How UCITS Corporate Bond Funds Behave in the Face of Financial Shocks

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

International investors consider UCITS funds to be a solid, reliable vehicle with very clear regulation. Achieving this success has required the commitment of European authorities, which, following recent financial crises, have intensified scrutiny over the role of redemptions in bond funds as a potential amplifier of market stress. In particular, they have emphasized the need to strengthen liquidity management tools and market-wide stress testing frameworks. But have they succeeded?

According to the latest study published by the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), although there were periods of higher redemptions, the magnitude of outflows in corporate bond funds remained relatively contained during three recent and clearly distinct financial shocks. For EFAMA, the results of the study contradict concerns expressed by financial regulators and international institutions, such as the FSB, the ECB, and the ESRB, which have argued that corporate bond funds — especially those offering daily liquidity — may amplify market stress during periods of turbulence.

“These concerns are based on the theoretical belief that a potential mismatch between the liquidity of fund assets and investors’ redemption rights could trigger forced asset sales (fire sales) and greater financial instability. However, our data indicate that such scenarios did not materialize in practice. Even during periods of high market volatility, fund managers appeared able to meet investor redemptions without resorting to disruptive asset sales or experiencing severe liquidity stress,” states the latest Market Insights report titled “Fund redemptions in periods of shock: evidence from outflows in UCITS corporate bond funds.”

EFAMA’s experts reached this conclusion after conducting a comprehensive analysis of daily and monthly redemption patterns of listed European corporate bond funds during the three most recent financial shocks — COVID-19 in 2020, the interest rate hikes of 2022, and the tariff shock of 2025 — assessing whether the observed redemption levels could pose a material threat to financial stability.

“This analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” highlighted Federico Cupelli, Deputy Director of Regulatory Policy at EFAMA.

Following the evidence
The organization explains that the evidence suggests that, at least in the cases analyzed, corporate bond funds acted as relatively stable investment vehicles rather than becoming sources of systemic risk. For example, although the analysis shows that the largest monthly fund redemptions ranged between 3% and 6% of the previous month’s net assets across all observations, ESMA’s stress test scenarios assume redemptions of 22% in a single week. “These results invite a more nuanced view of the role of corporate bond funds in financial stability debates and suggest that current liquidity management practices are more robust than sometimes assumed,” EFAMA notes.

In fact, they argue that the entire debate about the role of bond funds should be framed within a broader context, as investment funds are not the only holders of bonds. “Other key players, such as central banks, banks, pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds — among others — represent a much larger share of fixed income holdings compared to investment funds,” they point out.

Finally, they emphasize that this analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than broad-based regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. “Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” they argue.

EFAMA’s proposal
Based on its previous analysis, EFAMA has identified several principles that supervisors should take into account when overseeing funds:

  1. The notion of liquidity mismatch used by supervisors to identify vulnerabilities in the fund sector is inappropriate. In their view, rather than examining how much investors can redeem over a given period according to the fund’s rules, supervisors should consider how much outflow volume a fund can reasonably expect based on its historical behavior.
  2. Fund subcategories, such as investment grade and high-yield corporate bond funds, are not homogeneous categories. Therefore, they do not consider it appropriate to limit the analysis to their aggregate behavior (for example, by stating that “high-yield corporate bond funds exhibit structural liquidity mismatches”). “A more granular analysis is needed to identify those funds that are more vulnerable to liquidity shocks. Similarly, in top-down stress test scenarios, it is not appropriate to assume that all funds within a category will face similar levels of redemptions. Stress test exercises based on these assumptions are unlikely to accurately identify where vulnerabilities truly lie, if they exist,” they argue.

    3. It is relatively rare for a fund to experience daily outflows exceeding 3%. “This means that, in most cases, asset managers do not face sudden and significant outflows that could trigger forced asset sales. Moreover, large outflows are usually driven by the exit of an institutional investor from the fund,” they explain. In such cases, they note that the investor is typically required to provide sufficient advance notice to the manager so that preparations can be made for the withdrawal. For this reason, persistent daily outflows above 3% could be an indication of stress in a fund and may warrant closer supervisory attention.

Financial Institutions That Have Closed or Evacuated Offices in the Middle East

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

latin american resilient currencies
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In recent weeks, several international financial institutions and major financial services firms have adopted extraordinary measures in the Middle East — especially in Dubai and other Gulf financial centers — after Iran threatened to attack “economic centers and banks” as part of the escalation of the regional conflict. These warnings triggered temporary office evacuations, branch closures, or the shift to remote work for employees in some of the region’s main financial hubs.

One of the most notable cases is Citigroup. The US bank ordered the evacuation of several of its offices in Dubai, including facilities located in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and in the Oud Metha district. As a precautionary measure, Citi also temporarily closed some branches in the United Arab Emirates and asked its employees to work from home until the security situation stabilizes.

Another of the affected institutions was Goldman Sachs, which also asked its staff in Dubai and other Gulf countries to avoid going to the office.

JPMorgan Chase adopted similar measures: the bank allowed a large part of its workforce in the Middle East to work remotely while risks to corporate facilities and staff were being assessed.

Among the banks with a strong historical presence in the Gulf, Standard Chartered also asked its employees to temporarily leave offices in Dubai’s financial district and continue their activities remotely. The British bank generates a significant share of its revenue from Asia and the Middle East.

Another international institution affected was HSBC, which temporarily closed some branches in Qatar and expanded remote work policies for its staff in several Gulf countries.

In addition to banks, several global financial services and consulting firms — part of the international financial ecosystem — also adopted similar measures. Among them were PwC and Deloitte, which evacuated or temporarily closed offices in Dubai and other Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait, as a precautionary measure in response to the Iranian threats.

Note prepared using sources from Euronews, Reuters/AFP (L’Orient Today), The Times, Bloomberg, Middle East Monitor, and The New Arab.

Chilean and Colombian Peso, the Latin American Currencies With the Greatest Resilience

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

private bdcs united states
Canva

The Brazilian real and the Colombian peso should be the currencies that show the greatest resilience during the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, as they are net exporters of oil. Even so, the most notable movement for Ebury is the appreciation of the dollar of between 1% and 4% against the Latin American currencies that they usually cover, “given the shift that has taken place in global markets toward safe-haven assets.”

In its latest report, the firm’s experts highlight that the Chilean peso appears especially vulnerable as it is one of the largest net importers of oil among emerging markets. “In addition, the weight of energy in the national CPI is relatively higher than in other countries,” they add. By contrast, the second key conclusion of the report is that in Peru, local disruptions in the supply of natural gas have further worsened the situation.

The Brazilian real (BRL)

According to Ebury’s report, the Brazilian real has corrected some of its losses, but it has still depreciated by 1.5% against the greenback since the conflict in the Middle East escalated. “As a net exporter of oil, the Brazilian real should be less impacted than other emerging market currencies by the recent rise in oil prices. However, it has not emerged completely unscathed from the generalized flight toward safe-haven assets and currencies such as the dollar,” they note.

As for economic data, which have been completely overshadowed by the geopolitical conflict, Brazil’s fourth-quarter GDP growth came in line with expectations, registering a modest expansion of 0.1% quarter-on-quarter. According to their analysis, this clearly reflects the high interest rates set in Brazil, which they also believe have recently caused some slowdown in the labor market: the unemployment rate rose to 5.4%, although it remains close to historical lows. “Looking ahead, we still believe that Brazil’s central bank will begin its rate-cutting cycle this year, but it may act more cautiously while the conflict in the Middle East persists,” they conclude.

The Chilean peso (CLP)

As indicated in the previously mentioned conclusions of the report, the Chilean peso is one of the currencies most affected by the conflict in the Middle East, and not only at the regional level. “Chile’s position as a net importer of oil, together with the fall in copper prices amid the possibility of weaker global demand, have been the main factors behind the depreciation of the peso, which exceeded 4% last week. Given the risk of an inflationary rebound if the conflict drags on and if oil prices remain elevated, swap markets have drastically adjusted their expectations for rate cuts by the Central Bank of Chile this year,” Ebury argues.

They also highlight that just a few weeks ago markets were pricing in a rate cut at the next meeting with a probability close to 70%; now that figure has fallen to around 25%. “As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate a cautious BCCh at its next Monetary Policy Meeting, despite the recent slowdown in inflation observed in February. As long as geopolitical uncertainty persists and clear signs of de-escalation do not appear, the Chilean peso, like other emerging market currencies, will remain under downward pressure,” the report notes.

The Colombian peso (COP)

In the case of the Colombian peso, Ebury’s analysis indicates that it has also been one of the most resilient currencies in Latin America since the conflict in Iran broke out, as it is a net exporter of oil. That said, the document notes that it has also lost ground against the greenback (just over 1%) amid the generalized flight from risk assets and currencies.

In addition, the parliamentary elections do not appear to have had a significant impact on the exchange rate, with the expected political fragmentation taking place. “Pacto Histórico emerged as the political force with the greatest representation in Congress, while the strong result of Paloma Valencia puts her in a good position to compete with De la Espriella for the right-wing vote. Given the high percentage of undecided voters, the potential outcome of the presidential election continues to generate uncertainty in the local market, which could add a risk premium to the peso,” they note.

The Mexican peso (MXN)

For its part, the Mexican peso has fallen by more than 3% against the greenback since the outbreak of the conflict. According to the report, amid the possibility of higher inflation, markets have stopped pricing in rate cuts by Banxico. “In addition to developments in oil prices and geopolitical tensions, markets will closely monitor the negotiations over the USMCA, which are scheduled to begin next week,” they note.

In part, according to their view, this could be positive news for the Mexican economy, as trade uncertainty could dissipate sooner than expected. However, they believe that the net impact on the economy and the Mexican peso will depend largely on the content of the agreement that is ultimately ratified. In this sense, Ebury’s forecast is clear: additional volatility around the Mexican peso can be expected in the coming weeks.

The Peruvian sol (PEN)

Finally, the report highlights the performance of the Peruvian sol, which has fallen almost 4% since the first attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran, depreciating to levels not seen since late September. It is worth recalling that, as a net importer of oil, Peru is vulnerable to this energy shock.

“Although it started from more favorable inflation levels than other countries, a leak in a gas pipeline in the south of the country is causing a severe shortage, leading to energy rationing across different sectors. A significant rebound in inflation is expected in upcoming readings, which will partially correct once the leak is repaired. This is believed to take approximately two weeks. In this regard, it will be interesting to analyze how the BCRP responds to these developments at this week’s meeting,” Ebury concludes.

The Liquid and the Solid: What Is Happening with Private BDCs in the United States

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

fondos ucits bonos corporativos shocks
Canva

Tensions, crisis, a reminder of a structural reality, a turning point, and opportunity: in recent weeks the alternative assets and private credit sector has experienced episodes of lack of immediate liquidity that have led major asset managers to limit capital withdrawals.

This phenomenon does not necessarily imply insolvency, but it does reflect a structural problem in the segment: the difficulty of offering frequent liquidity in vehicles that invest in very illiquid assets, such as direct loans to companies.

There is a “liquidity mismatch,” or as Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF, notes in a recent report: “In simple terms, the market is remembering a structural reality: private credit is not a liquid asset, even though some structures attempt to offer periodic exit windows.”

A new difficulty for investors already saturated with uncertainty

Amid the enormous uncertainty generated by the new war in the Middle East and the chronic instability of public markets, experts are observing these movements that until recently “seemed unlikely,” according to Cruz himself.

For analysts at Apollo Academy (a firm specialized in alternative assets), we are facing a turning point.

During the period roughly between 2010 and 2022, low interest rates, abundant liquidity, and multiple expansion allowed many managers to generate returns without needing to rely heavily on operational value creation. However, the macroeconomic environment has changed structurally, and the sector now faces a scenario in which those factors can no longer sustain the same level of returns. In this context, the future success of private equity will depend on recovering the principles that historically defined the industry: discipline in acquisitions, operational improvement of portfolio companies, and clear strategies to generate liquidity at exit, argue David Sambur, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Equity; Matt Nord, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Hybrid; and Antoine Munfakh, Partner Deputy Glob, in a report attached at this link.

The Apollo report argues that private equity must return to its roots: “Traditionally, the attractiveness of this asset class was based on managers’ ability to acquire companies with potential for improvement, implement strategic and operational changes, and subsequently monetize that value through an exit. This approach involved active participation in the management of companies, with the objective of improving their efficiency, optimizing their cost structure, driving growth, or redefining their competitive positioning. Because they were not subject to the pressure of quarterly results typical of public markets, companies under private equity ownership could adopt long-term transformation strategies.”

Greater differentiation among asset managers

Experts agree that opportunities in the sector will depend on greater differentiation among asset managers’ strategies.

“Greater competition among managers, together with the return of some banks to certain segments of corporate financing, has begun to put pressure on origination conditions. This has translated into lower origination in some segments and a gradual compression of spreads, particularly in corporate direct lending, where most BDCs operate.

This adjustment is creating an increasingly clear differentiation within the universe of private credit. While many BDCs compete in the corporate direct lending segment, there are other areas of private credit where competition remains significantly lower,” says Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF.

In particular, financing backed by real assets — such as asset-backed lending and real estate financing — continues to offer attractive spreads and more defensive structures, with origination dynamics that remain favorable, the expert adds.

“For those investing with a long-term horizon, this dynamic is not necessarily negative. In fact, it can strengthen the ecosystem. When speculative flows decrease and the capital that remains is truly patient, managers can focus on what truly generates value: originating quality credit, structuring solid transactions, and capturing attractive spreads. In that sense, what is happening today with private BDCs is not a crisis, but a natural transition in a market that has grown rapidly over the past decade. And as often happens in financial markets, periods of adjustment are also those that ultimately consolidate long-term opportunities,” concludes Cruz.

Bond Market: An Unusual Behavior to Watch

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

kevin warsh economic debate
Canva

Rising oil prices and adjustments in global equity markets are capturing investors’ attention; however, investment firms are urging investors to watch what is happening in the fixed income market, especially with bonds. Since the start of the war between the U.S. and Iran at the end of February, the bond market has behaved in an unusual way for a geopolitical conflict.

According to experts, it is striking that instead of clearly acting as a safe haven, bonds have experienced selling pressure and their yields have risen. For example, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury exceeded 4%, driven by rising oil prices and inflation expectations. Normally, during geopolitical episodes there is a “flight to quality,” meaning investors buy sovereign bonds as safe-haven assets. However, this time the opposite has happened because inflation risk has weighed more heavily than the safe-haven effect. Some analysts have even noted that the bond market “is not functioning as a safe haven” in this episode.

Bond Market Behavior

“In the case of sovereign bonds, the most common pattern during periods of geopolitical tension has been a decline in yields due to demand for safe-haven assets. This was the initial reaction following the announcement of the military operation. However, yields subsequently rose throughout the week. With the exception of Japan, the main government debt markets have experienced a bear flattening so far this month, with short-term yields showing significantly worse performance. The so-called ‘bond vigilantes’ could argue that this reflects the increasingly fragile state of public balance sheets, given the high level of debt and ongoing fiscal expansion, which could undermine the traditional role of sovereign bonds as a store of value during periods of global uncertainty,” explain experts at Muzinich & Co.

Daniel Loughney, Head of Fixed Income at Mediolanum International Funds (MIFL), agrees that, so far, sovereign debt has shown the weakest performance, as inflation concerns have led to the dismantling of expectations for interest rate cuts. “In fact, the ECB is now expected to tighten monetary policy by around 50 basis points. As a result, short-term bonds have been the most affected, while longer-maturity bonds have suffered less,” he notes.

In the view of Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, the reason for this behavior is that the bond market is highly focused on the problems that could arise from rising hydrocarbon prices, particularly the impact of natural gas prices in Europe and the United Kingdom. “U.K. government bonds have performed very poorly during this period, with the yield on 10-year bonds rising by around 0.5% during this conflict, and shorter-dated bonds are now moving to price in an interest rate hike by the Bank of England in June.”

For their part, Adam Hetts, Global Head of Multi-Asset, and Oliver Blackbourn, Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson, explain that concerns about rising European inflation—or simply prolonged stickiness in the United States—would explain why bond yields have increased. “Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds have risen as markets have priced out one of the interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve that had been expected for the end of the year. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have moved less than their European counterparts, as Friday’s U.S. employment figures helped offset part of the upward pressure on yields stemming from expected inflation,” they note.

A Look at the Credit Market

In contrast, since the conflict between the U.S. and Iran began, investment grade credit has not significantly reflected economic tensions in prices. According to market reports, spreads have moved slightly but continue to reflect the excellent fundamental quality of most large companies in this environment.

“That is likely where the risk lies in the coming weeks: if oil and gas supply issues persist, which have a lasting negative impact on corporate quality, corporate credit is likely to underperform expectations. In recent months we have favored higher quality in credit markets, reducing risk and holding more cash than we normally would. It is not yet time to put that cash to work,” explains Hickmore.

Muzinich & Co acknowledges that total returns in credit markets are lower so far this month, although, interestingly, high yield has slightly outperformed investment grade credit. “In fact, a European investor positioned in U.S. high yield without currency hedging would probably be quite satisfied with that investment decision so far this month.” As for riskier assets, the U.S. asset manager expects credit spreads to widen.

The Conclusions

After this quick analysis of both markets, according to Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, what is happening is clear: “The increase in government bond yields is doing part of the heavy lifting and has prevented credit spreads from widening as much as we might have expected before the conflict began.”

Despite these unusual dynamics, Loughney argues in favor of staying invested and says conservative investors should not overreact. “Much of the downside risk has already been priced in under the assumption of a prolonged conflict. Any sign of resolution in the coming week could trigger some reversal of last week’s moves, from which investors could benefit,” he says.

Investment firms argue that the escalation of geopolitical risks has occurred at a time when inflationary pressures have been steadily moderating worldwide. As a result, they explain, over the past 12 months there have been more signs that fixed income can act as a counterweight to weakness in equity markets. “Central banks are likely to look through the brief spike in energy and commodity prices in general. However, a prolonged conflict that increases the likelihood of a sustained rise in oil prices will raise concerns about increasingly entrenched inflation. It is this secondary effect—if inflation expectations become unanchored—that could worry central banks. For now, we see some short-term upside risk for yields, but still within the recent trading range. Recent developments reiterate the need to actively manage fixed income portfolios, not only to take advantage of opportunities but also to protect against downside risks. As always, diversification remains key,” argues James Ringer, fund manager at Schroders.

Why Do We Still Have to Talk About Kevin Warsh?

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

snowden lane partners msci wealth manager
LinkedIn

One week before the meeting of the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed), and with attention focused on the effect that rising oil prices may have on inflation, it is necessary to bring the name of Kevin Warsh back into focus if we want to analyze what we can expect from U.S. monetary policy this year.

Warsh has been noted for his extensive experience, credibility, and strong reputation in the markets, as well as his leadership capacity and firm stance on inflation. In terms of monetary policy, experts consider him hawkish, as he has openly supported interest rate cuts under certain circumstances, although they add that he has a flexible attitude.

According to Raphael Olszyna-Marzys, international economist at J. Safra Sarasin Sustainable AM, the reasons why he was chosen are clear: “He is seen as politically loyal. In addition, he is the son-in-law of Ronald Lauder, a close friend and ally of Trump for many years. He is also a longstanding critic of what he considers the Fed’s overreach, such as financial regulation, consumer protection, the focus on inequality, and quantitative easing (QE). Finally, he has a reputation as a hawk due to his public opposition to the second round of QE, which ultimately led him to resign as a Fed governor in 2011. All of this should give him some credibility with the markets and potentially greater influence within the FOMC than other candidates.”

Robeco: A Genuine “Hawk”?

For experts at Robeco, although he has been portrayed as an “inflation hawk,” some nuances are necessary in the current context. They recall that during his time as a Federal Reserve governor, Warsh expressed concern about the inflationary risks stemming from quantitative easing (QE) and became one of its most outspoken internal critics. “Today we mainly know QE as a policy that has expanded the Fed’s balance sheet. For that reason, it is not surprising that, in an opinion article published in The Wall Street Journal in November 2025, he argued that ‘the Fed’s swollen balance sheet… can be significantly reduced.’ This stance has reinforced his recent portrayal as an ‘inflation hawk,’” they acknowledge.

However, the European asset manager believes that the image of Kevin Warsh as a “hawk” is exaggerated and expects him to support another reduction in official interest rates by June, which would likely be his first meeting as chairman. “In reality, his views suggest room for lower interest rates, not higher ones, and his goal of reducing the Fed’s balance sheet may prove to be more of a desire than a reality. As for his view that the Fed’s balance sheet may be excessively large, we believe that, in practice, it will be difficult to reduce it significantly without regulatory adjustments to the ‘abundant reserves’ regime of the banking system,” they argue.

MFS IM: Non-Traditional Monetary Easing

Regarding what to expect from him, Benoit Anne, Senior Managing Director of the Strategy and Insights Group at MFS Investment Management, believes that the “new Fed chairman” thinks there is room for monetary policy easing, but perhaps not in the most traditional way. “Warsh believes that the United States is experiencing a productivity miracle that will not only boost the country’s long-term growth potential but will also generate significant disinflationary pressures. As inflation moves lower, the Fed will have more room to continue cutting rates, which will please the White House. However, this is where a possible contradiction arises,” notes Anne.

According to the asset manager’s chief economist, Erik Weisman, a trajectory of stronger growth driven by productivity would normally tend to be associated with an increase in the neutral rate. This means that, on this basis, the room for maneuver for the Fed’s monetary policy in that macroeconomic scenario would be smaller, not greater, in the long term.

“Turning to Kevin Warsh’s view of the Fed’s balance sheet, it is clear to everyone that the new Fed chairman favors a certain degree of moderation. But if implemented, a reduction of the balance sheet could affect liquidity and interest rate volatility in a way that might be seen as contradictory to the initial goal of lowering rates,” adds Anne.

Something for Everyone, According to Wellington Management

At Wellington Management, they believe that Warsh could take a step toward reducing the Fed’s power with respect to its current broad mandate and could also play a key role in changing the Fed’s structure and in closer collaboration with the Treasury in managing the Fed’s balance sheet.

“The level of control that the Trump administration has over interest rates, as well as broader regulatory and supervisory decisions, will depend on the final composition of the Fed’s Board, including whether Jerome Powell decides to remain in his position. It will take some time before these decisions are made and before they matter to the markets, but in the medium term I expect them to be significant for the conduct of both monetary and broader policies,” explains Juhi Dhawan, macro strategist at Wellington Management.

Finally, the expert adds that the choice of Warsh, who has advocated restrictive monetary policies throughout his career, should somewhat ease concerns that managing inflation might take a back seat to political priorities. “Markets will be more willing to believe that economic data will dictate how monetary policy is conducted, which should stabilize the dollar from the perspective of devaluation risk,” Dhawan acknowledges.

Snowden Lane Partners Adds MSCI Wealth Manager to Its Advisory Ecosystem

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

mapfre gestora activos nuevo ceo
Canva

Snowden Lane Partners has announced that it will integrate MSCI Wealth Manager into its advisory ecosystem. It is a technological platform focused on portfolio management for the analysis of public and private assets, as well as tax optimization and the ability for advisors to generate responses for clients.

Specifically, MSCI Wealth Manager was designed to support advisors’ efforts when providing personalized financial advice, quickly showing the risks of each portfolio, as it is based on modeling technology that identifies those assets that deviate from clients’ investment objectives. The platform also integrates risk analysis with proposal-generation and model management tools, which supports a unified advisory experience.

Strategic Vision

In line with Snowden Lane’s commitment to offering comprehensive, personalized, and client-focused advice that supports that growth, the firm adopted MSCI Wealth Manager to equip its team of advisors with tools to differentiate their clients’ experience; compare, align, and customize clients’ portfolios around recommended asset allocations; identify new opportunities; and analyze portfolio data from the investment statements of current and prospective clients, which can be uploaded directly to the platform.

According to Snowden Lane Partners, the alliance follows a successful 2025, during which the firm expanded its capabilities in alternative assets, added senior profiles to further strengthen business development and talent acquisition operations, and continued expanding its advisory team, with new offices in the northeastern and southeastern United States.

“We are delighted to partner with MSCI, as we share a dedication to providing clients with best-in-class tools that enhance their advisory experience. Equally important is that our advisors now have a broader set of tools to continue putting our values into practice, offering clients transparent and individualized solutions for their specific needs. As our firm continues to grow, continuing to reinvest in technological capabilities that enhance the experience of our advisors and clients is essential, and this alliance with MSCI is the most recent example of that,” said Alison Burkett, Executive Vice President and Head of Corporate Development at Snowden Lane Partners.

For his part, Alex Kokolis, Global Head of Wealth at MSCI, said: “MSCI Wealth and Snowden Lane share a vision of advancing portfolio management technology to better respond to the evolving needs of end investors. We are proud to provide Snowden Lane’s advisors with the tools they need to align their clients’ portfolios with their goals, values, and evolving view of risk in today’s complex market environment. MSCI Wealth Manager can help Snowden Lane manage their clients’ specific investment needs efficiently, consistently, transparently, and with confidence.”

PwC: The Rapid Expansion of ETFs in the United States “Shows No Signs of Slowing”

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

government bonds becoming riskier assets
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Following record net inflows in 2025, assets under management in U.S. ETFs rose to $13.4 trillion, an increase of 30%. “And this rapid expansion shows no signs of slowing,” according to PwC’s annual ETF 2030 Survey. More than a third of U.S. respondents expect assets managed by American ETFs to more than double and reach $25 trillion or more by June 2030, up from $11.6 trillion in June 2025.

“In a rapidly evolving U.S. market, active ETFs are one of the engines of growth,” the study notes. While active ETFs represent 11% of the U.S. ETF market, 83% of the new ETFs launched in the country last year fell into this category. Moreover, nearly three quarters of U.S. respondents expect demand for active ETFs to increase over the next two or three years.

The combination of rapidly rising investor demand and a favorable regulatory environment led to a record 110 digital asset ETF launches in 2025. More than a third of respondents plan to launch more ETFs of this type over the next 18 months.

U.S. respondents also point to opportunities for ETF share classes following approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to the study, ETF managers will need to address various business, governance, and operational considerations to fully capture the potential of ETF share classes.

Global Figures

Assets under management in ETFs worldwide reached $19.5 trillion in 2025, up from $14.6 trillion in 2024, representing an annual growth rate of 33%, driven by strong performance in equity and bond markets. The global ETF industry also benefited from significant capital inflows, reaching a record $2.1 trillion, nearly 3.5 times higher than those of mutual funds.

And this growth trend could continue. According to the survey, more than 80% of respondents believe that investors’ preference for ETFs over other investment products will have a significant impact on the sector’s growth over the next two or three years.

In this regard, more than half of the participants in the study point to the conversion of other products, including mutual funds and separate accounts, into ETFs as a key driver of growth. More than a third expect a significant impact from the growth of ETF share classes added to existing mutual funds, where regulators allow it.

More than a third of respondents expect global ETF assets under management to reach $35 trillion or more by June 2030, more than double the assets managed by ETFs worldwide in June 2025. Nearly 70% do not rule out that the figure could reach at least $30 trillion by the end of the decade.

The Search for Alternatives Capabilities Fuels M&A in Asset Management

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ahorro administrado mexico pib
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Although not yet at the pace seen a few years ago, consolidation in the financial services industry, including the asset and wealth management businesses, has continued to show dynamism in the sector. The boom in alternative assets, in particular, has inspired companies to turn to the M&A market, as the desire to expand their investment capabilities in private markets has left its mark on asset managers.

During 2025, figures from McKinsey & Company show that transactions between asset and wealth managers reached 156, totaling $113 billion. This represents a 15% increase compared with 2024, but it is still a slower pace than recorded in the past, according to the report Global M&A Trends, signed by senior partners Jake Henry and Mieke Van Oostende.

According to the consulting firm’s analysis of the financial services industry, merger and acquisition activity in the world of asset and wealth management is being redirected toward businesses focused on investment capabilities.

This, they added, is especially true for deals that strengthen expertise in alternative assets. “Managers are targeting firms that give them an edge in private markets, real assets, or advanced technology,” the consultancy said on the matter.

From S&P Global Ratings they agree with the diagnosis, highlighting that the growing appetite for private credit strategies—a segment that is increasingly gaining ground in the alternatives space—and other alternative markets has led traditional managers to acquire additional investment capabilities.

Adding Capabilities

The objective, the rating agency outlined in a document on its outlook for the asset management sector in 2026, is to grow AUM, increase strategy diversification, and add publicly listed permanent capital. “The strategies being sought include private credit, infrastructure, and secondaries, among others,” a group of analysts from the firm wrote in their report.

In that sense, the rating agency highlighted a series of deals involving some well-known names from the world of traditional asset managers.

BlackRock, for example, announced in 2024 the purchase of the private credit firm HPS Investment Partners, the specialized house Global Infrastructure Partners, and the well-known data provider Preqin.

That same year, Janus Henderson Group announced the acquisition of Victory Park Capital Advisors, which invests in private credit. To strengthen this same asset class, Franklin Resources reported the purchase of Apera Asset Management the following year.

Another major buyer, as S&P Global Ratings listed, has been Affiliated Managers Group (AMG). During the past year, they indicated, the investment firm strengthened its capabilities in private equity with the purchase of Montefiore Investment; in infrastructure and energy transition, with Qualitas Energy; in logistics properties, with NorthBridge Partners; and in multi-strategy hedge investments, with the hedge fund Verition Fund Management.

One of the arguments in favor of this greater consolidation in the industry is related to the diversification of strategies within asset managers and the role it plays.

The Art of Diversifying

Some traditional managers are growing their alternatives offering, which could support revenue growth and visibility. Others are expanding their product offerings to offset outflows from strategies that are no longer in favor, according to S&P Global Ratings. In the opinion of its team of analysts, “more diversified firms are better positioned to retain their AUM as investment strategies become popular and unpopular.”

In addition, observers of the financial services sector point out that these asset classes bring with them a more favorable dynamic in corporate results.

As emphasized by the financial-sector specialist firm Crisil Coalition Greenwich, in a report corresponding to the first quarter of 2026, the mantra for asset managers during this year will be that “not all AUM is equal.”

In the past, they indicated, asset management firms have focused on capturing investor demand and boosting their own results through the launch of active ETFs and other public products, with fees that fall between index funds and actively managed vehicles. For the consultancy, this trend will continue in 2026, but more focused on alternatives, as it is more profitable for companies.

Although passive assets represent almost 30% of the asset management industry’s AUM, their figures show that they contribute only 7% of the sector’s revenue. By contrast, alternatives account for just 18% of AUM but generate 57% of the sector’s revenue. “These statistics clearly show that some dollars under management are worth much more than others when it comes to generating revenue,” the specialists at Crisil Coalition Greenwich said.

Diversification, Defensive Strategies, And Advisory: The Three Needs Identified by Advisors

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

diversification defensive strategies advisory needs
Canva

Equity markets have started 2026 with significant volatility. According to Mary Ann Bartels, CIO at Sanctuary Wealth, this reflects the typical turbulence associated with midterm election years, which are usually marked by corrections followed by strong rebounds. Despite the challenges, the S&P 500 aligns with historical patterns, supporting an optimistic outlook and emphasizing the importance of diversification.

In the view of Marlen Lopez, Senior Wealth Advisor and Founding Partner at Excelsis Global Private Wealth, for Latin American investors the main market drivers for this year include currency performance, commodity prices, and global exposure. “The U.S. dollar has weakened for three years while global reserve currencies such as the euro and the yen have strengthened. This has allowed them to benefit from greater exposure to non-dollar-denominated assets, mitigating risks arising from local currency volatility and taking advantage of foreign exchange opportunities. Maintaining a well-diversified portfolio across regions, sectors, and asset classes remains crucial to effectively manage risks and capitalize on global opportunities in a market that is increasingly stable but also more segmented,” Lopez says.

As a result, clients have adopted a diversified approach to mitigate market volatility and have leaned toward defensive strategies in search of stability, including investments in less volatile sectors such as Consumer Staples and Utilities, which offer stable returns. “We have seen the implementation of high-dividend equity strategies in uncertain markets and international diversification, especially in developed and emerging markets, which posted strong returns in 2025. Positioning is leaning toward taking advantage of corrections as buying opportunities, following the bullish projection for the S&P 500 in 2026,” she notes.

Compared with other years, Lopez has detected significant changes in asset allocation. In particular, she observes a greater emphasis on international equities and stronger demand for mixed fixed income. “The entry of the MSCI EAFE and Japan’s TOPIX into bull markets has led investors to increase global exposure to capture the superior returns recorded in 2025. Meanwhile, in fixed income, despite the mixed performance of the domestic bond market, high-grade investment assets continue to attract interest due to their currently competitive yields,” she says. She also acknowledges an increase in the weight of metals and commodities, as well as an adjustment in positions in technology.

EM, ETFs, and Alternatives

So far, Lopez has explained how investors have been feeling and how they have moved their portfolios, but her analysis goes a step further. She explains that diversification in developed markets such as Japan and in emerging markets continues to be a priority for investors due to the strong projected gains. “The growing need to mitigate concentrated risks has also led to greater adoption of strategies that include exposure to foreign currencies such as the euro, in addition to the U.S. dollar, expanding currency hedging within portfolios.”

On the other hand, she highlights that demand for ETFs will continue to grow in 2026 thanks to their ability to provide diversified access to specific sectors and global strategies while optimizing costs. “Offshore ETFs that trade in the International Quotation System (SIC) continue to be an attractive resource for Mexican investors, as they offer unique tax advantages and allow exposure to foreign currencies such as the euro (EUR) and the yen (JPY), along with USD, expanding flexibility and return potential in diversified portfolios,” she notes.

Beyond these trends, the expert from Excelsis Global Private Wealth makes it clear that the renewed interest in alternative assets as a source of diversification and protection against volatility has not been a one-off phenomenon. According to her, the most prominent assets and strategies are private credit, infrastructure, and hedge funds.

Filtering the Noise

Beyond asset allocation, what role are financial advisors playing? According to the team at Klosters, advisors have gained weight as “translators of noise.” “The market speaks in a language of algorithms and alarmist headlines, and our job is to translate that into our clients’ objectives. We don’t just report returns. We focus our support on managing expectations. In an overinformed world, our value is saying ‘this is 24-hour noise’ vs. ‘this is a structural change that affects your wealth,’” they explain.

Fernando de Frutos, CIO of Boreal Capital Management, goes a step further and notes that rather than “translators,” advisors have become a “filter” in the face of unlimited access to information and investor saturation. “The challenge is no longer accessing data, but distinguishing signal from noise,” Frutos says. When acting as a “filter,” he starts from the premise that the current geopolitical situation is more volatile than it was 10 or 20 years ago, but not necessarily more than it was 40 or 50 years ago during the Cold War—or even a century ago. “Many comparisons are made with the so-called ‘Pax Americana,’ which reached its peak in the 1990s after the fall of the Berlin Wall, when China was just beginning its economic and military rise. It is worth keeping perspective: that period was probably a historical exception, not the norm,” Frutos recalls.

It is nothing new that advisors have gone through different market events and shocks, but as pointed out by Grey Capital, what matters is putting what has been learned at the service of investors. “The lesson has been consistent: the wealth portfolios that navigate change best are not those that react the fastest, but those that are best structured and governed. In complex contexts, discipline and perspective are more valuable than speed. Every crisis teaches the same thing: those who have structure can wait; those who don’t are forced to react, and that is a major risk,” says Catherine Ruz Parada, partner at Grey Capital Latam.