Investec AM Global Insights 2015: Investors Must not Turn Their Back on Emerging Markets

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Investec AM: los inversores no deben olvidar a los emergentes, especialmente Asia, la única región capaz claramente de generar riqueza en el entorno actual
Investec gathers 250 investors from 23 countries in London for its 2015 Global Insights Event. Investec AM Global Insights 2015: Investors Must not Turn Their Back on Emerging Markets

At the Investec Global Insight Conference 2015 being held in London last month, Henrik du Toit, CEO of Investec Asset Management, outlined the company’s vision for the environment in which we currently operate by stating that investors must stop being locally biased to become true global investors.

The South African firm’s assets are a good example of this approach. With offices in Cape Town, London, Hong Kong, and Singapore, and  US$120bn in assets under management, they are the only asset management company originating in an emerging country, which plays in the big fund managers’ league. Moreover, its assets under management are equally divided between developed and emerging markets.

Richard Garland, Managing Director for the Global Advisory business at Investec AM, pointed out that the firm has seven investment teams with unique investment philosophies, offering a varied range of products, with a dynamic and business oriented corporate culture which is fully aligned with the needs of their clients.

Proof of this is that 15% of the company is held by the company’s key employees, including all senior professionals involved in the investment process. In addition, portfolio managers invest a significant amount in the funds they manage, to ensure that their goals are fully aligned with the other investors in the fund.

Garland acted as Master of Ceremonies on the conference; Du Toit, the company’s CEO, gave a broad overview on key points of the business, to make way for the speech by James Hand, co-director of the  4Factor Equity team, and a presentation by Michael Power, strategist for the firm, on the “Collision of Two Worlds,” developed and emerging, and its impact on investment portfolios.

Undisputed Protagonists: Emerging markets

Du Toit claimed that, with the arrival of new economies into the global arena, we have embarked on a journey in which the world is changing. He stated that one cannot be left out of the process of wealth creation that is occurring in emerging markets, and that although right now their role is under question, their protagonism is indisputable in the long term. For the company’s CEO, the best advice is to invest with a global focus rather than a country-by-country one.

Power, strategist for the firm, said that deflation is the main issue that any investment portfolio has to deal with. Overheating in the developed world is being offset by the deflationary influence from the emerging markets, which are able to produce at much lower costs due to their specialization and the low cost of labor. Thus, according to Power, the price deflation process suffered by Japan since the nineties is now also affecting the United States, and Europe even more so, as they are also facing a serious demographic problem, “Europe needs more babies,” he said. In fact, Asia is taking the jobs of the Western world, and the institutions in developed countries have reacted by cutting rates, encouraging credit, and increasing spending.

In this environment, Power urges investors not to turn their backs on the economies that are generating wealth. If Korea and Taiwan stole the limelight from Japan in the nineties, creating its problem of deflation, this century China has taken over, and now “we can even envision that ASEAN countries could be replacing China in this process” Power says. In short, and in the words of this strategist, “the white man has lost his job in favor of an Asian woman,” a difficult reality to digest.

What to do in this environment? Power recommended to those investors and advisers present, to prepare portfolios for capital preservation in a deflationary environment, which is going to continue. “The type of high-quality companies in which the Investec Global Franchise strategy invests are a good choice; also invest in bonds and cash, making sure it is in the appropriate currency; equities and Asian fixed income are also interesting, as well as certain private sectors in the United States, such as pharmaceuticals.”

Asian Equities and Value Stocks are Cheap

Several 4Factor Investec investment team members, as well as portfolio managers for the Asian Equities and Fixed Income teams, gave their views on various sectors and investment styles in two panels. One of these concentrated on developed markets and the other one on China. One of the conclusions in relation to developed markets is that even though there is a somewhat more attractive valuation in value stocks, perhaps it is too soon to embark into overweighting this asset class. However, the quality factor, although in higher ratios, is offering opportunities in companies with high generation of free cash flows which justify their prices. “Those stocks with free cash flow yields higher than 5.5% which grow by around 8% annually, mark the path to success,” Clyde Rossouw, co-director of the Quality Factor, pointed out.

James Hand, co-director of the 4Factor Equity team, analyzed the  situation by markets, styles, and sectors, concluding that looking at the valuations, the picture shows that emerging markets, Asia, and value stocks are cheap, while by sector,  valuations are low in cyclicals versus defensives, “but at the moment, you have to be willing to buy in these markets, which are cheaper, without any evidence that the fundamentals are improving, so unfortunately there is no clear answer” .

The event counted with a stellar presentation by Francois Pienaar, former captain of South Africa’s national rugby team in 1995, year when the team won the World Cup. Pienaar, played by Matt Dillon in Invictus, the film production directed by Clint Eastwood, shared with the audience his sporting and human experience when leading his team to victory at a time when the country was taking its first steps towards democracy. “My main criticism of the film is that in it, I had a disproportionate leading role, the victory in the Rugby World Cup was the work of the whole team,” Pienaar assured. He also shared the inspiration which the team always received from Nelson Mandela, who clearly understood from the onset the power which sport has to unite a people who at that time were divided. “From him, I obtained the motivation to make the world a better place, starting from your own home, your street, your neighborhood, your circle of friends, your city, and your country,” he concluded.

Blockbuster Year for Mixed Asset Products in Europe

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Mixed asset mutual funds drove the bulk of long-term net inflows from European investors through July 31, 2015, according to new data released in two reports from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

The European Fund Market Mid-Year Review and July 2015 FundFlash Monthly Snapshot reports both detail continued momentum in mixed asset products – those that invest in equities, bonds, cash and other funds –  and strengthening equity investments following June’s market correction. The reports include commentary and insight based upon a new partnership between Broadridge and MackayWilliams LLP, a leading mutual fund market analysis and research company firm for the domestic pan-European and cross-border fund markets.

Additional findings from Broadridge’s reports include:

  • Investors pumped EUR 55 billion into European investment funds including EUR 31 billion into long term funds in July
  • Mixed asset products accounted for 55% (EUR 124 billion) of total inflows in the first half and 23% (EUR 7 billion) in July
  • The top three markets by estimate net sales in July were Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom
  • The top fund firms by sales in July were BlackRock, DeAWM, GAM Holding, Intesa and Vanguard

“It’s been a challenging year for asset managers in Europe with some periods of intense market volatility and increasing competition coming from the banks,” said Diana Mackay, chief executive officer of MackayWilliams, “But low interest rates continue to drive flows into retail funds and mixed asset funds, in particular, are having a blockbuster year.”

“Our new partnership with MackayWilliams follows our recent acquisition of the Fiduciary Services and Competitive Intelligence unit from Thomson Reuters’ Lipper division,” said Frank Polefrone, senior vice president of Broadridge’s data and analytics business. “Together, these investments demonstrate our ongoing commitment to providing our clients with innovative data, analytics and insights to enhance their sales efforts.”

Institutional Sales Teams Adding to Headcount on Sales and Servicing Teams

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

New research from global analytics firm Cerulli Associates finds that institutional sales teams are adding personnel to their sales and service teams in the United States.

“We surveyed institutional sales managers about the types of changes they are making to their sales and service teams, and found, regardless of firm size, the majority of asset managers are focused on adding headcount,” states Alexi Maravel, associate director at Cerulli. “They plan to add headcount to nearly all groups, except relationship management, where headcount will remain the same.”

“Some institutional asset managers deliberately increase its client service and portfolio specialist headcount, because after the business is won, these relationships are immediately taken over by client service personnel,” Maravel explains.

“Institutional sales and service teams are typically structured to support portfolio management so that the firm’s investment personnel spend minimal time traveling and can focus on managing assets.”

“Managers that we spoke with also expressed interest in hiring junior associates for their sales, consultant relations, and client service teams,” Maravel continues. “Individuals in these roles are tasked with the more operational aspects of sales and service departments, such as intelligence and data-gathering, finding opportunities in territories, and assisting with creating slide decks that will be presented to clients and prospects.”

Morgan Stanley Investment Management Re-Opens Global Brands Fund for Subscriptions

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Los family offices se vuelven globales
Foto: toastyken, Flickr, Creative Commons. Los family offices se vuelven globales

Morgan Stanley Investment Management has announced that MS INVF Global Brands has re-opened for subscriptions after capacity became available in the strategy.

The investment thesis behind Global Brands has remained the same since its inception, providing a concentrated portfolio of high quality companies with the aim of compounding investors’ wealth over the long term, whilst striving to preserve capital in down markets.

“We have long taken a conservative approach to capacity management and will continue to do so to protect investment returns,” said Managing Director and Head of the International Equity team, William Lock, which manages MSIM’s Global Brands and Global Quality funds.

Bruno Paulson, Managing Director and Senior Portfolio Manager, continued “The fund is benchmark agnostic and our goal is to grow clients’ capital and not lose it. The economic robustness of quality companies helps to deliver returns when they are needed most – during challenging market conditions.”

Morgan Stanley is a leading global financial services firm providing a wide range of investment banking, securities, wealth management and investment management services. With offices in more than 43 countries, the Firm’s employees serve clients worldwide including corporations, governments, institutions and individuals.

What´s Really Restraining Bond Yields?

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

In the latest edition of Global Horizons, “A Brave New World for Fond Markets” Jeremy Lawson and Sebastian Mackay -Standard Life Investments- look at whether bond markets are pricing in a great stagnation and how yields are likely to evolve through the rest of the business cycle.

 “These are highly unusual times in the world of fixed income. The factors weighing on bond yields are numerous, complex and in some cases, unprecedented.” Said Jeremy Lawson, Chief Economist, Standard Life Investments

 “Aftershocks of the financial crisis are still being felt, seven years after Lehman Brothers collapsed. Our analysis shows that the scarring from the crisis and prolonged private sector deleveraging has raised desired savings, weighing on domestic demand and inflation. Weakness in domestic demand in advanced economies has been amplified by policy mistakes and this has depressed labor markets, discouraged firms from investing, and held down inflation. Productivity growth, which had been in decline even before the crisis, has weakened further, underpinned by the drought in private and public capital spending.” 

 “Both by accident and design, central banks and regulators have been pursuing policies that lower real interest rates and term premia, enhancing the demand for all income yielding assets. Central banks have been forced to keep short term interest rates at or even below the zero lower bound, and to put in place unconventional policy measures aimed at suppressing real interest rates along the entire yield curve.”

 Jeremy Lawson, adds “Looking ahead and taking account of these special factors – why should the market change its mind and begin to anticipate higher long term interest rates? We examine the potential triggers for long-term bond yields to shift in the US. If recoveries in the advanced economies become more self-sustaining and if emerging market economic and financial conditions do not deteriorate further, inflation expectations could pick up. The Fed should be willing to accommodate some increase in real interest rates. Investors might also demand more compensation for holding long-term interest rate risk.

 “We conclude that it is unlikely that the long term interest rates will return to their pre-crisis norms. Our research suggests that the benchmark US 10 year government bond yield will peak at 3 to 4% during the current business cycle. This would be above today’s levels but well below the peak of previous business cycles.”

Robeco, about China: “Some Investors Did Leave The Market, Providing A Good Entry Point for Long Term Investors”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Robeco apuesta por valores con crecimiento, beneficios en dólares y costes en renminbis al invertir en bolsa china
Victoria Mio, co- chief investment officer in Asia Pacific at Robeco.. Robeco, about China: "Some Investors Did Leave The Market, Providing A Good Entry Point for Long Term Investors"

Victoria Mio, co- chief investment officer in Asia Pacific at Robeco and Robeco Chinese Equites’ fund manager, explains in this interview with Funds Society her outlook for the Chinese economy and markets and the impact for the global economy.

How would you explain the volatility that the Chinese stock markets have experienced in recent weeks?

For the offshore Chinese equities listed in Hong Kong and the US, the recent volatility is due to the following factors: continued lack of sign for macroeconomic condition improvement in China; changing of Chinese currency CNY pricing mechanism and 3% one-off CNY depreciation; lack of upside surprise from the 1H2015 corporate earnings result season in August; expectation of interest rate hike in the US causing funds outflows from global emerging markets, including China. For the domestic A share markets, there is a Chinese specific condition: unwinding of margin finance. At the peak, margin financing through the official channels stood at CNY 2.3 trn in mid Jun, and dropped to less than CNY 0.9 trn.

Will the current Chinese government measures be enough? To what extent the Chinese authorities have room to boost the markets?

China government has recently introduced new stimulus as debt-swap (CNY 3.2 trn debt-swap program for maturing short-term LGFV debts to be converted into long-term local government bonds), local government projects (boosting the capital adequacy ratios of China Development Bank and Export-Import Bank of China, and issue policy bonds to support local government projects), infrastructure (support construction in 5 areas: agriculture, urban infrastructure, environment protection, public housing and high-end manufacturing & telecom), property (PBOC cut the down-payment requirement for second homes to 40% from 60%.  This will likely lead to an improvement in property investment in 4Q15), export (the State Council pledged on 26 August 2015 to support China’s export by cutting levies on exported goods, increase the transparency of port and customs fees, etc.) and consumption (the government also cut the RRR for auto loan by 300bps to support auto finance).

These stimuli may not be enough to stop the deceleration in growth, but they will reduce the downside. We expect that the Chinese central bank will continue to cut interest rate or RRR in Oct this year, and will continue the monetary easing policy next year. We also expect the government to do more fiscal spending to boost growth in the coming months, particularly related to the 13th Five Year Plan (covering 2016-2020).  The initial plan is likely to be announced in October 2015 and finalized  in March 2016.

Is there anything you may find positive about such markets correction?

Valuation becomes extremely attractive now. Some investors did leave the market, providing a good entry point for long term investors.

Do you see room for further declines in China’s markets?

Given the extreme bearishness in the market, and record low valuation, the downside is limited.  The risk is to the upside in the next 3-6 months.

At this moment, what is your strategy: taking the opportunity to buy low or selling because of high volatility?

We remain overweight China within our APxJ/EM coverage universe. We are selective with stock ideas, and prefer sectors/stock names with healthy earnings growth trajectory, and potentially have higher US$ or equivalent revenue exposure while its cost base is more RMB denominated. Such sectors/companies will benefit under the RMB depreciation scenario.

To what extent this crisis will impact in the developed world, especially Europe and the US? Do you think the situation can be spread around, as we saw in August?

Due to capital control in China, the correction in China A share markets will have little impact on global markets, except the Hong Kong equity market, through the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect.

The net impact of the change in the RMB currency management approach on the global economy is dependent on whether policy-makers also take up easing measures in a way that stabilizes growth in China. A currency move, just by itself, will lead to tightening financial conditions elsewhere in the world (by way of appreciation of other economies’ trade-weighted indices) and could prolong the impact of disinflationary forces on the global economy. We expect this impact to be felt most materially in the Asia ex Japan region and also in the US (given the close trade linkages between China and these economies).

What about the contagion of other markets in Asia? And in Latin America?

From macro perspective, the Asia ex Japan region is highly exposed to the impact of China’s slowdown, as China has emerged as a key source of end demand over the past years.  Within the region, Korean, Taiwan and Singapore would be the most affected via the direct trade channel, while Indonesia and Malaysia would be affected via the commodity price channel, owing to their status as the net commodity exporters in the region. 

Latin America is less directly exposed to China’s end demand. But with the majority of tis exports basket commodity related, a growth slowdown in China would affect the region via weaker commodity prices and a negative terms of trade impact. Domestic demand could be further affected via weaker consumer purchasing power and reduced attractiveness of commodity related investment. Government spending could be constrained by weaker commodity tax revenues.

From a currency market perspective, the adjustment of the fixing mechanism of the CNY may have a potential impact on other Asia currencies, as the resultant devaluation has resulted in the Asian currencies trading weaker too.

Do you think this turmoil may lead the Fed to delay, even more, the interest rates hikes?

Specifically, for the Fed, China’s move complicates one of the three criteria – a leveling out in the trade-weighted dollar – that the Fed had laid out earlier this that, if met, would give it the confidence to raise the target rate this year. Robeco holds the view that the Fed will start its first rate hike in December 2015.

What impact will the new China have in global growth, commodity prices, and in general, in the world economy?

Unlike the “old China” sectors that are more investment + export driven and more energy intensive, the “new China” is more consumption driven and less energy intensive. If the relatively faster growth in “new China” helps to prevent a major slowdown in China’s growth, in general, China is likely to continue contribute to world GDP growth by a significant share, though commodities prices are unlikely find a meaningful lift from this.

Will there be soft or hard landing?

We expect China to have a gradual pace of adjustment to address the challenges of managing the disinflationary pressure and high debt level. This gradualism approach means that the disinflationary pressure could persist for longer as we believe that the magnitude of excess capacity in China remains large during this slow adjustment process.

As policy makers continue to adopt gradual adjustment, we believe investment growth will continue to slow in an environment of relatively high real borrowing cost trend, particularly for the industrial corporate sector. Moreover, moderation in corporate revenue and nominal industrial growth is resulting in the corporate sector slowing wage growth, which in turn is likely to weigh on private consumption growth. Hence, we expect GDP growth to slow to 6.8% YoY in 2016.

We have seen the slower GDP growth mainly weighed by industrial sectors. The current weakness in growth mainly reflected the difficulties in industrial economy on the back of deceleration in investment growth and systematically weaker external demand. However, services sectors growth continues to outperform the industrial sectors. The services sectors – which represented 48.1% of GDP in 2014 (vs. 44.2% in 2010) – have been outperforming the overall GDP growth. Tertiary sectors growth was 8.4% YoY in 1H15 (vs. 7.8% YoY in 2014), partially offsetting the slower growth in secondary sectors (6.1% YoY in 1H2015 vs. 7.3% YoY in 2014). The strength in the services sectors is reflected in the relatively higher reading of non-manufacturing PMI at around 53-54, well above manufacturing PMI which is hovering at around or slightly below 50.

Global Fund Industry Assets Under Management Dropped by a 4% in August

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Global assets under management in the collective investment funds industry dropped by US$ 1.44 trillion or minus 4% in August and stood at US$ 34.7 trillion at the end of the month. Estimated net outflows accounted for US$ 20.8 billion while the remainder of the drop was due to market losses. Thus a provisional all time high in assets under management was reached at the end of April 2015 with US$ 36.4 trillion, according to Lipper Thompson figures.

All asset types posted negative average returns with Equity funds performing worst at minus 6.9% on average in US$ terms, while Bond funds where hit most net redemptions wise with minus US$ 38 billion. Some of this money, however, found its way into Money Market funds, which were able to attract US$ 28.5 billion net new money. However, the trend into money market funds slowed from the previous month as the market waited, “on hold”.

Taking a look at Lipper Global Equity Classifications, Equity Global ex US (+13.7), Equity Japan (+5.3) and Equity Europe funds with plus US$ 3.4 billion accounted for the highest estimated net inflows, while Equity US funds (+US$ 1.7 billion) were able to halt the outflows trend as observed in the previous two months. On the lagging side we find Equity Global (-10.5), Equity Emerging Markets Global (-9.1) and Equity Asia Pacific ex Japan funds with a minus US$ 8.2 billion in estimated net outflows.

On the Bond Classifications side, Bond Global (-6.7), Bond USD High Yield (-6.1) and Bond Emerging Markets Global HC with minus US$ 5 billion led the outflows table while only Bond USD Mortgages attracted significant net new money with plus US$ 1.4 billion. Money Market funds USD led the overall inflows table with plus US$ 30.1 billion followed by Money Market EUR funds with plus US$ 16.4 billion net new money.

“Rising volatility in equity markets and an uncertain outlook for fixed income, due to mixed signals from the FED, combined with a significantly expansive monetary policy from the ECB have left their traces in the global investment funds market in August, with investors remaining put or moving to the side lines,” commented Otto Christian Kober, Lipper’s Global Head of Methodology and author of the report.

Bond fund outflows seem to anticipate rising interest rates as equity markets retreat from their all time highs”, added Kober.

Going Local Down in Acapulco

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Few global asset classes have experienced the same level of risk re-pricing as emerging market (EM) local currency bonds over the last three years. The yield on the asset class relative to a basket of developed market government bonds now stands at a six-year high, representing a pickup of 5.4%. Meanwhile, EM currencies have weakened to such an extent that many of them now appear very cheap on a range of valuation measures. However, we believe –says Standard Life Investment in their document- investors should refrain from viewing the asset class as a potential beta allocation opportunity. Rather, they should seek to understand the varied dynamics of the small number of large countries in the opportunity set.

When assessing investment opportunities within emerging markets, the company focusses on understanding the direction of travel of fundamentals for each country. This allows them to understand which are improving and which are deteriorating. The company´s relative value models for local market instruments determine whether these fundamental changes, or expected changes, are reflected in asset prices.

Its investment case in Turkey, for example, is less favourable. The country is heading toward fresh parliamentary elections, as the process of coalition building following the June elections appears to be failing. Meanwhile, they believe the country’s financing mix is extremely risky. “There are internal policy challenges that need to be resolved before we could become more bullish on local market assets. In Brazil, even though we believe that the government’s revisions to primary surplus targets for 2015 may present risks to debt sustainability, the market understands these risks better than those present in Turkey. Therefore, we would still consider holding Brazilian debt.

Meanwhile –says the company-, the renewed slump in commodity prices continues to present challenges to those countries which rely on these products as a source of exports, government revenues or GDP growth. Any rebound in commodity prices – especially oil – would result in a more constructive view of fundamentals in Malaysia and Nigeria. Among oil exporters, Standard Life Investments believes Colombia should perform well in the months to come. “Its currency has undergone a drastic adjustment and we believe fiscal and monetary tightening is likely in the short to medium term.”

Emerging markets have been subjected to extreme stresses in recent years: the ‘taper tantrum’, China weakness and the precipitous decline in commodity prices having created something of a perfect storm. In such a scenario, investors can be guilty of exhibiting insufficient discretion, choosing instead to view all EM countries as equal. For those willing to take a more nuanced approach, however, this creates opportunities. Sound fundamentals and coherent, responsible policy making are still on display among many EMs, and their local currency bonds offer an attractive level of income in today’s low-yield world.

AllianzGI Expands Fixed Income Expertise with Ex M&G Mike Riddell

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Allianz Global Investors has announced that it is further expanding its European fixed income expertise. As part of this expansion, AllianzGI has appointed Mike Riddell as UK fixed income portfolio manager.

With a track-record of European fixed income experience dating back to the 1950s, Allianz Global Investors is already one of the leading fixed income managers in Europe, with EUR 147 billion of European fixed income assets under management. Expanding its Eurozone fixed income capability to include a regional fixed income focus in the UK, fully integrated into AllianzGI’s established global fixed income platform, will help ensure AllianzGI continues to offer the blend of expert, active investment solutions that clients want.

Mike, who starts his new role on October 1, joins AllianzGI from M&G Investments, with a strong track-record across a range of fixed income funds. At M&G, Mike was an active contributor to the Bond Vigilantes blog, writing regularly on global fixed income topics, and was particularly well-known for his bearish view of China. Based in London, Mike, who has worked in international fixed income markets for nearly fifteen years, will report to Mauro Vittorangeli, CIO for Conviction Fixed Income at Allianz Global Investors.

Franck Dixmier, Global Head of Fixed Income at Allianz Global Investors, said: “Allianz Global Investors has a fixed income heritage stretching back many decades. Creating a dedicated footprint in the UK, one of the world’s most important and outward-looking financial markets, will perfectly complement our existing Eurozone expertise, giving our clients access to a one-stop shop for European fixed income.

“Mike joins us at an exciting time for our fixed income business, and I am sure that his deep experience of both UK and global fixed income markets will play a central role in building this new pillar in our international fixed income capability. Hiring such a senior, experienced fixed income practitioner as Mike underlines our ambition for our bond business in the UK.”

Mike, and a number of AllianzGI’s other fixed income experts, will be blogging at www.allianzglobalinvestors.co.uk/fixedincome from October 1st.

Putting Market Volatility Into Perspective

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

With recent equity volatility, news headlines are once again screaming about the collapse of capital markets worldwide and are claiming that conditions globally have not only weakened but have suddenly and drastically deteriorated. “We have many things to say, but will only say a few, with hopes that by focusing on our most important facts, principles, and insights, our message might be heard through the din of the mainstream media”, says Daniel Chung, CEO of Fred Alger Management.

This is an extract from the US based asset management firm:

Volatility Creates Buying Opportunities

First, markets are markets, and thus volatility is to be expected and, indeed, welcomed by smart investors. An important fact: U.S. equity corrections of 5%
or more are common — very common. There have been over 200 such declines since 1927.Since that year, the average decline among corrections exceeding 5% has been 12.1% and the median has been 8.3%. The recent correction, with the S&P 500 index declining 12.4%, has therefore been simply average or perhaps just slightly worse. It’s not, however, “unusual,” “extreme,” or “catastrophic” as newspapers and TV commentators suggest. Rather, it’s normal. In particular, we note –he says- that the correction occurred when the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite Index were at post-Great Recession highs. From that perspective, this correction should be viewed as highly normal, rational, and even, may we dare say, pleasing to long-term, fundamental investors. This philosophy of investing is something that Alger has embraced for over 50 years. Simply put, we maintain that the correction is a buying opportunity. We are not alone in this belief, he adds. Warren Buffett, for example, recently said volatility has created even greater discounts on the stocks that he is buying. Investors, he added, should take a long-term perspective rather than focus on volatility. Warren agrees with our view that stocks are likely to be substantially higher in 10 years.

A Look at Economies Across the Globe

Second on our list is the state of global economies, the CEO adds. There is no single fact that we, nor anyone, can cite to reassure readers that all is economically well globally. Yet, our view, based on the research of our investment team and resources provided by our excellent economic and strategic partners across the world, is that not much has changed. Again, the situation is simply not as dramatic as headlines suggest. And, we are at least very certain that nothing has fundamentally happened to imply that the world has gone from “recovering” to “ruination” in such a short time as markets suggest. The U.S. economy is running, or perhaps jogging would be a more apt image. The jogging may not be occurring in every sector or every area, but overall the economy is fine and, unquestionably, better than it was two, three, or five years ago.

For example, consumer confidence is at post-2008 highs and the housing market recovery is continuing, with housing starts reaching 1.2 million units in both June
and July of this year (See Figures 1 and 2). This is steady progress in the housing market, but it remains below, roughly, the 1.5 million unit long-term average that we continue to view as needed to reflect growth in the U.S. population. In comparison, monthly housing starts hit a Great Recession low of only 478,000 units in April of 2009. Shifting lifestyle preferences may be altering the kind of housing preferred by U.S. consumers, but residential as well as commercial real estate continues to be a positive driver for the U.S. economy. Unemployment, meanwhile, has significantly declined and continues to drop. In past commentaries, we expressed our belief that as the labor market improves, there would be variations in unemployment rates among different divisions of workers. That belief was correct. In particular, college educated Americans have had strong employment prospects for several years now and today, with unemployment within this subgroup at only a bit over 2%, they are in short supply from the perspective of employers. Significant improvements have been seen across the less educated subgroups of Americans as well.

Corporate Earnings Have Been Resilient

Similarly, on the corporate side of our economy, revenues and profits have been quite resilient despite weakness in foreign markets. Europe is very mixed, with some countries such as Ireland, Iceland, Germany, and the United Kingdom doing much better than various other countries, including Greece and Russia. But Europe overall is not worse than it was one, two, or three years ago. Looking elsewhere, certain commodity- reliant exporting countries such as Brazil are truly in difficult shape. And –he adds- the Chinese economy is certainly slowing (as it has been for years) as it realigns from being driven by growing exports and by statist policies, including government investment in capital and construction intensive projects, to being driven by consumer services and the private sector. Dislocations in such a massive and shifting economy as China should be expected, but that doesn’t necessarily mean a broader collapse is occurring.

Rethinking the Role of the Federal Reserve

Finally, we provide our strong opinion on a subject that dominates too many headlines and discussions: what will the Federal Reserve do in the near future? Our opinion: the Fed no longer matters. Central bank interest rate management
as a “tool” for managing the U.S. economy and economic growth is fundamentally and largely irrelevant. Many professional investors have expressed concerns over potential Federal Reserve interest rate increases. While interest rates certainly matter, we believe that the Fed long ago lost control of that aspect of the economy and that is a good thing. As we have said before in our Market Commentaries, we are not concerned about the Fed raising rates because the main rates that consumers and corporations borrow at will be determined ultimately by lenders and by debt and bond investors, not the Fed. We think that since the adoption of quantitative easing and the long, unprecedented maintenance of an essentially zero Fed Funds rate, the result has been to show that the once thought “emperor” has no clothes. Do not misunderstand us; market interest rates matter very much. But barring Fed rate mismanagement of an exceptional absolute scale (i.e., the Fed raises rates by 400 basis points, not 50 or 100 basis points), it’s simply that the Fed currently has no real control over rates. We think the U.S. market is indeed reacting to fears of higher rates — but we think the global situation makes it very clear that significant rate increases will not happen in any absolute sense. Rates are declining across the globe, making U.S. nominal rates more attractive (even as they do nothing or, as shown in August, decline slightly) to global investors. Much to the dismay of those who wish the Fed to be truly the emperor of our economy, corporations (driven by the dynamic individuals who work at them) are innovating, competing, growing, and realigning their businesses for the future, regardless of what the Fed does or doesn’t do. We see the real markets offering U.S. companies many advantages in the recent rout: lower commodity and energy prices (costs), increased buying power for international expansion, and increased workplace attractiveness for an increasingly global labor force. U.S. workers — despite persistently flat nominal wages — are also benefiting tremendously from lower costs for many basic necessities as well as from the productivity or “enjoyment” enhancing values delivered by technology and Internet industries. As an example, 20 years ago, many well-off U.S. citizens owned a camera, a video camera, a CD player, a stereo, a video game console, a cellphone, a watch, an alarm clock, a set of encyclopedias, a world atlas, a Thomas Guide, and other assets that had a combined cost of more than $10,000. All of those items are now either standard on smartphones, or they can be purchased at an app store for less than the cost of a cup of coffee.

Drivers of Equity Market Performance

What does matter? Corporate and consumer fundamentals are driven by opportunities, changes, and challenges that are abundant in the real economy, the real world. And we see a lot of opportunity for growth, profit, and recovery. With that in mind, we believe stock markets will oscillate on uncertainty, but we believe the most likely outcome will be a sharp recovery for the markets into year-end and in 2016, the expert says. As an active equity manager with a research-driven, fundamental investment strategy, we think the potential for generating substantial returns by investing in leading companies that are innovating, growing, and taking advantage of incredible opportunities within the U.S. and global economy is highly attractive.