Last updated: 09:30 / Tuesday, 16 June 2015
Column by MFS

Down to the Wire in Greece

Imagen
 Down to the Wire in Greece

Until this month, the base case for Grecce of many analysts and strategists was for an eventual agreement, even though no one had offered a clear road map on how to get there. In MFS´ view, such optimism suggested that these observers were overlooking the facts on the ground.

Virtually no progress toward an agreement has been made since the Syriza government took office in January. Pilar Gomez-Bravo, Fixed Income Portfolio Manager, Lior Jassur, Fixed Income Research Analyst, and Erik Weisman, Chief Economist & Fixed Income Portfolio Manager at MFS would argue that by rejecting existing agreements, sending conflicting messages and failing to provide detailed alternative proposals, Syriza has damaged Greece’s relationships with creditors. Now the country has little money left and has made no reforms or even commitments to reforms — and nearly all eurozone goodwill and solidarity has evaporated in the process.

Higher risk of default

June promised to be a milestone in the Greek debt saga, with the month’s first debt service installment payable to the IMF on 5 June and the second bailout program expiring at the end of the month. On 4 June, however, Greece took advantage of a rarely used IMF procedure to bundle together its 5, 12, 16 and 19 June installments totaling 1.5 billion euros and delay payment until 30 June.

Running out of cash and credit, Greece may be facing a political crisis, as the Syriza government’s adherence to its anti-austerity election platform could be putting the country’s economic future at risk. The three experts at MFS suspect that holding a referendum on extending austerity measures or launching a snap election now would be unlikely to solve much at this stage. “Even if another party could win an overall majority, it would take weeks to organize a budget and put forward an actionable plan for further reforms that would be acceptable to the creditor countries. Regaining the confidence and goodwill of its creditors could take Greece years”, said.

“We thought Greece might miss a payment, though without that leading to a declaration of default by the IMF. After last events, we are raising the probability we assign to default. And with large debt repayments due to the ECB by 20 July, political uncertainty further increases the chances that the default process could become disorderly”, point out from MFS.

Terms of agreement

From the perspective of creditors such as Germany, said the experts, the main point is that a framework for the second bailout package had been agreed upon with the government of a sovereign country. By the terms of this 2012 bailout, tangible reforms were supposed to be implemented in exchange for funding. Then another government under Prime Minister Tsipras came into power by promising to renegotiate the terms of this bailout — especially its onerous conditions for reform.

Now creditors wonder whether this or any successor government will honor any existing agreements. That is why the creditors have been so inflexible. Politicians in the creditor countries need to see far more compromises on structural reforms before extending additional funding to Greece”, argued.

The firm thinks that there is an increasing acceptance that Greece could default on its sovereign debt or other state obligations and still remain within the eurozone. After all, a country cannot be expelled from the common currency zone; it has to choose to leave. If Greece chooses to leave the eurozone, it would also need to leave the European Union under current treaties, and the Greek population clearly does not want that to happen.

Nonetheless, the markets are facing a significant amount of market uncertainty and potential dislocation “if we enter the uncharted territory of a default within the eurozone or a country leaving the European Union. Based on the relative stability of periphery bond spreads and equity markets, it seems that investors may be underestimating such risks”.

Admittedly, the likely intervention of the ECB — as well as the implementation of the relatively new EFSF, Outright Monetary Transactions and banking union reforms — should help to provide financial stability and support asset prices in the near term. At the very least, however, we would likely see increased volatility — particularly on the currency side — and a migration toward “safer haven” assets. “Given the uncertainty that surrounds such a default or “Grexit,” we would warn against assigning too low a probability on a negative market event”, conclude.

 

menu
menu