New Sovereign Wealth Funds, Opportunities For External Managers

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

The growing number of resource-rich countries establishing sovereign wealth funds present an ideal opportunity for asset managers not sufficiently specialized or alternative to win mandates from established sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), according to the latest issue of The Cerulli Edge – Global Edition.

Cerulli says that new SWFs are likely to need help in the early stages, even in mainstream asset classes and geographies. It cites, as an example, oil-rich Nigeria, which is in the early stages of a complex three-fund approach to sovereign wealth. The structure comprises: a stabilization fund, an infrastructure fund, and a future generation fund. The latter, which Cerulli likens to a classic sovereign fund, is to receive 40% of oil surpluses, with a target allocation of 80% for growth assets. «It is likely that much of that will need the assistance of external managers,» says Barbara Wall, Europe research director at Cerulli.

The firm notes that while some SWFs are only interested in managers that either provide a specialist alternative that cannot be replicated internally, or a partnership model that opens the door to new investment possibilities, others appear committed to outsourcing the majority of their funds to external managers.

Funds from as far afield as Angola to Kazakhstan, Mongolia to East Timor or Papua New Guinea are potential opportunities. «An increasing number of countries feel they need a sovereign fund in order to diversify assets for the long term. These funds–some of which may grow to have tens of billions of dollars under management–will be lucrative sources of outsourcing mandates in their early years,» adds Wall.

In its review of the changes taking place within the SWF arena, Cerulli notes that established heavyweight Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is bringing more of its assets in-house. «What’s unusual about this move is that instead of bringing passive assets under its own supervision, the management that is being brought back in-house appears to be quite technical and specialist,» says David Walker, who leads Cerulli’s European institutional research practice. «For example, last year, ADIA created two new mandates within its internal equities department: U.S. equities and high conviction. The latter in particular is not normally the sort of mandate that a fund like this would take in-house, not when two-thirds of the fund is still outsourced.»

Walker adds that two of ADIA’s three most significant hires over the past two years have been for internal rather than external asset management: Christof Ruhl as global head of research and John Pandtle as head of the United States in the internal equities department. Other areas of increasing internal expertise include real estate and infrastructure.

BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey Finds Investors Regaining Risk Appetite

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Global investors have regained appetite for risk against the backdrop of strong liquidity and a fairly positive economic outlook, according to the BofA Merrill Lynch Fund Manager Survey for June.

A net 66 percent of respondents expect the global economy to strengthen over the next year. This bullish reading is unchanged from last month’s survey. However, concern at the pace of expansion is rising. A net 78 percent now anticipate below-trend growth over the next 12 months. In response, more investors than ever before (63 percent) are calling on companies to increase their capital spending.

Equities are in greater favor than at any time since the start of the year. A net 48 percent of asset allocators report overweights, up 11 percentage points month-on-month, even though a net 15 percent now regard the asset class as over-valued – this measure’s strongest response since 2000. Appetite for real estate has also risen. The net 6 percent overweight reported ranks as the highest in eight years.

In contrast, underweight positions in bonds (now regarded as over-valued by a net 75 percent) have reached their highest level since the end of 2013.

The prospect of debt defaults in China has strengthened as the most significant risk on investors’ horizon. It is now cited by 36 percent of respondents. 20 percent worry most over potential ‘asset mania’ – a new category introduced in the survey this month.

Even so, investors have reduced their cash buffers. Although still somewhat high, average holdings of 4.5 percent are at their lowest since January.

“Although fund inflows and oil prices argue for near-term consolidation, the case for a summer ‘melt-up’ remains stronger than for a meltdown as high liquidity and low growth force investor cash levels down,” said Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research.

“Europe has been a cheap way to get equity exposure, but investors no longer see Europe as cheap. This together with some uncertainty on the level of growth may be why optimism is starting to wane,” said Obe Ejikeme, European equity and quantitative strategist.

European QE postponed

Investors no longer see quantitative easing by the European Central Bank as imminent. 42 percent of respondents anticipate any ECB program coming in Q4 or even 2015, up from 19 percent last month. A further 22 percent expect no action. Against this background, longer-term conviction towards European equities has started to decline. A net 21 percent now see Europe as the equity market they are most likely to overweight over the next year, down seven percentage points month-on-month.

However, current allocations suggest global investors are not yet ready to give up on the region. Net overweights have risen for the second consecutive month, to a net 43 percent.

Elsewhere, regional fund managers are already showing signs of caution. A net 6 percent of now regard European equities as over-valued – the highest proportion since 2000. As recently as April a net 16 percent viewed the market as under-valued.

Japan picks up

Japanese equities have declined 7 percent this year, underperforming other global markets. The survey shows global investors treating this as a buying opportunity. A net 21 percent are now overweight, up from a net 7 percent in May.

Moreover, a net 10 percent favor overweighting Japan in preference to all other equity markets in the next year.

These changes come as regional fund managers turn significantly more positive on Japan’s outlook than recently. A net 73 percent expect the country’s economy to strengthen over the next 12 months. This represents a 20 percentage point rise in the space of two months.

Dollar dominates

Bullishness on the U.S. dollar has re-emerged strongly. A net 79 percent of respondents now expect the currency to appreciate over the next year. This stands out as one of the strongest readings on this measure in the past 15 years.

In contrast, a net 28 and 48 percent expect the Euro and Japanese yen, respectively, to weaken over the same period. The European currency’s reading has declined seven percentage points month-on-month. This appears to reflect a combination of the ECB’s dovish stance and some weaker European macro data.

An overall total of 223 panelists with US$581 billion of assets under management participated in the survey from 6 June to 12 June 2014. A total of 167 managers, managing US$422 billion, participated in the global survey. A total of 120 managers, managing US$270 billion, participated in the regional surveys. The survey was conducted by BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research with the help of market research company TNS.

BNY Mellon IM firma un acuerdo con Banca Mediolanum para distribuir sus fondos en Italia

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

BNY Mellon IM Signs Distribution Agreement with Banca Mediolanum and Investment Partnership with Mediolanum Vita
Foto: NicolaCorboy, Flickr, Creative Commons. BNY Mellon IM firma un acuerdo con Banca Mediolanum para distribuir sus fondos en Italia

La gestora global multiboutique BNY Mellon Investment Management, con 1,6 billones de dólares bajo gestión, ha anunciado un nuevo acuerdo con Banca Mediolanum que le permitirá distribuir sus fondos entre los clientes minoristas del banco en Italia, a través de una red de asesores financieros de más de 4.500 profesionales.

A través de esas red, distribuirá sus fondos UCITS y soluciones de inversión que están dentro de la sicav BNY Mellon Global Funds, plc. La gama incluye soluciones de renta fija, variable, fondos dinámicos flexibles y de retorno absoluto, así como otras estrategias diseñadas para buscar retornos consistentes en condiciones de mercado volátiles.

Además, la gestora ha firmado un acuerdo con Mediolanum Vita, según el cual cuatro estrategias y fondos de BNY Mellon IM se unirán al rango de “collective investments undertakings (CIUs)” que pueden ser vendidos con la política de seguros de Mediolanum MyLife, un unit-linked que ofrece a los inversores una selección de soluciones de inversión de alta calidad.

Se trata de las siguientes estrategias: en primera lugar, el fondo BNY Mellon Global Real Return, un fondo multiactivo flexible que combina la protección de capital con la búsqueda de retornos. En segundo término, el fondo BNY Mellon Absolute Return Equity, un producto de retorno absoluto que busca retornos positivos independientemetne de la dirección del mercado. También, BNY Mellon Global Equity Income, un fondo de renta variable que selecciona de forma activa valores capaces de generar dividendos altos y sostenibles a largo plazo; y la estrategia Newton Asian Income, por último, que pretende capturar el potencial crecimiento de las compañías asiáticas.

“El acuerdo con Banca Mediolanum forma parte de nuestra creciente estrategia en Italia”, comenta Marco Palacino, director de gestión de BNY Mellon Investment Management en el país. “Estamos comprometidos con fortalecer y extender nuestra relación con las redes más importantes en Italia y acercarnos a los inversores”, añade.

 

Amherst Capital Brings Real Estate Expertise to Standish Mortgage Team

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Standish Mellon Asset Management Company LLC («Standish»), a BNY Mellon investment boutique with a focus on fixed income, announced that Standish’s dedicated mortgage team have become employees of its subsidiary, Amherst Capital Management LLC («Amherst Capital»), in order to unite Amherst Capital’s deep real estate expertise and industry-leading technology with Standish’s investment processes for mortgage-related assets.

As dual officers of Standish, the mortgage team will remain in Boston and continue to utilize the same investment processes for Standish clients, while gaining access to Amherst Capital’s real estate data set and analytical tools to provide an information advantage for specialized solutions in the U.S. real estate credit space. The mortgage team will provide investment advice with respect to approximately US$ 6.5bn of real estate-related assets.

«Amherst Capital’s loan-level data analysis of the real estate capital markets provides the mortgage team with a unique perspective on the fundamental elements driving asset performance, and a specialized set of tools for managing risk,» said Dave Leduc, CEO of Standish. «This collaboration reinforces Standish’s long history of innovation, client service and working with the best talent in the industry to enhance the investing process for our clients.»

Under the leadership of Sean Dobson, a well-known real estate finance executive with a history of managing U.S. real estate investment strategies, Amherst Capital is tapping the expertise of senior mortgage analysts, including Laurie Goodman, who provides leadership and guidance in research and investment strategy on an exclusive advisory basis as Non-Executive Director.

«This is an important milestone for Amherst Capital as we position ourselves to offer a comprehensive set of real estate credit investment capabilities, including direct lending strategies,» said Sean Dobson, Amherst Capital CEO. «The U.S. real estate credit markets are still in disrepair from the financial crisis and asset managers will play a bigger role to facilitate recovery. Inefficiencies within the sector tend to reward a high level of investment in research and analytics, and as such, Amherst Capital is poised to play a significant role in this transformation.»

Amherst Capital was established by BNY Mellon in collaboration with Amherst Holdings in 2015 to support Standish’s capabilities in real estate investing and to also offer standalone real estate investment solutions to meet the growing demand of an underserved real estate credit market as a consequence of the changing U.S. regulatory landscape.

Julius Baer to Acquire Majority Stake in Kairos Investment Management

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Kairos Investment Management SpA, the leading independent Italian wealth and asset management firm, has delivered impressive, profitable growth since the start of its partnership with Julius Baer in 2013: assets under management have nearly doubled from EUR 4.5 billion to EUR 8 billion. On the back of this successful partnership, Julius Baer has decided to increase its participation to 80% for an undisclosed amount, following its initial purchase of 19.9%. The transaction is expected to close in the course of 2016. Julius Baer and Kairos have agreed to list Kairos in a subsequent step through an offering of a minority percentage of Kairos’ share capital. Both steps are subject to regulatory approval.

Kairos was established in 1999 as a partnership and today employs a total staff of over 150. The company is specialized in wealth and asset management, including best-in-class investment solutions and advice. Paolo Basilico, founding partner, president and CEO of Kairos, and his partners will continue to run the business with the same team and pursue the same client-centric strategy.

Boris F.J. Collardi, CEO of Julius Baer, commented: “The partnership between Julius Baer and Kairos has proven to be a powerful force in the Italian wealth management sector, surpassing our expectations when we started this journey in 2013. We are confident that the future close cooperation combined with the intended listing will bring additional growth momentum and will further strengthen our position in the Italian wealth management market.”

Paolo Basilico added: “We are very pleased with our development over the last years, which confirms our positioning to provide independent investment excellence to our clients. I am very much looking forward to deepening our partnership with Julius Baer and being able to spearhead Kairos into the next phase of growth.”

European Investors are Favoring Fixed Income ETFs

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

As of October 30th, 2015, European ETP assets stood at $514 billion (€465 billion) according to Deutsche Bank’s European Monthly ETF Market Review. During the month, European ETP had net inflows of +€6.4 billion, considerably more than the +€1.8 billion from September. Fixed Income ETFs led the charge with notable inflows of +€3.5 billion followed by Equity ETFs which received +€2.5 billion over the last month. Commodity ETPs listed in Europe recorded inflows of +€400 million during the same period.

US-listed ETFs providing exposure to European equities registered monthly inflows of +$2.3 billion bringing YTD total to over +$32.4 billion.

According to Deutsche Bank, Investors remained bullish on the Energy sector while Short and Leverage Long focused ETFs lost momentum.

Within fixed income, investment grade led the flows, attracting +€2.9 billion over the last month, bringing YTD numbers to +€20.4 billion. High yield bonds reversed previous month’s trend and recorded inflows of +€700 million.

To see the full report follow this link.

A 30% Fall in Total AUMs of Funds Focused on Greater China Region is Unnerving, but a Long View is Needed

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Asset managers offering China-focused funds to European investors will need patience in abundance as they await a recovery in flows after growth in the world’s second-biggest economy slowed and its stock market plunged, but the rewards will justify the pain in most cases, according to the latest issue of The Cerulli Edge – European Monthly Product Trends Edition.

The global analytics firm, accepts that some asset managers may have to axe certain products, while others will withdraw completely from China. However, it maintains that the recent turmoil should be seen as a cyclical blip.

«China, like the rest of Asia, continues to offer huge opportunities,» says Barbara Wall, Europe research director at Cerulli. «Granted, a 30% fall in three months in total assets under management of funds focused on the greater China region is unnerving but a long view is needed. China’s economy is on course to overtake the United States, while its population of 1.35 billion includes around 100 million retail investors, according to some estimates

The company notes that China’s unusually high concentration of retail investors is one of the factors behind the panic reaction to what is a slowing of economic growth, rather than a recession. Also, the Chinese government still has much to learn about how best to intervene in the market when things go wrong.

«China is uncharted territory, which means there are no easy answers. However, the fundamentals remain attractive. AUM data, along with share prices, looks much better when compared with five years ago than with three months ago,» says Wall.

The firm notes that despite suffering some setbacks in China, Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management, one of the biggest European investors in Asia, describes its stance on the country as «strategically overweight«. It is among those who view the situation as a «buying opportunity».

Fidelity, one of the longest established players in Asia, has also run into glitches in China, but Cerulli believes the firm will be rewarded in the longer term. «With sizeable teams of analysts looking specifically at China, companies such as Fidelity are better equipped than most to pick the stocks that will bounce the highest from the recent fall,» says Brian Gorman, an analyst at Cerulli.

«Volatility is likely to linger, but the rewards will be high for those willing to play the long game. For some, this will mean closing certain products and returning to the drawing board, to come up with a better offering,» adds Gorman.

Prudential IM pasará a llamarse PGIM y lanzará una plataforma UCITS en Reino Unido y Europa

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Prudential IM to Change its Name to PGIM and Launch UCITS in UK and Europe
Foto: Sheri . Prudential IM pasará a llamarse PGIM y lanzará una plataforma UCITS en Reino Unido y Europa

Prudential Investment Management ha anunciado el lanzamiento de una plataforma UCITS para ampliar su presencia en Reino Unido y Europa, coincidiendo con su cambio de marca en enero de 2016, cuando pasará a llamarse PGIM.

El cambio de nombre obedece al deseo de la gestora, con 947.000 millones de dólares en activos bajo gestión, de reflejar su liderazgo como una de las mayores gestoras de fondos del mundo y su experiencia en una gran gama de productos. Este cambio coincide con la expansión global de los negocios de la compañía.

En este sentido, la gestora ha anunciado la ampliación de su gama de soluciones y productos para satisfacer la creciente demanda, especialmente por parte de clientes globales, de estrategias que permitan equilibrar el riesgo a largo plazo y los objetivos de retorno a través de carteras diversificadas. Así, creará PGIM Funds, una plataforma UCITS a través de la que operar en Reino Unido y Europa. La plataforma  permitirá a sus negocios ir más allá de los UCITS de renta fija para incluir una nueva serie de fondos, de otras clases de activos, y ofrecerlas tanto a clientes institucionales como a inversores particulares.

En la actualidad, la compañía opera en 16 países, de los cinco continentes, ofreciendo productos de diferentes clases de activos, que van desde renta fija pública y privada, hasta deuda o participaciones en real estate, pasando por renta variable fundamental y cuantitativa. La operativa se canaliza a través de un modelo multi-manager, en el que cada clase de activo es gestionado por un equipo especializado responsable de las inversiones y de los resultados del negocio, siempre bajo unos estándares comunes de control, gestión de riesgo y compliance.

Los negocios que cambiarán de nombre serán:

  • Prudential Fixed Income utilizará la denominación PGIM fuera de los Estados Unidos, donde en la actualidad es conocida como Pramerica, desde enero.
  • Prudential Mortgage Capital Company pasará a llamarse PGIM Real Estate Finance en todo el mundo, a mediados de 2016.
  • Prudential Real Estate Investors será conocida como PGIM Real Estate en todo el mundo, a mediados de 2016.

Invesco Adds Two Eurozone Equity Funds to Their Offer

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Looking to meet continental European investors’ demand for focused exposure within the European equity market, Invesco launched two new funds. The new additions to their European investment platform are the Invesco Euro Structured Equity Fund and the Invesco Euro Equity Fund. Both funds are registered for sale in most of the countries in Continental Europe and offer investors two distinct approaches to tapping the potential of the Eurozone equity market.

The two funds follow the established investment process and philosophy of the Invesco Pan European Structured Equity Fund and the Invesco Pan European Equity Fund within a more focused investment universe, and can thus leverage on the success of these funds.

Commenting on the dual fund launch, Carsten Majer, Chief Marketing Officer Continental Europe, said: «The launch of these two funds continues to broaden and diversify our European investment capability. Given the current low-interest rate environment and with low and falling yields on fixed income products, we think that equity funds are likely to see continued strong demand, with Eurozone equities poised to profit from the continuing European economic recovery.”

The Invesco Euro Structured Equity Fund is managed by Alexander Uhlmann and Thorsten Paarmann. They can draw on the support of the Invesco Quantitative Strategies Team in Frankfurt whose investment philosophy is based on translating fundamental and behavioural finance insights into portfolios, through a systematic and structured process that combines these insights with rigorous control based on its proprietary risk model. The fund aims to offer investors the full long-term performance potential of Euro equities while aiming to control the volatility normally associated with equities.

Thorsten Paarmann commented: “In the current market environment, we believe that the case for low-volatility investing remains strong. The fund’s defensive approach to the market and intended low correlation with the benchmark and its competitors aims to offer an efficient risk/return profile and to help preserve wealth particularly during periods of economic stress.”

The Invesco Euro Equity Fund is managed by Jeff Taylor and the Invesco European Equities Team in Henley-on-Thames. The team’s long-term investment approach seeks to capitalise on valuation anomalies in the market, with the benchmark considered to be more of a point of reference as opposed to a determinant of investment decisions. By not favouring any one particular investment style, the fund can take advantage of what we believe is the best mix of individual risk/reward opportunities in the market, at any point in time in whatever stock, sector or country they are to be found.

Jeff Taylor commented: “While the fund can potentially offer attractive alpha in strong equity markets, its flexible approach and valuation focus aim to deliver attractive performance under most market conditions.”

Rising Interest Rates: The Big Picture

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

While macroeconomic news out of China, and the price of oil has dominated the most recent financial market headlines, the U.S. Federal Reserve policy has been a subject of debate and intense focus for years.  Investors, bankers, economists and reporters alike are fixated on every word the Federal Reserve and its board of Governors releases.  The examination of, and some might argue obsession with, Fed statements has reached a point where the market can rapidly change direction based on just an alteration of word choice, even when the overall message remains the same.  These statements garner so much attention because traders and investors are trying to gain an edge in predicting when interest rates will rise.  Setting aside the debate on when the exact date of an interest rate hike might be, this paper examines what rising rates mean for your investment portfolio and argues that the long-term benefits are something investors should welcome not fear.  In order to examine this in detail, we first must have a good understanding of how the Federal Reserve works and why its policy affects interest rates.

What is the US Federal reserve and why does it matter?

The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (commonly referred to as the Fed) is the central bank of the U.S. financial system and its primary function is to enact monetary policy that helps to stabilize and improve the U.S. economy.  The Fed’s three main objectives are: to maximize employment, keep prices of goods stable, and moderate long-term interest rates.  As the economy goes through cycles from economic booms to recessions, the Fed takes action to moderate the booms and minimize the probability and depth of recessions.  One of the key tools the Fed uses to keep the economy stable is interest rates. In this case, interest rates reflect the yield paid to buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds.  The Fed can influence the level of interest rates by buying large quantities of Treasury bonds on the open market, thereby pushing prices of the bonds up and yields down and vice versa.  In general, the Fed will increase interest rates in order to slow down the economy and decrease them to stimulate growth.

Why do investors fear rate increases?

Investors have feared the prospect of rising interest rates for two main reasons: the potential for slower economic growth and negative returns for bonds.  The Federal Reserve uses higher interest rates to slow the economy by increasing the cost of doing business and buying a house.  Companies looking to build a new factory or invest in new technologies often raise funds for these projects by issuing bonds.  As interest rates rise on Treasury bonds they rise correspondingly on corporate bonds, increasing the cost of financing for companies.  As the cost of financing increases, companies are less likely to invest in new projects, slowing the economic growth rate of the economy.  Similarly as interest rates rise on Treasury bonds, the interest rates for mortgages on homes also rise.  This increases the monthly payment required to build or own a home, subsequently slowing the pace of growth in the housing market.  While we think this is a legitimate concern in the long run because slowing economic growth can act as an impediment to earnings growth and stock prices, at this point in the interest rate cycle the effects should be limited.

Interest rate changes don’t just affect the economy; they can also have sudden and material impacts on performance of investment products.  Interest rates and the prices of bonds have an inverse relationship, as rates rise bond prices fall and vice versa.  During the past 30 years, investors have enjoyed a long cycle of declining interest rates.  In September of 1981 the 10-year Treasury Bond peaked at an interest rate of over 15%.  Since then, interest rates have been steadily declining, producing an environment of sustained strong performance as bond prices rise.  The U.S. Barclays Aggregate Index has delivered an annualized return of nearly 8% over that time span, with only a few short periods of mild negative returns, conditioning investors to expect strong consistent positive returns in fixed income.  Many fear that when the Fed changes its policy and begins to raise interest rates, negative bond returns will cause widespread selling of fixed income products causing further declines in bond prices.  This concern is certainly warranted and we have positioned our clients’ portfolios to protect against this risk, however, we continue to believe that higher interest rates is a healthy outcome for investors and the market in the long-run.

What are the benefits?

At Federal Street Advisors, we believe that rising interest rates do present real near-term risks that investors should be prepared for but recognize that higher interest rates will also bring long-term benefits to those who are well positioned.  Higher interest rates are an indication of economic strength, improve income available for investment products, and promote rational capital markets.

While the Federal Reserve does use higher interest rates to slow economic growth late in a business cycle, it is important to understand that the potential upcoming interest rate hike is not an attempt to slow growth but rather to return interest rates rate to a normalized level.  During the financial crisis of 2008/2009, the Federal Reserve lowered their interest rate policy target effectively to zero where it has remained since then.  This was a historically extreme measure designed to promote business investment, stabilize the housing market, restore confidence in the stock market and stimulate economic growth.  The Federal Funds target interest rate (the interest rate that the Fed targets for monetary policy) has been 0%-0.25% since December 16th, 2008, well below its long run average of 7.4%1.  An increase in the Fed’s target interest rate today would be indicative of their confidence in the economic strength and stability as they seek to bring interest rates to a normalized level, and not an attempt to slow the growth rate of the economy.

While a declining interest rate market has resulted in strong performance from bonds, low absolute levels of interest actually significantly reduce the potential for future returns.  One of the primary goals of a zero interest rate policy is to reduce the cost of financing for companies.  Companies have been able to issue bonds to investors at all-time low interest rates.  While this is a good deal for companies, it’s not a great outcome for investors, who are forced to take increasingly lower compensation for the risk of lending this money.  The yield on the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index was just 2.3% as of September 30th, compared to 6.6% twenty years ago.  Low coupon rates generally mean poor opportunities for returns and more recent results have reflected that as the Barclays Agg has returned just 1.7% in the last three years.  While an increase in interest rates will likely result in negative returns for bonds in the near-term, it greatly improves the long-term return potential by allowing investors to reinvest coupons at higher interest rates. In our estimation, investors in the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index might experience a drawdown of as much as 7.5% if interest rates were to rise by 2%, but would still be expected to achieve a 10-year annualized return 0.7% higher than a scenario in which interest rates remained unchanged and no drawdown occurred2.  This scenario analysis highlights both the importance of protecting against the near-term risks of an interest rate increase but also the improvements to long-term total return opportunities.

Low interest rates can cause investors to take on more risk:

Sustained low interest rates also have significant impacts on investor behavior, which can cause imbalances in the capital markets.  Low interest rates means the retiring baby boomer generation in particular are not able to depend on the same level of income from their municipal bonds portfolios. Due to the lack of income in bonds, these investors have been forced to buy areas of the equity market that pay dividends, such as the utilities sector, but may expose themselves to more risk than is appropriate as a result. Increases in interest rates will bring increases in income from bond portfolios, and allow investors with lower risk profiles to return to more suitable asset allocations.

Pension funds will also benefit from a rising rate environment.  These funds are required to report an estimate of the value of their future obligations to pay benefits to retirees.  Since the bulk of these payments will occur in the future, they use a “discount rate” to calculate the value of the future payments in present terms.  This discount rate is tied to the prevailing interest rates in the market. Lower interest rates means a lower discount rate, which results in larger future obligations.  As interest rates fall, the pension fund’s financial health deteriorates and they are also forced to adopt a more aggressive or risky asset allocation to achieve the returns needed to pay retirees.  Conversely, if interest rates rise, pension funds should regain healthier financial conditions, the risk levels of their investments can be reduced, and payments to the beneficiaries will ultimately be more secure.

Active management will benefit:

Sustained low interest rates have also presented challenges to the performance of active managers through the encouragement of irrational investor behavior and unsustainable low financing costs.  While influencing the equity markets is not a stated goal of the Federal Reserve, it is an outcome of their zero interest rate policy.  As described previously, low income and poor total return expectations in bonds have pushed fixed income investors into buying stocks in the utilities sector.  In 2014, as interest rates fell, this sector returned 29%, outpacing every other sector in the market.  Active managers were broadly underweight the sector on fundamental concerns that high relative valuations and chronically low growth rates posed significantly greater risk than the promise of 3-4% of income.  In this environment, active managers posted one of the worst years of relative performance on record (link to previous paper here?).

In addition to changing investor behavior, low interest rates offer greater support to companies in poor financial condition making it more difficult to separate good investments from bad ones.  Low interest rates mean low financing costs for companies raising money through the issuance of bonds.  This low cost financing benefits companies in poor financial condition or those that have been mismanaged disproportionately to high quality, well-run business.  The best-run companies are typically rewarded with low financing costs in all market environments, or in many cases do not need to rely on debt financing at all because they are able to fund new projects and investment from cash flow from their existing business.  A decrease in interest rates has little effect on the cost structure of these companies. Conversely, when interest rates are low, low quality companies that need to raise cash from the debt markets are able to do so at lower costs than ever before.  The stocks of these low quality companies can be rewarded in low interest rate environments as their fundamentals appear improved, but as interest rates rise and the costs of financing increase, these results will be unsustainable.  While the style of active managers can vary, most look to buy companies with superior business models and strong management teams, which should benefit on a relative basis as interest rates rise leading to active manager outperformance.

Conclusion:

Given the attention the media gives the topic it is easy to get caught up in the intense debate of when the Fed might raise interest rates, but as recent history has shown it is difficult to predict.  In the beginning of 2014, 46 economists polled by the Wall Street Journal expected the Federal Funds rate to be an average of 1% by the end of 2015 and yet today the effective rate remains roughly 0.1%.  At Federal Street Advisors, we believe the game of attempting to time an unpredictable interest rate rise is not one that our clients will benefit from playing.  While we recognize that there are near-term risks to bond portfolios associated with an interest rate increase, it is increasingly important to keep the big picture in mind: a higher interest rate environment is both inevitable and healthy for the market, and investors who are well prepared will benefit.

1«Historical Changes of the Target Federal Funds and Discount Rates.»  Federal Reserve Bank of New York, n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2015. http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/statistics/dlyrates/fedrate.html

2Analysis assumes a parallel shift in the yield curve occurring evenly over the first 12 months with income being reinvested at higher rates. Full scenario analysis is available upon request.