Hasenstab Anticipates Continued Strengthening of the US Dollar against the Euro and Japanese Yen

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Throughout much of 2016, bond markets held onto stretched valuations in US Treasuries, largely ignoring the undercurrents of rising inflation and resilient strength in the US labor market. During the first half of the year, there were even a number of market participants arguing that inflation had become structurally lower and that deflationary risks were of great concern.

The research conducted by the Templeton Global Macro team indicated just the opposite, and they warned investors of what they believed were exceptional vulnerabilities in US Treasury valuations and asymmetric risks in longer duration exposures.

Markets began to incrementally trend toward that viewpoint in October as the 10-year US Treasury note’s yield modestly rose. By November, a sharp correction in US Treasury valuations was fully underway, manifesting very quickly after the results of the US election as markets appeared to rapidly move toward their long-held view that inflation pressures were rising. Once those corrections to yields began, they were quite severe in a very short period of time, demonstrating just how extreme those valuations had become. Rising yields in the US were accompanied by depreciations of the Japanese yen and the euro.

As Michael Hasenstab, Ph.D., Executive Vice President, Portfolio Manager and Chief Investment Officer at Templeton Global Macro, looks toward 2017, he expects many of the underlying conditions in developed economies that were rapidly driven back into market pricing in late 2016 to only deepen and extend.

Hasenstab anticipates increasing inflation in the US as wage pressures rise and the economy continues to expand, while the euro-area and Japan diverge markedly from the US path.

These global trends are likely to continue to pressure bond markets in the developed world but also to generate significant opportunities in specific local-currency emerging markets (EMs) where yields have been high and currencies already appeared extremely undervalued, even as their economic fundamentals have remained resilient. The Templeton Global Macro teamis optimistic on the valuations in specific EMs in Latin America and Asia ex Japan, but remain wary of duration risks across the developed world.

Expect Rising US Inflation Pressures in 2017

Their case for rising inflation in the US is primarily centered on rising wage pressures across a US labor force that has been at full employment for much of 2016 and continues to strengthen, accompanied by overly loose monetary policy and fiscal policy set to expand. Core CPI (Consumer Price Index) inflation has persisted above 2.0% throughout 2016 and shows signs of continuing to trend higher. Ultimately, they expect headline inflation to rise above 3.0% in early 2017 as the base effects from last year’s decline in oil prices fall out of the figures. Additionally, they expect an escalation in government spending from the incoming US administration, notably in the form of increased infrastructure development, which would add to existing inflation pressures, along with giving a boost to growth and likely increasing the level of US Treasury issuance. In the event that the incoming administration imposes trade restrictions and tariffs, this would also drive up the costs of goods in the US. Taken together, they expect inflation to exceed the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) target by early 2017 and believe the Fed needs to continue to hike rates. They also see scenarios in which the market should continue to drive yields higher regardless of the Fed’s timeline.

Weakness in the Euro and Japanese Yen Is Likely to Continue

As rates trend higher in the US, they expect continued strengthening of the US dollar against a number of vulnerable currencies, most notably the euro and Japanese yen. Markets began to see a refortifying of the euro’s and yen’s depreciating trends in October as US Treasury yields rose while the European Central Bank (ECB) and Bank of Japan (BOJ) continued to run exceptionally accommodative monetary policies. Those depreciations only deepened after the US election results in November as the 10-year US Treasury note’s yield surged above 2.20%. They continue to see strong cases for ongoing monetary accommodation in the eurozone and Japan as both regions need currency weakness to support their export sectors and drive growth, and each relies far more on the weakness in their currencies than the US does. Both regions also need inflation, particularly Japan.

The growing rate divergences between the low to negative yields in the eurozone and Japan, and rising Treasury yields in the US, should benefit the objectives of the ECB and BOJ, in their view, motivating the central banks to take more assertive measures now that they can be more effectively deployed against firmer rate increases in the US. The euro also faces increased pressures from rising political risks with the recent rise of populist movements in the European Union (EU). Upcoming elections in France and Germany in 2017 will be important indications of just how strong or vulnerable the political will is to uphold the EU and eurozone project. On the whole, Europe’s need for continued policy accommodation and currency weakness is more immediate to the upcoming year, while Japan’s need is more ongoing and long term. Nonetheless, they expect weakness in both currencies in the upcoming year.

Select Emerging Markets Remain Resilient and Undervalued

Across EMs, they continue to see significant variations between vulnerable economies and a number of much stronger ones. Markets reacted negatively toward a broad group of EMs in the wake of the US election in November, on fears that protectionist US policies could damage global trade. However, the Templeton Global Macro team has seen a shift in the incoming administration’s earlier warnings of enormous tariffs to more of a balance of free and fair trade. There are several scenarios in which the actual impacts to specific EM economies from trade policy adjustments could be minimal to negligible, in their assessment.

Additionally, a number of EMs have already weathered severe shocks over the last year and appear far more resilient to potential increases in trade costs at the margin than markets have indicated. In fact, several EMs have significantly improved their resiliencies over the last decade by increasing their external reserve cushions, bringing their current accounts into surplus or close to balance, improving their fiscal accounts, and reducing US-dollar liabilities. During periods of short-term uncertainty, markets tend to overplay the potential US policy factors and under-recognize the more important domestic factors within the countries. They expect those valuations to ultimately revert back toward their underlying fundamentals over the longer term as markets more accurately assess their actual value.

They have positive outlooks for several local-currency exposures in specific EMs that they view as undervalued, notably Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Indonesia and Malaysia, among others. Specifically regarding Mexico, any free trade restrictions would not end trade between the US and Mexico, they would just raise the costs. Many of the largest US corporations have extensive investments in Mexico and have integrated Mexican production into their supply chains. This considerably complicates the ability of any administration to significantly reduce trade between the two countries, even with an imposition of tariffs. Negative effects on the Mexican peso from potential trade restrictions have been excessively priced in by markets, in their view, and do not reflect fair value even when factoring in a reversion to WTO (World Trade Organization) trade standards. They expect a recovery in the peso as the country’s central bank continues to use policy to strengthen the currency and markets adjust to the underlying fair value.

Indonesia is also a strong example of the resiliency in specific EMs. They saw commodity prices collapse, trade volumes decline and China’s growth moderate, yet Indonesia has still been growing at 5%, with a balanced current account when including foreign direct investment. Additionally, they have seen massive depreciations in EM currencies in 2016, yet there have been no solvency issues in countries like Indonesia or Malaysia. Twenty years ago, it may have been more difficult for many of these countries to weather a protectionist trade shock, a commodity price shock and an exchange rate shock all at the same time. Yet today these countries are in much stronger positions to handle these types of macro shifts and changes to global trade policies. Should the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) not be concluded, it would not be catastrophic to countries like Indonesia—certainly the region would be stronger with that type of trade agreement, in their assessment, but Indonesia was strong without the TPP and is not dependent on an enhanced trade agreement to continue doing well. Markets have tended to follow the headline impact of trade policy rhetoric, in their opinion, yet the underlying fundamentals tell a much stronger story.

Overall, as they turn the calendar to 2017, the risks of rising populism in Europe and the US and the potential impacts to global trade from protectionist policies bear watching. Despite an increase in developed-market political risks, there are a number of compelling opportunities across specific EMs that give us optimism for the upcoming year. Ironically, several Latin American countries, such as Brazil, Argentina and Colombia, have recently turned away from previous failed experiments with populism and have moved toward more orthodox policies, taking pro-market and fiscally conservative approaches while maintaining credible monetary policy, proactive business environments and outward-looking trade. They continue to prefer a number of undervalued opportunities across local-currency EMs over many of the overvaluations and low yields across the developed markets. It is their hope for 2017 that developed countries experimenting with populism can skip the negative consequences by instead returning to the successes from more orthodox policy-making.

AXA IM launches Global ‘Robotech’ Fund

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

AXA IM today announces the launch of the AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech Fund (“the Fund”). Managed by Tom Riley and Jeremy Gleeson at AXA IM Framlington Equities, the Fund is a Luxembourg domiciled SICAV following an active, unconstrained, multi-cap, robotics strategy. The manager aims to invest in global growth companies spanning robotics and automation applications across various areas including the industrial, technology, manufacturing, healthcare and transportation sectors.

Tom Riley, Lead Fund Manager of the AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech Fund said: “We are at the early stages of the robotics revolution, the robotics market is expected to grow by 10% a year until 2025. While this is anemerging multi-decade theme, it is already an investible area from which we aim to select 40 to 60 fast growth companies to build a global portfolio diversified across market cap and sectors. Robotics will continue to have a significant impact on society for years to come and an increasing number of new listed small and mid-cap companies will become investment opportunities over time.”

The launch of the Fund, follows the success of a dedicated global robotics mandate for the Japanese retail market that AXA IM launched in December 2015 that has seen its assets grow to approximately $1 billion to date. The strategy has outperformed the broader market since launch.The new Fund will be managed by the same team following the same investment approach.

Mark Beveridge, Global Head of Framlington Equities at AXA IM added: “AXA IM have a long history and track record in thematic equity investing (e.g. technology, healthcare, biotech, listed property etc.). We have been early adopters of the robotics trend and have been investing in areas such as industrial automation, autonomous vehicles and robot assisted surgery for a number of years in other strategies. We fundamentally believe you need an active manager to access new growth areas such as robotics – there is no broadly used standard robotics benchmark that you can try to replicate. We have great momentum in an uncrowded space; demand for our robotics strategy has been incredible from clients in Japan and we are excited that we can now offer this strategy more widely.”

Tom Riley will be working alongside Jeremy Gleeson, the Lead Fund Manager of the circa $430m AXA Framlington Global Technology Fund. Jeremy has 19 years’ experience investing in technology and technology disruptions. They will also work closely with Framlington Equities regional and sector specialists (i.e. healthcare). The AXA World Funds Framlington Robotech fund is a Luxembourg-domiciled SICAV. The Fund has both retail and institutional share classes and is registered for distribution in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands and the UK. Registration is expected for Switzerland in coming months

Eaton Vance Corporation Announces Completion of Acquisition of Assets of Calvert Investment Management

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Eaton Vance Corporation Announces Completion of Acquisition of Assets of Calvert Investment Management
Foto: Dennis Yang . Eaton Vance Corporation anuncia la adquisición de los activos de Calvert Investment Management

Eaton Vance announced the completion of the previously announced purchase of substantially all of the business assets of Calvert Investment Management, by Calvert Research and Management, a newly formed Eaton Vance subsidiary.  In conjunction with the acquisition, the Boards of Trustees and the shareholders of the Calvert mutual funds (Calvert Funds) have approved investment advisory agreements with Calvert Research and Management. Terms of the transaction are not being disclosed. 

Founded in 1976, Calvert Investments is a recognized leader in responsible investing, with $12.1 billion of fund and separate account assets under management as of October 31, 2016.  Calvert Investments is an indirect subsidiary of Ameritas Holding Company.  In conjunction with the transaction, John Streur, President and Chief Executive Officer of Calvert Investments, is joining Calvert Research and Management in the same role.   

The Calvert Funds are one of the largest and most diversified families of responsibly invested mutual funds, encompassing actively and passively managed equity, fixed income and asset allocation strategies managed in accordance with the Calvert Principles for Responsible Investment.  Mr. Streur remains President of the Calvert Funds.

“Eaton Vance is pleased to complete the previously announced purchase of the business assets of Calvert Investments,” said Thomas E. Faust Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Eaton Vance Corp.  “The new Calvert Research and Management is dedicated to building on the Calvert brand and legacy to achieve global leadership in responsible investment management.”

UHNW Individuals Will Donate US$29.6 Million Over the Course of Their Lifetimes

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

UHNW Individuals Will Donate US$29.6 Million Over the Course of Their Lifetimes
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: goodfreephotos.com. Los UHNWI donan 29,6 millones de dólares a lo largo de sus vidas

According to a new report on global philanthropy, major giving among ultra-high net worth (UHNW) individuals rose to an all-time high in 2015, growing 3% since 2014. On average, UHNW individuals – those with a net worth of US$30 million or more – will donate US$29.6 million over the course of their lifetimes, with total global UHNW public lifetime giving estimated at US$550 billion.

The median gift by major UHNW philanthropists in the Middle East is US$5 million, 50% higher than in North America, and rising levels of wealth in the region suggest that even larger sums will be directed at positive causes in the coming years.

The report, “Changing Philanthropy: Trend Shifts in Ultra Wealthy Giving” commissioned by Arton Capital and produced by Wealth-X reveals that major donors, those UHNW individuals who have donated at least US$1 million in their lifetime, are significantly wealthier than their UHNW peers and have an average net worth of nearly US$300 million. The report also shows that major donors hold a greater share of their wealth in liquid assets, US$85 million on average, and typically donate about half of their cash holdings to charity over a lifetime.

The report focuses on innovations in giving, identifying the trends that are helping to increase the scale of donations and exploring new developments in philanthropy such as impact investing, how “giving back” is becoming integral to the identity of an organization, and analysing the extent to which the Millennial generation is setting a new philanthropic agenda.

Other findings include:

  • Most major donors are self-made – UHNW individuals with self-made fortunes represent nearly 70% of major donors and, on average, they are more than twice as wealthy as their UHNW peers.
  • Education and health are top causes – education remains by far the most popular philanthropic cause for UHNW individuals, followed by health, with environmental issues increasing in importance.
  • Millennials are reshaping philanthropy – the younger generation is ushering in new philanthropic models that combine traditional foundations with profit-making endeavours and social enterprises, and are driving employee-based philanthropy.
  • The blurring of corporate and individual philanthropy – UHNW individuals are leveraging the resources at their disposal to maximise their return on giving, aligning the philanthropic strategy of their business with their own personal giving.

“Ultra wealthy individuals in the Middle East give nearly 10% of their net worth to philanthropic causes, which does not even account for the substantial Zakat and Sadaqah charitable contributions made anonymously across the region,” explained John Hanafin, CEO of Arton Capital in MENA. “The trends identified in this report are truly global, with the ultra-wealthy behaving in similar ways whether they are from Shanghai or Zurich or New York, and the Middle Eastern members of this club are no different, which demonstrates the global connectivity of wealth in the modern world.”

“At Arton Capital we share the firm belief that the prosperity of one individual, one company, or one nation is interdependent with the prosperity of others,” said Arton Capital Founder & President Armand Arton. “By shifting focus from day-to-day thinking to generation-to-generation planning, wealthy individuals have the power to make a positive impact to some of the world’s most significant challenges.”

You can download the report in the following link.

The European Fund Industry, Still in a “Consolidation Mode” According to Lipper

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

fusionesdehanspixabay
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. f

At of the end of September 2016 there were 31,889 mutual funds registered for sale in Europe. 
Luxembourg continued to dominate the fund market in Europe, hosting 9,243 funds, followed by 
France, where 4,404 funds were domiciled. 


For Q3 2016 a total of 599 funds (368 liquidations and 231 mergers) were withdrawn from the market, while only 466 new products were launched, according to the report “Launches, Liquidations, and Mergers in The European Mutual Fund Industry, Q3”, by Lipper Thomson Reuters.

With 466 newly launched products for Q3 2016, they saw a similar number of new products as the number for Q3 2015. The number of liquidations went up 14%, and the number of mergers declined a massive 29%.

Launches, Mergers, and Liquidations over the Past Five Years

With 466 newly launched products for Q3 2016, Lipper noticed a slightly higher number of newly issued products than for Q3 2015 (453). Compared with the launches for Q2 2016 (463), the number was flat.

The number of liquidations went up 14% compared with Q3 2015; comparing Q3 2016 closures with those of Q2 2016, Lipper saw a decrease (-16%). European fund promoters showed above-average activity with regard to fund liquidations in Q3 2016 and as a result maybe for the whole year 2016.

Opposite to the number of fund liquidations, the number of mergers went down 29%, comparing Q3 2016 with Q3 2015; compared with Q2 2016, the difference was smaller, with 8% more mergers for Q2 2016.

“The net size of the European fund universe decreased constantly since Q3 2012, which might be seen as a sign the European fund industry is in a consolidation mode. The net decrease of 133 products for Q3 2016 showed a lower number than for Q3 2015 (-193)”, say Detlef Glow -Lipper’s Head of EMEA Research-, and Christoph Karg -Content Management Funds EMEA-, the authors of this report.

Changes in European Fund Universe Asset Classes, Q3 2016

Q3 2016 witnessed the launch of 466 funds: 145 equity funds, 94 bond funds, 166 mixed-asset funds, 51 “other” funds, and 10 money market funds. During the same period 368 funds were liquidated: 119 equity funds, 76 bond funds, 72 mixed-asset funds, 84 “other” funds, and 17 money market funds.

For Q3 2016, 231 funds were merged: 66 equity funds, 82 bond funds, 60 mixed-asset funds, 6 “other” funds, and 17 money market funds.

The net changes for Q3 2016 showed negative totals for the measured asset classes: equities (net -40 products), money market products (net -24 products), “other” funds (net -39 products), and bond funds (net -64 products); mixed-asset products gained a net 34 products.

“The positive trend with regard to fund launches in the mixed-asset sector might not be too surprising, since this sector contains multi-asset products, which have been in the favor of investors over the last two years. Fund promoters appear to want to participate in this trend by launching new products. Especially in the overall low- interest-rate environment, mixed- and multi-asset products continue to be the preferred asset class for investors”, according to the authors.

Outlook

“Pressure to become more profitable and to save on costs, in addition to increased demands from regulators, might have been the drivers during Q3 2016 for further consolidation in the number of funds registered for sale in Europe. Since this consolidation took place in spite of increasing assets under management and healthy inflows for the year 2016 so far, European fund promoters may be preparing themselves for increasing competition with regard to fees that can be charged investors in Europe”.

“Because fees are being widely discussed, there is not much room for increases, despite costs for asset managers increasing in the future because of higher regulatory demands. We could see a further decrease in the number of funds, driven by fund promoters trying to be more efficient as well as by possible takeover transactions within the European fund management industry”, the authors conclude.

Tortoise Launches UCITS Fund Focusing on North American Energy Infrastructure

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Tortoise Launches UCITS Fund Focusing on North American Energy Infrastructure
Foto: Maureen. Tortoise lanza un fondo UCITS centrado en la infraestructura energética de América del Norte

Tortoise Capital Advisors, the investment manager specializing in listed energy investing, has announced the launch of the Tortoise North American Energy Infrastructure Fund, an Undertaking for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS) fund domiciled in Luxembourg. The fund invests in North American pipeline companies, including Master Limited Partnership (MLP)-related securities.

“The fund focuses on the large and diverse North American pipeline universe, providing access to the sizable pipeline network of one of the world’s largest producers and consumers of energy,” said Brent Newcomb, a Director at Tortoise. “We are pleased to make this strategy accessible to investors outside of the United States.”

The strategy for the Tortoise North American Energy Infrastructure Fund is based on Tortoise’s U.S. mutual fund, Tortoise MLP & Pipeline Fund, which was launched in 2011 and invests in MLPs and MLP-related securities. The UCITS fund offers institutional and retail share classes in three currencies, USD, EUR and CHF. Minimum investment levels for the fund are set at $2,500 for retail investors and $1,000,000 for institutional investors.

“We believe the current investment opportunity is particularly attractive given valuations, industry fundamentals and the industry growth trends,” added Tortoise Portfolio Manager Brian Kessens. “This growth potential starts with energy production leading to increased energy transportation needs, including exports of low cost energy from the United States to the rest of the world.”

Tortoise is a recognized leader in North American energy infrastructure investing, and one of the largest investment managers of U.S. registered energy infrastructure funds. The firm formed the first NYSE-listed closed-end fund focusing on MLPs in 2004 and has managed energy infrastructure investments across economic cycles and natural disasters. This fund expands upon Tortoise’s legacy of leadership and innovation in the sector.

FINRA´s Regulatory and Examination Priorities 2017

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

FINRA´s Regulatory and Examination Priorities 2017
Foto: Mariya Chorna . Prioridades regulatorias y de supervisión de FINRA para 2017

Each year, FINRA publishes its Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter to highlight issues of importance to FINRA’s regulatory programs. In this year´s letter, Robert W. Cook, President and CEO, provides information about areas FINRA plans to review in its 2017 exams based on observations from its regulatory programs as well as input from various stakeholders, including member firms, other regulators and investor advocates.

Robert W. Cook, says: “As you will see, a common thread running throughout the Priorities Letter is a focus on core “blocking and tackling” issues of compliance, supervision and risk management. Most of the topics addressed in this year’s letter have been highlighted in prior years, but specific areas of emphasis have been updated or modified based on recent observations and experience. Attention to the core regulatory requirements identified in the letter—and how to address them in light of new business challenges and market developments—will serve investors and markets well.

“Your ongoing input on existing and emerging issues that put investors and market integrity at risk is very important. We share a common goal of promoting investor confidence, and I ask that you let us know of any areas on which you think FINRA should focus its regulatory resources to protect investors and bolster market integrity.

“Since joining FINRA in August, I have been engaged in an ongoing “listening tour,” meeting with member firms, regulators and investor groups, among others. I am grateful for the feedback and time many people have given me. In the coming months, I plan to provide more information about some concrete steps we are planning—based on the listening tour, as well as other input—to take a fresh look at certain aspects of FINRA’s programs and operations and to identify opportunities to do our work more effectively. In the meantime, I want to share with you two more modest steps we are already planning to take. 

“First, I have heard frequently from firms and other FINRA stakeholders that it would be useful to learn more about what FINRA is seeing through its examination programs. They have suggested that publishing common examination findings would help inform firms of deficiencies FINRA has observed, including in its areas of priority, and allow firms that have not yet been examined to fix any similar deficiencies. I agree, and starting this year, we will publish a summary report that outlines key findings from examinations in selected areas. This document will alert firms to what we are seeing from a national perspective and, therefore, serve as an additional tool firms can use to strengthen the control environment for their business. 

“Another suggestion that emerged from my meetings is that many small firms would like us to explore how FINRA can provide more, and perhaps different, compliance tools and resources to assist them in complying with applicable regulatory requirements. I have already asked our staff to develop several new resources along these lines, and in 2017 we will introduce a “compliance calendar” and a directory of compliance service providers. In addition, to gather more information in this area, we recently sent a brief survey to small firms to help us learn about the compliance tools and resources they would find valuable. We have received very helpful input from firms to date, but it is not too late to participate. If you are a small firm and have not already completed the survey, please do so to help us better assist you. 

“A related area of focus in the coming year will be recognizing the vital role that small firms—as well as larger firms—play in facilitating capital formation by small and emerging growth companies, which are vital engines of our economy and of job creation. We will be looking for opportunities to support these activities, including by providing guidance where appropriate to encourage innovative business models and new technologies in the Fintech space, consistent with maintaining important investor protections.

“Some have asked me when my listening tour will be finished. The short answer is: never. As noted above, in the coming months I will share with you some additional steps we will be undertaking that have been informed by the listening tour, and I am very excited about moving forward with these initiatives. But the listening will not end during my tenure. I hope you will always feel free to reach out directly to me or to anyone on our staff with your ideas and suggestions on how FINRA can better execute its mission of investor protection and market integrity.”

You may see the document that follow the letter here.

Sotheby’s Launches Global Luxury Division and Announces Leadership

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Sotheby's Launches Global Luxury Division and Announces Leadership
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainFoto: Maarten ten Holder - foto cedida. Sotheby's lanza una división de lujo y estilo de vida y nombra a Maarten ten Holder su director

Sotheby’s announced the appointment of Maarten ten Holder as global Managing Director of the Company’s new Luxury & Lifestyle Division, uniting the categories of jewelry, watches, wine, cars and experiences, as well as the relationship with Sotheby’s International Realty, under one senior executive. A highly experienced member of the firm’s senior management team, Maarten will relocate to New York from London, where he was most recently Managing Director of the operations in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa. Prior to his post in London, Maarten held leadership positions in New York, Milan and Amsterdam.  His appointment is effective immediately.

“Our creation of a new division that unites these key areas globally under Maarten’s talented leadership is yet more progress on Sotheby’s strategy to serve clients and provide value for shareholders,” said Tad Smith Sotheby’s CEO.”

Maarten ten Holder added, “I am thrilled to step into this crucial role leading the new Luxury & Lifestyle division. Each of these businesses operates in a market even larger than the art market, and I am excited to lead our strategic effort to fashion our talented teams into a stronger foundation for Sotheby’s growth.”

Maarten ten Holder began his career at Sotheby’s in Amsterdam. Early on, Maarten played an integral role in many large-scale country house sales across Europe and helped to organize Sotheby’s first auction in France in 1999.  He took on the role of Deputy Managing Director in Italy in 2002, before moving to New York in 2006 as Managing Director of North & South America. During his tenure in New York, and more recently in London, Maarten oversaw some of the most high profile auctions in recent memory, including the sale of Edvard Munch’s The Scream, the collection of Mrs. Paul Mellon, property from the personal collection of Deborah, Duchess of Devonshire, and the personal collection of David Bowie. Additionally, he was involved in numerous major sales of jewelry including the collections of Mrs. Charles Wrightsman and Mrs. Estée Lauder & Mrs. Evelyn H. Lauder, as well as the recent $175 million record-breaking sale of jewelry in Geneva.

Maarten’s involvement with car auctions began in 2005 with Sotheby’s landmark sale of cars and related memorabilia at Ferrari‘s legendary premises in Maranello, Italy. This past November, he was an auctioneer for the RM Sotheby’s sale of The Duemila Ruote sale in Milan – the largest automobile collection sale ever staged in Europe.  An accomplished auctioneer, Maarten regularly conducts sales in all of Sotheby’s major international selling locations in five different languages.

 

Navigating Negative Rates In 2017

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

We are facing a world where ‘safe assets’ pay nothing or even charge you to own them, yield can only be found at higher risk levels and markets which have benefited from falling yields are vulnerable to a change in direction. The question for investors is: what to do? We believe there are opportunities worth pursuing, along with risks that require careful mitigation.

Despite these difficulties, we believe a thoughtful approach can help investors to meet these income challenges, by applying six simple rules:

Identify your objectives

You need to clearly define your investment objectives and use these to guide all portfolio decisions. What yield or return do you need? What level of risk tolerance is acceptable? Are

you sensitive to short or longer term capital risk? How much liquidity do you require? If all of these things are broadly realistic, they can guide you in building an appropriate portfolio.

However, if you try to push any of these objectives too far, the balance of outcomes may be unattainable. For example, if you try to chase yield too far, it may increase the risk to capital loss. If you try to push volatility down too low, you may not be able to generate yield or a suitable return.

Diversify your portfolio

Diversification is one of the most powerful tenets of portfolio construction. Assets with different characteristics will often offset each other in terms of risk, but can all still contribute towards performance, thereby improving the return achievable for a given level of risk. This is incredibly useful when trying to balance the need for yield against a limited appetite for volatility.

The key issue here is implementation. We think asset class labels can be highly misleading. For example, we think there is a much closer relationship between equities and high yield bonds than high yield and government bonds. Their respective labels say they are different asset classes, while their underlying performance driver, essentially corporate profitability, is the same for both.

We believe investors need to consider asset behaviour, when building portfolios. This is why we think of assets as exhibiting either ‘growth’, ‘defensive’ or ‘uncorrelated’ characteristics, regardless of the traditional labels. A truly diversified portfolio will have a blend of all three, which is critical to achieving proper portfolio diversification.

Adapt to changing market conditions

What is attractive today will change over time as markets move and economies evolve. Adapting exposure to re ect these changes, and rotating out of asset classes as they become less attractive can help towards achieving the stated objective.

In particular, certain types of assets will typically do well in times of economic expansion, such as equities and high yield bonds, and do poorly in recession, whereas other assets normally exhibit more defensive qualities, such as high quality government bonds. So a fundamentally different mix of exposures makes sense at different stages of the business cycle. It is, however, important to take account of value, as assets tend to go from cheap to expensive and back again, and the cyclical behaviour of assets may change in response to these valuations changes. Assets, for example, like government bonds, may have lost some of their defensive characteristics as they have become more expensive, making them less useful in negative economic periods.

Build exposure from the bottom up

Building portfolios from the bottom-up seeks to ensure that positions are consistent with the desired outcome, rather than just exhibiting broad market characteristics. The market will

contain many securities which may not help towards meeting your objectives. It will contain expensive assets, as well as ones that don’t provide much income. It will also contain assets with signi cant quality or capital risks. As a result, it is important to tailor the underlying portfolio to re ect the desired outcome and, again, to allow this mix to evolve over time.

Think holistically

Building from the bottom-up also allows a holistic approach across asset classes and capital structures. For example, given the many challenges faced by the banking sector, we have felt

that it is generally better to lend to banks as a senior bond holder than to own their equity. Regulatory change is designed to make harder for banks to make money for their equity holders, but conversely regulation is designed to make banks safer for their bond holders.

Similarly, earlier this year when oil prices collapsed, a lot of energy-related assets ended up at relatively cheap levels across their capital structures. We looked to see whether there were interesting opportunities that could do well, even if oil prices remained low, and which would benefit from any recovery in the oil price. Reviewing the opportunity set, we found that some of the best opportunities were within US high yield energy sector bonds, but selectivity would be key, because of the risk of default.

Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst

Financial markets are always hostage to events. One way to guard against this is to think about which events are worth worrying about, and then analyse their potential consequences

for markets, and the implications for your portfolio. This can be looked at alongside how probable the event appears to be, to decide whether to hedge exposed areas within the portfolio. This kind of approach worked particularly well in advance of the UK’s EU referendum, a discrete risk event with an uncertain binary outcome.

Rather than taking a view on how the vote would go, we believed that a more prudent course was to seek to reduce risk to limit the possible downside, in return for perhaps foregoing some of the upside. It can be very useful to manage exposure around future referenda or elections in a
similar way.

Open-ended event-based risks offer a different challenge, such as the risk of a ‘hard landing’ in China, the risk of an oil price spike, or the risk of a bond yield spike. With these, it is worth examining exposure levels to see whether it makes sense to hedge certain risks while still maintaining core strategic positions.

John Stopford is Co-Head of Multi-Asset at Investec.

 

And Now for Something Completely Different?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

HSBC Global Research asks if the ECB QE set to become an ‘ex policy’. In its last European Economics Quarterly the firm explains that there’s more than a whiff of Monty Python’s famous parrot sketch in the ECB’s current position. “Like Michael Palin trying to persuade John Cleese that his dead parrot might be just “resting” or “pining for the fjords”, so the ECB for the past few years has been keen to convince markets that it has the will and the means to return inflation to target, despite mounting evidence to the contrary”.

It is two years since the ECB announced QE, albeit belatedly and cautiously. Yet inflation still seems stuck in a rut. “So is ECB QE, like Monty Python’s parrot, dead? Is it an ex-policy? Is it time for something completely different?”, asks HSBC Global Research.

Markets have become more optimistic on inflation and the reflation trade is on

Since Donald Trump was elected as the next US president, equities and bond yields have risen and the US dollar has appreciated. This positive sentiment has affected Europe. During Q4, ten-year bund yields rose from around -10bps to +25bps, and at 1.4% gilt yields are up around 90bps from their post-Brexit lows. European equities have shrugged off various political shocks to end 2016 at highs for the year.

To HSBC, the market reaction jars with the economic realities. The two key tailwinds to eurozone growth over the past two years – energy price deflation and fiscal headroom from falling government borrowing costs – have ended. They expect the eurozone to grow by just 1.2% in 2017. This is 0.2% higher than their previous forecast thanks to strong momentum going into the year, but it still marks a slowdown from 2016. Unemployment and economic slack are still elevated in three of the eurozone’s big four economies and are likely to remain so.

There may be structural global factors, such as price-sensitive, digitally-savvy consumers restraining inflation. And the impact of monetary policy is still limited by a low ‘natural’ real interest rate. It will require more than a dose of US fiscal expansion to reverse the trend in the factors that have driven ‘natural rates’ down, such as slowing productivity growth, high debt burdens and unfavourable demographics. In short, they think we are a long way from seeing ‘the whites of the eyes’ of sustained eurozone inflation.

Core inflation in the eurozone is unlikely to rise much above 1% over the coming years, even if headline inflation is set to rise reasonably sharply. The 18% rise in the EUR oil price through Q4 2016 alongside EUR depreciation means they now see eurozone inflation peaking briefly at 1.8% and averaging 1.6% in 2017 (up from 1.0% previously). But they see core inflation reaching just 1.2% in 2018. Indeed, even after the latest extension of QE to December 2017, the ECB itself is only forecasting inflation rising to 1.7% by 2019.

The eurozone is unlikely to follow the US down the path of fiscal expansion. Markets shouldn’t rely on the fiscal expansion to drive up growth and inflation, even if there is a strong case for Europe to follow the US. In aggregate, the eurozone’s deficit, current account and public debt burden provide a more favourable base to launch a fiscal loosening. Also, there is an urgent need for investment, with the level of investment around EUR200bn below where it should be given the level of GDP. Even the European Commission has acknowledged this and requested (for the first time) an aggregate fiscal expansion of 0.5% of GDP. Unsurprisingly, it wants this to come from the surplus countries although it has no powers to enforce this.

So is it time for something completely different?

Perhaps the ECB’s best option to meet its inflation mandate is to accept lower inflation for a few years, ramp down its bond buying programme gradually and put the pressure back on governments to make structural reforms. To avoid a repeat of 2012, where reforms arguably contributed to a recession and the rise of populist parties, there would also need to be an investment-led fiscal stimulus that raises both near-term and, via higher future productivity, longer-term growth. This would require further steps toward centralised fiscal policy, after the raft of 2017 elections.

The ECB should reduce its purchases further at the end of 2017. In reality, the ECB is unlikely to administer a sharp shock. Mario Draghi has been clear that there will be no sudden stop to QE. However, they do think the ECB will reduce the QE purchase rate further when the current programme finishes in December 2017. Of course, the ECB may give different reasons for piling pressure on governments (eg higher headline inflation projections) but they think it is likely to announce another six-month extension, buying at EUR40bn per month, probably at its October 2017 meeting.  And there is always the possibility of it adjusting its policy mix away from government bond buying to other forms of easing.