First Sovereign Joins Luxembourg Green Exchange

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

The world’s first sovereign green bond, issued by the Republic of Poland, lists at the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LuxSE). The EUR 750 million green bond will, in parallel, be displayed on the Luxembourg Green Exchange (LGX).

“Poland is one of the leading sovereign issuers listed on our exchange. We are delighted that we were chosen as the listing venue for the country’s first green bond; it is at the same time the first sovereign green bond issued in international capital markets,” comments Robert Scharfe, CEO of LuxSE.

Asked about the selection criteria when choosing the listing venue for the green bond, Poland’s Deputy Minister of Finance, Piotr Nowak, explained: “LuxSE is one of the biggest stock exchanges for international bonds in Europe, and a very innovative one. The recent implementation of the Green Exchange is a proof of an open-minded approach towards the needs of financial markets. On top of that, we received strong recommendations from market participants to list there”.

Poland lists EUR 50 billion worth of bonds in Luxembourg. The green bond is listed on the EU-regulated market and its maturity date is 20 December 2021. The proceeds, as stated in the framework and prospectus, will be used for renewable energy, clean transportation, sustainable agriculture operations, afforestation, national parks and reclamation of heaps.

Apex Fund Services nombra a Daniel Strachman como director de desarrollo de negocio para Estados Unidos

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Apex Fund Services Appoints Daniel Strachman as Head of US Business Development
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainFoto: hugorouffiac. Apex Fund Services nombra a Daniel Strachman como director de desarrollo de negocio para Estados Unidos

Apex Fund Services ha anunciado el nombramiento de Daniel Strachmanas, un reconocido experto de la industria de la gestión de inversiones, como director de desarrollo de negocio en Estados Unidos.

Strachman aporta más de veinte años de experiencia en servicios financieros, y ha trabajado en Cantor Fitzgerald, Morgan Stanley, y A&C Advisors, brindando orientación estratégica, asesoría y apoyo a compañías de gestión de inversiones e inversores instituciones.

Además, Strachman es autor de nueve libros sobre estrategias de inversión, entre ellos «Los fundamentos de la gestión de hedge funds e iniciarse en hedge funds». Desde su nuevo puesto en Apex, dirigirá iniciativas de crecimiento en Estados Unidos y ofrecerá a las gestoras de fondos soluciones proactivas de administración de los mismos.

«Daniel es una incorporación realmente importante a nuestro equipo estadounidense en este momento y aporta una experiencia sin igual sobre la gestión de activos local. El nombramiento de un experto tan reputado demuestra nuestro compromiso con la expansión de nuestra presencia en el mercado estadounidense y con el mejor y más local soporte posible. La carrera de Daniel habla por sí misma y sus antecedentes y conocimiento ayudarán a impulsar nuestra presencia en Norteamérica mientras seguimos expandiendo nuestra presencia local», declaró Peter Hughes, fundador y consejero delegado de Apex Fund Services.

«Estoy muy ilusionado de unirme a Apex en este momento crucial en la industria de la gestión de fondos. Nunca antes la industria ha estado bajo tanta presión de mercado, fees, resultados y regulación, donde se hace necesario para inversores y gestores un administrador de fondos verdaderamente independiente. Espero ampliar el alcance de Apex en el mercado al ofrecer exactamente lo que el mercado necesita», añadió el propio Strachman.

Man Group completa la compra de la gestora de real estate Aalto

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Man Group Completes Acquisition of Aalto
Foto: LuckyCavey, Flickr, Creative Commons.. Man Group completa la compra de la gestora de real estate Aalto

El pasado octubre, Man Group anunciaba un acuerdo para adquirir la totalidad del capital social de Aalto Invest Holding y la creación de Man Global Private Markets (Man GPM), como oferta de la firma en mercados privados, para dotar a los clientes de acceso a inversiones a más largo plazo con un perfil de riesgo-retorno complementario a la gama actual de productos. Ahora, la gestora ha completado la operación de compra del gestor de real estate con sede en Londres Aalto, por un importe de 25 millones de dólares. El grupo pagó esta cantidad, dos tercios en liquidez y un tercio en nuevas acciones ordinarias del nuevo Man Group.

«Estamos encantados de haber completado la compra de Aalto, un paso clave en el desarrollo de Man Global Private Markets, nuestro nuevo motor de inversiones para clases de activos privados, y en la continua diversificación de Man Group», comenta Luke Ellis, CEO de Man Group. Y añade que la compra representa «una oportunidad atractiva para los clientes», que tendrán acceso a estrategias de inversión de largo plazo que ofrecen un perfil de riesgo-recompensa complementario a los actuales productos de la gestora.

Así, Aalto se convertirá en un componente del nuevo Man Global Private Markets.

Mikko Syrjänen y Petteri Barman, fundadores de Aalto, serán los co-reponsables de Activos Reales en Man GPM, tomando un papel protagonista en el desarrollo estratégico de la oferta en activos reales. 

Aalto es un gestor de inversiones especializado en activos reales con presencia en Estados Unidos y Suiza que a 30 de septiembre de 2016 gestionaba 1.700 millones de dólares, y en cuya base de clientes predominan los grandes inversores institucionales. Aalto, que será la plataforma de activos reales de Man GPM, se especializa en la gestión de estrategias de renta variable inmobiliaria y deuda, incluyendo inversiones directas en viviendas unifamiliares en EE.UU. y préstamos a real estate comercial y residencial en Europa y Estados Unidos.

A 30 de septiembre del año pasado, Man Group contaba con activos bajo gestión de 80.700 millones de dólares (73.300 millones de euros).

Los activos de los hedge funds de mercados emergentes marcan niveles récord

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Emerging Market Hedge Fund Assets Rise To Record As Global Trade Adjustments Begin
Foto: Asja Boro. Los activos de los hedge funds de mercados emergentes marcan niveles récord

Los hedge funds de mercados emergentes cerraron el tercer trimestre en un nuevo nivel récord de activos, eclipsando el máximo anterior registrado en el segundo trimestre de 2015. Los activos dedicados a hedge funds de emergentes aumentaron a casi 200.000 millones de dólares en el tercer trimestre de este año.

Esta es una cifra 9.800 millones de dólares por encima del trimestre anterior y supone unas ganancias trimestrales especialmente robustas, pese a la salida neta de inversores por valor de 850 millones de dólares, según el último informe de la industria llevado a cabo por HFR, el líder mundial de indexación, análisis e investigación de la industria global de hedge funds.

«El capital de los hedge funds de los mercados emergentes aumentó a un nivel récord en el tercer trimestre debido a que los mercados de divisas, de renta fija y de materias primas se ajustaron a los impactos que tendrán en las políticas monetarias y el comercio tanto el Brexit como las elecciones estadounidenses», afirmó Kenneth J. Heinz, presidente de HFR.

«A medida que los mercados de renta variable de los emergentes han subido, los hedge funds de emergentes han complementado estas ganancias direccionales y han mitigado los riesgos con las operaciones tácticas y no direccionales creadas por las políticas cambiantes y las dislocaciones temporales. Es probable que el próximo período de ajuste de la política monetaria de Estados Unidos y Reino Unido EE.UU. genere oportunidades atractivas para los hedge funds de mercados emergentes, ampliando su liderazgo en lo que ha evolución y expansión de capital se refiere en 2017″, señala Heinz.

Los fondos de cobertura centrados en Latinoamérica ampliaron el poderoso repunte registrado hasta la fecha, liderando todas las áreas de desempeño de hedge funds hasta octubre. El número total de fondos de cobertura centrados exclusivamente en la inversión en América Latina se mantuvo en 107, mientras que el capital total aumentó a 6.700 millones de dólares en el tercer trimestre.

Los fondos de cobertura que invierten en Rusia y Europa del Este también registraron fuertes ganancias, con el índice HFRI EM Rusia y Europa del este subiendo un 6.5 por ciento en el tercer trimestre. Desde entonces más de 170 hedge funds se concentran en invertir en Rusia y Europa del Este, con un AUM estimado de 28.900 millones de dólares.

El índice HFRI de Mercados Emergentes (Total) ganó un 5,06 por ciento en el tercer trimestre y añadió un 1,10 por ciento en octubre, liderado por las exposiciones regionales a Latinoamérica, Rusia y a los países emergentes de Asia. El índice sube un 9,1 por ciento hasta el mes de octubre.

 

PCR: Bob Miller sucede a Rob Fiore como CEO

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

PCR: Bob Miller Succeeds Rob Fiore as CEO
Foto: geralt. PCR: Bob Miller sucede a Rob Fiore como CEO

PCR, la firma de agregación de datos patrimoniales y servicio de reporte para asesores de grandes patrimonios (UHNWI) y clientes, ha anunciado que Bob Miller sucede a Rob Fiore como CEO. Miller fue fundador y CEO de CorrectNet y pionero en soluciones de información a clientes ultra seguras para las principales firmas institucionales de gestión de riqueza del mundo.

Miller se unió a la PCR como vicepresidente y asesor estratégico el año pasado para ayudar a lanzar las recientes inversiones tecnológicas de la compañía. Durante este período, PCR  cristalizó su propuesta de valor, introdujo un sistema de precios innovador, y lanzó un programa de distribuidores que ahora permite a proveedores tecnológicos y de software volver a vender los servicios de la compañía para grandes patrimonios.

«El mandato de nuestros dueños es muy claro. En primer lugar, asegúrese de que las 1.200 familias a las que actualmente damos servicio se beneficien de las innovaciones que ahora estamos trayendo al mercado. Ellos nos ayudaron a construir nuestro negocio y estamos comprometidos con su éxito continuo. A continuación, capitalice nuestras capacidades y recientes inversiones para hacer crecer el negocio nuevas formas, para pasar de 125 millones de dólares a 500 millones en activos agregados», declara Miller.

La compañía también anunció promociones en el equipo directivo. Adam Carta, anteriormente director senior de operaciones, ha sido promovido a COO con responsabilidades sobre todos los aspecto de la plataforma de entrega. Bill Hiza, ex gerente del equipo de analistas financieros, ha sido ascendido a Sr. VP Client Experience. Bill Lichtwald, un veterano de ventas con 20 años de experiencia en FinTech, ha pasado a ser Senior VP Head of Sales.

«Abordamos las necesidades de las casi 72.000 familias UHNW norteamericanas de forma diferente a la de muchos de los recién llegados, principalmente los proveedores de software. Fuimos creados por familias con grandes patrimonios que sentían que eran incapaces de obtener una imagen completa y precisa de su riqueza”, declaró Miller.

 

Potential US Trade Ramifications of the Trump Election

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

According to public statements from President-elect Trump, reshaping U.S. trade policy will be a high priority for the incoming Trump Administration. President-elect Trump has announced his intention to, among other things:

  • Withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”).
  • Renegotiate terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), and if NAFTA partners do not agree to participate in renegotiations, submit notice that the United States intends to withdraw from NAFTA.
  • Pursue bilateral trade deals.
  • End unfair trade practices.

Jones Day explores whether and to what extent the Trump Administration may be able to accomplish President-elect Trump’s U.S. trade policy goals and the associated implications for U.S. international trade.

Trade Agreements

Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”)

President-elect Trump has indicated that he will issue a notification of intent to withdraw from the TPP, which was signed in 2015 by the United States and 11 other nations, but has not yet been approved by the U.S. Congress. In a June 2016 campaign speech, Trump stated that, “The TPP would be the death blow for American manufacturing … It would make it easier for our trading competitors to ship cheap subsidized goods into U.S. markets—while allowing foreign countries to continue putting barriers in front of our exports.”

Together with transparency provisions, labor and environmental protections, and other elements, the TPP contains provisions to lower both non-tariff and tariff barriers to trade among the member countries and establishes an investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. For some time, Obama Administration officials were optimistic that the TPP would be submitted to Congress for approval before the end of 2016, but the current political climate appears to have foreclosed this possibility, and the TPP now appears to be dead, at least in its current form. Indeed, Republican leadership in Congress recently confirmed that there would not be a vote on the TPP during the lame-duck session of Congress.

By its terms, the TPP would enter into force 60 days after all 12 member countries confirm domestic ratification. If all 12 countries do not confirm domestic ratification by February 4, 2018, the TPP would take effect once at least six original signatories that account for at least 85 percent of the combined gross domestic product (“GDP”) of the original signatories ratify the agreement. The United States represents approximately 62 percent of the aggregate GDP of the TPP member countries. As such, it would be impossible for the TPP, in its current form, to enter into force without domestic ratification by the United States.

There could be further discussions regarding a trade agreement with one or more of the TPP member countries. With Trade Promotion Authority, which was passed in 2015 and will be available until 2018, the President can send trade agreements to Congress for an up or down vote. This authority makes it easier for trade agreements to be passed by Congress, since members of Congress cannot amend any provisions of the agreements.

North American Free Trade Agreement

NAFTA is a free trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States that became effective on January 1, 1994. NAFTA was the most comprehensive free trade agreement negotiated at the time and contained several key provisions, including provisions relating to removal of trade barriers, services trade, foreign investment, intellectual property rights protection, government procurement, and dispute resolution.

President-elect Trump has stated that he will notify Canada and Mexico that the United States intends to immediately renegotiate the terms of NAFTA to “get a better deal” for U.S. workers.

During the campaign, Trump described NAFTA as “the worst trade deal ever signed” and said that the agreement has and continues to kill American jobs.

Under Article 2202 of NAFTA, the parties are permitted to renegotiate NAFTA and amend or add provisions. Both Canada and Mexico have stated that they would renegotiate NAFTA, and some renegotiations have occurred as part of the TPP, to which Canada, Mexico, and the United States are signatories.

Should it occur, the renegotiation process would be complex, as the respective legislative bodies in each country also would need to approve amendments to the agreement.

It is uncertain which of the 20 chapters of NAFTA the countries would renegotiate. The likeliest may be Chapter Three, which focuses on duties, non-dutiable barriers, rules of origin, and customs procedures. The Canadian and Mexican governments could use the opportunity to seek to reopen negotiations in areas of importance to them, including the alternative dispute resolutions mechanisms available under NAFTA. After a renegotiation, the legislative amendment process in each country could be lengthy and burdensome.

President-elect Trump has stated that if Canada and Mexico do not agree to a renegotiation, the United States will submit notice that it intends to withdraw from NAFTA. The Trump Administration would have the authority to do so under the President’s power over foreign affairs and Article 2205 of NAFTA, which states: “A Party may withdraw from this Agreement six months after it provides written notice of withdrawal to the other Parties. If a Party withdraws, the Agreement shall remain in force for the remaining Parties.”

Withdrawal from NAFTA would not, by itself, increase U.S. tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, which, prior to NAFTA, averaged approximately 4.3% on imports from Mexico. Instead, raising tariffs on Canadian or Mexican goods following a U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA would require a presidential proclamation.

Past proclamations have lowered duties. However, by issuing a new proclamation, or by revoking President Clinton’s earlier proclamation eliminating duties upon implementation of NAFTA, President-elect Trump could increase tariffs pursuant to Section 201 of the NAFTA Implementation Act, which authorizes the President to, following consultations with Congress, proclaim additional duties as necessary and appropriate to maintain the general level of reciprocal concessions with Canada and Mexico.

Any such actions could face Congressional criticism and court challenges by affected parties. Given that the United States is a member of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) and, therefore, is bound by the Most Favored Nation (“MFN”) clauses under the WTO agreements, the Trump Administration would be required to apply the preferential rates set forth in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, the rejection of which could result in a complaint by Canada or Mexico before the WTO.

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership

Although President-elect Trump has not publicly discussed the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (“TTIP”), which is being negotiated with the European Union, as much as the TPP, the future of negotiations for TTIP also are uncertain given President-elect Trump’s statements that he would review and renegotiate all trade agreements.

Prospects of a successful conclusion of the negotiations, which have already been fraught with opposition from several actors, seem increasingly unlikely in the foreseeable future.

In that regard, following the election, the EU Commissioner for Trade stated that the TTIP negotiations would be placed “in the freezer” for “quite some time.”

Bilateral Trade Agreements

Although, as noted above, the Trump Administration’s support for multilateral trade agreements (i.e., agreements involving the United States and more than one other country) may be uncertain, President-elect Trump has stated that he will pursue bilateral trade agreements (i.e., agreements between the United States and one other country). For example, if the United States withdraws from NAFTA, the Trump Administration could seek bilateral trade agreements with Canada and/or Mexico. In addition, in the wake of a British exit from the European Union, the Trump Administration may pursue a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom.

In 2017, Diversification and a Selective Approach Will Be Key in Seeking out Yield

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

According to Natixis Asset Management, in the current market context characterized by political uncertainties and increased volatility, diversification and a selective approach will be key in seeking out yield.

 2016 was eventful and full of surprises, from the Brexit vote to Donald Trump’selection, and 2017 looks set to be equally unpredictable, with some major political events coming up and a likely divergence in monetary policies.

According to Natixis Asset Management’s experts, investors who are seeking out yield will need to adopt an increasingly selective approach in view of the numberof risks we are currently seeing on the financial markets.

Shift in worldwide macroeconomic balance

According to Natixis Asset Management’s Chief Economist Philippe Waechter, we are set to see a change in the economic system in 2017 as a result of an in-depth shift in the balance of economic policies in the US. “As is the case for other developed countries, monetary policy has so far underpinned private domestic demand”, he states. “This explains why central banks kept their interest rates very low. But the tax cuts pledged by Donald Trump will buoy US domestic demand and give the Fed back some leeway, enabling it to raise its key rate and reclaim some flexibility as it manages monetary policy.»

Across other developed countries, the framework remains unchanged: the central bank’s policy is still the key decisive factor in driving growth momentum. In this respect, at its December meeting the ECB clearly announced that it would keep its key rate low, even after the end of its Quantitative Easing program.

“This new order for US economic policy is set to trigger a divergence in monetary policies and hence push up US interest rates” adds Philippe Waechter. “We are not expecting any strong moves to underpin economies in other developed markets, so this will lead to an increase in the dollar over the long term.”

Inflation is set to remain limited, well under the ECB target in the Eurozone and close to this target in the US. Meanwhile, energy will no longer make a negative contribution to inflation, but against a backdrop of modest growth worldwide, Philippe Waechter does not see a strong or lasting rise in oil prices.

Bond markets faced with rising interest rates

2016 was characterized by renewed volatility due to political risk. Concerns on the cycle in China at the start of the year, question marks over OPEC’s strategy after plummeting oil prices, along with various protest votes (Brexit, Trump, Italian referendum) turned out tobe decisive for the financial markets. The Fed’s caution and the ECB’s active approach buoyed bond performances. The low interest rate context continued, particularly as the ECB extended its asset purchase program to credit in particular. However, the trend towards yield curve flattening gave way to a sharp steepening movement in the second half of the year.

According to Ibrahima Kobar, Co-CIO and Head of Fixed Income, uncertainties and political risk will still be ever-present in 2017. “Europe will remain at the very heart of concerns due to Brexit and elections in France”, he explains. “Divergence of monetary policies may also trigger pressure on the bond markets. Lastly, OPEC members’ resolve will be tested when faced with the expected rebound in US output. The steep yield curve will safeguard investors on the fixed income markets, but we should expect greater volatility in 2017. Diversification will be key.”

However, against this backdrop, Natixis Asset Management expects neutral to positive performances across the various bond indices. “On the credit market, we prefer products where duration to interest rates is virtually zero, such as ABS or loans, followed by shorter duration products, High Yield as a whole as these bonds are negatively correlated with interest rates, and lastly, convertible bonds”, concludes Ibrahima Kobar.

European equities: a year of two halves

On the equity markets, against a backdrop of ongoing very sluggish growth and weak inflation, Donald Trump’s election quickened expectations of price increases and broke with the trend towards fiscal consolidation. “The configuration in Europe is different, but equities have followed trends on the US stock market, stepping up the sector rotation that kicked off mid-2016”, states Yves Maillot, Head of European Equities. “Cyclical and banking stocks have swiftly corrected part of their discount, to the detriment of defensives.” The key question remains the sustainability of this trend.

According to Yves Maillot, the US recovery looks logical, but transposing it to Europe is not a given. “We therefore think it is appropriate to follow the shift towards banking stocks in the short term, but we must consider revisiting defensive stocks in the second half of 2017 as the recovery in growth will be more limited in Europe. We are also keeping an eye on oil stocks due to the combination of more stable oil prices, a drop in oil exploration spending and the increase in free cashflow. Lastly, small caps’ increasing profit growth advantage over large caps continues to make this segment attractive”, concludes Yves Maillot.

Asset allocation: emergence of new correlations between asset classes

According to Franck Nicolas, Head of Investment & Clients Solutions, we could see anumber of shifts in the usual correlations between the various assets in 2017.

All eyes will be on changes in US economic policy. Tax cuts are set to swiftly prompt renewed confidence in both consumer spending and corporate investment, yet the fiscal stimulus from infrastructure will take much longer and looks less certain. “This change in direction comes at a time when risky assets are carrying demanding valuations due to several years of accommodative monetary policy, and this could trigger long-lasting disaffection in the shape of several months of stock market stagnation”, explains Franck Nicolas. Similarly, political and economic risks in the Eurozone, such as the severe disparity of emerging regions, make a highly selective approach to asset allocation absolutely vital.

“More than ever, the secular trend towards a widespread rise for financial assets seems interrupted, so a more discerning stance will be required to seek out yield”, adds Franck Nicolas. “We are fairly positive on US equities at this stage, although they are somewhat pricey. In the second part of the year, we will likely take profits, and if the yield curves steepen, we will bolster our allocation on US bonds. Meanwhile in Europe, we underweight both equities and fixed income. Lastly, on emerging markets, selection will be the watch word: fundamentals are admittedly stabilizing, but the rising dollar could hamper growth in some regions”, concludes Franck Nicolas.

Philanthropic Strategies for 2017 and Beyond

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

There are several strategies that can be utilized to help you implement your philanthropic mission. While you can make gifts that solely benefit charities, you can also make gifts that provide you with financial benefits. Both offer the opportunity for immediate and deferred gifting. John O. McManus, Founding Principal, McManus & Associates, identifies tax-efficient estate planning vehicles to consider for your ongoing philanthropic mission.

Set up a Family Foundation
Rather than making gifts directly to charities and surrendering any say as to the application of the gifts thereafter, a Foundation allows you to retain control over the administration and investment of the assets that you have earmarked for future grant-making, while enjoying the full benefit immediately of a charitable income tax deduction – up to 30% of your adjusted gross income for cash gifts and 20% for gifts of appreciated stock. By making gifts to charities in increments over time, you and your family can maximize your influence over their ongoing use to the selected charities. Presently, your estate would benefit from an estate tax deduction equal to the fair market value of any assets passing to the Foundation at your death.  However, under President-Elect Trump’s tax proposal, contributions of appreciated assets to a private foundation established by the decedent or the decedent’s relative would be disallowed.

Create a Charitable Remainder Trust (CRT)
Charitable remainder trusts are irrevocable trusts that provide for two classes of beneficiaries: (i) the income beneficiary who receives a fixed percentage of income for the CRT term, which could be a specified number of years (up to 20) or the remainder of your lifetime, and thereafter (ii) the designated charity or family foundation, to which the remaining assets of the CRT go after the term is completed. Due to the fact that a gift of the remainder interest in the CRT is given to a tax-exempt, not-for-profit organization, you would qualify for an income tax deduction for the initial contribution to the CRT. The amount of the current income tax deduction is based on the present value of the remainder interest to the charity and is limited to 20% of your adjusted gross income. Any part of the deduction not deployed for the year of the gift to the CRT (for example, if your income is less than the deduction) may be carried forward as an income tax deduction in the succeeding four years.

Consider a Charitable Lead Trust
Charitable Lead Trusts (CLTs) are irrevocable, split-interest trusts in which income payments are made to a qualified charity, while the remaining trust corpus is given to a noncharitable beneficiary, generally the spouse or children of the donor. The assets are permanently excluded from your estate for estate tax purposes. When the trust terminates, the assets remaining are passed to the designated beneficiaries free of estate and gift tax. For those with a strong interest in making charitable donations, CLTs provide a means to make donations to charities without completely disinheriting children or a spouse.  The low interest rate environment today reduces the required annual charitable donation and increases the probability of greater assets transferring to the beneficiaries. The challenge is to manage the assets so that they generate the necessary payments for the charity, while at the same time providing growth that will pass to your family.

Contribute to a Donor-Advised Fund
A donor-advised fund is a separately identified fund that is maintained and operated by a section 501(c)(3) organization, which is called a sponsoring organization. Each fund is composed of contributions made by individual donors. Once the donor makes the contribution, the organization has legal control over it. However, the donor retains advisory privileges with respect to the distribution of funds and the investment of assets in the account.

Donors receive a tax deduction when they make a charitable contribution to a donor-advised fund. Deductions can be taken up to 50% of adjusted gross income (AGI) for gifts of cash and up to 30% of AGI for gifts of appreciated securities (with a 5-year carryforward for unused amounts above this AGI limit).

The Vital Guide to Hiring FP&A Experts

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) experts are a pillar of any finance team, only building their models after feeling the pulse of every part of the business. This guide -published by a group of Toptal writers- will help you identify the very best FP&A candidates, arming you with the right sets of questions to make sure they are best suited to your specific needs.

Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) experts are jacks-of-all-trades and the master of most others, making them both difficult to come by and desperately valuable. According to a CEB report, “Finance and its HR partners have become adept at recruiting accountants and [other] technical professionals who have learned how to apply new regulations quickly to financial statements and manage short-term variation in their careers. However, very few professionals have been taught the skills that will help them succeed in a more judgment-based role, which also requires advanced analytical and interpersonal skills.”

Recruiting for a role that is still taking shape can be difficult and downright frustrating. This may be particularly true for FP&A, a role in which sales targets, marketing campaigns, product launches, planned investments, capital needs, political risks and far more variables besides are pored over and broken down. This guide is designed to help you spot top financial planning and analysis experts, who combine strong analytical mindsets and technical ability with top-notch people skills.

While there’s no hard and fast recruiting method, there are certain questions you can ask, allowing you to identify the skillsets needed.

Learners at Heart

FP&A consultants need to be learners at heart. They must strive to know your business inside and out, as well as understand external factors, such as emerging trends within your industry. They will display a natural curiosity and the ability to learn quickly, turning new knowledge into valuable insights. To assess this, consider asking candidates questions like the following:

Q: The CFO of a $400M company has tasked you with an urgent project to identify the leading cost drivers in the company’s flagging pharmaceutical division, where costs have spiked 30% in the last year, while profitability has remained stagnant. This is an area of the business with which you are not familiar, and the CFO has given you a week to prepare a presentation for the executive team with a plan to increase the division’s profitability by 10+% in 12-18 months. How do you approach this project?

Top FP&A specialists know the right questions to ask in order to rapidly understand the financial dynamics of any area of the business & how to address any problems. Here are a few key questions good candidates may ask.

  • What are the financial results & trends for this division over the last few years?
  • What are the trends in the division’s industry, including competitive overview?
  • What are the key metrics for this division? How are performance & success measured?
  • What are the division’s strategic & financial goals/targets, both short-term and long-term?
  • What are the cost drivers for this division?
  • How do you allocate costs within this division? What is the methodology used? How do you measure return on investment?
  • Who are the decision makers within this division?

Top FP&A specialists are quick to absorb relevant data and know to disregard superfluous information, all while driving toward solutions-oriented analysis.

Talented Communicators

“I have seen people who are Excel wizards, but can’t convey key messages [for their companies]. They struggle with taking it to the next level. How do you turn a financial model into a clear message with specific recommendations and solutions? That’s the key skill,» according to Carlos Aguirre, VP of Finance @ Toptal.

It’s not enough to have outstanding analytical skills. Top FP&A consultants must be able to establish their own credibility, explain complex financial problems in simple terms to key stakeholders, and propose clear solutions, backed by accurate data and insightful analysis.

When communicating with FP&A candidates, the following traits, which are commonly valued in many new hires, are especially important to emphasize and screen for:

  • Intellectual curiosity (i.e. the ability to ask the right questions)
  • Patience with your questions
  • Politeness
  • Social skills and a great first impression
  • Ability to clearly teach you about something that you don’t already know

FP&A experts need to inspire confidence through skillful communication. Otherwise, their business recommendations will fall flat, and the company won’t benefit.

Q: Your client, the CEO of a $200M late-stage startup, has asked you to analyze the company’s financial results over the past year and prepare a capital allocation model for the upcoming year to present to the executive team. In the process, you uncover multiple inaccuracies in their underlying data, and you know that the company’s CFO was responsible for building their accounting/finance system from the ground up. How do you approach the project?

Elite FP&A consultants must be confident in their analyses, be capable of addressing data issues head-on, and proactively propose solutions that fix the roots of these problems. They need to be able to instill confidence that they have a detailed understanding of the situation at hand.

In responding to this question, a good FP&A candidate will clearly outline their plan for:

  • Communicating with the CFO to discuss & further investigate data issues.
  • Helping fix the underlying issues and assembling accurate financial data for the successful completion of the project at hand.
  • Providing a strong position on what the organization stands to gain by following the proposed capital allocation model vs. other alternatives (including those that may have been taken in the past).
  • Ensuring a long-term fix for the data issues and a more robust system and/or process for the organization’s financial data gathering & analysis, so as to ensure that inaccuracies don’t happen again (while also making it clear how this fix / investment will benefit the organization in the long run).

Critical Thinkers

The difference between average FP&A talent and top FP&A talent often comes down to their ability to handle large amounts of data & tight deadlines. You need to understand whether a candidate is prone to analysis paralysis.

Top FP&A experts have a keen sense for how to approach each project, how much time to allocate to each step, and which areas deserve most of their time & focus.

Q: Profit, which is currently hovering at 3% of revenue, has declined 20% over the last year within Top Flight’s core business unit–its fleet of private jets. What is your approach for efficiently identifying the main issues & making recommendations for improvements? What specific data would you leverage? What would be an alternative approach, and why?

FP&A experts will begin by outlining an overall framework, as well as the key questions that they think will most efficiently help uncover the underlying issues & help shape a successful solution. They will outline the data set needed for efficient analysis.

They will also think of strong alternative solutions in case the original approach does not yield efficient answers & optimal solutions.

FP&A experts will be able to evaluate a variety of different analytical approaches in parallel, quickly determine which one has the highest potential to be fruitful, and tackle it by asking some of the following questions:

  • What are the financial results & trends for this business unit over the last few years?
  • What are the key performance indicators & metrics for this business unit? How are those performing versus historical periods?
  • How is the industry performing? Are there macroeconomic issues at hand? Or is this company’s business unit underperforming the industry & the competition?
  • What do leaders within the business unit think is causing the underperformance? What do they think is an optimal strategic path forward? Does the data & analysis support this?
  • Have any initiatives have been put into place already? What were the results? Are there elements that have not been contemplated which may be contributing to the issue? (i.e. need to “peel the onion” and fully understand performance drivers & the root causes of the issues in each sub-segment within the business unit).

Creative Problem-Solvers

Along with being strong critical thinkers, top FP&A specialists are also creative problem-solvers. You want eager and adept solutions-oriented candidates. They should be hungry to proactively solve problems across the organization, horizontally and vertically.

Q: Your client is a small, privately-held business that has experienced 20% year-over-year revenue growth over the last three-year period. Lately, however, the company has been more budget-constrained, and growth has stagnated. You know that the company has ambitious long-term growth goals. How do you optimize the organization’s capital structure in order to reignite growth while keeping costs under control?

Top FP&A consultants will be able to assemble creative, innovative solutions to open-ended problems like this one. Here, it seems that the client needs more capital to invest and jump-start revenue growth. What’s the best way to tackle this issue?

For starters, FP&A experts need to be make an assessment to determine how efficiently current capital is being used, and what the return on invested capital is. Does the company really need to find additional capital? Or can existing capital usage be further optimized?

An FP&A expert can help identify creative options for reallocating existing capital & budgets to funnel more capital towards the areas with highest value from a strategic & return on investment perspective. If cost-cutting is a must, then a return on invested capital analysis can help make the most efficient cost cutting (optimization) decisions – fully backed by proper analytics.

If additional capital is needed, an FP&A expert needs to be able to advise the client on the different options available (i.e. both debt & equity) and the pros and cons of each. This includes impact to ownership, tax implications, interest costs involved, covenants or other thresholds/requirements imposed by the capital issuer, etc. In making a recommendation, FP&A experts will account for the different risks & benefits involved with each option, as well as take into consideration the client’s short & long term goals.

Patient, yet Ambitious

FP&A experts must walk a fine line between being patient and being ambitious. Weeding through reams of technical data requires both perseverance and the ability to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Experts must display patience while learning about every facet of the company as they hone their basis for analysis.

Their patience should be matched with an ambition to be a vital key player and strong voice at the decision-making table. Experts should be zealous in their ability to influence the trajectory of the business with their unique efforts. FP&A is not a passive function, and a candidate’s attitude should reflect this activist spirit.

Q: Your client is the board of a $1B pharmaceutical company and has asked you to build a rolling 13-week cash flow forecast to present at the organization’s next board meeting. However, the company’s CFO has been slow to provide all the information you need. How do you keep the process moving while waiting for this critical information?

Top-flight FP&A consultants can read the room and pragmatically assess possible solutions to roadblocks.

This is where patience comes into play. FP&A consultants must be able to successfully work with the CFO and build healthy credibility. However, they will ultimately never sacrifice their focus on providing their client, the board, with the comprehensive forecast requested (and on a timely basis).

An FP&A consultant will understand that a CFO is a very busy individual, and will take a proactive approach in outlining a clear framework with specific data & information requirements so as to avoid any time wasting. The FP&A expert will also offer to connect and work with the CFO’s Team directly to gather such data & information in a timely manner.

If the CFO has been very busy, it is possible that he/she will feel uneasy about not being able to spend enough time on this project. It is therefore imperative for the FP&A expert to masterfully walk the CFO through the analysis in detail, giving him/her the necessary comfort about the accuracy of the end product and building credibility along the way.

Essential Technical Skills

The best FP&A experts need to be competent with the tools that companies are using for their financial planning and analysis activities (i.e. BI / EPM software).

As part of the hiring process, it is important to evaluate how (and how well) candidates engage with key tools of the trade (besides Excel, which is a must!). Ask them to walk you, in detail, through their experience in working with some of the tools noted below. Specifically, inquire what their level of interaction with those tools was (i.e. did they help implement them? Were they super users? Did they use them on a regular basis for their analysis activities? etc.).

Financial planning and analysis specialists need to be familiar with tools that enable monitoring and analyzing of an organization’s performance, key metrics & KPIs (such as revenue & profitability, margins, ROI, net working capital, cash conversion cycle, etc.). It’s important for FP&A consultants to be well-versed in how such tools (e.g. Hyperion, Business Objects, Cognos, etc.) work & support strong analytics.

Q: A medium-sized firm in Silicon Valley is seeking your help to select the platform the company should use next year to support their FP&A activities. Walk us through your decision-making process.

FP&A experts will need to ask and answer several key questions when considering platforms alternatives, for example:

  • What are the client’s key needs for the system? What type of analytics are best suited for the business?
  • What is the client’s budget and timeline for this implementation? Can the vendor provide estimates on implementation & recurring costs based on scope?
  • How rapidly is the client expanding? This is key to ensuring the solution addresses both current & future needs.
  • What system alternatives are out there that may suit the client’s needs? What have other companies in the client’s space used? Are there reviews/ratings available? Does online research unearth a stellar track record of system performance & service?
  • Does the vendor have partnerships with complementary third-party professional services or applications?
  • What resources does the client currently have in place for this implementation project? Which gaps need to be filled to ensure successful implementation?

And That’s How You Find the Best Talent

«It’s all about closing the gap between raw data, insights, and action», says Dylan Hoffman, former VP of Finance @ DNA Marketing.

Technical skills in finance are only as good as the business solutions they produce.

FP&A experts are creative problem solvers, who help you look backward and forward to answer the most pressing challenges facing your organization. The best FP&A experts will also be able to quickly bridge the gap from raw data to solutions. For the best among them, not only do they think outside the box – there is no box.

You can read the original article in this link.

Billionaire’s Overall Wealth Declined by USD 300 Billion

  |   Por  |  0 Comentarios

UBS Group AG and PwC presented their joint annual billionaires report, “Are billionaires feeling the pressure?” The report examines wealth creation within the billionaire segment in 2015 and singles out the transfer of USD 2.1 trillion in billionaire wealth that is expected over the next two decades.

2015 saw a pause as total billionaire wealth fell by USD 300 billion to USD 5.1 trillion. Headwinds such as the transfer of assets within families, commodity price deflation and an appreciating US dollar, impacted the growth of billionaire wealth. Average billionaire wealth dropped from USD 4.0 billion to USD 3.7 billion and the US added only five net new billionaires in 20151. In contrast, Asia produced one billionaire every three days, with China alone accounting for over half of the 113 additions.

The findings build on UBS/PwC’s previous Billionaires Reports, released in May and December 2015. According to the new report, we are about to witness the greatest transfer of wealth in human history. Approximately 460 billionaires will transfer USD 2.1 trillion, the equivalent of India’s GDP, to their heirs over a period of just 20 years. For most of Asia’s young economies, where over 85% of billionaires are first- generation, this will be the first-ever handover of billionaire wealth.

Josef Stadler, Head Global Ultra High Net Worth, UBS, said: “The findings of this report help us stay ahead of the issues that matter to better advise our clients, which include over half the world’s billionaires and three out of every five billionaires in Asia. Even as China’s growth moderates, it is the bright spot for great wealth growth. Led by a tech sector on the rise, China minted 80 new billionaires in 2015 and Asia overall created a new billionaire nearly every three days. Meanwhile Europe’s billionaires stood out for maintaining and passing wealth down to their heirs. This is something that regions like Asia, where many more billionaires are first generation, can learn a lot from, especially as we head into the greatest period of wealth transfer we’ve ever seen. Just as Asian billionaires can gain from the experience of wealth transfer in Europe, there’s much that Europe can learn from the rapid billionaire growth in Asia.”

Michael Spellacy, Global Wealth Leader at PwC US added: “As the shockwaves from regulatory upheaval in the EU continue to trigger global currency fluctuations, strategic planning becomes even more crucial for wealth preservation. Those who control assets face tough investment questions. Encouragingly, this year’s report shows that Europe’s billionaires were the most resilient with many of the 60 individuals from Europe inheriting their fortunes in 2015 for the first time. The US, which boasts the biggest collection of billionaires by region, sets the trend. Total US billionaire wealth fell, but ‘new money’ fared better than old, falling by just 4%, from an average of USD 4.7bn per individual to USD 4.5bn.”

Key findings from the report include:

A USD 2.1 trillion inheritance
The past 20 years of exceptional wealth creation will soon be followed by the largest-ever wealth transfer. We estimate that less than 500 people (460 of the billionaires in the markets we cover) will hand over USD 2.1 trillion, a figure equivalent to India’s GDP, to their heirs in the next 20 years. For most of Asia’s young economies, where over 85% of billionaires are first generation, this will be the first-ever handover of billionaire wealth.

The Gilded Age pauses
After more than 20 years of unprecedented wealth creation, the Second Gilded Age has stalled. The transfer of assets within families, commodity price deflation and an appreciating US dollar have emerged as significant headwinds. In 2015, in the markets we cover, 210 fortunes broke through the billion-dollar wealth ceiling and 160 billionaires dropped off, leading to a net increase in the billionaire population of 50 to 1,397. Yet their total wealth fell from USD 5.4 trillion to USD 5.1 trillion. Average wealth fell from USD 4 billion in 2014 to USD 3.7 billion in 2015. It is still too early to tell if 2015 signals a pause in the Gilded Age or something more.

Old legacies’ lessons for new billionaires
Of the billionaire fortunes that have fallen below the billion dollar mark since 1995, 90% were not preserved beyond the first and second generations. At a time of economic headwinds and imminent wealth transfer, Europe’s old legacies are a model for new billionaires to avoid this fate. Germany and Switzerland, in particular, are the countries with the greatest share of ‘old’ wealth. Asia’s family- orientated billionaires may wish to adapt the European model of wealth preservation to their own needs.

New philanthropic models
In the first half of the 20th century, entrepreneurial families such as the Carnegies and Rockefellers funded significant advances in areas such as education and health. By doing so, they displayed many traits associated with billionaires – chiefly business focused and smart risk-takers – to drive success. After over three decades of this new Gilded Age, billionaire philanthropy is growing all over the world. New philanthropic models are emerging (loans, guarantees, contracts, impact investing etc.) and the millennial generation is putting philanthropy at the heart of their family values. In spite of this the current Gilded Age may not match its predecessor’s record.

You can read the full report here.