the euro-area and Japan diverge markedly from the US path.

These global trends are likely to continue to pressure bond markets in the developed world but also to generate significant opportunities in specific local-currency emerging markets (EMs) where yields have been high and currencies already appeared extremely undervalued, even as their economic fundamentals have remained resilient. The Templeton Global Macro teamis optimistic on the valuations in specific EMs in Latin America and Asia ex Japan, but remain wary of duration risks across the developed world.

Expect Rising US Inflation Pressures in 2017

Their case for rising inflation in the US is primarily centered on rising wage pressures across a US labor force that has been at full employment for much of 2016 and continues to strengthen, accompanied by overly loose monetary policy and fiscal policy set to expand. Core CPI (Consumer Price Index) inflation has persisted above 2.0% throughout 2016 and shows signs of continuing to trend higher. Ultimately, they expect headline inflation to rise above 3.0% in early 2017 as the base effects from last year’s decline in oil prices fall out of the figures. Additionally, they expect an escalation in government spending from the incoming US administration, notably in the form of increased infrastructure development, which would add to existing inflation pressures, along with giving a boost to growth and likely increasing the level of US Treasury issuance. In the event that the incoming administration imposes trade restrictions and tariffs, this would also drive up the costs of goods in the US. Taken together, they expect inflation to exceed the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) target by early 2017 and believe the Fed needs to continue to hike rates. They also see scenarios in which the market should continue to drive yields higher regardless of the Fed’s timeline.

Weakness in the Euro and Japanese Yen Is Likely to Continue

As rates trend higher in the US, they expect continued strengthening of the US dollar against a number of vulnerable currencies, most notably the euro and Japanese yen. Markets began to see a refortifying of the euro’s and yen’s depreciating trends in October as US Treasury yields rose while the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) continued to run exceptionally accommodative monetary policies. Those depreciations only deepened after the US election results in November as the 10-year US Treasury note’s yield surged above 2.20%. They continue to see strong cases for ongoing monetary accommodation in the eurozone and Japan as both regions need currency weakness to support their export sectors and drive growth, and each relies far more on the weakness in their currencies than the US does. Both regions also need inflation, particularly Japan.

The growing rate divergences between the low to negative yields in the eurozone and Japan, and rising Treasury yields in the US, should benefit the objectives of the ECB and BOJ, in their view, motivating the central banks to take more assertive measures now that they can be more effectively deployed against firmer rate increases in the US. The euro also faces increased pressures from rising political risks with the recent rise of populist movements in the European Union (EU). Upcoming elections in France and Germany in 2017 will be important indications of just how strong or vulnerable the political will is to uphold the EU and eurozone project. On the whole, Europe’s need for continued policy accommodation and currency weakness is more immediate to the upcoming year, while Japan’s need is more ongoing and long term. Nonetheless, they expect weakness in both currencies in the upcoming year.

Select Emerging Markets Remain Resilient and Undervalued

Across EMs, they continue to see significant variations between vulnerable economies and a number of much stronger ones. Markets reacted negatively toward a broad group of EMs in the wake of the US election in November, on fears that protectionist US policies could damage global trade. However, the Templeton Global Macro team has seen a shift in the incoming administration’s earlier warnings of enormous tariffs to more of a balance of free and fair trade. There are several scenarios in which the actual impacts to specific EM economies from trade policy adjustments could be minimal to negligible, in their assessment.

Additionally, a number of EMs have already weathered severe shocks over the last year and appear far more resilient to potential increases in trade costs at the margin than markets have indicated. In fact, several EMs have significantly improved their resiliencies over the last decade by increasing their external reserve cushions, bringing their current accounts into surplus or close to balance, improving their fiscal accounts, and reducing US-dollar liabilities. During periods of short-term uncertainty, markets tend to overplay the potential US policy factors and under-recognize the more important domestic factors within the countries. They expect those valuations to ultimately revert back toward their underlying fundamentals over the longer term as markets more accurately assess their actual value.

They have positive outlooks for several local-currency exposures in specific EMs that they view as undervalued, notably Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Indonesia and Malaysia, among others. Specifically regarding Mexico, any free trade restrictions would not end trade between the US and Mexico, they would just raise the costs. Many of the largest US corporations have extensive investments in Mexico and have integrated Mexican production into their supply chains. This considerably complicates the ability of any administration to significantly reduce trade between the two countries, even with an imposition of tariffs. Negative effects on the Mexican peso from potential trade restrictions have been excessively priced in by markets, in their view, and do not reflect fair value even when factoring in a reversion to WTO (World Trade Organization) trade standards. They expect a recovery in the peso as the country’s central bank continues to use policy to strengthen the currency and markets adjust to the underlying fair value.

Indonesia is also a strong example of the resiliency in specific EMs. They saw commodity prices collapse, trade volumes decline and China’s growth moderate, yet Indonesia has still been growing at 5%, with a balanced current account when including foreign direct investment. Additionally, they have seen massive depreciations in EM currencies in 2016, yet there have been no solvency issues in countries like Indonesia or Malaysia. Twenty years ago, it may have been more difficult for many of these countries to weather a protectionist trade shock, a commodity price shock and an exchange rate shock all at the same time. Yet today these countries are in much stronger positions to handle these types of macro shifts and changes to global trade policies. Should the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) not be concluded, it would not be catastrophic to countries like Indonesia—certainly the region would be stronger with that type of trade agreement, in their assessment, but Indonesia was strong without the TPP and is not dependent on an enhanced trade agreement to continue doing well. Markets have tended to follow the headline impact of trade policy rhetoric, in their opinion, yet the underlying fundamentals tell a much stronger story.

Overall, as they turn the calendar to 2017, the risks of rising populism in Europe and the US and the potential impacts to global trade from protectionist policies bear watching. Despite an increase in developed-market political risks, there are a number of compelling opportunities across specific EMs that give us optimism for the upcoming year. Ironically, several Latin American countries, such as Brazil, Argentina and Colombia, have recently turned away from previous failed experiments with populism and have moved toward more orthodox policies, taking pro-market and fiscally conservative approaches while maintaining credible monetary policy, proactive business environments and outward-looking trade. They continue to prefer a number of undervalued opportunities across local-currency EMs over many of the overvaluations and low yields across the developed markets. It is their hope for 2017 that developed countries experimenting with populism can skip the negative consequences by instead returning to the successes from more orthodox policy-making.

AXA IM launches Global ‘Robotech’ Fund

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

AXA IM today announces the launch of the AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech Fund (“the Fund”). Managed by Tom Riley and Jeremy Gleeson at AXA IM Framlington Equities, the Fund is a Luxembourg domiciled SICAV following an active, unconstrained, multi-cap, robotics strategy. The manager aims to invest in global growth companies spanning robotics and automation applications across various areas including the industrial, technology, manufacturing, healthcare and transportation sectors.

Tom Riley, Lead Fund Manager of the AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech Fund said: “We are at the early stages of the robotics revolution, the robotics market is expected to grow by 10% a year until 2025. While this is anemerging multi-decade theme, it is already an investible area from which we aim to select 40 to 60 fast growth companies to build a global portfolio diversified across market cap and sectors. Robotics will continue to have a significant impact on society for years to come and an increasing number of new listed small and mid-cap companies will become investment opportunities over time.”

The launch of the Fund, follows the success of a dedicated global robotics mandate for the Japanese retail market that AXA IM launched in December 2015 that has seen its assets grow to approximately $1 billion to date. The strategy has outperformed the broader market since launch.The new Fund will be managed by the same team following the same investment approach.

Mark Beveridge, Global Head of Framlington Equities at AXA IM added: “AXA IM have a long history and track record in thematic equity investing (e.g. technology, healthcare, biotech, listed property etc.). We have been early adopters of the robotics trend and have been investing in areas such as industrial automation, autonomous vehicles and robot assisted surgery for a number of years in other strategies. We fundamentally believe you need an active manager to access new growth areas such as robotics – there is no broadly used standard robotics benchmark that you can try to replicate. We have great momentum in an uncrowded space; demand for our robotics strategy has been incredible from clients in Japan and we are excited that we can now offer this strategy more widely.”

Tom Riley will be working alongside Jeremy Gleeson, the Lead Fund Manager of the circa $430m AXA Framlington Global Technology Fund. Jeremy has 19 years’ experience investing in technology and technology disruptions. They will also work closely with Framlington Equities regional and sector specialists (i.e. healthcare). The AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech fund is a Luxembourg-domiciled SICAV. The Fund has both retail and institutional share classes and is registered for distribution in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands and the UK. Registration is expected for Switzerland in coming months

Eaton Vance Corporation anuncia la adquisición de los activos de Calvert Investment Management

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Eaton Vance Corporation Announces Completion of Acquisition of Assets of Calvert Investment Management
Foto: Dennis Yang . Eaton Vance Corporation anuncia la adquisición de los activos de Calvert Investment Management

Eaton Vance Corporation da por finalizada la ya anunciada adquisición de los activos de negocio de Calvert Investment Management, por parte de Calvert Research and Management, una recién creada filial de Eaton Vance. Conjuntamente con la adquisición, los Consejos de Administración y los accionistas de los fondos de inversión Calvert (Calvert Funds) han aprobado acuerdos de asesoramiento de inversión con Calvert Research and Management. Los términos de la transacción no se han hecho públicos.

Fundada en 1976, Calvert Investments es un reconocido líder en inversión responsable, con 12.100 millones de dólares en activos bajo gestión correspondientes a fondos y cuentas separadas, a 31 de octubre de 2016. Calvert Investments es una filial indirecta de Ameritas Holding Company. A raíz de la transacción, John Streur, presidente y CEO de Calvert Investments, ocupará ese misma posición en Calvert Research and Management.

Los Fondos Calvert son una de las familias más grandes y diversificadas de fondos de inversión responsable, que abarca estrategias de renta variable de gestión activa y pasiva, renta fija y asignación de activos administrados de acuerdo con los Principios Calvert para Inversión Responsable. Streur se mantiene como presidente de los Fondos Calvert.

«Eaton Vance se complace en completar la anteriormente anunciada compra de los activos de negocios de Calvert Investments», declara Thomas E. Faust Jr., Presidente y CEO de Eaton Vance Corp. «La nueva Calvert Research and Management está comprometida con la construcción sobre la marca y el legado de Calvert para logar un liderazgo global en la gestión de inversiones responsables».

Los UHNWI donan 29,6 millones de dólares a lo largo de sus vidas

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

UHNW Individuals Will Donate US$29.6 Million Over the Course of Their Lifetimes
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: goodfreephotos.com. Los UHNWI donan 29,6 millones de dólares a lo largo de sus vidas

De acuerdo con un nuevo informe sobre la filantropía global, los donativos importantes entre individuos con un patrimonio ultra-alto (UHNWI por sus siglas en inglés) aumentaron a un máximo histórico en 2015, creciendo un 3% desde 2014. En promedio, los individuos UHNW – aquellos con un patrimonio neto de 30 millones de dólares o más – donarán 29,6 millones a lo largo de su vida.

La donación media de los principales filántropos UHNW en Oriente Medio es de 5 millones de dólares, 50% más que en América del Norte, y los crecientes niveles de riqueza en la región sugieren que estas sumas crecerán en los próximos años.

El informe titulado «Cambiando la filantropía: cambios de tendencia en la donación de altos patrimonios«, encargado por Arton Capital y producido por Wealth-X, revela que los donantes principales, esos individuos que han donado al menos 1 millón de dólares en su vida, son significativamente más ricos que otros UHNW que no donan tanto y tienen un patrimonio neto promedio de casi 300 millones de dólares. El informe también muestra que los principales donantes tienen una mayor proporción de su riqueza en activos líquidos, 85 millones de dólares en promedio, y suelen donar alrededor de la mitad de sus fondos en efectivo a la caridad a lo largo de sus vidas.

El informe se centra en las innovaciones en la donación, identificando las tendencias que están ayudando a aumentar la escala de las donaciones y explorando nuevos desarrollos en la filantropía como la inversión de impacto, el cómo «devolver» se está volviendo integral a la identidad de una organización. Así como analizando el alcance de la generación de los millenials a la hora de establecer una nueva agenda filantrópica.

Otros hallazgos incluyen:

  • La mayoría de los grandes donantes hicieron su propia fortuna- los UHNWI con fortunas hechas por sí mismos representan casi el 70% de los principales donantes.
  • La educación y la salud son las causas principales – la educación sigue siendo la causa filantrópica más popular para los UHNWI, seguida por la salud, mientras que los temas ambientales se vuelven cada vez más importantes.
  • Los millenials están reformando la filantropía – la generación más joven está introduciendo nuevos modelos filantrópicos que combinan fundaciones tradicionales con emprendimientos lucrativos y empresas sociales, y están impulsando la filantropía basada en los empleados.
  • La difuminación de la filantropía corporativa e individual – Los UHNWI están aprovechando los recursos a su disposición para maximizar su retorno al donar, alineando la estrategia filantrópica de su negocio con su propia donación personal.

«Las personas de altos patrimonios en el Medio Oriente dan casi el 10% de su patrimonio neto a causas filantrópicas, eso sin contar las sustanciales contribuciones anónimas para Zakat y Sadaqah en toda la región», explicó John Hanafin, CEO de Arton Capital en MENA . «Las tendencias identificadas en este informe son verdaderamente globales, con los ultra-ricos comportandose de manera similar, ya sean de Shanghai o Zurich o Nueva York, y los miembros de Oriente Medio de este club no son diferentes, lo que demuestra la conectividad global de la riqueza en el mundo moderno».

«En Arton Capital compartimos la firme creencia de que la prosperidad de un individuo, una empresa o una nación es interdependiente con la prosperidad de los demás», dijo el fundador y presidente de Arton Capital, Armand Arton. «Al cambiar el enfoque del pensamiento cotidiano a la planificación de generación a generación, los individuos de alto patrimonio tienen el poder de hacer un impacto positivo en algunos de los retos más importantes del mundo».

Puede descargar el informe en el siguiente link.

The European Fund Industry, Still in a «Consolidation Mode» According to Lipper

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

fusionesdehanspixabay
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. f

At of the end of September 2016 there were 31,889 mutual funds registered for sale in Europe. 
Luxembourg continued to dominate the fund market in Europe, hosting 9,243 funds, followed by 
France, where 4,404 funds were domiciled. 


For Q3 2016 a total of 599 funds (368 liquidations and 231 mergers) were withdrawn from the market, while only 466 new products were launched, according to the report “Launches, Liquidations, and Mergers in The European Mutual Fund Industry, Q3”, by Lipper Thomson Reuters.

With 466 newly launched products for Q3 2016, they saw a similar number of new products as the number for Q3 2015. The number of liquidations went up 14%, and the number of mergers declined a massive 29%.

Launches, Mergers, and Liquidations over the Past Five Years

With 466 newly launched products for Q3 2016, Lipper noticed a slightly higher number of newly issued products than for Q3 2015 (453). Compared with the launches for Q2 2016 (463), the number was flat.

The number of liquidations went up 14% compared with Q3 2015; comparing Q3 2016 closures with those of Q2 2016, Lipper saw a decrease (-16%). European fund promoters showed above-average activity with regard to fund liquidations in Q3 2016 and as a result maybe for the whole year 2016.

Opposite to the number of fund liquidations, the number of mergers went down 29%, comparing Q3 2016 with Q3 2015; compared with Q2 2016, the difference was smaller, with 8% more mergers for Q2 2016.

“The net size of the European fund universe decreased constantly since Q3 2012, which might be seen as a sign the European fund industry is in a consolidation mode. The net decrease of 133 products for Q3 2016 showed a lower number than for Q3 2015 (-193)”, say Detlef Glow -Lipper’s Head of EMEA Research-, and Christoph Karg -Content Management Funds EMEA-, the authors of this report.

Changes in European Fund Universe Asset Classes, Q3 2016

Q3 2016 witnessed the launch of 466 funds: 145 equity funds, 94 bond funds, 166 mixed-asset funds, 51 “other” funds, and 10 money market funds. During the same period 368 funds were liquidated: 119 equity funds, 76 bond funds, 72 mixed-asset funds, 84 “other” funds, and 17 money market funds.

For Q3 2016, 231 funds were merged: 66 equity funds, 82 bond funds, 60 mixed-asset funds, 6 “other” funds, and 17 money market funds.

The net changes for Q3 2016 showed negative totals for the measured asset classes: equities (net -40 products), money market products (net -24 products), “other” funds (net -39 products), and bond funds (net -64 products); mixed-asset products gained a net 34 products.

“The positive trend with regard to fund launches in the mixed-asset sector might not be too surprising, since this sector contains multi-asset products, which have been in the favor of investors over the last two years. Fund promoters appear to want to participate in this trend by launching new products. Especially in the overall low- interest-rate environment, mixed- and multi-asset products continue to be the preferred asset class for investors”, according to the authors.

Outlook

“Pressure to become more profitable and to save on costs, in addition to increased demands from regulators, might have been the drivers during Q3 2016 for further consolidation in the number of funds registered for sale in Europe. Since this consolidation took place in spite of increasing assets under management and healthy inflows for the year 2016 so far, European fund promoters may be preparing themselves for increasing competition with regard to fees that can be charged investors in Europe”.

“Because fees are being widely discussed, there is not much room for increases, despite costs for asset managers increasing in the future because of higher regulatory demands. We could see a further decrease in the number of funds, driven by fund promoters trying to be more efficient as well as by possible takeover transactions within the European fund management industry”, the authors conclude.

Tortoise lanza un fondo UCITS centrado en la infraestructura energética de América del Norte

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Tortoise Launches UCITS Fund Focusing on North American Energy Infrastructure
Foto: Maureen. Tortoise lanza un fondo UCITS centrado en la infraestructura energética de América del Norte

Tortoise Capital Advisors, el gestor especializado en inversiones energéticas cotizadas, ha anunciado el lanzamiento del Tortoise North American Energy Infrastructure Fund, un UCITS domiciliado en Luxemburgo. El fondo invierte en compañías norteamericanas de conductos, incluyendo valores relacionados con la Master Limited Partnership (MLP).

«El fondo se centra en el gran y diverso universo de gaseoductos y oleoductos norteamericanos, proporcionando acceso a la importante red de conductos de uno de los mayores productores y consumidores de energía del mundo», declaró Brent Newcomb, director de Tortoise. «Nos complace hacer esta estrategia accesible para los inversores no residentes en Estados Unidos».

La estrategia del fondo se basa en el fondo estadounidense de la gestora, Tortoise MLP & Pipeline Fund, que se lanzó en 2011 e invierte en MLPs y valores relacionados con MLP. El UCITS está abierto a inversores institucionales y minoristas en tres divisas, dólares, euros y francos suizos. Los niveles mínimos de inversión para el fondo se fijan en 2.500 dólares para minoristas y un millón de dólares para los inversores institucionales.

«Creemos que la actual  oportunidad de inversión es particularmente atractiva teniendo en cuenta las valoraciones, los fundamentales de la industria y las tendencias de crecimiento de la misma», agregó Brian Kessens, gestor de Tortoise.»Este potencial de crecimiento comienza con la producción de energía que lleva al aumento de la necesidad de transporte de energía, incluyendo las exportaciones de energía de bajo costo de Estados Unidos al resto del mundo».

La firma es un líder reconocido de la inversión en infraestructura de energía en América del Norte y uno de los mayores gestores de inversiones de fondos de infraestructura de energía registrados en Estados Unidos.

Prioridades regulatorias y de supervisión de FINRA para 2017

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

FINRA´s Regulatory and Examination Priorities 2017
Foto: Mariya Chorna . Prioridades regulatorias y de supervisión de FINRA para 2017

Cada año, FINRA publica su carta anual de prioridades regulatorias y de supervisión para resaltar los asuntos importantes para los programas reguladores de FINRA. En la carta de este año, Robert W. Cook, presidente y CEO de FINRA, proporciona información sobre las áreas que el regulador planea inspeccionar en su exámenes de supervisión de 2017 en base a la observación de los programas regulatorios, y las aportaciones de diversas partes interesadas, incluyendo firmas asociadas, otros reguladores y defensores de los inversores.

Robert W. Cook, dice: «Como verán, un hilo común a lo largo de la carta de prioridades es el enfoque en las cuestiones centrales de cumplimiento normativo, supervisión y gestión de riesgo. La mayoría de los temas abordados en la carta de este año se han destacado en años anteriores, pero las áreas específicas de énfasis se han actualizado o modificado en base a recientes observaciones y experiencias. Prestar atención a los requisitos normativos básicos identificados en la carta -y cómo abordarlos a la luz de los nuevos retos empresariales y la evolución del mercado- será útil para inversores y los mercados.

Sus continuos comentarios sobre aspectos existentes o emergentes que ponen los inversores y la integridad del mercado en riesgo es muy importante. Compartimos un objetivo común de promover la confianza de los inversores, y les pido que nos comunique cualquier área en la que crea que FINRA debería concentrar sus recursos regulatorios para proteger a los inversores y fortalecer la integridad del mercado.

Desde que me uní a FINRA en agosto, he estado comprometido en un viaje continuo de escucha, reuniéndome con firmas asociadas, reguladores y grupos de inversores, entre otros. Estoy agradecido por la información recibida y el tiempo que muchas personas me han dedicado. En los próximos meses, tengo previsto proporcionar más información sobre algunos pasos concretos que estamos planeando -basados ​​en el viaje continuo de escucha, así como otras aportaciones- para examinar de nuevo ciertos aspectos de los programas y operaciones de FINRA y para identificar oportunidades de hacer nuestro trabajo más eficazmente. Mientras tanto, quiero compartir con ustedes dos modestos pasos más que ya estamos planeando dar.

En primer lugar, he escuchado frecuentemente de firmas asociadas y otros interlocutores que sería útil conocer lo que FINRA está viendo a través de sus programas de examen y supervisión. Se nos ha sugerido que la publicación de los resultados habituales de nuestros exámenes ayudaría a las empresas a estar informadas de las deficiencias que FINRA observa, incluyendo las áreas de prioridad, y permitiría corregir deficiencias similares a las empresas que aún no hayan sido examinadas. Estoy de acuerdo y, a partir de este año, publicaremos un informe resumido que resalte los hallazgos más importantes de los exámenes en ciertas áreas seleccionadas. Este documento alertará a las firmas sobre lo que estamos viendo con una perspectiva nacional y, por lo tanto, servirá como una herramienta adicional que las firmas podrán utilizar para fortalecer el contexto de control en su negocio.

Otra sugerencia que surgió de mis reuniones es que muchas pequeñas empresas quisieran que exploráramos cómo podemos proveer más, y quizás diferentes,  herramientas y recursos de cumplimiento regulatorio para ayudarles a cumplir con los requisitos regulatorios aplicables. Ya he pedido a nuestro personal que desarrolle varios nuevos recursos en este sentido, y en 2017 introduciremos un «calendario de cumplimiento regulatorio» y un directorio de proveedores de servicios de cumplimiento normativo. Además, para reunir más información en esta área, recientemente enviamos una breve encuesta a pequeñas empresas que nos permitirá conocer qué herramientas y recursos de cumplimiento regulatorio encontrarían valiosos. Hemos recibido aportaciones muy útiles por parte de las empresas hasta ahora, pero todavía no es demasiado tarde para participar. Si es usted una firma pequeña y no ha completado la encuesta, por favor hágalo para ayudarnos a ayudarle mejor.

Un área de atención el próximo año será el reconocimiento del importante papel que juegan las pequeñas firmas -igual que las grandes empresas-, en facilitar la formación de capital a través de firmas pequeñas y emergentes, motores vitales de nuestra economía y de la creación de empleo. Buscaremos oportunidades para apoyar estas actividades, incluyendo la orientación cuando sea apropiado, para alentar modelos de negocios innovadores y la utilización de nuevas tecnologías en el espacio Fintech, consistente con el mantenimiento de una protección importante de los inversores.

Algunos me han preguntado cuándo terminará mi gira de escucha. La respuesta corta es: nunca. Como ya señalé anteriormente, en los próximos meses compartiré con ustedes algunos pasos adicionales que llevaremos a cabo, producto de mi gira de escucha, y estoy muy ilusionado con la buena marcha de estas iniciativas. Pero la escucha no terminará durante mi mandato. Espero que siempre se sienta libre de comunicarse directamente conmigo o con cualquier persona de nuestro equipo con sus ideas y sugerencias sobre cómo FINRA puede cumplir mejor su misión de protección de los inversores y de la integridad del mercado”.

Puede acceder a los documentos que siguen a la carta aqui.

Sotheby’s lanza una división de lujo y estilo de vida y nombra a Maarten ten Holder su director

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Sotheby's Launches Global Luxury Division and Announces Leadership
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainFoto: Maarten ten Holder - foto cedida. Sotheby's lanza una división de lujo y estilo de vida y nombra a Maarten ten Holder su director

Sotheby’s ha anunciado el nombramiento de Maarten ten Holder como director global de la nueva división Luxury & Lifestyle de la compañía, uniendo las categorías de joyería, relojes, vino, coches y experiencias, así como la relación con Sotheby’s International Realty, bajo un alto ejecutivo. Su nombramiento es efectivo inmediatamente.

Miembro del equipo directivo de la firma y con gran experiencia, Maarten se trasladará a Nueva York desde Londres, desde donde era director de operaciones en Europa, Próximo Oriente, India y África. Antes de su ocupar este puesto en Londres, Maarten fue el titular de diversos cargos de liderazgo en Nueva York, Milán y Amsterdam.

«La creación de la nueva división, que une estas áreas clave a nivel mundial bajo el liderazgo de Maarten supone un mayor avance en la estrategia de Sotheby´s de dar servicio a los clientes y proporcionar valor a los accionistas», declaró Tad Smith, CEO de Sotheby’s.

«Estoy encantado de asumir este importante papel de liderazgo de la nueva división Luxury & Lifestyle. Cada uno de estos negocios opera en un mercado mayor que el del arte, y estoy ilusionado de liderar nuestro esfuerzo estratégico para llevar nuestro equipo hacia una base más fuerte para el crecimiento de Sotheby’s», agregó Maarten ten Holder.

Maarten ten Holder comenzó su carrera en la firma en Amsterdam. Ha desempeñado un papel fundamental en numerosas ventas de casas de campo en toda Europa y ayudó a organizar la primera subasta de Sotheby’s en Francia en 1999. Asumió el cargo de director general adjunto en Italia en 2002, antes de trasladarse a Nueva York en 2006 como director general de América del Norte y del Sur. Durante su periodo en Nueva York, y más recientemente en Londres, Maarten ha supervisado algunas de las subastas más destacadas de los últimos tiempos, incluyendo la venta de “El grito” de Edvard Munch, la colección de la señora de Paul Mellon, la colección personal de Deborah, Duquesa de Devonshire, y la colección personal de David Bowie. Además, ha participó en numerosas ventas de joyas importantes, incluyendo las colecciones de Charles Wrightsman, Estée Lauder y Evelyn H. Lauder, así como la venta reciente de 175 millones de dólares en joyas en Ginebra.

Su involucración en subastas de automóviles data de 2005, con la venta de autos y recuerdos relacionados de las legendarias instalaciones de Ferrari en Maranello, Italia. En el mes de noviembre pasado, fue subastador en la venta de The Duemila Ruote en Milán, la mayor venta de colecciones de automóviles que se haya realizado en Europa. Subastador consumado, Maarten realiza regularmente ventas en todas las principales ubicaciones de internacionales de Sotheby en cinco idiomas diferentes.

Navigating Negative Rates In 2017

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

We are facing a world where ‘safe assets’ pay nothing or even charge you to own them, yield can only be found at higher risk levels and markets which have benefited from falling yields are vulnerable to a change in direction. The question for investors is: what to do? We believe there are opportunities worth pursuing, along with risks that require careful mitigation.

Despite these difficulties, we believe a thoughtful approach can help investors to meet these income challenges, by applying six simple rules:

Identify your objectives

You need to clearly define your investment objectives and use these to guide all portfolio decisions. What yield or return do you need? What level of risk tolerance is acceptable? Are

you sensitive to short or longer term capital risk? How much liquidity do you require? If all of these things are broadly realistic, they can guide you in building an appropriate portfolio.

However, if you try to push any of these objectives too far, the balance of outcomes may be unattainable. For example, if you try to chase yield too far, it may increase the risk to capital loss. If you try to push volatility down too low, you may not be able to generate yield or a suitable return.

Diversify your portfolio

Diversification is one of the most powerful tenets of portfolio construction. Assets with different characteristics will often offset each other in terms of risk, but can all still contribute towards performance, thereby improving the return achievable for a given level of risk. This is incredibly useful when trying to balance the need for yield against a limited appetite for volatility.

The key issue here is implementation. We think asset class labels can be highly misleading. For example, we think there is a much closer relationship between equities and high yield bonds than high yield and government bonds. Their respective labels say they are different asset classes, while their underlying performance driver, essentially corporate profitability, is the same for both.

We believe investors need to consider asset behaviour, when building portfolios. This is why we think of assets as exhibiting either ‘growth’, ‘defensive’ or ‘uncorrelated’ characteristics, regardless of the traditional labels. A truly diversified portfolio will have a blend of all three, which is critical to achieving proper portfolio diversification.

Adapt to changing market conditions

What is attractive today will change over time as markets move and economies evolve. Adapting exposure to re ect these changes, and rotating out of asset classes as they become less attractive can help towards achieving the stated objective.

In particular, certain types of assets will typically do well in times of economic expansion, such as equities and high yield bonds, and do poorly in recession, whereas other assets normally exhibit more defensive qualities, such as high quality government bonds. So a fundamentally different mix of exposures makes sense at different stages of the business cycle. It is, however, important to take account of value, as assets tend to go from cheap to expensive and back again, and the cyclical behaviour of assets may change in response to these valuations changes. Assets, for example, like government bonds, may have lost some of their defensive characteristics as they have become more expensive, making them less useful in negative economic periods.

Build exposure from the bottom up

Building portfolios from the bottom-up seeks to ensure that positions are consistent with the desired outcome, rather than just exhibiting broad market characteristics. The market will

contain many securities which may not help towards meeting your objectives. It will contain expensive assets, as well as ones that don’t provide much income. It will also contain assets with signi cant quality or capital risks. As a result, it is important to tailor the underlying portfolio to re ect the desired outcome and, again, to allow this mix to evolve over time.

Think holistically

Building from the bottom-up also allows a holistic approach across asset classes and capital structures. For example, given the many challenges faced by the banking sector, we have felt

that it is generally better to lend to banks as a senior bond holder than to own their equity. Regulatory change is designed to make harder for banks to make money for their equity holders, but conversely regulation is designed to make banks safer for their bond holders.

Similarly, earlier this year when oil prices collapsed, a lot of energy-related assets ended up at relatively cheap levels across their capital structures. We looked to see whether there were interesting opportunities that could do well, even if oil prices remained low, and which would benefit from any recovery in the oil price. Reviewing the opportunity set, we found that some of the best opportunities were within US high yield energy sector bonds, but selectivity would be key, because of the risk of default.

Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst

Financial markets are always hostage to events. One way to guard against this is to think about which events are worth worrying about, and then analyse their potential consequences

for markets, and the implications for your portfolio. This can be looked at alongside how probable the event appears to be, to decide whether to hedge exposed areas within the portfolio. This kind of approach worked particularly well in advance of the UK’s EU referendum, a discrete risk event with an uncertain binary outcome.

Rather than taking a view on how the vote would go, we believed that a more prudent course was to seek to reduce risk to limit the possible downside, in return for perhaps foregoing some of the upside. It can be very useful to manage exposure around future referenda or elections in a
similar way.

Open-ended event-based risks offer a different challenge, such as the risk of a ‘hard landing’ in China, the risk of an oil price spike, or the risk of a bond yield spike. With these, it is worth examining exposure levels to see whether it makes sense to hedge certain risks while still maintaining core strategic positions.

John Stopford is Co-Head of Multi-Asset at Investec.