Emerging Market Debt Remains Resilient Despite Global Turbulence

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Historically, global shocks have not been kind to emerging markets, given risk-off sentiment and their vulnerability to fluctuations in cross-border capital flows. However, despite the timeless warning from Sir John Templeton—who described “This time is different” as the four most dangerous words in investing—the turbulence caused by the global energy shock resulting from the war involving the United States, Israel, and Iran found emerging-market assets, as an asset class, in a stronger position. And the market is taking notice.

“Global fixed-income markets have experienced a sharp increase in volatility as the significant rise in energy prices and geopolitical uncertainty triggered a rapid repricing of inflation risks, leading to higher yields and a flattening of yield curves,” said Álvaro Peró, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income at Capital Group, in a recent market commentary.

Despite this environment, emerging market debt has remained relatively resilient. Even after the successive shocks of Liberation Day 2025—when President Donald Trump announced a sweeping package of tariff increases affecting all countries—and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, emerging-market bonds have held up comparatively well.

From early April of last year through early May this year, Vontobel noted that local-currency emerging-market fixed income outperformed the Global Aggregate Index by more than 11% (all measured in U.S. dollars). At the same time, hard-currency sovereign bonds generated returns more than 9% above the global benchmark. These markets, the asset manager highlighted, “have demonstrated remarkable stability, with no dramatic capital outflows or free-falling local currencies.”

A Story of Resilience

According to Vontobel’s team—based on a report authored by Jean-Louis Nakamura, Thomas Schaffner, and Raphael Lüscher for equities, and Adrian Bender for fixed income—the traditional narrative surrounding emerging markets no longer reflects reality.

If the old view of weak markets vulnerable to capital flows and commodity cycles were still accurate, they argued, the asset class would have been severely impacted by recent events. Instead, what they see is “a level of structural resilience that would have been unimaginable” in the past.

“Many emerging markets have undergone a fundamental transformation over the past decade: fiscal positions have strengthened, monetary frameworks have become more credible, corporate governance has improved, and dependence on domestic demand and trade with other emerging-market partners has increased. At the same time, these economies have taken leadership positions in many of the winning themes of an increasingly bifurcated global economy,” the Vontobel professionals stated.

This transformation, they concluded, has laid the foundations for the current resilience and explains “the way these markets have weathered recent crises that would previously have been highly destabilizing.”

Strong Prospects for Emerging Market Debt

Looking ahead, investment firms generally see a favorable environment for emerging-market fixed income.

Against a global backdrop in which major central banks—the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan—are adjusting their monetary policy approaches, Capital Group sees encouraging signs within the asset class.

“We identify selective value opportunities in high-quality local-currency emerging-market debt with solid fundamentals and attractive real yields,” said Peró, adding that the firm also sees appeal in “certain emerging-market currencies that benefit from favorable terms-of-trade dynamics.”

Meanwhile, the fixed-income team at Neuberger Berman noted that while short-term risks remain significant, the long-term opportunity is still compelling. “We believe the substantial upward adjustment in emerging-market debt yields, cheaper currencies, and generally strong starting fundamentals support a positive medium-term total return outlook, with particularly attractive upside potential once the current crisis begins to move toward resolution,” they commented.

That said, in a global environment where geopolitical risks have produced very different outcomes across countries, prospects within the emerging-market universe remain highly diverse.

The Latin American Case

According to the asset manager, as the conflict in the Middle East drags on, the primary downside risk comes from the indirect effects of the oil shock on inflation and growth. “For emerging markets, which have been growing at an annual pace of around 4%, the threshold for a truly negative scenario remains high, but performance dispersion could be significant,” the firm stated in a recent market commentary.

Given the current inflationary risk environment, Neuberger Berman views Latin American markets as relatively well protected compared with other emerging regions. This is due, they explained, “to their exposure to commodities and energy, as well as their geographic distance from the conflict.”

Brazil is of particular interest to the firm. “The combination of a monetary easing cycle, supportive commodity-price trends, and attractive valuations could create an asymmetric opportunity,” they noted.

This view is complemented by Mexico, given the benefits that the U.S.-driven nearshoring trend—accelerated by tensions with China—could bring to the Mexican economy.

Wellington Management Acquires Hartford Funds from The Hartford

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

Wellington Management and The Hartford have announced the signing of a definitive agreement under which Wellington will acquire Hartford Funds, a provider of investment solutions for the wealth management market. Upon completion of the transaction, Hartford Funds will be integrated into Wellington’s U.S. wealth management business and will subsequently operate under the Wellington brand.

The transaction will enable Wellington to provide financial advisors and investors with broader access to investment capabilities, a stronger distribution platform, and more integrated support within the U.S. wealth management market. This will be achieved by combining Wellington’s global institutional investment expertise with Hartford Funds’ established relationships with financial advisors.

The acquisition transforms the companies’ long-standing strategic partnership into a single full-service organization capable of delivering better outcomes for financial advisors and investors over the coming decades. The combined organization will be a stronger independent investment manager, better positioned to compete in an industry that continues to evolve.

Jean Hynes, CEO and Managing Partner of Wellington Management, stated: “For more than 40 years, Wellington and Hartford Funds have worked together to support advisors and investors, and I am excited about what this combination means for the future of both organizations. Wellington’s nearly century-long investment track record is supported by a deep commitment to advisors, investors, and employees, and I know the Hartford Funds team shares that same commitment.

Together, we are building on the strengths that have defined our relationship to deepen our commitment to the U.S. wealth management market through expanded access to investment capabilities, broader distribution reach, and additional resources for advisors and investors. I look forward to continuing to build on the strengths that have defined our collaboration in the years ahead.”

From his part, Christopher Swift, Chairman and CEO of The Hartford, commented: “We are proud of the strong, advisor-focused asset management business we have built, supported for many years by Wellington’s outstanding investment capabilities. This transaction allows us to deliver immediate and sustained value to The Hartford’s shareholders while positioning the exceptional Hartford Funds team for continued success. This combination represents the ideal long-term home for Hartford Funds.”

A Four-Decade Strategic Partnership

Wellington and Hartford Funds have maintained a close relationship for more than four decades, built on a shared objective of delivering strong outcomes for financial advisors and investors.

The relationship began in 1978 and evolved formally in 1984 with the launch of a long-term mutual fund sub-advisory partnership. Since then, the collaboration has expanded to include new capabilities, such as ETFs and additional investment strategies, reflecting a shared commitment to innovation and growth.

Today, Wellington serves as sub-advisor for 83% of Hartford Funds’ approximately $160 billion in assets, supported by a sales and client service team of more than 160 professionals dedicated to representing Wellington’s investment platform.

Strategic and Operational Benefits of the Transaction

  1. A single, fully integrated platform: The transaction will combine Wellington’s institutional expertise and nearly century-long investment track record with Hartford Funds’ extensive advisor distribution platform and deep relationships with financial intermediaries. The result will be a stronger and more strategically aligned U.S. wealth management platform encompassing investment management, distribution, and client service.
  2. Expanded capabilities and solutions for advisors and investors: As an integrated platform, Wellington will provide advisors with broader access to investment strategies and solutions across mutual funds, ETFs, separately managed accounts (SMAs), model portfolios, and alternative investments. This offering will be supported by enhanced market insights, expanded capabilities, and improved service resources to help advisors address the evolving needs of their clients.
  3. Positioned for long-term growth: By operating as a single full-service firm, Wellington will drive long-term growth in the wealth management market through expanded access to investment capabilities, a larger advisor distribution platform, and broader commercial reach.

The combined organization will have approximately 200 client-facing professionals, offering broader solutions, more coordinated support, and a simpler, more consistent experience for advisors and investors.

Christina Kopec Rooney, Head of U.S. Wealth at Wellington Management, commented: “This combination strengthens our competitive advantage and the value we deliver to advisors and clients by bringing together Wellington’s investment capabilities and global expertise across both the institutional and wealth management segments with Hartford Funds’ U.S. distribution scale and highly regarded team.

I am excited about our combined strengths and the potential to innovate and deliver best-in-class investment solutions, deeper insights, and expanded access to Wellington’s capabilities, including alternative investments. It is a highly compelling combination built on decades of close collaboration.”

Greg Frost, President of Hartford Funds, added: “The partnership between Hartford Funds and Wellington is built on shared values, organizational alignment, and a focus on delivering excellence in investment management for advisors and investors. We are delighted to become part of a single integrated Wellington platform and believe this combination represents not only continuity for our clients and teams, but also a reaffirmation of our shared investment philosophy. We look forward to working together to build on our history and create new opportunities for growth and innovation.”

Transaction Terms

The estimated net present value of the transaction is $1.9 billion. Under the terms of the agreement, The Hartford will receive $300 million in cash at closing, in addition to further payments linked to the after-tax available cash generated by the combination of the Hartford Funds business and Wellington’s activities related to Hartford Funds—including the sale of certain Wellington-sponsored products in the U.S. wealth management market—during the seven years following the completion of the transaction.

The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2027, subject to the necessary regulatory and fund approvals.

Transaction Advisors

J.P. Morgan Securities is acting as financial advisor to Wellington, while Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is serving as legal advisor.

On behalf of The Hartford, Goldman Sachs is acting as financial advisor and Weil, Gotshal & Manges as legal advisor.

Janus Henderson Strengthens Its U.S. Offshore Team with a New Appointment

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesyPedro Fernandes, Associate Director of Janus Henderson’s U.S. Offshore Team.

Janus Henderson has announced the appointment of Pedro Fernandes as Associate Director within its U.S. Offshore Client Group. Fernandes joined the firm on June 1, 2026, and is based in Florida, reporting to Paul Brito, Executive Director of the Client Group North America Offshore.

In this newly created role, Fernandes will be responsible for strengthening Janus Henderson’s existing relationships with wholesale intermediary clients while also developing new partnerships across the Northeastern and Southeastern United States.

He joins the firm from Citi, where he spent four years in various positions, most recently as Assistant Vice President, building extensive experience in the U.S. offshore market. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration with concentrations in Finance and Business Technology from the University of Miami, and is fluent in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

“We are very pleased to welcome Pedro to Janus Henderson. He combines deep expertise in the U.S. offshore market with a strong track record of building lasting client relationships. As we continue investing in high-quality talent, his client-focused approach will help us better meet the evolving needs of investors, strengthen partnerships across the region, and support the next phase of our growth in this key market,” said Paul Brito, Executive Director of the Client Group North America Offshore at Janus Henderson.

According to the asset manager, Pedro’s appointment is the latest addition to Janus Henderson’s U.S. Offshore Client Group, following the hiring of Franco Cassoni in April 2026.

Investment Committees Gain Prominence and Displace Founders in Family Office Decision-Making

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

The evolution of family offices toward increasingly professionalized management models is transforming the way these structures make decisions regarding investments, governance, and wealth planning. This is the conclusion of a new global study conducted by Ocorian, an international provider of services to asset managers and asset owners, including private clients, fund administration, capital markets, and corporate and regulatory solutions.

The research, based on responses from members of entrepreneurial families and senior family office executives responsible for a combined $119.37 billion in assets, reveals a significant shift in internal leadership models.

Today, nearly half (47%) report that an investment committee has the final say on major investment decisions or wealth structures, compared with just 6% who still leave this responsibility to the family founder. In addition, 39% say decision-making authority rests with members of the next generation, while 6% delegate this role to external advisors and 3% to family councils or boards of directors.

The report also reveals a unanimous consensus: all surveyed family offices believe their organizations have become more professional over the past year and have implemented significant changes to achieve that goal.

Among the most common initiatives is the development of a more diversified and professionally managed investment portfolio (54%), as well as greater use of specialized external advisors (51%).

Meanwhile, 46% report having strengthened their compliance, tax, and legal infrastructure, while the same percentage have advanced the development of more robust succession plans.

Other measures aimed at strengthening these organizations include the creation of more cohesive philanthropic programs (42%) and the enhancement of management teams responsible for overseeing the family office (41%).

In terms of governance, the study shows a clear consolidation of formal mechanisms. Sixty-five percent of family offices now have an investment committee that includes independent members, while 60% have established an advisory board for the next generation.

More than half (56%) have created a formal risk committee, and 54% have independent external trustees or a board of directors. In addition, 35% have established a family council, and 18% have adopted a formal family constitution or charter.

Despite these advances, the sector continues to face significant challenges, particularly in relation to the increasingly complex international regulatory environment.

Only 8% of respondents believe they are very well advised and fully prepared to meet current regulatory requirements. Most (74%) consider themselves to be in a reasonably strong position, while 18% rate their preparedness as average.

According to Dion Yee, Chief Commercial Officer at Ocorian, “Family office operations and management are undergoing an increasingly rapid process of professionalization, and many organizations have already introduced substantial changes to their governance structures and the way they make investment decisions.”

“Many are looking ahead and preparing for succession, and investment committees are progressively replacing founders in decision-making rather than automatically transferring that responsibility to the next generation. However, there is still work to be done, particularly given global regulatory requirements that continue to evolve and become more complex,” he adds.

Ocorian’s specialized family office division offers a comprehensive approach to helping families navigate the challenges and opportunities associated with wealth management. Its model is based on long-term personal relationships and a deep understanding of clients’ priorities.

Its core services include family office formation and administration, human resources support, luxury asset and lifestyle management, family governance advisory, residency and relocation services, as well as specialized support in immigration, visas, payroll, maritime and aviation crew management, and financial reporting.

Europe Leads the Top Vacation Home Markets for HNWIs

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

Global Citizen Solutions, a residency and citizenship planning consultancy, has published its report, Best Destinations for Owning a Vacation Home as an HNWI: The Lifestyle Perspective. The study ranks 20 global markets and concludes that seven of the top ten destinations for HNWIs (high-net-worth individuals) are located in Europe.

The analysis examines 20 established global markets, represented by their flagship luxury vacation home destinations, and evaluates them based on three criteria: real estate market quality, quality of life and lifestyle, and destination accessibility.

The study’s main conclusion is that the highest-ranked destinations are not those that excel in a single category, but rather those that perform strongly across all three simultaneously.

The fact that seven of the top ten destinations are European is due, according to Global Citizen Solutions (GCS), to a combination that is difficult to find in other regions: favorable weather, high-quality infrastructure, political stability, and accessible rules for foreign buyers. In the words of Patricia Casaburi, CEO of Global Citizen Solutions: “Europe’s leadership here is structural, not accidental. The leading markets share a rare alignment of climate, luxury infrastructure, security, and ease of purchase that continues to make the continent attractive to lifestyle-oriented buyers.”

Spain stands out for its balance between strong property appreciation and the highest quality-of-life score in the study. Portugal, meanwhile, recorded the highest appreciation in the ranking (a 17.7% increase in median bank appraisal values through October 2025), a strong safety index, and relatively accessible entry prices—factors that support rental yield potential in markets such as the Algarve and Comporta.

France and Italy, meanwhile, attract HNWIs through long-term demand and prestige, even with more moderate growth or higher entry prices. Austria and Switzerland offer near-maximum levels of security and a limited supply of properties. The United States leads in air connectivity, while Greece ranks highest for climate, with the greatest number of sunshine hours in the study. Niseko, Japan, and Queenstown, New Zealand, are also attractive from a portfolio perspective, offering diversification and high levels of safety.

The analysis also identifies a clear divide between two types of markets. Southern European destinations—Spain, Portugal, France, and Italy—appeal to buyers seeking lifestyle, capital appreciation, and a property they will use throughout the season. Alpine markets, by contrast, are favored by those seeking intergenerational value: limited supply and buyers who tend to hold properties for generations. Austria and Switzerland achieved the highest safety scores in the study. Austria is the more accessible of the two for foreign buyers, with less restrictive purchasing rules.

Liana Simonyan, researcher at the Global Intelligence Unit of GCS, adds: “Using a three-pillar framework, this index ranks twenty established luxury markets, with deliberately greater weight assigned to lifestyle and destination appeal than to real estate fundamentals—a methodological decision based on how high-net-worth individuals actually experience their vacation homes.”

Condoleezza Rice Warns That the AI Race Between the United States and China Will Define the World Order

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Condoleezza Rice en el Summit Insite 2026

Former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice argued that the world is undergoing a profound transition away from the international order built after World War II, and that artificial intelligence (AI) represents the greatest technological disruption within that reconfiguration. Rice spoke before financial industry executives at INSITE 2026, an event organized by BNY, where she analyzed the new geopolitical landscape, the risks facing the West from China’s technological advances, and the challenges AI poses for education and institutional leadership.

“For nearly 80 years, we had a system that progressively moved toward an international economy that was not zero-sum. My growth did not come at your expense,” said Rice. That system, she argued, is breaking down, driven in part by the inability to integrate China as a cooperative actor within the global order.

Rice noted that Xi Jinping stated in 2015 that China would surpass the United States in frontier technologies such as AI, and that since then the Asian country has behaved more like a challenger to the system than a participant in it. Added to this is a domestic backlash in the United States against 80 years of globalization, with broad segments of the population who did not benefit from the model now calling for manufacturing to return home. “There is a recalibration underway, and we are somewhere in the middle of that recalibration,” she said.

On artificial intelligence, Rice was direct: it is a two-horse race, and she wants a democracy to win it. Her argument is not only technological but also political. It will never be possible to predict all the problems AI will create or all of its power, she warned, which is why it is preferable for its development to occur in an open society, with investigative journalism and institutional checks and balances. Regarding China, she was categorical: it will manage AI very differently from a democracy, just as it did with COVID, hiding problems and lying about them.

The former official acknowledged that the United States holds an advantage in cutting-edge innovation, partly thanks to restrictions on exports of advanced chips to China. But she warned: “We make a mistake if we believe everything China does is simply copying.” As an example, she cited DeepSeek, the Chinese AI model that shook the sector at the beginning of 2025. All national security experts were stunned, she said, but no AI scientist was surprised because “they were reading the academic papers.” Rice also emphasized that none of the company’s scientists studied outside China, revealing the strength of its domestic research ecosystem.

She identified two areas where China has an advantage over the United States: the speed of AI adoption and the global spread of its low-cost, open-source models, which are expanding worldwide more rapidly than American models. In light of this, Rice called for preserving the U.S. innovation ecosystem and advocated minimal regulation. She proposed a framework aligning the interests of major infrastructure providers, frontier-model developers, and the federal government in order to avoid what she described as “an AI 9/11,” without slowing innovation.

The debate over AI has also reached the classroom. Rice, a professor at Stanford University, argued that students must learn how to use AI agents with judgment: as assistants to critical thinking, not substitutes for it. If the agent does all the work, the brain stops exercising itself, she warned. She cited a recent article documenting how instant access to information reduces the practice of analytical thinking: where someone once tried to remember the date of the Crimean War, they now simply perform a search. Rice said this phenomenon will force a rethinking of teaching methods and the way organizations train their employees.

Rice also warned about a troubling domestic trend: Americans are more skeptical of AI than any other population in the developed world. She attributed this skepticism to the prevailing narrative that technology will destroy jobs, increase energy consumption, and threaten people. “With that narrative around AI, is it any surprise that people are nervous about such a powerful technology?” she asked. To illustrate the point, she recounted the story of an 11-year-old daughter of a friend who was remarkably polite to her chatbot. When her father pointed out that it was only a program, the girl replied: “When they come for us, I’ll be on the list of people who were nice to it.”

At the conclusion of her remarks, Rice described AI, robotics, synthetic biology, and space exploration as “civilizational technologies.” If future generations can look back and say these technologies were managed wisely, given their immense power, then humanity will have met the greatest challenge of its time, she argued. The former U.S. official also warned that the answer is not to lay off workers and replace them with agents, but rather to explore combinations that enable greater productivity with the same number of people, enhanced by AI tools.

UBS Strengthens Its International Platform in Florida with Two New Hires

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

UBS continues to strengthen its presence in one of the most dynamic markets for wealth management with the appointment of Juan Antonio Sánchez Braña to UBS Wealth Management – Florida International. The executive will be based in Coral Gables and will be joined by Delvis Dominguez, who will assume the role of Senior Wealth Strategy Associate.

The Swiss firm is seeking to expand its capabilities to serve internationally connected clients with increasingly sophisticated wealth management needs, a segment that has become increasingly important in South Florida due to the presence of Latin American families and clients with assets spread across multiple jurisdictions.

Sánchez Braña brings more than 20 years of experience in private banking and investment advisory, with expertise in global wealth planning, portfolio construction, alternative investments, and risk management. He also holds three of the financial industry’s most respected professional designations: Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), Financial Risk Manager (FRM), and Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst (CAIA).

According to information available in his professional profile, he spent a significant part of his career at Santander Private Banking International in Miami and also has prior experience in Spain. He is also a member of the CFA Society Miami.

Joining him is Delvis Dominguez, who also comes from Santander Private Banking International and has a strong academic background. He graduated from the Master of Science in Finance program at Florida International University, where he received distinctions including the Best Student Award and the Leadership Award, and graduated with highest honors after achieving a perfect academic record. Dominguez has also passed Level I of the CFA Program.

The arrival of both executives reflects the growing strategic importance of Miami and Coral Gables as key hubs for the international wealth management industry. In recent years, the region has established itself as one of the leading centers for serving Latin American clients and families with complex wealth structures.

With these additions, UBS aims to strengthen one of the fastest-growing areas within private banking: providing comprehensive advisory services to global clients by combining investment capabilities, wealth planning expertise, and specialized solutions for the management of substantial fortunes.

The Great Dilemma Returns to Central Banks: How to Curb Inflation Without Choking the Economy

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

The task facing central banks in the coming months will not be an easy one. With a new round of policy meetings just a week away, experts point out that inflation risks are rising on the one hand, while growth forecasts continue to be revised downward on the other. Markets are pricing in interest rate hikes in both Europe and the United States; however, uncertainty regarding the duration of the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is adding skepticism around those expectations.

What is clear is that markets are being driven by shifts in interest rate expectations and geopolitical developments, with tensions between the United States and Iran adding further volatility.

“Fixed income rallied as moderating inflation and central bank signals reinforced a more cautious monetary policy outlook. Equities remained resilient, supported by strong corporate earnings, particularly in the technology sector. The U.S. dollar remained firm thanks to the Federal Reserve’s relatively hawkish stance, while weaker European data weighed on the euro. Overall, interest rate expectations continue to dominate performance across asset classes,” explain analysts at Union Bancaire Privée (UBP).

The Impact of Hormuz and Iran

According to Raphael Olszyna-Marzys, International Economist at J. Safra Sarasin Sustainable AM, interest rates have shown a very close correlation with oil prices.

“The longer crude oil prices remain elevated, the greater the likelihood of second-round effects emerging. This is precisely the scenario central banks want to avoid, and their messaging has been clearly hawkish since the conflict began. In fact, they have been successful: market-based inflation expectations remain well anchored, especially at the longer end of the curve,” he explains.

This environment implies that much of the rise in bond yields reflects an increase in real interest rates. According to Olszyna-Marzys, if all other factors remain unchanged, this increase represents a tightening of financial conditions. As a result, it will weigh on growth and labor markets, in addition to the direct impact of higher energy prices.

“Central banks face a delicate balancing act: if they do not act decisively enough, inflation expectations could rise again; if they tighten too aggressively, the economy could slow more than necessary,” warns the expert from J. Safra Sarasin Sustainable AM.

For Olszyna-Marzys, market expectations for interest rate hikes are excessive, particularly given that investors are pricing in three additional hikes by the European Central Bank (ECB) before year-end.

“As a result, we expect some decline in yields once energy prices retreat. That decline will likely follow some form of agreement between the United States and Iran,” he notes.

A Broader Perspective

Against this backdrop, what can be expected from the major central banks?

For François Rimeu, Senior Strategist at Crédit Mutuel Asset Management, an objective reading of current U.S. data suggests that a near-term increase in interest rates could be justified.

“In our view, risks currently appear greater in U.S. interest rates than in eurozone rates, which could ultimately support further appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro. Naturally, much will depend on developments in the conflict with Iran and commodity prices. But absent significant improvement in the coming months, Mr. Warsh’s task appears particularly challenging,” says Rimeu.

David Rees, Head of Global Economics at Schroders, agrees that a rapid and lasting resolution to the conflict in the Middle East would eliminate significant tail risks. However, he argues that the damage already caused by higher commodity prices and supply chain disruptions appears to have pushed the global economy toward a more stagflationary direction that markets may not yet have fully priced in.

“We doubt that growth will prove resilient enough to force the hawkish central banks of Europe and the United Kingdom to raise interest rates. For the same reason, the rate cuts that markets had expected this year in the United States also appear unlikely to materialize,” argues Rees.

Regarding Asia, Rees notes that Japan should benefit from fiscal stimulus and robust wage growth.

“This, together with higher energy costs and a weaker currency, will keep inflation above target. As a result, the Bank of Japan is likely to continue moving forward with a gradual normalization of monetary policy,” he says.

He also notes that optimism surrounding growth and emerging price pressures has fueled hopes that the Chinese economy may finally emerge from three years of deflation.

“China could export supply-side price pressures and add further upside to global goods inflation. However, the continued collapse of the property sector suggests that hopes for sustained domestic reflation will ultimately be disappointed. The macroeconomic backdrop has already begun to weigh once again on equity markets and could, over time, also limit appreciation of the renminbi,” he adds.

Institutional Investors and Wealth Managers Believe Tokenized ETFs Will Drive Mass Adoption in the Markets

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Canva

Barriers to the expansion of tokenization are beginning to fall as major investment firms consider launching tokenized ETFs, according to new global research conducted by London-based Nickel Digital Asset Management (Nickel), Europe’s largest digital-asset-focused hedge fund manager, founded by former professionals from Bankers Trust, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan.

The study, conducted among institutional investors and wealth managers from organizations that collectively oversee more than $14 trillion in assets, found that almost all respondents (97%) believe that the potential launch of tokenized ETFs—such as those being considered by BlackRock—will be significant for the sector’s expansion. Nearly one-third (32%) view this development as very important.

The research also reflects a strong conviction that tokenization will continue to grow. Nearly 70% of respondents believe that the number of asset managers seeking to tokenize investment funds and asset classes will increase over the next three years.

The survey, which included firms from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, Brazil, and the United Arab Emirates, highlights growing awareness of the benefits of tokenization.

Private markets are viewed as the segment with the greatest potential. Nearly 70% of respondents identified private equity as the asset class offering the most opportunities, followed by fixed income (55%) and listed equities (42%).

Shorter settlement times, enhanced risk-management capabilities, and lower costs were cited as the least compelling benefits.

The study also confirms that concerns surrounding the expansion of tokenization remain. Nearly three out of four respondents (73%) identified distribution challenges as one of the five main barriers to adoption among professional investors, while 70% pointed to the lack of maturity among service providers.

The Latin American Offshore Market Enters a New Era of Global Oversight

  |   By  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

For decades, offshore structures in Latin America were associated with financial privacy, wealth diversification, and access to jurisdictions with more sophisticated legal frameworks.

However, the international regulatory environment has changed dramatically and is giving way to a new era characterized by more intensive oversight, greater transparency obligations, and unprecedented cooperation among tax authorities and supervisory bodies.

Rather than signaling the end of the offshore business, what is taking place is a profound transformation in the rules under which it operates.

One of the pillars of this transformation is the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The standard enables the automatic exchange of financial information between jurisdictions and has become one of the principal tools for combating international tax evasion.

Today, more than 120 jurisdictions participate in the framework, which requires financial institutions, banks, custodians, and certain investment vehicles to report information on accounts held by tax residents of other countries. The OECD has recently expanded the scope of the system to include digital assets, electronic money, and certain indirect investment structures.

At the same time, the international anti-money laundering framework continues to tighten. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), whose global network encompasses 205 jurisdictions, has intensified its mutual evaluations of the effectiveness of national systems for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

This trend has direct implications for Latin America. Countries in the region, grouped under GAFILAT (Financial Action Task Force of Latin America—a regional intergovernmental organization composed of 18 countries whose primary objective is to prevent and combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction), are subject to periodic reviews that assess not only the existence of regulations but also the authorities’ actual ability to supervise, identify beneficial owners, and sanction non-compliance.

For financial institutions and firms engaged in international wealth management, these changes represent a significant increase in compliance requirements. Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, transaction monitoring, and tax documentation have become strategically important functions.

Likewise, the growing adoption of international family structures, trusts, and estate planning vehicles is compelling private banks, asset managers, and multifamily offices to strengthen their compliance capabilities and international tax advisory services.

Industry specialists believe that the traditional offshore banking model based on bank secrecy has been overtaken by events. The new value proposition revolves around sophisticated services, wealth planning, geographic diversification, and access to international markets—but under much stricter transparency standards.

This process also coincides with the expansion of reporting frameworks for cryptoassets. The OECD is promoting the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), which will extend information-sharing mechanisms to the digital asset ecosystem, further reducing areas that have traditionally been considered opaque.

As a result, the Latin American wealth management industry is facing a turning point. International oversight no longer distinguishes between traditional financial centers and emerging jurisdictions. The ability to adapt to regulatory changes and strengthen compliance functions is becoming a key differentiator for market participants.

Far from disappearing, the offshore business appears to be evolving toward a more institutional, more transparent model that is closely aligned with global regulatory priorities.