- Carbon pricing has so far failed to take off. But it could soon become a pillar of the green economy
- According to members of the Pictet-Clean Energy fund’s Advisory Board, a fully functioning carbon pricing mechanism could be the difference between halting climate change and allowing it to spiral out of control
The transition from a fossil-fuelled economy to one powered by renewables carries the promise of being as transformational as the agricultural and industrial revolutions. But as things stand, hopes for containing climate change look ambitious.
New net zero pledges from the US, China and Europe are inadequate. They still leave the world far short of the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global temperature rises to below 2 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels. This is why carbon pricing is essential.
According to members of the Pictet-Clean Energy fund’s Advisory Board, a fully functioning carbon pricing mechanism could be the difference between halting climate change and allowing it to spiral out of control. Market forces, they argue, can be a powerful ally, helping change the behaviour of businesses and consumers.
The problem is finding a way to harness them effectively. Currently averaging globally at just USD 2 per tonne of CO2, the carbon market is clearly not doing the job it was set up to do. The International Energy Agency says carbon prices need to rise to as much as USD 140 by 2040 to meet Paris goals.
Breaking the tragedy
Getting there will not be straightforward. As former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney warned, the battle against climate change is hampered by the “tragedy of horizon”. In other words, the current generation has no direct incentive to fix the problem when catastrophic impacts of climate change will not be felt for decades. By making carbon emissions more costly today, however, there is the possibility of avoiding that tragedy.
The World Bank’s modelling has shown that carbon pricing has the potential to halve the cost of implementing Paris targets, saving some USD 250 billion by 2030. One problem is that carbon pricing schemes don’t cover nearly enough of the world’s emissions.
Globally, the carbon pricing market accounts for about 12 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent – which translates into just under a quarter of all annual global greenhouse gas emissions (1).
The US, the world’s biggest polluter, does not even participate in carbon trading at the federal level while the Paris climate agreement did not include a provision for pricing carbon (2). Industry lobby groups in coal, oil and gas sectors had been fierce opponents too. And then there is a wide divergence in prices from country to country.
European countries set the example. Sweden levies the highest carbon tax in the world at SEK1,190 (EUR 117)/tonne CO2, covering about 40 per cent of its greenhouse gas emissions. In Europe, the world’s biggest and oldest market, carbon prices rose more than five-fold since 2018 to a record high in May (see Fig. 1).
But elsewhere, carbon remains under-priced. According to the IEA, the average carbon prices would need to rise almost 50-fold to USD 75-100 /tonne by 2030 and then USD 125-140 by 2040 to meet Paris Agreement goals.
University of California San Diego researchers believe even that will fall short. Their study puts the social cost of carbon – which takes into account empirical climate-driven economic damage estimations and socio-economic projections – at a staggering USD 417/tonne (3).
The lack of a harmonised market and a unified global carbon price are perhaps the most significant problems. Businesses, especially in energy-intensive industries, may relocate out of countries with high carbon costs into those with laxer emission constraints – in a phenomenon known as “carbon leakage”.
Our advisory board members say renewed international efforts to fight global warming could encourage more countries and regions to start adopting carbon pricing schemes. That should push prices higher in the long term and prevent carbon leakage.
The signs are encouraging. In China, which launched its national carbon market in February, market participants expect the price to average RMB 66/tonne (USD 10) in 2025 before rising to RMB 77 by the end of the decade (4). It has the potential to be the world’s biggest carbon market.
Elsewhere, the American Petroleum Institute, the powerful fossil fuel lobby, is now endorsing the introduction of carbon prices in a major policy reversal that underscored seriousness in tackling climate change.
What’s more, Brussels plans to present proposals to revise and possibly expand its emission trading system in line with the European Green Deal and its new target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 per cent by 2030.
One way to improve the emission pricing system is to expand the use of carbon credits. Governments can give out credits to businesses that lower their carbon footprint with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, reforestation activities or energy efficiency solutions.
This way, companies can gain flexibility in complying with carbon pricing regulations.
The discussion on carbon pricing and credits is likely to feature prominently during the landmark UN climate talks in Glasgow later this year as potential cornerstone to supporting climate goals.
An overlooked benefit of effective carbon pricing is that it can also accelerate the pace of innovation in clean energy technologies and promote a faster and broader adoption of products and services that have yet to become commercially viable.
For example, our Advisory Board members say, certain types of hydrogen power generation that combines carbon storage could become cost competitive if carbon prices are set around EUR 60-70 per tonne of CO2.
Other technologies that could become viable at higher carbon prices include advanced power transmission mechanisms and next-generation batteries.
This would have significant benefits. The IEA estimates such technologies alone have the potential to cut global energy sector CO2 emissions by nearly 35 gigatonnes of CO2 by 2070, or 100 per cent of what’s considered sustainable in the same period.
The transition to a decarbonised economy will be among the most wrenching socio-economic shifts humans have ever experienced. Yet even though the survival of the planet is at stake, resistance to change is proving difficult to overcome. A higher carbon price can smooth the path.
(1) Carbon Pricing Dashboard, World Bank
(2) Article 6 of the Paris Agreement provides options for voluntary cooperation amongst countries in achieving their NDC (nationally-defined contributions) targets to allow for higher climate ambition, promote sustainable development, and safeguard environmental integrity
(3) Ricke, K., Drouet, L., Caldeira, K. et al. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Clim Change 8, 895–900 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0282-y
(4) China Carbon Pricing Survey 2020
Information, opinions and estimates contained in this document reflect a judgment at the original date of publication and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented herein.
This material is for distribution to professional investors only. However it is not intended for distribution to any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Information used in the preparation of this document is based upon sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of those sources. Any opinion, estimate or forecast may be changed at any time without prior warning. Investors should read the prospectus or offering memorandum before investing in any Pictet managed funds. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested.
This document has been issued in Switzerland by Pictet Asset Management SA and in the rest of the world by Pictet Asset Management Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and may not be reproduced or distributed, either in part or in full, without their prior authorisation.
For US investors, Shares sold in the United States or to US Persons will only be sold in private placements to accredited investors pursuant to exemptions from SEC registration under the Section 4(2) and Regulation D private placement exemptions under the 1933 Act and qualified clients as defined under the 1940 Act. The Shares of the Pictet funds have not been registered under the 1933 Act and may not, except in transactions which do not violate United States securities laws, be directly or indirectly offered or sold in the United States or to any US Person. The Management Fund Companies of the Pictet Group will not be registered under the 1940 Act.
Pictet Asset Management Inc. (Pictet AM Inc) is responsible for effecting solicitation in North America to promote the portfolio management services of Pictet Asset Management Limited (Pictet AM Ltd) and Pictet Asset Management SA (Pictet AM SA).
In Canada Pictet AM Inc is registered as Portfolio Managerr authorized to conduct marketing activities on behalf of Pictet AM Ltd and Pictet AM SA. In the USA, Pictet AM Inc. is registered as an SEC Investment Adviser and its activities are conducted in full compliance with the SEC rules applicable to the marketing of affiliate entities as prescribed in the Adviser Act of 1940 ref. 17CFR275.206(4)-3.