Blackstone Appoints Rashmi Madan as Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Private Wealth

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyRashmi Madan, Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Private Wealth

Blackstone has announced significant changes to accelerate the growth of its Private Wealth business. With more than $300 billion in assets under management from the global private banking channel, the business has been a pioneer in serving individual investors for more than two decades.

After overseeing the development of the private wealth business in EMEA, Rashmi Madan, a Blackstone veteran with 15 years at the firm, has been promoted to the newly created role of Global Head of Portfolio Solutions. According to the firm, in this new position, Madan will lead the expansion of Blackstone’s multi-strategy solutions, leveraging her extensive experience across asset classes and long-standing client relationships. The firm plans to develop several investment solutions within this new initiative.

As a result, Simona Maellare will join Blackstone as Head of EMEA for Private Wealth, where she will lead the firm’s efforts to expand and strengthen its private banking business in Europe and the Middle East. Maellare most recently served as Global Co-Head of the Alternative Capital Group at UBS, as well as Co-Head of EMEA for OneUBS, and brings more than 30 years of experience advising and partnering with alternative asset managers on capital raising and strategic growth in the EMEA region. With a long track record advising some of the world’s leading asset managers on their expansion in EMEA, Maellare brings to Blackstone exceptional expertise, trusted relationships, and a proven ability to build and scale businesses at the highest level.

The firm explains that these appointments strengthen Blackstone’s leadership in two priority areas for its next phase of growth and will help expand multi-strategy investment solutions for advisors and their clients, as well as accelerate the international expansion of the Private Wealth business.

“We have built this business by investing in exceptional talent with a deep commitment to clients. Rashmi and Simona each bring experience and relationships that are difficult to replicate: Rashmi in multi-strategy solutions, which we see as a powerful growth frontier, and Simona in the markets of Europe and the Middle East, where the opportunity for individual investors is significant. Simona’s arrival and Rashmi’s new role will be key as we continue to develop differentiated solutions for our clients globally. I look forward to working closely with both,” said Joan Solotar, Global Head of Blackstone Private Wealth.

For her part, Rashmi Madan, Global Head of Portfolio Solutions for Blackstone Private Wealth, stated: “Multi-asset investing allows clients to access the breadth of Blackstone’s platform within a single strategy. As private markets continue to expand and advisor toolkits become more sophisticated, Blackstone Portfolio Solutions will help deliver integrated, investor-focused portfolios built on the firm’s flagship perpetual strategies. I am excited to lead this business and capitalize on the opportunities ahead.”

More Population, Multinationals, and International Investors Behind the Transformation of Miami Real Estate

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyPilar Lecha, Real Estate Broker.

The transformation that Miami’s real estate market is undergoing is a clear example of what is happening across Florida, where two major trends converge: population movements and its appeal to investors. According to Pilar Lecha, a real estate broker with more than a decade of experience in the luxury market, the strong population growth in the state is reshaping cities, and Miami is the clearest expression of this broader shift.

“More than 1,350 people a day are moving to the state of Florida, and a third of them are arriving in Miami. Florida has become the second state in receiving Americans who decide to relocate. This is a trend we began to see after the COVID-19 pandemic, but it has persisted over time. In addition, this movement has been reinforced by the fact that numerous multinationals have also decided to move their headquarters to Miami, attracted by the city’s potential in terms of location, business strength, and economic level,” explains Lecha.

In this regard, Citadel — Ken Griffin’s hedge fund — Blackstone, and Inter&Co are among the latest examples of major financial firms that have set up in the city. As Lecha notes, “many of these firms have moved to Brickell, which has come to be known as the Wall Street of the South, due to its strategic location and the financial community that has developed there.”

Investment opportunities

As a result, Lecha explains that these trends have transformed the real estate market, increasing its value and making it more attractive as an investment. “When investors arrive in Miami, what they want to know is whether they are too late or still on time to invest in this market. In my view, there are still interesting opportunities, but above all, it is an investment with significant growth potential. One figure that illustrates this opportunity is that there are currently 153 buildings under construction. What we are seeing is that residential supply is growing, particularly in segments aimed at short-term rentals,” she notes.

A key factor supporting demand for real estate in Miami, according to Lecha, is that the market facilitates leverage, “which allows investors to enter with smaller tickets and ultimately make significant investments.” In her view, two other factors that make this market attractive are a more favorable tax framework for investors and an environment with a somewhat weaker dollar, “as both increase investors’ purchasing power.” Finally, she highlights that the strong presence of international investors means the local market is more sensitive to mortgage rates and global uncertainty.

Investor profile

But who is leading investment? According to MIAMI Realtors, in 2025 foreign buyers accounted for 15% of residential purchases in South Florida, seven times the national average (2%). In addition, nearly half of all international purchases in Florida are concentrated in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach; more than half of these transactions are made in cash, and most properties are acquired for investment or vacation use.

Latin America is the driving force behind this international flow: Colombia leads with 15% of total foreign buyers in Miami, followed by Argentina (11%), Mexico (7%), Brazil (7%), and Venezuela (5%). “Latin American investors have always shown interest in Miami, and real estate is a way to bring their capital. Beyond returns, this type of investor finds legal certainty here, and that holds great value. Brazilians and Colombians are currently the most active investors,” she explains.

Finally, Lecha adds that she has also observed growing interest from European investors, particularly Spaniards: “They tend to be entrepreneurs — both large and small — as well as family offices. They enter with smaller tickets and are also investing in smaller properties.”

A young city with a future

One aspect that Lecha emphasizes is that this transformation in real estate is occurring alongside the evolution of the city itself. “Miami has managed to break its seasonality. We cannot forget that, in addition to being a business and financial hub, it receives 17 million tourists a year, with its port being the busiest in the United States. To that reality driven by tourism, we now add all these large companies, business activity, and population inflows. This translates into a dynamic, young city full of events — such as the World Cup — that further place it on the global map,” she highlights.

The city’s character is relevant because, according to Lecha’s experience, its evolving features also influence investment trends. “The clearest example is the crypto asset ecosystem. Miami has positioned itself as a benchmark in this space, thanks to the firms that have established themselves here, and as a result we are seeing many real estate transactions carried out in crypto,” she says. She adds: “We see two profiles buying real estate with crypto. One is an older buyer, over 50, who holds crypto and, being more cautious, moves it into property. The other is a younger profile, more familiar with this asset, who either takes out loans in crypto or completes transactions in crypto to maintain their position in cryptocurrencies.”

Her conclusion, after years living in the city and working in the real estate market, is that all these “energies” coexist in Miami and give it a unique vitality.

Professionalization, Holistic Vision, and Impact: The Three Trends Shaping Philanthropy

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

state street etf listed private abs
Canva

As philanthropy and impact investing take on a more strategic role in how families manage their wealth, and as the great wealth transfer accelerates, family offices are not only adapting but are also beginning to influence how capital is deployed to address social and environmental challenges.

In this regard, the UBS Global Family Office Report 2025 identifies three clear trends in how these high-net-worth entities approach philanthropy: greater professionalization of these services, a stronger role for family offices within philanthropy, and a shift from isolated impact toward integration across the entire family asset portfolio.

According to the report’s conclusions, the family office landscape is not changing in a single direction, nor at the same pace for everyone. Rather, we are seeing a global trend in which different factors point to a shift toward more integrated ways of organizing capital and aligning wealth, business, and philanthropy.

Response of family offices

“For some family offices, this has meant looking beyond mere portfolio construction and thinking more deliberately about alignment between governance structures, investment strategies, and operating businesses. Others are placing greater emphasis on internal coordination, with the family office increasingly acting as the connective tissue between entities, advisors, and decision-makers,” explain UBS.

In their view, in practice this has less to do with adopting a specific ideology and more with responding to increasing complexity through better governance, clearer mandates, and stronger execution.

On the other hand, the report finds that collaboration has become another common theme: “Whether working with peers, co-investors, public institutions, or philanthropic partners, family offices are seeking to operate in more interconnected ways. The ability to convene and contribute within partnerships is becoming just as important as financial expertise.”

In this context, a relevant aspect is the role being played by technology and AI, which are not yet widely integrated into philanthropy or family office governance. “Many firms recognize their longer-term potential, especially for improving transparency, comparability, and insight in increasingly complex structures. Over time, digital capability will likely become an important support for decision-making, alongside judgment and experience,” the report notes as a trend.

According to its conclusions, the family offices best positioned for what lies ahead will be those that combine disciplined execution with openness to new ways of working; those that view alignment, collaboration, and continuous learning as essential capabilities. “For those seeking to manage their wealth with purpose and influence, this moment offers an opportunity: to shape their own legacy and, equally important, the broader systems in which their capital operates,” the report concludes.

State Street IM Launches an ETF of Listed and Private ABS

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

ucits corporate bond funds shocks
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

State Street Investment Management has announced the launch of the State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB), an actively managed exchange-traded fund designed to expand investor access to a fast-growing, higher-quality segment of global credit markets.

PRAB primarily invests in investment grade asset-backed securities (ABS), both listed and private, including collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), as well as residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The fund’s innovative exposure to both listed and private ABS responds to growing investor demand for income-oriented strategies with higher ratings. The fund’s allocation to private ABS may include, among others, securities provided by Apollo Global Securities, LLC.

By investing across a broad range of investment grade ABS — including ABS sectors that have historically had limited or no representation in the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond IndexPRAB can serve as an effective complement to core bond allocations and help diversify sources of income within a bond portfolio.

“Although the global asset-backed financing market exceeds $20 trillion, ABS have long been underrepresented in investor portfolios,” said Anna Paglia, Chief Business Officer at State Street Investment Management. “With PRAB, we are expanding investor access to a higher-quality yet still largely untapped segment of the global credit market, which offers diverse sources of potential income and the possibility of higher returns compared to corporate bonds with a similar risk profile,” she concluded.

Managed by State Street Investment Management’s active fixed income team, the PRAB ETF adopts a risk-aware top-down approach combined with bottom-up security selection designed to overweight the most attractive sectors and issuers.

PRAB adds to State Street Investment Management’s growing range of innovative public and private credit solutions, following the launches of the State Street® IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and the State Street® Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRSD) in 2025. The range had attracted approximately $980 million in assets as of the end of February 2026.

How UCITS Corporate Bond Funds Behave in the Face of Financial Shocks

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

obstaculos inversor minorista esma

International investors consider UCITS funds to be a solid, reliable vehicle with very clear regulation. Achieving this success has required the commitment of European authorities, which, following recent financial crises, have intensified scrutiny over the role of redemptions in bond funds as a potential amplifier of market stress. In particular, they have emphasized the need to strengthen liquidity management tools and market-wide stress testing frameworks. But have they succeeded?

According to the latest study published by the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), although there were periods of higher redemptions, the magnitude of outflows in corporate bond funds remained relatively contained during three recent and clearly distinct financial shocks. For EFAMA, the results of the study contradict concerns expressed by financial regulators and international institutions, such as the FSB, the ECB, and the ESRB, which have argued that corporate bond funds — especially those offering daily liquidity — may amplify market stress during periods of turbulence.

“These concerns are based on the theoretical belief that a potential mismatch between the liquidity of fund assets and investors’ redemption rights could trigger forced asset sales (fire sales) and greater financial instability. However, our data indicate that such scenarios did not materialize in practice. Even during periods of high market volatility, fund managers appeared able to meet investor redemptions without resorting to disruptive asset sales or experiencing severe liquidity stress,” states the latest Market Insights report titled “Fund redemptions in periods of shock: evidence from outflows in UCITS corporate bond funds.”

EFAMA’s experts reached this conclusion after conducting a comprehensive analysis of daily and monthly redemption patterns of listed European corporate bond funds during the three most recent financial shocks — COVID-19 in 2020, the interest rate hikes of 2022, and the tariff shock of 2025 — assessing whether the observed redemption levels could pose a material threat to financial stability.

“This analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” highlighted Federico Cupelli, Deputy Director of Regulatory Policy at EFAMA.

Following the evidence
The organization explains that the evidence suggests that, at least in the cases analyzed, corporate bond funds acted as relatively stable investment vehicles rather than becoming sources of systemic risk. For example, although the analysis shows that the largest monthly fund redemptions ranged between 3% and 6% of the previous month’s net assets across all observations, ESMA’s stress test scenarios assume redemptions of 22% in a single week. “These results invite a more nuanced view of the role of corporate bond funds in financial stability debates and suggest that current liquidity management practices are more robust than sometimes assumed,” EFAMA notes.

In fact, they argue that the entire debate about the role of bond funds should be framed within a broader context, as investment funds are not the only holders of bonds. “Other key players, such as central banks, banks, pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds — among others — represent a much larger share of fixed income holdings compared to investment funds,” they point out.

Finally, they emphasize that this analysis suggests that risk-based supervision is more effective than broad-based regulation in addressing potential liquidity mismatches in the fund sector. “Rather than applying broad measures across the entire fund universe, it may be more effective to focus regulatory attention on specific groups of funds that are structurally more exposed to the risk of extreme outflows,” they argue.

EFAMA’s proposal
Based on its previous analysis, EFAMA has identified several principles that supervisors should take into account when overseeing funds:

  1. The notion of liquidity mismatch used by supervisors to identify vulnerabilities in the fund sector is inappropriate. In their view, rather than examining how much investors can redeem over a given period according to the fund’s rules, supervisors should consider how much outflow volume a fund can reasonably expect based on its historical behavior.
  2. Fund subcategories, such as investment grade and high-yield corporate bond funds, are not homogeneous categories. Therefore, they do not consider it appropriate to limit the analysis to their aggregate behavior (for example, by stating that “high-yield corporate bond funds exhibit structural liquidity mismatches”). “A more granular analysis is needed to identify those funds that are more vulnerable to liquidity shocks. Similarly, in top-down stress test scenarios, it is not appropriate to assume that all funds within a category will face similar levels of redemptions. Stress test exercises based on these assumptions are unlikely to accurately identify where vulnerabilities truly lie, if they exist,” they argue.

    3. It is relatively rare for a fund to experience daily outflows exceeding 3%. “This means that, in most cases, asset managers do not face sudden and significant outflows that could trigger forced asset sales. Moreover, large outflows are usually driven by the exit of an institutional investor from the fund,” they explain. In such cases, they note that the investor is typically required to provide sufficient advance notice to the manager so that preparations can be made for the withdrawal. For this reason, persistent daily outflows above 3% could be an indication of stress in a fund and may warrant closer supervisory attention.

Geopolitical conflicts: Tools to benefit from market volatility in investment portfolios

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

geopolitical conflict market volatility
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainAutor: sergeitokmakov

Tensions between the United States, Israel, and Iran are once again placing geopolitics at the center of financial markets. For asset managers, the challenge is not only to react to volatility, but to design portfolios capable of withstanding energy shocks, unexpected inflation, and recurring episodes of global uncertainty.

For years, institutional investors operated under an implicit assumption: geopolitics could trigger episodes of volatility but rarely altered the long-term functioning of global markets. That paradigm is now changing.

The conflict in the Middle East serves as a reminder that geopolitical risks can directly affect energy markets, inflation dynamics, and the behavior of financial assets.

The critical point lies in the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important energy corridor, through which approximately 20% of global oil consumption flows. Any disruption in this strategic route could trigger sharp movements in energy prices, inflationary pressures, and greater volatility across financial markets.

For asset managers, the key question is clear: how to construct portfolios capable of withstanding and adapting to a more volatile geopolitical environment.

This geopolitical context arrives at a time when the asset management industry was already undergoing structural changes.

The world’s largest asset managers currently oversee nearly $140 trillion in assets, intensifying competition to generate alpha, innovate in product offerings, and expand distribution channels.

At the same time, several analyses point to clear trends shaping the industry:

  • accelerated growth of private markets
  • fee pressure in traditional products
  • greater use of technology and artificial intelligence in portfolio management
  • increasing demand for alternative strategies

In this environment, reports such as Northern Trust’s Global Investment Outlook 2026 warn that markets may face greater dispersion among assets, more persistent inflation, and recurring episodes of volatility—factors that reinforce the importance of active management.

Another important transformation is the growing convergence between public and private markets. Increasingly, traditional asset managers are incorporating private market strategies, while alternative firms are seeking structures that allow them to broaden their investor base.

The result is a new asset management model in which public and private markets begin to integrate within a single investment architecture.

Portfolio resilience in the new geopolitical era

In this new environment, portfolio resilience no longer depends solely on diversification between equities and bonds. It increasingly relies on a combination of structural factors and the architecture of the investment vehicle itself.

How markets typically react to geopolitical shocks

Although geopolitical conflicts often trigger initial episodes of volatility, they can also create temporary dislocations across financial markets. Historically, such events tend to affect asset classes and economic sectors in different ways.

In the case of tensions in the Middle East, markets usually react through four primary channels:

  • Energy and commodities: risk to strategic routes such as the Strait of Hormuz can push oil and natural gas prices higher.
  • Safe-haven assets: during periods of heightened risk aversion, assets such as gold, the U.S. dollar, and U.S. Treasury bonds often attract stronger inflows.
  • Defense and security: geopolitical conflicts are often accompanied by increased defense and national security spending.

Market volatility: rising uncertainty tends to increase volatility and dispersion across asset classes.

From strategy to investment vehicle

In this context, the structure of the investment vehicle becomes almost as important as the underlying strategy itself.

Asset securitization allows investment strategies or portfolios to be transformed into more efficient and scalable vehicles, offering several advantages for asset managers:

  • facilitating access to international capital
  • consolidating institutional track records
  • improving transparency and distribution
  • providing flexibility in the selection of underlying assets and enhancing diversification 
  • connecting private market opportunities with the liquidity of public markets

These solutions are gaining traction precisely because they address one of the industry’s biggest challenges today: how to expand access to new investment strategies in an increasingly competitive environment.

Geopolitical crises generate uncertainty, but they also tend to create new investment opportunities.

In this environment, institutional asset managers are paying greater attention to risk diversification, exposure to real-economy assets, and the use of more flexible investment structures.

In a world where geopolitics once again plays a decisive role in financial markets, firms that successfully combine structural innovation, genuine diversification, and global access to capital will be better positioned to transform volatility into a competitive advantage.

In line with this evolution in the industry, solutions such as those offered by FlexFunds enable asset managers and investment firms to transform strategies into efficient and scalable investment vehicles, facilitating access to international markets and distribution to a global investor base. For more information, please contact our experts at info@flexfunds.com

Financial Institutions That Have Closed or Evacuated Offices in the Middle East

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

latin american resilient currencies
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In recent weeks, several international financial institutions and major financial services firms have adopted extraordinary measures in the Middle East — especially in Dubai and other Gulf financial centers — after Iran threatened to attack “economic centers and banks” as part of the escalation of the regional conflict. These warnings triggered temporary office evacuations, branch closures, or the shift to remote work for employees in some of the region’s main financial hubs.

One of the most notable cases is Citigroup. The US bank ordered the evacuation of several of its offices in Dubai, including facilities located in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and in the Oud Metha district. As a precautionary measure, Citi also temporarily closed some branches in the United Arab Emirates and asked its employees to work from home until the security situation stabilizes.

Another of the affected institutions was Goldman Sachs, which also asked its staff in Dubai and other Gulf countries to avoid going to the office.

JPMorgan Chase adopted similar measures: the bank allowed a large part of its workforce in the Middle East to work remotely while risks to corporate facilities and staff were being assessed.

Among the banks with a strong historical presence in the Gulf, Standard Chartered also asked its employees to temporarily leave offices in Dubai’s financial district and continue their activities remotely. The British bank generates a significant share of its revenue from Asia and the Middle East.

Another international institution affected was HSBC, which temporarily closed some branches in Qatar and expanded remote work policies for its staff in several Gulf countries.

In addition to banks, several global financial services and consulting firms — part of the international financial ecosystem — also adopted similar measures. Among them were PwC and Deloitte, which evacuated or temporarily closed offices in Dubai and other Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait, as a precautionary measure in response to the Iranian threats.

Note prepared using sources from Euronews, Reuters/AFP (L’Orient Today), The Times, Bloomberg, Middle East Monitor, and The New Arab.

Chilean and Colombian Peso, the Latin American Currencies With the Greatest Resilience

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

private bdcs united states
Canva

The Brazilian real and the Colombian peso should be the currencies that show the greatest resilience during the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, as they are net exporters of oil. Even so, the most notable movement for Ebury is the appreciation of the dollar of between 1% and 4% against the Latin American currencies that they usually cover, “given the shift that has taken place in global markets toward safe-haven assets.”

In its latest report, the firm’s experts highlight that the Chilean peso appears especially vulnerable as it is one of the largest net importers of oil among emerging markets. “In addition, the weight of energy in the national CPI is relatively higher than in other countries,” they add. By contrast, the second key conclusion of the report is that in Peru, local disruptions in the supply of natural gas have further worsened the situation.

The Brazilian real (BRL)

According to Ebury’s report, the Brazilian real has corrected some of its losses, but it has still depreciated by 1.5% against the greenback since the conflict in the Middle East escalated. “As a net exporter of oil, the Brazilian real should be less impacted than other emerging market currencies by the recent rise in oil prices. However, it has not emerged completely unscathed from the generalized flight toward safe-haven assets and currencies such as the dollar,” they note.

As for economic data, which have been completely overshadowed by the geopolitical conflict, Brazil’s fourth-quarter GDP growth came in line with expectations, registering a modest expansion of 0.1% quarter-on-quarter. According to their analysis, this clearly reflects the high interest rates set in Brazil, which they also believe have recently caused some slowdown in the labor market: the unemployment rate rose to 5.4%, although it remains close to historical lows. “Looking ahead, we still believe that Brazil’s central bank will begin its rate-cutting cycle this year, but it may act more cautiously while the conflict in the Middle East persists,” they conclude.

The Chilean peso (CLP)

As indicated in the previously mentioned conclusions of the report, the Chilean peso is one of the currencies most affected by the conflict in the Middle East, and not only at the regional level. “Chile’s position as a net importer of oil, together with the fall in copper prices amid the possibility of weaker global demand, have been the main factors behind the depreciation of the peso, which exceeded 4% last week. Given the risk of an inflationary rebound if the conflict drags on and if oil prices remain elevated, swap markets have drastically adjusted their expectations for rate cuts by the Central Bank of Chile this year,” Ebury argues.

They also highlight that just a few weeks ago markets were pricing in a rate cut at the next meeting with a probability close to 70%; now that figure has fallen to around 25%. “As a result, it is reasonable to anticipate a cautious BCCh at its next Monetary Policy Meeting, despite the recent slowdown in inflation observed in February. As long as geopolitical uncertainty persists and clear signs of de-escalation do not appear, the Chilean peso, like other emerging market currencies, will remain under downward pressure,” the report notes.

The Colombian peso (COP)

In the case of the Colombian peso, Ebury’s analysis indicates that it has also been one of the most resilient currencies in Latin America since the conflict in Iran broke out, as it is a net exporter of oil. That said, the document notes that it has also lost ground against the greenback (just over 1%) amid the generalized flight from risk assets and currencies.

In addition, the parliamentary elections do not appear to have had a significant impact on the exchange rate, with the expected political fragmentation taking place. “Pacto Histórico emerged as the political force with the greatest representation in Congress, while the strong result of Paloma Valencia puts her in a good position to compete with De la Espriella for the right-wing vote. Given the high percentage of undecided voters, the potential outcome of the presidential election continues to generate uncertainty in the local market, which could add a risk premium to the peso,” they note.

The Mexican peso (MXN)

For its part, the Mexican peso has fallen by more than 3% against the greenback since the outbreak of the conflict. According to the report, amid the possibility of higher inflation, markets have stopped pricing in rate cuts by Banxico. “In addition to developments in oil prices and geopolitical tensions, markets will closely monitor the negotiations over the USMCA, which are scheduled to begin next week,” they note.

In part, according to their view, this could be positive news for the Mexican economy, as trade uncertainty could dissipate sooner than expected. However, they believe that the net impact on the economy and the Mexican peso will depend largely on the content of the agreement that is ultimately ratified. In this sense, Ebury’s forecast is clear: additional volatility around the Mexican peso can be expected in the coming weeks.

The Peruvian sol (PEN)

Finally, the report highlights the performance of the Peruvian sol, which has fallen almost 4% since the first attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran, depreciating to levels not seen since late September. It is worth recalling that, as a net importer of oil, Peru is vulnerable to this energy shock.

“Although it started from more favorable inflation levels than other countries, a leak in a gas pipeline in the south of the country is causing a severe shortage, leading to energy rationing across different sectors. A significant rebound in inflation is expected in upcoming readings, which will partially correct once the leak is repaired. This is believed to take approximately two weeks. In this regard, it will be interesting to analyze how the BCRP responds to these developments at this week’s meeting,” Ebury concludes.

The Liquid and the Solid: What Is Happening with Private BDCs in the United States

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

fondos ucits bonos corporativos shocks
Canva

Tensions, crisis, a reminder of a structural reality, a turning point, and opportunity: in recent weeks the alternative assets and private credit sector has experienced episodes of lack of immediate liquidity that have led major asset managers to limit capital withdrawals.

This phenomenon does not necessarily imply insolvency, but it does reflect a structural problem in the segment: the difficulty of offering frequent liquidity in vehicles that invest in very illiquid assets, such as direct loans to companies.

There is a “liquidity mismatch,” or as Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF, notes in a recent report: “In simple terms, the market is remembering a structural reality: private credit is not a liquid asset, even though some structures attempt to offer periodic exit windows.”

A new difficulty for investors already saturated with uncertainty

Amid the enormous uncertainty generated by the new war in the Middle East and the chronic instability of public markets, experts are observing these movements that until recently “seemed unlikely,” according to Cruz himself.

For analysts at Apollo Academy (a firm specialized in alternative assets), we are facing a turning point.

During the period roughly between 2010 and 2022, low interest rates, abundant liquidity, and multiple expansion allowed many managers to generate returns without needing to rely heavily on operational value creation. However, the macroeconomic environment has changed structurally, and the sector now faces a scenario in which those factors can no longer sustain the same level of returns. In this context, the future success of private equity will depend on recovering the principles that historically defined the industry: discipline in acquisitions, operational improvement of portfolio companies, and clear strategies to generate liquidity at exit, argue David Sambur, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Equity; Matt Nord, Partner Co-Head of Private Equity and Head of Hybrid; and Antoine Munfakh, Partner Deputy Glob, in a report attached at this link.

The Apollo report argues that private equity must return to its roots: “Traditionally, the attractiveness of this asset class was based on managers’ ability to acquire companies with potential for improvement, implement strategic and operational changes, and subsequently monetize that value through an exit. This approach involved active participation in the management of companies, with the objective of improving their efficiency, optimizing their cost structure, driving growth, or redefining their competitive positioning. Because they were not subject to the pressure of quarterly results typical of public markets, companies under private equity ownership could adopt long-term transformation strategies.”

Greater differentiation among asset managers

Experts agree that opportunities in the sector will depend on greater differentiation among asset managers’ strategies.

“Greater competition among managers, together with the return of some banks to certain segments of corporate financing, has begun to put pressure on origination conditions. This has translated into lower origination in some segments and a gradual compression of spreads, particularly in corporate direct lending, where most BDCs operate.

This adjustment is creating an increasingly clear differentiation within the universe of private credit. While many BDCs compete in the corporate direct lending segment, there are other areas of private credit where competition remains significantly lower,” says Jaime Cruz, Portfolio Manager Private Debt USA at Fynsa AGF.

In particular, financing backed by real assets — such as asset-backed lending and real estate financing — continues to offer attractive spreads and more defensive structures, with origination dynamics that remain favorable, the expert adds.

“For those investing with a long-term horizon, this dynamic is not necessarily negative. In fact, it can strengthen the ecosystem. When speculative flows decrease and the capital that remains is truly patient, managers can focus on what truly generates value: originating quality credit, structuring solid transactions, and capturing attractive spreads. In that sense, what is happening today with private BDCs is not a crisis, but a natural transition in a market that has grown rapidly over the past decade. And as often happens in financial markets, periods of adjustment are also those that ultimately consolidate long-term opportunities,” concludes Cruz.

Bond Market: An Unusual Behavior to Watch

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

kevin warsh economic debate
Canva

Rising oil prices and adjustments in global equity markets are capturing investors’ attention; however, investment firms are urging investors to watch what is happening in the fixed income market, especially with bonds. Since the start of the war between the U.S. and Iran at the end of February, the bond market has behaved in an unusual way for a geopolitical conflict.

According to experts, it is striking that instead of clearly acting as a safe haven, bonds have experienced selling pressure and their yields have risen. For example, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury exceeded 4%, driven by rising oil prices and inflation expectations. Normally, during geopolitical episodes there is a “flight to quality,” meaning investors buy sovereign bonds as safe-haven assets. However, this time the opposite has happened because inflation risk has weighed more heavily than the safe-haven effect. Some analysts have even noted that the bond market “is not functioning as a safe haven” in this episode.

Bond Market Behavior

“In the case of sovereign bonds, the most common pattern during periods of geopolitical tension has been a decline in yields due to demand for safe-haven assets. This was the initial reaction following the announcement of the military operation. However, yields subsequently rose throughout the week. With the exception of Japan, the main government debt markets have experienced a bear flattening so far this month, with short-term yields showing significantly worse performance. The so-called ‘bond vigilantes’ could argue that this reflects the increasingly fragile state of public balance sheets, given the high level of debt and ongoing fiscal expansion, which could undermine the traditional role of sovereign bonds as a store of value during periods of global uncertainty,” explain experts at Muzinich & Co.

Daniel Loughney, Head of Fixed Income at Mediolanum International Funds (MIFL), agrees that, so far, sovereign debt has shown the weakest performance, as inflation concerns have led to the dismantling of expectations for interest rate cuts. “In fact, the ECB is now expected to tighten monetary policy by around 50 basis points. As a result, short-term bonds have been the most affected, while longer-maturity bonds have suffered less,” he notes.

In the view of Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, the reason for this behavior is that the bond market is highly focused on the problems that could arise from rising hydrocarbon prices, particularly the impact of natural gas prices in Europe and the United Kingdom. “U.K. government bonds have performed very poorly during this period, with the yield on 10-year bonds rising by around 0.5% during this conflict, and shorter-dated bonds are now moving to price in an interest rate hike by the Bank of England in June.”

For their part, Adam Hetts, Global Head of Multi-Asset, and Oliver Blackbourn, Portfolio Manager at Janus Henderson, explain that concerns about rising European inflation—or simply prolonged stickiness in the United States—would explain why bond yields have increased. “Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds have risen as markets have priced out one of the interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve that had been expected for the end of the year. Yields on 10-year Treasuries have moved less than their European counterparts, as Friday’s U.S. employment figures helped offset part of the upward pressure on yields stemming from expected inflation,” they note.

A Look at the Credit Market

In contrast, since the conflict between the U.S. and Iran began, investment grade credit has not significantly reflected economic tensions in prices. According to market reports, spreads have moved slightly but continue to reflect the excellent fundamental quality of most large companies in this environment.

“That is likely where the risk lies in the coming weeks: if oil and gas supply issues persist, which have a lasting negative impact on corporate quality, corporate credit is likely to underperform expectations. In recent months we have favored higher quality in credit markets, reducing risk and holding more cash than we normally would. It is not yet time to put that cash to work,” explains Hickmore.

Muzinich & Co acknowledges that total returns in credit markets are lower so far this month, although, interestingly, high yield has slightly outperformed investment grade credit. “In fact, a European investor positioned in U.S. high yield without currency hedging would probably be quite satisfied with that investment decision so far this month.” As for riskier assets, the U.S. asset manager expects credit spreads to widen.

The Conclusions

After this quick analysis of both markets, according to Luke Hickmore, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Aberdeen, what is happening is clear: “The increase in government bond yields is doing part of the heavy lifting and has prevented credit spreads from widening as much as we might have expected before the conflict began.”

Despite these unusual dynamics, Loughney argues in favor of staying invested and says conservative investors should not overreact. “Much of the downside risk has already been priced in under the assumption of a prolonged conflict. Any sign of resolution in the coming week could trigger some reversal of last week’s moves, from which investors could benefit,” he says.

Investment firms argue that the escalation of geopolitical risks has occurred at a time when inflationary pressures have been steadily moderating worldwide. As a result, they explain, over the past 12 months there have been more signs that fixed income can act as a counterweight to weakness in equity markets. “Central banks are likely to look through the brief spike in energy and commodity prices in general. However, a prolonged conflict that increases the likelihood of a sustained rise in oil prices will raise concerns about increasingly entrenched inflation. It is this secondary effect—if inflation expectations become unanchored—that could worry central banks. For now, we see some short-term upside risk for yields, but still within the recent trading range. Recent developments reiterate the need to actively manage fixed income portfolios, not only to take advantage of opportunities but also to protect against downside risks. As always, diversification remains key,” argues James Ringer, fund manager at Schroders.