CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: (stephan)
. A Glimpse into North Korea
During a recent visit to Asia, I took the opportunity to join a tour to the notorious demilitarized zone that separates North and South Korea. The “DMZ” as it is more commonly referred to, is 4 kilometers wide and has served as a buffer zone between the two states since the Korean War Armistice Agreement of 1953.
Lacking a peace treaty to bring the Korean War to an official conclusion, the countries remain technically at war, which makes the plight of the Kaesong Industrial Complex—a jointly run industrial park—all the more intriguing for visitors.
The complex, located just north of the DMZ, has manufactured goods for export into the South since 2004. According to global news agencies, there are 124 South Korean companies operating within this area and our tour guide informed us that some 50,000+ workers from the North can expect to earn approximately US$100 per month for their services.
If these figures are accurate, these employees earn only 6% of the average household disposable income in the South. However, upon closer inspection, this facility is less about profit margins than it is a step toward re-unification; a concept that was repeatedly referred to throughout our tour.
Despite this positivity, my visit unfortunately coincided with an indefinite closure of the Kaesong Industrial Complex—a response by the South to the launching of a North Korean long-range rocket. While this is not the first time the complex has had to close, it should be noted that past shut-downs had been initiated by the North. Whether we will see future reconciliation on this front remains open to debate.
While we don’t know if the lights are out for good or not at Kaesong, my experience was that commerce is not completely absent from the region. As just one of 42 paying visitors on my tour, I saw several other bus-loads of sightseers at multiple stops. Furthermore, whether it was in the Joint Security Area, the Third Infiltration Tunnel or the Dora Observatory, we found gift shops were never all that far away. This offered me the opportunity to buy key rings, figurines and even soju—a distilled rice liquor—that reputedly came from the North.
From my various vantage points (and despite technically setting foot inside the secretive state), it is impossible to tell what life is truly like in North Korea, north of the DMZ. Whether North Korea will ever see projects such as Kaesong as a pathway to economic development remains to be seen. But I would like to think that one day I’ll be able to return to this fascinating region in an investment capacity.
Colin Dishington, CA, CFA, is Research Analyst at Matthews Asia.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Matthias Born, senior portfolio manager, European Equities at Allianz Global Investors. Allianz GI’s Matthias Born is attending the Fund Selector Summit
Matthias Born, senior portfolio manager, European Equities at Allianz Global Investors will be discussing structural growth investing at the upcoming Fund Selector Summit Miami 2016, taking place 28-29 April.
Born, who is lead portfolio manager on the Allianz Europe Equity Growth Select fund, will outline how a high conviction strategy can focus on the most attractive structural growth ideas. His fund has been designed to benefit from bottom-up stock selection, through which weights on individual stocks are based on conviction levels across growth, quality and valuation criteria.
The conference, aimed at leading funds selectors and investors from the US-Offshore business, will be held at the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne. The event-a joint venture between Open Door Media, owner of InvestmentEurope, and Fund Society- will provide an opportunity to hear the view of several managers on the current state of the industry.
Born was appointed co-leader of the Investment Style Team Growth in 2009. Since then he has been lead portfolio manager of the funds and mandates of the strategy Euroland Equity Growth and Continental Europe Growth.
Before joining Allianz GI he worked for the Middle Market Group (Global Corporate Finance) at Dresdner Bank. In 2001, he graduated in Business Administration from the University of Würzburg with a master’s degree.
You can find all the information about the Fund Selector Miami Summit 2016, aimed at leading fund selectors and investors from the US-Offshore business, through this link.
Photo: Mike Gibb, co-head Global Wealth Management Distribution at Legg Mason Global Asset Management. Mike Gibb, co-head Global Wealth Management Distribution at Legg Mason Global Asset Management, will join the Fund Selector Summit Miami
Mike Gibb, equity specialist, co-head Global Wealth Management Distribution at Legg Mason Global Asset Management will join the upcoming Funds Society Fund Selector Summit Miami 2016, which takes place on the 28th and 29th of April.
The conference, aimed at leading funds selectors and investors from the US-Offshore business, will be held at the Ritz-Carlton Key Biscayne. The event-a joint venture between Open Door Media, owner of InvestmentEurope, and Fund Society- will provide an opportunity to hear the view of several managers on the current state of the industry.
Focusing on European long/short equity opportunities, Gibb, who is also an equity product specialist of Martin Currie, a Legg Mason affiliate, will look to outline how combining bottom up stockpicking with a macro overlay can generate alpha and deliver absolute returns in variable market conditions.
Before his previous role managing relationship and wealth mangement opportunities, Gibb was a client services director covering an institutional client base across regions. He has also been a hedge fund salesman with responsibility for investors in Europe and Asia. Before joining Martin Currie in 2005, Gibb was at Credit Suisse First Boston as a director and equity saleman for five years.
He was also an equity research salesman at Salomon Smith Barney for four years and before that a Far East equities fund manager for Gartmore and Scottish Amicable in 1990-1995. He is an associate of the UK Society of Investment Professionals (Asip) and a member of the CFA Society of the UK and has attained the Fundamentals of Alternative Investments certificate from CAIA . He graduated with an MA (Hons) in economic science from The University of Aberdeen.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: US Lipper Awards 2016. Five Columbia Funds Earn Lipper Fund Awards
Five Columbia funds have received 2016 Lipper Fund Awards as top-performing mutual funds in their respective Lipper classifications for the period ending December 31, 2015:
Columbia Select Large-Cap Value Fund (R5 shares): Large-Cap Value Funds classification (290 funds) – 10 years
Columbia Greater China Fund (Z shares): China Region Funds classification (26 funds) – 10 years
Columbia Global Equity Value Fund (I shares): Global Large-Cap Value Funds classification (39 funds) – 3 years
Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (Z shares): Large-Cap Core Funds classification (499 funds) – 10 years
Columbia AMT-Free California Intermediate Muni Bond Fund (Z shares): California Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds classification (30 funds) – 10 years
The U.S. Lipper Fund Awards recognize funds for their consistently strong risk-adjusted three-, five-, and 10- year performance, relative to their peers, based on Lipper’s proprietary performance-based methodology.
“We are pleased to have five funds recognized by Lipper for their consistent, risk adjusted performance,” said Colin Moore, Global Chief Investment Officer. “Our priority is to deliver consistent investment returns for our clients through superior research and capital allocation within and across our strategies and with a deep understanding of their investment needs.”
This is the fifth consecutive year that Columbia Select Large-Cap Value Fund has earned a Lipper Award in the Large-Cap Value category. The fund received the award for 10-year performance in 2015 (90 funds), 10- year performance in 2014 (84 funds), for 5-year and 10-year performance in 2013 (102 funds and 84 funds), and for 5-year performance in 2012 (402 funds).
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Moyan Brenn. PineBridge Investments Completes Fundraising for Structured Capital Partners III, L.P.
PineBridge Investments, the global multi-asset class investment manager, has announced the final close for PineBridge Structured Capital Partners III, L.P. (together with parallel partnerships, the “Fund”).
PineBridge completed the fundraising in March with US $600 million of aggregate capital commitments, surpassing its planned target amount of US $500 million. The Fund will invest in junior capital securities including mezzanine debt and structured equity issued by privately-owned middle- market companies across all sectors in North America.
F.T. Chong, Managing Director and Head of PineBridge Structured Capital, stated, “We are committed to being reliable and flexible providers of junior capital to middle market companies. We are pleased with the positive reception for our Fund. Most of the Limited Partners from our prior fund have signed up for this Fund and new investors include major institutions in the US as well as Europe, the Middle-East and Asia.”
Photo: Moyan Brenn. Japan's "Show Me the Money" Corporate Governance
The fact that due to the encouragement of the Abe Administration, Japanese corporations are strongly emphasizing profitability is extremely important to investors in Japanese equities. This is “icing on the cake” of the “Show Me the Money” corporate governance improvement that we have long-highlighted in our thought leadership effort on Japan. Indeed, while increasing the number of independent directors and other recent governance issues are very important in the intermediate term for Japan, it is crucial for investors to understand that much of the profitability message has actually been understood by Japanese corporates for a decade. This is shown by the divergence in the profit margins from the trend in GDP growth in the chart below, showing that even though GDP growth has remained quite subdued, profit margins have surged.
Since the Koizumi era, Japan has embarked on major rationalizations in most industries, with the number of players often reduced from seven down to three. The fruits of this restructuring were slower to ripen than in Western world examples, and they were hidden by a series of crises (the Lehman shock, the turbulence in China, the strong Yen and of course, the Tohoku crisis), but since Abenomics began, the global backdrop for Japan has been stable and there have been no domestic crises, thus allowing the fruits to ripen.
The CY2Q15 data on overall corporate profits (not just of listed companies) recently announced continues this upward trend, showing that the pretax profit margin’s four-quarter average hit a new high of 5.26%. We expect that profit margins will expand further in coming quarters, driven by continued industry rationalizations and cost-cutting. It is also worth mentioning that forex related profits are not the only driver of this improvement, as the profit margin of services industries also surged to a new record high, as shown in the second chart below.
Of course, this improving structural profitability trend has become more fully realized by global investors, but there remain a decent number of Japan-skeptics, and 2Q profit margins surged so much that this dwindling group should reduce their remaining doubts; and thus, there is a significant amount of overseas capital that can still flow into Japanese equities.
Conclusions
Years of corporate restructuring’s progress was hidden due to successive global and domestic crises.
“Show me the Money!” corporate governance: Japanese companies care even more now about corporate profitability.
The dividend paid by TOPIX is surging upward and we expect it to double in the five years from 2013 through 2018.
On top of the corporate tax cut in April, Abenomics is having a strongly positive effect on profits due to the normalized Yen and further deregulation should gradually push profit margins higher.
Poor demographics are linked with GDP growth, but countries with strong automation and efficiency capabilities can completely offset such (see our report on Debunking Demographics). As these charts show, even if Nominal GDP growth is fairly flat, corporate profits can rise sharply in Japan due to productivity increases and gearing to global growth via multinationalization.
Opinion column by John Vail, Chief Global Strategist at Nikko AM
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: L'Ubuesque Boîte à Savon
. Japan's "Show Me the Money" Corporate Governance
Given the 4th quarter slowdown in the global economy, it is no surprise that overall corporate profit margins in Japan decelerated during that period. But before one panics and says that they are about to plummet, one should realize that it would likely require a global recession for such to occur and that the 2005-2007 period showed that profit margins can plateau at a high level for an extended period of time. Indeed, the four quarter average is still creeping upward to new record levels, and like most of the rest of the world, the manufacturing sector is declining while the non-manufacturing sector is accelerating to record highs. Meanwhile, Japanese profits are performing much better than those in the US or Europe. We have covered the reasons for such in our recent piece The Japanese Equity Outlook After the Nasty New Year Start, but let us emphasize herein the corporate governance aspect of that piece.
The fact remains that, partially due to the encouragement of the Abe administration, Japanese corporations are continuing their structural shift towards improving profitability. This is “icing on the cake” of the “Show Me the Money” corporate governance improvement that we have long-highlighted in our thought leadership effort on Japan. Indeed, while increasing the number of independent directors and other recent governance issues are very important in the intermediate term for Japan, it is crucial for investors to understand that much of the profitability message has actually been understood by Japanese corporates for a decade. This is shown by the divergence in the profit margins from the trend in GDP growth in the chart below, showing that even though GDP growth has remained subdued, profit margins have surged.
Since the Koizumi era, Japan has embarked on major rationalizations in most industries, with the number of players often reduced from seven down to three. The fruits of this restructuring were slower to ripen than in Western world examples, and they were hidden by a series of crises (the Lehman shock, the turbulence in China, the strong Yen and of course, the Tohoku crisis), but since Abenomics began, the global backdrop for Japan has been stable and there have been no domestic crises, thus allowing the fruits to ripen.
The CY4Q15 data on overall corporate profits (not just of listed companies) recently announced unsurprisingly shows some flattening of this upward trend, with pretax profit margin’s four-quarter average hitting the slightly higher new record level of 5.36%. We expect that profit margins will flatten in coming quarters, partially driven by continued industry rationalizations and cost-cutting, but also negatively impacted by the stronger Yen. As mentioned above, the profit margin of services industries also surged to a new record high, as shown in the second chart below.
One should also note that Ministry of Finance statistics do not cover post-tax income, and due to recent corporate tax cuts, the overall net profit margin is likely expanding significantly.
Conclusions
Japan’s overall corporate profit margin is unlikely to reverse soon on a four-quarter basis, while we believe the service sector will remain strong.
“Show Me the Money!” corporate governance: partly due to Abenomics, Japanese companies care even more now about corporate profitability and shareholder returns.
The dividend paid by TOPIX is surging upward and we expect it to double in the five years from 2013 through 2018.
Poor demographics can be linked with poor GDP growth, but countries like Japan with strong automation and efficiency capabilities will likely continue to completely offset this factor (see our report on Debunking Demographics).
As these charts show, even if Nominal GDP growth is fairly subdued, corporate profits can rise sharply in Japan due to productivity increases and gearing to global growth via multinationalization. Thus, weak domestic GDP statistics should not concern investors much. Indeed, normally, the service sector would be hurt the most by weak domestic GDP in a typical country, but Japan’s services sector profitability has been very strong despite weak GDP and we expect such to continue, which should assuage investors’ fears to a large degree.
John Vail is Nikko AM’s Head of Global Macro Strategy and Asset Allocation.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Billie Ward. China: Real or Imagined Economic Improvement?
The ‘lower for longer’ environment that we are experiencing has required central banks to adopt some extraordinary measures. Most recently the Bank of Japan adopted negative interest rates and the European Central Bank pulled multiple levers including cutting the depo rate by 0.1%, increasing quantitative easing and opening it up to non-financial corporate bonds, as well as introducing a new series of four-year targeted long-term refinancing operations (TLTROs). These measures, along with an upswing in corporate profitability and growing signs of stability in credit markets, have helped provide a backdrop against which risk assets look more benign. They have certainly resulted in a wild ride for banks.
Our view is that, in Europe at least, the ECB measures are probably a net positive for bank earnings and banking pressures should diminish from here; but market sentiment is still ‘see-sawing’ between confidence that central banks absolutely have enough in their policy toolkits to avert deflationary pressures and stimulate growth, and fears that those toolkits do not have a lot left in them – as seen by initial reactions to the ECB closing the door on further rate cuts.
In the US, a host of market participants had been circulating expectations that the US could be heading into recession this year, but economic data has begun to turn, with very strong US employment data in particular coming hot on the heels of other economic surprises, helping to ease financial conditions. But we must bring China in here. As China-watchers, we are trying to interpret whether the recent improvement in sentiment is backed up by real or imagined economic improvement. Clearly, none of the structural issues we have identified previously appears to have been addressed: the central bank is targeting a 6-6.5% growth rate this year and the liquidity taps have been turned on but, ultimately, we believe China is experiencing a cyclical rather than a structural improvement as the PBoC tries to ease the pace at which economic growth decelerates. For the US, the key question is one of divergence: is the Fed able to adopt monetary policy that diverges from ECB and Bank of Japan actions and operates independently of spillover pressure from the China slowdown? We believe the US dollar is ready for another leg-up, but it needs a catalyst such as the Fed raising rates – that may not happen until June.
Brexit uncertainties persist. The online polls seem unambiguously to be coming out in favour of leave, whereas the phone polls are unambiguously favouring remain – by a wide margin. Central establishment figures have entrenched themselves on both sides of the debate but this has not lessened the uncertainty, that is only intensifying as we move closer to the 23 June referendum. Sterling has been the main mover in this, with market forecasts indicating 1.50 against the dollar is the appropriate valuation for remain and 1.20 an appropriate valuation for leave. As the polls change, so Sterling gets battered about. How markets change in the run-up to the referendum will be interesting. The uncertainty is putting ever more distance between the Bank of England moving interest rates – despite relatively good labour market numbers – with our valuation research indicating the first rate rise in April 2019, though some analysts have pushed that back to 2020.
Mark Burgess is CIO EMEA and Global Head of Equities at Columbia Threadneedle.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Walter-Wilhelm
. Momentum Building in U.S. Impact Investing Market
Private investments are a growing area of opportunity for asset managers looking to get into the impact investing space, according to the last issue of The Cerulli Edge – U.S. Monthly Product Trends Edition. Thus far, only a small portion of managers has penetrated the impact investing market. In Cerulli’s 2016 alternative investments survey, just 14% of institutional asset managers polled indicate that they manage alternative asset impact funds (or thematic investing funds).
The survey, conducted in partnership with US SIF, shows that over the next two to three years, more than half of asset managers offering responsible investment products expect high demand from foundations (56%) and high-net-worth (52%) investors. Moreover, the research reveals that more than half (52%) of consultants surveyed are evaluating and, in some cases, recommending impact investments to their private wealth and institutional clients.
Mutual fund assets dropped for the fourth straight month, losing 0.7% in February to end the month at $11.3 trillion. The continued decline is now entirely attributable to performance. Despite underlying market fluctuations, February brought little change to ETF assets, as they held steady at just about $2 trillion. Flows reversed course during the month and totaled nearly $3 billion for the vehicle.
Foto cedida. Telecommunications, Healthcare, Consumer Products or Services: Sectors in which Muzinich sees Value in High Yield
The high yield debt market is worth $ 1.3 trillion in the US alone, that of European high yield is about 500 billion, and the corporate debt market of emerging countries is growing. Erick Muller – Head of Markets and Products Strategy at Muzinich, who recently visited Miami- thus explained the scope of the huge , corporate credit industry, in which his company has focused since its foundation in 1988. The strategies managed by the management company are neither limited to high yield, since it also invests in investment grade securities, nor to a fixed term.
Time to invest in energy…
Muller believes that the price of the oil barrel will remain low and volatile, and avoids investing in the US energy sector, except in those companies not sensitive to the price of crude oil. “Now is not the time to invest: with the barrel price remaining at around US$ 40, 30% of companies could fail in the next 12 months. There are sectors that represent better opportunities, such as telecommunications, cable television, healthcare, and consumer products or services, to name a few,” he said in an interview with Funds Society.
Equities or corporate debt ?
According to Muller, there is starting to be some competition between equities and high yield corporate debt, and there seems to be a greater flow towards the latter. “Now is the time to enter the corporate debt market, but staying within securities rated BB or B, and away from emission with a C rating,” says Muller, explaining that the crisis will continue, and lower quality debt can suffer.
Now is also the time to be tactical, because the correlations are very large; and flexible, in order to afford seizing opportunities and exiting at the appropriate time, without being tied down. Another one of this strategist’s keys for investment in the current market environment is diversification, more sophisticated diversification which dilutes risks within each asset class, while allowing him to remain loyal to his convictions.
The US high yield market, which is very domestic economy oriented, is attractive for its fundamentals (except for some activities such as oil or mining), The European is attractive for its lower volatility, while the emerging markets could be attractive for their valuation.
“We are very cautious about global growth. The Fed raised rates for reasons of financial stability and not to relax overheating in the US economy,” said the strategist, who does not believe that the conditions for more than one rate hike in 2016 are given, but also warns that we will have to wait until June to be clearer as to how the year will end.
In his opinion, the most appropriate strategies for this environmentare the short-term US high yield debt strategy, absolute return (global, tactical, and long-short), and those focused on long-term US high yield debt.
