Nouriel Roubini Bets on U.S. Resilience: “American Exceptionalism Has Not Ended”

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Nouriel Roubini
Photo courtesy

During the “2026 Bolton Advisor Conference,” held in Miami, renowned economist Nouriel Roubini outlined an optimistic view of the future of the U.S. economy. Throughout his presentation, first, and later during his conversation with the firm’s Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer, John Cataldo, he highlighted the growth potential and resilience of the U.S. economy in the coming years.

The CEO of Roubini Macro Associates, a New York-based consulting firm that provides strategic macroeconomic analysis, began his presentation with a perspective on the current global regime shift, warning about the transition “from relative political stability to relative instability, or even chaos.”

“We are now in a period in which supply shocks, especially negative ones, have become significant: covid, supply chain problems, protectionism, restrictions on migration, and geopolitical conflicts, all fragmenting and deglobalizing the world economy, generating stagflation risks,” he analyzed.

Roubini warned about the shift of the global economy toward more regulated markets and the risks of lower growth and higher inflation: “This entire set of concerns indicates that our economic regime is moving away from free markets toward regulated markets, and toward a situation where growth could be lower and inflation gradually higher, what people call stagflation,” he stated.

However, when analyzing the future of the United States, he affirmed: “American exceptionalism has not ended, the U.S. stock market is not in a bubble, our debts are not unsustainable or exorbitant. The dollar is going to remain and fluctuate, but it is not going to collapse.”

For the speaker, the key to U.S. leadership lies in its capacity for innovation and technological adaptation. “Technology, historically, is a positive supply shock that increases potential growth, productivity, and reduces the cost of producing goods and services. Artificial intelligence is just the latest manifestation of that positive shock,” he explained. In his view, the current technological revolution “is more important than the invention of fire, the introduction of agriculture, the printing press, the steam engine, or electrification.”

The economist, who also serves as Professor Emeritus of Economics at the New York University (NYU) Stern School of Business, projected that this innovation cycle will allow the United States to grow faster than other developed economies. “If the United States grows faster than Europe, eventually the dollar will be stronger, not weaker,” he stated. Roubini emphasized that the acceleration of potential growth, thanks to technology and digitalization, will be the best remedy for the country’s fiscal challenges. “Having a larger deficit and growing public debt is a problem. But if U.S. potential growth accelerates, the debt-to-GDP ratio will tend to stabilize or decline,” he argued.

Along these lines, Roubini also downplayed fears about the dollar: “The honest truth is that there is no alternative. The U.S. dollar will continue to be the world’s leading reserve currency because we remain the place to invest, among others, not the only one, but the main one.”

Referring to the financial market, he rejected the idea of a long-term bubble in U.S. assets: “If one takes a medium-term view, returns for the best private technology companies, for the Nasdaq and the S&P, will be as high as in the last twenty years, and probably much higher. We are not in a bubble. This is something secular.”

By contrast, Roubini was skeptical about the supposed cryptocurrency revolution: “Calling these things currencies is incorrect. Perhaps they are crypto assets, but they are not currencies, because anyone who knows basic monetary theory understands that for something to be money or currency it must be a unit of account. Things are priced in dollars, euros, yen; nothing is priced in Bitcoin… it has to be a stable store of value, and it is too volatile.”

Regarding Latin America, he was direct: “Latin America, like most emerging markets, is a mixed picture. One must ask which country has macroeconomic stability, because without stability there is no foundation for growth. Latin America has oscillated between booms and crises, and between right- and left-wing populism. I would say things are changing in part because many of these countries learned that loose fiscal and monetary policy is a recipe for disaster.”

In the case of Argentina, he specified: “The program (of President Javier Milei) may be radical, but the type of economic adjustment that was needed required shock therapy, and that is what is being done. It will take time and involve pain, but eventually it will produce results.”

He also addressed the rivalry between the United States and China, arguing that strategic competition will persist, but that the U.S. capacity for innovation and adaptation will be a decisive factor in maintaining global leadership: “Even before Trump, there was already a kind of cold war between the U.S. and China in economic, political, military, and security matters. That competition will continue. China is an emerging power.”

Closing his presentation, Roubini emphasized that American exceptionalism remains in force, supported by institutional strength, innovation capacity, the strength of the dollar, and the resilience of the financial system. According to his assessment, the United States is positioned to experience a cycle of accelerated growth and sustain its leadership in an increasingly fragmented and challenging world.

Greater Risk Appetite Drives Global Investment Flows Into ETPs

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Global purchases of exchange-traded products (ETPs) totaled 212.4 billion dollars in April, marking their sixth-largest month of inflows on record, according to BlackRock data. The firm points to the return of risk appetite as the main reason behind the surge in investment flows into ETPs.

This rebound was largely driven by increased inflows into equities (148.4 billion dollars), which offset a slight decline in fixed-income purchases (52.8 billion dollars). Commodity flows returned to positive territory (3.5 billion dollars) following a period of investment outflows driven by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Although overall fixed-income flows were similar to the previous month (52.8 billion dollars in April versus 56.5 billion in March), the figure masked a significant rotation within the asset class, according to the firm.

The return of risk appetite caused flows into rate-sensitive fixed-income assets to fall from 38.5 billion dollars to 10.4 billion dollars — the lowest level since June 2025 — while flows into spread products increased. High-yield (HY) credit rebounded from the record outflows recorded in March (-8.9 billion dollars) to post inflows of 5.3 billion dollars in April, the highest amount since May 2025, mainly toward U.S. exposures.

Investment-grade (IG) credit ETPs and emerging-market debt ETPs recorded inflows of 10.8 billion and 8.2 billion dollars in April, respectively, following relatively stable flows for both in March. Subscriptions into inflation-linked assets also remained steady, with 2.2 billion dollars added to global inflation-linked ETPs in April.

The decline in rate-sensitive flows was largely due to the collapse in short-term rate flows, which fell from 26.6 billion dollars in March to 900 million in April, although reductions were also seen across other maturities.

In March, short-term positions accounted for 69% of total rate flows, while in April this percentage dropped to just 9%, with mixed-maturity products becoming the most popular position, accounting for more than 50% of flows.

Return to U.S. positions

Investments in U.S. assets drove the rebound in flows into equity ETPs, which rose from 39.5 billion dollars in March to 121.2 billion in April, representing the fourth-largest monthly inflow on record. Purchases of U.S. equities increased across all listing regions, with flows largely directed toward large-cap exposures.

By contrast, European equity flows (-2.5 billion dollars) and emerging-market equity flows (-26.6 billion dollars) entered negative territory, while purchases of Japanese equities fell to 1.9 billion dollars.

The global emerging-market equity flow picture was once again distorted by flows listed in the APAC region, which accounted for all outflows in April (-37.1 billion dollars) and offset increased purchases in the U.S. listing region (5.4 billion dollars) and EMEA (4.1 billion dollars).

By contrast, although European equity sales were driven mainly by U.S.-listed ETPs (76% of total European equity outflows), April also saw net sales of EMEA-listed products, marking the first month of simultaneous outflows from European equity ETPs in both listing regions since December 2024.

Vanguard Strengthens Its Offshore Push in Miami With the Addition of Mauricio Calmet

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

Vanguard announced the addition of Mauricio Calmet as Sales Executive within its U.S. Offshore division, based in Miami, Florida. From this position, the executive will focus on expanding and strengthening the firm’s distribution efforts in the U.S. offshore market, one of the most competitive and strategic segments for global asset managers.

Calmet joins the firm with experience in investment distribution and relationships with international financial advisors, wealth managers, and brokerage platforms. Before joining Vanguard, he worked at Schroders, where he worked from New York on developing relationships with international wealth managers and independent financial advisors, particularly in the Latin America and U.S. offshore business.

According to his professional profile, he also holds FINRA Series 7 and Series 63 licenses, in addition to the SIE (Securities Industry Essentials), key certifications for the distribution of financial products in the United States. He is a graduate of Rutgers Business School.

Calmet’s addition comes at a time when Vanguard seeks to continue expanding its presence among international investors and offshore advisors, taking advantage of growing demand for low-cost strategies, ETFs, and global investment solutions.

The firm, founded in 1975 and headquartered in Pennsylvania, manages trillions of dollars in assets and is recognized as one of the world’s largest fund managers.

Pibank US Accelerates Its Digital Expansion in the U.S. With a Platform Developed Alongside VASS

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ETF industry wealth growth
Photo courtesy

Pibank US strengthened its expansion strategy in the U.S. market alongside VASS, a global firm specialized in digital transformation, following the development of a new digital banking platform designed to operate in one of the most complex and competitive regulatory environments in the world.

The project allowed the institution to launch a functional digital banking model in just six months under an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) framework, supported by a technological architecture built on Amazon Web Services and Salesforce solutions. According to both companies, the implementation also helped quadruple the initial client acquisition targets projected for this stage of growth.

Pibank US’s entry into the U.S. financial system required simultaneously addressing technological, regulatory, and operational challenges. The institution needed a platform capable of offering an agile and simple digital experience for users without compromising key aspects such as cybersecurity, scalability, and regulatory compliance.

To meet these needs, VASS designed a flexible infrastructure aimed at integrating different banking systems and enabling the gradual expansion of the institution’s digital operations.

“The collaboration with Pibank US focused on building a solid foundation of digital trust from the outset,” explained Javier Perez García, Global Head of Solutions & Delivery at VASS. The executive highlighted that the project was conceived to combine speed of deployment with high standards of security and user experience.

The platform incorporates biometric authentication tools, instant connectivity, and simplified digital processes to facilitate account opening and improve interaction with clients from the first point of contact.

For her part, María Peuriot, Executive Director of Pibank US, noted that the technology company quickly aligned itself with the institution’s strategic vision and supported the project’s execution through all its phases.

“Its ability to combine agility, technological expertise, and execution has been fundamental in building a robust and reliable application,” she stated.

The operation takes place in an environment of growing competition among digital banks and fintech platforms in the United States, where financial institutions are seeking to accelerate technological transformation processes to improve operational efficiency, user experience, and scalability.

VASS currently has more than 4,100 professionals and a presence in more than 50 countries. The company participates in digital transformation projects in sectors such as financial services, insurance, energy, telecommunications, retail, and public administration, specializing in areas such as artificial intelligence, process automation, digital experience, and data analytics.

Laura Valdez (Franklin Templeton): “A Large Part of the Growth of the ETF Industry Will Come From the Wealth Segment”

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyLaura Valdez, Vice President of the ETF Business Development Team at Franklin Templeton.

Franklin Templeton closed the first quarter of the year with more than $61 billion in global assets on its ETF platform. The firm proudly highlights this figure as an example of its growth and track record in the exchange-traded fund business, which began in 2013 with the launch of its first ETF and gained further momentum in 2016 with the launch of an official platform under the Franklin LibertyShares brand.

In 2025, the firm’s ETF business experienced strong growth, surpassing projected targets. This momentum was accompanied by significant expansion in the active ETF segment and an important milestone: ETF AUM surpassed $50 billion. Overall, assets grew by approximately 60% during the year, reflecting strong client demand and the continued expansion of capabilities globally. This positive trend has continued into the beginning of the new fiscal year. Currently, Franklin Templeton’s ETF platform stands at around $70 billion in global AUM, highlighting both the pace of growth and the scale achieved.

According to Laura Valdez, Vice President of the ETF Business Development Team at Franklin Templeton, the asset manager is prepared to maintain this pace of growth and, looking ahead, the firm’s ambition is to establish itself as one of the leading global ETF platforms. To achieve this, it is committed to a differentiated approach that combines active ETFs, indexed solutions, and outcome-oriented strategies, while also facilitating access to its investment capabilities across multiple global asset classes. We discussed all of this in our interview with her.

Why do you believe this growth will come from certain regions?

We are seeing growth globally across EMEA, Asia, LatAm, and the United States. The United States is our largest market, and that is obviously a reflection of the reality of the global industry. In fact, at the end of last year, there were $13.5 trillion in assets in the U.S., while UCITS ETFs represented more than $3 trillion. Consequently, the greatest growth we have observed has taken place in the United States, where the platform is larger. However, our teams are highly motivated to grow the global ETF platform with specialists based throughout Europe. Looking toward LatAm, the team has also been highly motivated because we have seen growth in the use of UCITS ETFs.

Do you see an opportunity in Europe’s recent active UCITS ETF market?

I believe Franklin Templeton entered this market at the right time. Initially, we saw many product launches, so it took some time to understand where investor flows were heading. We launched our first vehicle in 2013, and it was directly an active ETF, because we were building on the experience and track record acquired in the U.S. market. Then, formally, our ETF platform in Europe arrived in 2017 with the launch of passive and factor-based products. Since then, we have seen significant growth in assets under management, especially over the last two years. Our view is that active ETFs are the part of the business where the greatest growth can be achieved, not only in Europe, but globally.

What explains the increase in ETF flows you mention?

On the one hand, we have seen a trend toward active ETFs with global exposure, including regional and country exposures. On the other hand, and I consider this almost the most relevant factor, ETFs used to be viewed as a passive tool, but investors no longer interpret them that way. They have become a more sophisticated tool through which we can offer different investment strategies, from equities to multi-assets, including thematic and alternative investments. This shift in investors’ interpretation and use of the vehicle is significant in Europe, even though the tax ecosystem is different.

What changes have you seen in the ETF selection process among platforms, advisors, and selectors over the last 18 months?

First, I should clarify that I focus exclusively on platforms in the United States, working with banks and broker-dealers. That said, what I am seeing is that as there are more products, there is more due diligence and more competition. For example, we have seen an increase in requirements in terms of assets because analysts are concerned that a product could close. It is striking that the asset-size requirements for ETFs have continued to increase.

On the other hand, it is important to understand that the objective is not to replicate a successful product — notwithstanding structural and regulatory differences — but to recognize that these players are not looking for the same thing in every market. For example, U.S. advisors often build portfolios using U.S.-style model portfolios because they work for larger American banks and wealth managers. However, when they build portfolios, they are reflecting the U.S. investor and not what a European or Latin American investor demands. This means that launching UCITS ETFs is not about replicating what we already have or know works; it must be something specific and tailored to the investors who use UCITS.

Regarding the wealth segment, how do you think ETFs are being interpreted and used?

Globally, within the wealth segment, this shift in perception of ETFs as something merely passive is taking place. Additionally, this is a segment that appreciates the cost efficiency and transparency offered by ETFs, both in pricing and, in the case of the United States, because of tax advantages. This leads me to believe that a large part of the growth of the ETF industry will come from the wealth segment.

What does the word innovation mean in the ETF business?

I think a very interesting reflection — and one we do not make often enough — is that ETFs are being used as a real innovation tool. For example, in 2024 in the United States, we saw the launch of all the ETFs in the crypto and digital assets space. In other words, the mutual fund structure was not used to design how to invest in this new asset class. That is something significant. In addition, the SEC continues approving different digital currencies and new products, and we know this serves as a benchmark for other markets around the world. Over the past two years, we have seen new innovations, such as private fixed-income ETFs and ETF share classes for mutual funds. I believe all of this is very interesting, although I think there is still development needed in terms of market infrastructure.

Tokenized ETFs or private market ETFs: which do you believe will be the next frontier crossed by this type of vehicle?

As an employee of Franklin Templeton, I will tell you that I feel fortunate to have a CEO who has dedicated many resources to exploring blockchain technology. As a result, we have developed very interesting products such as Benji, which is a money market mutual fund that exists on the blockchain and is a tokenized product. In this sense, we already have ETFs that have been tokenized and are being distributed. On the other hand, I believe we must be very cautious when talking about private market ETFs because the foundation of the ETF is that it has a fully liquid structure.

Finally, how do you plan to compete for your place among the major ETF providers?

We are in a market with a high concentration of large players, but with market evolution and innovation, we are seeing a reduction in that concentration. For example, the growth of active ETFs has created an opportunity for Franklin Templeton to bring all its specialized portfolio management teams into the ETF space, a vehicle that offers a broad range of strategies. What is interesting is that if you analyze what is happening in the active ETF segment, that reality has begun to change. In the United States, the market share of the top 10 active ETF providers has been declining. In 2020, they held 82% of the assets, and by the end of the first quarter of 2026, that figure had fallen to 67%.

Bci Securities Celebrates 10 Years in the United States Driven by the Support of Chile’s Largest Bank

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

banca mexicana era post cuántica
Photo courtesyFrom left to right: Carlos Martin, CEO of Bci Securities; Ignacio Yarur, President of Bci; and Javier Moraga, Chief Investment and Corporate Finance Division at Bci.

Bci Securities, the brokerage and wealth management firm of Grupo Bci in the United States, celebrates its tenth anniversary of operations in the country, consolidated as one of the leading financial platforms for Latin American clients seeking access to global markets from Miami.

The company closed 2025 with the best financial results in its history, recording an 842% increase in net profit, a performance that reflects the strength of its business model and the strategic support of Banco Bci, Chile’s largest banking institution and the Latin American financial institution with the greatest presence in the United States.

With its sights set on the future, Grupo Bci has defined an ambitious roadmap for its international expansion. Among its main objectives is doubling its client base in Florida before 2029, with a special focus on high-net-worth individuals and companies from across Latin America. To support this new stage, the group will allocate more than $600 million to investment in technology and artificial intelligence over the next five years, with the goal of optimizing its operational capabilities, improving the client experience, and strengthening its financial advisory services.

Bci Securities was founded in 2016 as an international extension of Bci’s brokerage and wealth management divisions. Its initial purpose was to offer Latin American investors direct access to international financial instruments from the United States. What at the time represented a strategic bet in a context of high uncertainty is now a consolidated platform with active participation in sovereign debt markets, equities, and international mutual funds.

The firm is part of Grupo Bci’s regional financial solutions platform, which also includes Bci Miami and City National Bank of Florida (CNB). The latter has multiplied its assets fivefold over the past decade, reaching $28 billion, contributing to the group’s operations in Florida currently representing 40% of its total assets.

Bci Securities has connected clients and partners with global markets over the past decade, providing a global perspective with local expertise. We are an advisory platform that facilitates direct access to global liquidity and institutional-level execution, complementing the value proposition that Grupo Bci offers its clients,” said Carlos Martin, CEO of Bci Securities.

Behind this expansion is the trajectory of an institution with nearly 90 years of history. Founded in 1937, Banco Bci currently manages more than $90 billion in assets, serves nearly six million clients in Chile, Peru, and the United States, and maintains some of the strongest credit ratings in Latin American banking, with ratings of A2 by Moody’s and A- by S&P Global and Fitch Ratings.

Access to Co-Investments Becomes a Key Factor in Manager Selection

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Latin American wealth Miami
Canva

Co-investments are becoming an increasingly important route through which U.S. institutional investors access private markets, according to the latest edition of Cerulli Edge—U.S. Institutional Edition.

According to its analysis, as demand continues to grow, co-investment capabilities are no longer simply an option for asset managers: they are becoming a standard expectation and a key factor in attracting institutional interest.

“Within private markets, co-investments have emerged as a highly relevant alternative for institutions seeking to reduce the distance between pooled fund structures and direct asset ownership,” Cerulli notes. Its analysis concludes that a net 16% of asset owners expect to increase their allocation to co-investments over the next 24 months; 19% anticipate increasing it, compared with only 3% who expect to reduce it.

Cerulli points out that institutions use co-investments not only to reduce fees, but also to gain direct visibility into transaction analysis and structuring, as well as to strengthen their relationships with managers. According to Cerulli, management firms state that 42% of co-investment partnerships originated through direct relationships with asset owners, while nearly a quarter (24%) emerged through investment consultants and outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) service providers.

Key findings

Its conclusion is that co-investments have become a fundamental mechanism for creating and strengthening these relationships. “Access to co-investments is now part of the initial manager evaluation process, rather than something negotiated separately after the investment has been made. Managers unable to offer this type of access are reducing their potential universe of limited partners, and not as a future risk, but as a present reality,” said Gloria Pais, Research analyst at Cerulli.

Another conclusion of the analysis is that intermediaries,  consultants and OCIOs, deserve increasing attention. “Mid-sized institutions are increasingly accessing co-investments through intermediaries, gaining both cost advantages and access to transactions they likely could not originate on their own,” Pais added.

The expert noted that “proactively developing these intermediary relationships, rather than treating them as secondary to direct institutional contact, is increasingly becoming a smarter allocation of business development resources.

Less Manhattan, More Miami: The Battle for Latin American Wealth Accelerates in the U.S.

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

dividend ETFs investors
Photo courtesy

The discussion surrounding a possible new tax on second homes in New York City has once again fueled a trend that for several years has been reshaping the wealth map in the United States: competition among states to attract private capital, family offices, and international fortunes, particularly from Latin America.

Although the initiative is still going through approval processes and political debate, the mere announcement is already being interpreted by wealth managers and investors as another sign of growing tax pressure on high-net-worth individuals in New York. At the same time, it strengthens the positioning of jurisdictions such as Florida and Texas as preferred destinations for the relocation of Latin American wealth.

According to the proposal being discussed in New York, the new levy would target owners of high-value second homes, amid increasing political pressure to finance affordable housing programs and close urban fiscal gaps. The debate also comes at a time when global wealth migration is gaining speed and sophistication.

“Today, wealth migration is no longer only international; it is also happening within the United States,” Juan Carlos Eguiarte, country manager of BAIA Capital in Mexico, explained in an interview with Funds Society.

For the executive, the phenomenon cannot be analyzed in isolation or solely from a tax perspective. In reality, it reflects structural competition among U.S. jurisdictions to capture highly mobile private capital.

“Florida has spent years consolidating itself as one of the main recipients of private capital and high-net-worth individuals’ wealth. It is no longer just a retirement or purely residential city; today Miami has become a platform for attracting private capital,” he noted.

Miami’s transformation has been particularly visible since the pandemic. Investment funds, hedge funds, private equity firms, and family offices moved operations from New York and California, attracted by a more favorable tax environment, lower state taxes, more flexible regulation, and an increasingly deep financial ecosystem.

Data from Henley & Partners estimates that the United States continues to be the world’s leading destination for migrating millionaires, while Florida ranks among the states with the highest growth in ultra-high-net-worth residents. Miami-Dade alone has recorded a sharp increase in premium real estate prices in recent years, partly driven by Latin American buyers.

The appeal for investors from the region is not limited to the tax component. Factors such as legal certainty, regulatory stability, quality of life, and international connectivity are carrying increasing weight in wealth-related decisions.

“The southern states of the United States are even more favorable in climate-related matters, and Florida has also become a Latin American capital,” Eguiarte pointed out.

The mobility of capital, he added, has now reached unprecedented levels. “When tax and regulatory differences begin to become material, capital optimizes jurisdiction, whether internationally or within the United States itself.”

In that context, New York maintains its position as the continent’s main financial center but faces growing challenges in retaining part of the international private capital that historically gravitated toward Manhattan and other premium markets.

The discussion also comes at a particularly relevant moment for Latin America. Regional economic slowdown, political uncertainty, and the limited capacity to absorb capital in some economies are pushing business families and large fortunes to diversify structures and jurisdictions.

Eguiarte believes the phenomenon should not be interpreted solely as capital flight.

“I do not see it so much as capital flight, but rather a lack of absorption capacity in Mexico and Latin America because economies are not growing at the same pace as fortunes,” he stated.

According to his analysis, the problem lies in the scarcity of productive projects and infrastructure capable of channeling large private capital surpluses with sufficiently attractive returns and long-term stability.

“This triggers the need to seek jurisdictions and locations capable of absorbing that productive capital,” he explained.

Paradoxically, Latin America offers considerably higher nominal interest rates than the United States. However, high-net-worth investors are increasingly weighing variables such as sovereign risk, legal certainty, and institutional stability.

“It is no coincidence that interest rates in Latin America are much higher; they respond to risk factors and the need to provide an additional premium to investors,” the executive indicated.

The broader context of the discussion, wealth sector specialists agree, is that global capital no longer competes only among countries, but among cities and states capable of building attractive ecosystems for international wealth.

“The jurisdictions that manage to combine stability, efficiency, and market depth will be the ones that capture the next generation of wealth,” Eguiarte concluded.

Dividend ETFs, a Focus of Interest for Investors

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

patrimonios latinoamericanos Miami
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Artificial intelligence-related companies have captured investors’ attention in recent times. However, dividend-focused ETFs serve as a reminder that there is life beyond the leading players of the new technological revolution and that including income-related vehicles is good protection for portfolios.

The data supports this view, as investment flows into ETFs listed in the United States reached $6.3 billion in April, implying net inflows of $36.9 billion so far this year. This figure is slightly higher than the $35 billion recorded in the same period last year, according to investment flow figures published by First Trust.

At S&P Global, they note that dividends play an important role in generating total equity returns. Since 1926, they have contributed approximately 31% of the total return of the S&P 500, while capital appreciation has accounted for the remaining 69%. Therefore, “sustainable dividend income and the potential for capital appreciation are important factors for total return expectations,” according to the firm.

Companies use stable and growing dividends as a sign of confidence in their business outlook, while market participants view those track records as an indication of corporate maturity and balance sheet strength, according to S&P Global.

ETFs that invest in dividend-paying stocks can be “simple and comprehensive solutions” for those seeking income, according to Morningstar. The firm lists several reasons. The first is that dividend ETFs hold a portfolio of dividend-paying stocks and therefore “offer immediate diversification.”

In addition, dividend ETFs “typically have low costs,” and they are also easy to buy and sell. “Many of the best dividend exchange-traded funds are managed by popular asset managers that have brokerage platforms,” the firm notes. Lastly, investors who want exposure to dividend-paying stocks through an ETF “have a wide variety of good exchange-traded funds to choose from.”

Although dividend ETFs focus on income, each one applies very different strategies and, as a result, their performance can vary considerably from one another. For this reason, Morningstar believes that investors seeking passive income through dividend ETFs “should do their research carefully to understand exactly what the ETF invests in before buying it.”

At VanEck, they point to the shift in the interest rate environment during this decade and the typically resilient performance of high-dividend securities as one of the reasons behind the popularity of some of their dividend ETFs. The firm explains that during the low interest rate era of the 2010s, investors favored “growth at any price.” But current interest rates make the compensation offered by high dividends more attractive. Therefore, they note that dividend strategies can perform well not only in bullish stock markets but also during periods of volatility, although every market cycle is different.

A Debate on the “Heavy Hand” of Regulation and the Rise of ETFs

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

What began in 2014 as an effort to give economists a voice in an environment dominated by lawyers has now become the epicenter of empirical analysis on financial oversight. At the opening of the SEC Annual Conference, the balance of more than a decade of supervision delivered a clear warning: regulation cannot be a series of “random acts” of punishment.

One of the topics addressed during the event was the analysis of the “broken windows” policy. “This theory, adapted from urban criminology, suggests that prosecuting minor infractions prevents larger crimes. However, the analysis presented questions whether this approach can be transferred to the complex world of white-collar crime,” experts noted during the conference.

Mark T. Uyeda, SEC commissioner, explained that while empirical evidence suggests that monitoring minor infractions can reduce serious financial misconduct, the industry warns of a dangerous side effect: the diversion of limited resources. “Abusing discretionary authority undermines the predictability that markets require,” participants heard during the forum, noting that imposing sanctions over technical issues — such as the use of personal mobile devices for work communications — does not always reflect a consensus on what constitutes unacceptable conduct.

The debate also revolved around the SEC’s own success metrics. In this regard, there is concern that if the success of an administration is measured solely by the number of enforcement actions and the amount of fines collected, regulatory staff may prioritize quantity over the quality of financial justice. According to the experts, the complexity of the current regulatory framework leaves excessive room for “novel” legal interpretations that could chill socially valuable economic activities.

Beyond oversight, the conference also addressed the transformation of institutional savings through the use of ETFs. The figures are striking: in 2005, ETFs represented just 3.2% of assets compared with mutual funds. By 2025, that figure had climbed to nearly 30% of the market, with $13.4 trillion in assets.

According to some studies, a new phenomenon is emerging: managers of these vehicles may be incentivized to adopt highly volatile strategies to attract an increasingly broad base of retail investors, posing new challenges for system stability.

The conference concluded by reaffirming the need for academia to scrutinize the regulator. “In a market that now includes cryptoassets and overnight stock trading, data analysis presents itself as the only tool capable of ensuring that public policies are not merely political reactions, but decisions grounded in economic reality,” Uyeda reminded attendees.