Foto: Leif and Evonne
. Nancy Bosley nombrada directora de desarrollo de negocio de Global Insurance Solutions Group
Nancy L. Bosley has been named Director of Strategic Business Development for Global Insurance Solutions Group (GISG), an independent insurance brokerage firm with offices in Greater Philadelphia and Miami, as announced by Michael Blank, managing partner. In this role, Bosley is responsible for the strategic development aspects of GISG, with specific emphasis on the firm’s expanded services for the international and domesticwealth management, private banking, and investment advisory channels.
Bosley most recently served as President of Transamerica Life Brokerage after serving as the organization’s Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, and Chief Sales Officer. Prior to joining Transamerica, Bosley served as President and Chief Executive Officer of LifeMark Partners, a national brokerage marketing organization. Bosley has been in the life insurance industry since 1980, first serving as a principal in Security House, for 20 years, an independent life brokerage firm.
“Our firm is privileged to be a recognized leader in insurance-based solutions for businesses and families world-wide. With the additional bench strength of Nancy, we are further positioned for expansion and growth in 2016 within the registered investment advisory and private banking channels,” said Blank. “Our expanded team further elevates our support model to assist wealth managers and private banks as they grow and scale their businesses.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrAndrea Mossetto, Investment Specialist of Parvest Diversified Dynamic Fund (BNP Paribas IP). Courtesy photo.. "In Markets, We Can Be More Confident That “Bad Will Be Bad” and “Good Will Be Good” When It Comes to News or Data”
Andrea Mossetto, Investment Specialist of Parvest Diversified Dynamic Fund (BNP Paribas IP), explains in this interview with Funds Society the secret of this strategy and the importance of flexibility in the current environment, as well as where the best opportunities.
According to the PDD dynamic multi asset strategy, which asset class do you currently think has more value?
In current financial markets, characterised by a declining influence of external stimulus, we can be more confident that “bad will be bad” and “good will be good” when it comes to news or data. This is a welcome development seeing how in the past “bad appeared good” given the uncertain environment brought about by central banks’ unconventional monetary policy.
In a “winner takes all” market, at first glance, performance will be the only parameter that investors take note of, with no distinction between the thousands of management styles populating this type of multi-asset investments still sustained by strong inflows across Europe.
Since the end of 2014, we at THEAM believe asset allocation flexibility has become paramount to limit drawdowns and turn market challenges into opportunities. Investment performance can come from the asset manager’s ability to efficiently capture market risk premiums. To accomplish this, six years ago THEAM built a strategy where the weightings allocated to the various asset classes are not set in stone and there are no guidelines favouring one asset class over another. At no time do these strategies hold just one asset class or focus, say, 60%, of the portfolio exposure on a single investment theme. Instead, funds are always invested in a range of assets and the mix is adjusted according to the realized volatility of each asset held in the portfolio.
Is it the right moment to invest in more risky assets within equities or should we be more cautious?
Our approach can meet the needs of investors who, in an environment that has become structurally more volatile, are looking for a strategy that seeks to provide a stable risk profile without sacrificing the potential return. Our ‘Isovol’ risk-based strategic asset allocation is designed to offer risk stability and exposure reactiveness in bull and bear markets. We are able to align a flexible asset allocation with market dynamics according to the realized volatility of each asset held in the portfolio.
With our approach, investors can still have exposure to asset classes that they perceive as risky, while relying on the fund managers to scrutinize those risks by using a range of monitoring tools and their knowhow. At the same time, they are invested in asset classes that are typically less volatile, less cyclical, etc. and that can act as a counterweight.
As a result of such a multi-pronged strategy, investors can expect the portfolio to be shifted into higher-yielding assets in rising markets to maximize returns, while in a downturn, an adjustment to a more risk-averse portfolio should ensure that losses are minimised. Such an approach should appeal to investors intuitively.
Is it necessary to include other type of asset classes in the portfolio to look for such a decorrelation and reach a truly diversified portfolio?
On top of the Risk-based Strategic Asset Allocation, our Medium-term opportunistic ‘diversification assets’ aim to contextualize the portfolio within a dynamically changing world. The aim of such opportunistic trades could be to hedge the portfolio against a growth slowdown, e.g. in China (by being long Australian 10-year government bond), and an unstable market environment (by being long gold). Being long the US dollar index should allow the strategy to benefit from gains in the dollar against G4 currencies.
Tactically, the fund manager may put in place hedging strategies to manage the market inflection points he identifies, even before a rebalancing signal has been activated.
Will investors’ demand for balanced funds continue to grow?
Flexible multi-asset funds can be a good way for investors to diversify their portfolio investments. Current economic conditions, with still low interest rates, a hesitant global economic recovery and geopolitics-related risk aversion, have reinforced the perception of many investors that their usual investments can no longer ensure the looked-for returns. In many financial markets, the heightened degree of uncertainty and the potential for volatility spikes remain a challenge.
We believe such a transparent approach helps investors understand the reasons for changes in the asset allocation and the risks they could incur. The EUR 2.3 bln AUMs progression we experienced since beginning 2014 is the investors answer to this these funds, well-suited for this environment, willing to invest over medium-term horizon.
What is the fund’s investment philosophy?
A key objective and benefit of this approach is to minimize losses in a downturn and maximize returns when markets are rising. By combining the strengths of our asset managers and calculation models, the strategy has outperformed the market peer group since the end of 2009. It is simple and intuitive on top of being well suited for client searching for a transparent and straightforward approach to be exposed to financial markets.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: OnCall team. Investor Demand For Real Assets Will Surge By 2020
Private equity, real estate and infrastructure managers anticipate strong growth in assets in the next five years, according to new research Building for the future: How alternative investment managers are rising the demographic challenge from BNY Mellon, prepared in collaboration with Preqin. the study surveyed 340 private equity, real estate and infrastructure fund managers globally.
Global macro-economic, social and environmental shifts are fuelling a need for investments in real assets, property and infrastructure worldwide. The report forecasts that appetite for these assets among retail and institutional investors will continue to grow. Sixty percent of infrastructure managers, 44% of real estate managers and 39% of private equity managers surveyed expect their assets under management to grow by at least 50% in the next five years.
“Deep-rooted demographic and macro forces are driving an unprecedented need for investment in real assets such as transport facilities, communications networks, housing and hospitals. These demands far outstrip the reach of government and public finances, and this creates huge opportunities for private capital to play a part in people’s everyday lives,” said Alan Flanagan, global head of Private Equity and Real Estate Fund Services at BNY Mellon.
While institutional investors, most notably pension funds and family offices, currently demonstrate the biggest appetite for real investments, almost half of the private equity and real estate fund managers surveyed believe that retail investors will account for a higher level of capital inflows by 2020 than they do today. Investment will come from mass affluent and high net worth individuals in developing markets, the continued expansion of sovereign wealth funds, and increasing numbers of defined contribution schemes.
“Investors are turning more and more to real assets to find yield, diversify their portfolios, and steer through volatile markets,” said Flanagan. “The growth in real asset investments has been impressive and there is no sign of it slowing down. As a result, the marketplace has become increasingly competitive on deal sourcing, presenting challenges for managers to successfully deploy the capital they have raised.”
The majority of alternative investment managers surveyed have seen institutional investor appetite for real assets climb over the last 12 months. A third of real estate and 41% of infrastructure managers are seeing the most demand coming from public pension funds, followed by private sector pension funds. Private equity managers see the greatest interest coming from family offices, followed by public pension funds (26% and 25% respectively). The survey also revealed that more than a third of infrastructure and real estate fund managers had altered their investment approach, either by diversifying their assets or exploring different geographies and niche strategies.
The need for transparency, driven by clients and regulators, is prompting a growing number of managers to consider outsourcing certain functions. Overall, two-thirds of fund managers across all asset classes feel regulation might lead to outsourcing in the future. Cost was the most commonly stated reason to outsource, in addition to having access to enriched data and analytics from an outsourcing provider and access to the expertise of external staff.
“Investment managers’ business models must have flexibility to thrive in such a fast-evolving environment and also be able to meet growing regulatory reporting as well as institutional investor demands for transparency,” added Flanagan. “To maintain strong allocations and achieve sustainable growth, it’s vital that managers of assets are invested in their infrastructure and supported by the right operating models.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Atli Hardarson. Do You Need Inflation Protection?
“We believe inflation risks are underappreciated and underpriced. Now may be an opportune time for forward-thinking investors to add inflation risk management to their portfolios,” says Stewart Taylor, Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio Manager at Eaton Vance on the company’s blog.
According to Taylor, it’s easy to understand the lack of investor demand for this asset class. The CITI Inflation Surprise Index has been negative 52 of the last 53 months. With the exception of the financial crisis, year-over-year (YOY) headline CPI has been lower than at any point since the late 1960s.
“What many investors don’t appreciate is how persistent weakness in energy and food prices has hidden the underlying growth in services inflation. While energy and food represent only 21% of the CPI, they explain about 80% of its change,” he says while highlighting:
Spot WTI crude is down 55% from June 2014, while the S&P Goldman Sachs Food Index is down roughly 50% from its 2011 high.
Over this same period, the YOY run rate for services inflation has averaged 2.5% and has climbed above 3% over the past few months.
Because of this, Eaton Vance believes that the bear market in food is over and that the energy bear market is either over or in its very late stages. “Strength in energy and food should quickly translate to higher goods CPI, which, in turn, should help boost the already elevated services CPI. There is also evidence of increasing wage pressures. The 3.4% YOY growth in the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker in April is the strongest growth since February 2009. Historically, wage pressures have been associated with periods of higher inflation” Taylor writes.
The April CPI highlighted the changing inflation dynamic: The month-over-month change in headline CPI (0.4%) was the biggest monthly gain since February 2013. Also, at 2.1%, YOY Core CPI is now above the Fed’s 2% target; at 1.6%, YOY Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) (the Fed’s desired metric) is approaching its 2% target.
The trend in year-over-year Core CPI bottomed in early 2015 and has since been moving higher. Several alternate CPI measures that attempt to remove the most volatile index components to better ascertain the underlying trend also confirm this.
Taylor and his team think that investors are beginning to realize that the bear markets in energy and food are near an end. After roughly a year of outflows, net flows into TIPS funds and ETFs have turned positive over the past two months (ended April 2016), while break-even inflation rates on 5-year TIPS have begun to price in higher expected inflation. “We think these trends are still in their early innings.” And that “inflation assets are inexpensive relative to growing inflation risks.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Ines Hegedus-Garcia
. Bolton Global Capital incorpora al equipo de Alex Astudillo
Bolton Global Capital recently announced that Alex Astudillo has joined the firm’s Miami office. Alex held the position of Senior Vice President with Merrill Lynch where he worked for the past 14 years and built a successful international wealth management practice with $173 million in client assets and $1.8 million in annual revenues. “We are proud to have such a distinguished professional affiliate with our organization and look forward to supporting the continued growth of his business.” stated Ray Grenier, CEO of Bolton. Angela Canas will manage client support operations for the team which will be branded under the name Private Wealth Advisors. Angela has been with Merrill Lynch for the past 9 years.
With the acquisition of the Astudillo team, Bolton is continuing to establish its position as a premier destination for top wirehouse teams transitioning to the independent business model. Over the past 3 years, the firm’s Miami office has acquired seven major teams from Merrill Lynch and a half dozen other teams from Morgan Stanley, RBC Wealth Management as well as Citi and HSBC Private Banks.
The Bolton Massachusetts based firm offers teams with $100 million or more in AUM, access to a wealth management platform with all of the capabilities of the major firms for both domestic and international business. Even with robust growth in AUM over the last five years, Bolton is highly selective in accepting new teams. According to Grenier “Quality is our number one criteria for affiliation. The most successful teams in the business generally focus on client satisfaction and on mitigating portfolio exposure to losses. Affiliating with the highest quality professionals is the key to sustainable growth in the wealth management industry.
Foto: Jeff Djevdet. Irlanda, Malta, Bélgica, Holanda, Chipre y Luxemburgo, los más afectados si se produce el Brexit
An exit from the EU by the UK (‘Brexit’) would weigh on the economies of other EU countries and increase political risks in Europe, Fitch Ratings says.
They mention that although they would not expect to take any immediate negative rating actions on other EU sovereigns if the UK left, negative actions would become more likely in the medium term if the economic impact were severe or significant political risks materialised.
“The economic impact of a yes vote in the 23 June referendum would be lower for the EU than for the UK, but would still be palpable. It would reduce EU exports to the UK, although the extent would depend on the nature of any UK-EU trade deal and the degree and duration of sterling depreciation.” The most exposed countries would be Ireland, Malta, Belgium, the Netherlands, Cyprus and Luxembourg, all of whose exports of goods and services to the UK are at least 8% of GDP.
EU countries could gain from the shift of some FDI from the UK to the EU. However, countries such as Luxembourg, Malta, Belgium and Germany, with a large stock of FDI and financial assets in the UK, would suffer losses in the euro value of those assets if there were a permanent depreciation of sterling. The banking sectors of Ireland, Malta, Luxembourg, Spain, France and Germany have sizeable links to that of the UK.
Brexit would reduce the UK’s contribution to the EU budget (a net EUR7.1bn in 2014 after rebates), potentially to zero. This would imply that other net contributors would have to increase payments, or net recipients accept lower EU expenditure. Brexit would create a precedent for countries leaving the EU. “It could boost anti-EU or other populist political parties, and make EU leaders more reluctant to implement unpopular policies with long-term economic benefits. Negotiating the terms of the UK’s exit could exhaust the EU’s time and energy and open up new fronts of disagreement. Brexit could shift the centre of gravity of the EU, making it more dominated by the eurozone core, poorer, more protectionist and less economically liberal. If the UK were to thrive outside of the EU, it might encourage other countries to follow suit.”
Brexit could precipitate Scotland leaving the UK, which might intensify secessionist pressures in other parts of the EU, such as Catalonia in Spain.
Fears of other countries leaving could widen bond spreads for “peripheral” countries, potentially increasing the average cost of debt and making it more challenging to reduce government debt/GDP ratios.
Fitch is not recommending any particular position, vote or outcome regarding the referendum vote on June 23rd 2016. If you want to read their report titled “‘Brexit’ Would Raise Downside Risks to EU Sovereigns”, follow this link.
Photo: Sriyan Pietersz. Prominent ASEAN Analyst Sriyan Pietersz Joins Matthews Asia As Investment Strategist
Matthews Asia has announced the appointment of Sriyan Pietersz as Investment Strategist.
In this newly created role, Sriyan will be a key member of the investment team, responsible for developing research focused on economic and political developments within ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and frontier markets in Asia. His in-depth knowledge and unique insights into the region will support the Matthews Asia investment team and complement their wider research efforts.
Sriyan will also play a key role in representing the firm’s deep expertise of the developments in the ASEAN region and frontier markets to the firm’s clients and prospects around the world. He will act as a spokesperson for the firm on ASEAN and play an important role in the delivery of Matthews Asia’s thought leadership initiatives related to investing in Asia.
Prior to joining the firm, Sriyan was a Managing Director at J.P. Morgan Investment Bank, where he spent over 11 years with responsibilities spanning both equity research and distribution. As Head of ASEAN and Frontier Markets Equity Research, he was responsible for formulating country equity investment strategy for Thailand/Vietnam, regional Southeast Asia asset allocation, thematic strategy, and macro/strategy on Asian frontier markets, as well as managing a team of 18 equity research analysts. A member of the Asia Pacific Research senior management team, Sriyan was consistently ranked in the Top-3 in Institutional Investor sell-side research polls during his time at J.P. Morgan. Subsequently, he spent time in equity sales as Head of ASEAN Equity Distribution. Prior to this, he spent over 10 years in senior equity research roles in Asia, managing teams of equity analysts and conducting both macroeconomic and equity analysis.
William Hackett, Chief Executive Officer: “We are very pleased to welcome Sriyan to Matthews Asia. With almost three decades of experience focused on ASEAN countries, he is considered one of the leading authorities on the region’s economy and equity markets. Our global client base will undoubtedly benefit from his insight and analysis into the ASEAN region. I am delighted we have been able to attract someone of Sriyan’s calibre to the firm and as we continue to see the region’s equity markets develop and new frontier markets begin to open to investors, his appointment further cements our reputation as a leading, forward-thinking Asia-specialist investment manager.”
Robert Horrocks, PhD, Chief Investment Officer: “With nearly three decades of experience conducting both country and equity analysis into the ASEAN region, Sriyan has developed a deep understanding of the region’s markets and the growing role they play in Asia’s economy. His considerable expertise will further enhance the knowledge that already resides within our investment team and help develop our thoughts around how we invest in these countries.”
Sriyan Pietersz, Investment Strategist: “I’m delighted to have this opportunity to join Matthews Asia, a leading Asia investment specialist, and privileged to work with and learn from an investment team that has delivered outstanding returns for its investors over the long term.”
Foto: Randen Pederson
. Los inversores estadounidenses asignan erróneamente a los ETFs beneficios que no tienen
More than three-quarters of investors agree that index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are a cheaper way to invest, but 71% also believe they are less risky, according to new research published by Natixis Global Asset Management. The findings suggest that many investors have expectations that don’t reflect a full understanding of the risks of index funds versus the benefits.
“It is critical to understand the risks in your portfolio, so it’s troubling to see investors mistakenly assign benefits to index funds that they don’t actually have”
The asset management firm commissioned an independent survey of 750 individual investors in the U.S., from the affluent to the high net worth. It found that: 64% of investors think using index funds will help minimize investment losses; 69% believe index funds offer better diversification; And 61% believe index funds provide access to the best investment opportunities in the market.
However, investors expecting lower risk may have been surprised at the start of 2016 when the Standard & Poor’s 500 had its worst opening since 1928. The index bottomed out on February 11, having fallen 10.5% since trading began in January. The market did rebound, finishing the quarter 0.7% ahead. But tracking the index would have resulted in a hair-raising ride. And while the first quarter might be seen as an anomaly, volatility in markets is not.
“It is critical to understand the risks in your portfolio, so it’s troubling to see investors mistakenly assign benefits to index funds that they don’t actually have,” said John Hailer, CEO of Natixis Global Asset Management for the Americas and Asia. “Index funds have a place in portfolios, but their low cost seems to be providing a ‘halo effect’ that could blind-side investors during volatile markets.”
Professional investors see the role for passive investing differently. Recent surveys of both institutional investors and financial advisors by the asset manager showed they preferred active strategies to take advantage of market movements, generate alpha and provide risk-adjusted returns, while viewing passive investing primarily as a way to save on management fees.
Investors willing to use new investment strategies
The survey finds evidence that investors are willing to move beyond 60/40 allocation investment approaches. Nearly two-thirds (65%) say a traditional approach (equities and bonds) to portfolio allocation is no longer the best way to pursue returns and manage investments.
Further, 70% of investors want new strategies that are less tied to broad markets and 75% favor strategies that can help them better diversify their portfolio, an approach that would seem to open the door to wider ownership of alternative investments.
But just over half of investors (52%) surveyed actually own alternative assets, a grouping that includes private equity, long-short funds, hedge funds and real estate.
Investors who don’t own alternatives say the assets are too risky (56%); 34% acknowledge they don’t understand how alternatives work, and 28% don’t think they need alternatives.
Investors say learning more about investing is the number one thing that would help them better achieve their investment objectives – adding to their financial knowledge was named by 42% of respondents.
“It is encouraging to see investors are looking beyond traditional asset classes to build portfolios designed to help them reach their financial goals through the widest range of potential market conditions,” said Hailer. “However, it is clear the financial industry still needs to provide more education to help investors make informed decisions.”
About the survey Natixis surveyed 750 individual investors across the United States with a minimum of $200,000 in investable assets. The online survey was conducted in February 2016 and is part of a larger global study of 7,100 investors in 21 countries from Asia, Europe, the Americas and the Middle East. The findings are published in a new whitepaper, “Help Wanted: How investor behavior is rewriting the job description for financial professionals.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, Flickr. AXA to Sell Its Investment, Pensions and Direct Protection Businesses in the UK to Phoenix Group Holdings
AXA announced today that it had entered into an agreement with Phoenix Group Holdings to sell its (non-platform) investment and pensions business and its direct protection business (Sunlife) in the UK. Completion of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of regulatory approvals, and is expected to occur in the second semester 2016.
The overall consideration for the sale of the UK Life & Savings businesses, including the transaction announced today, the sale of the offshore investment bonds business based in the Isle of Man announced on April 28th, and the sale of the wrap platform Elevate announced on May 4th would amount to ca. GBP 632 million (or ca. Euro 832 million). These transactions would generate an exceptional negative P&L impact of ca. Euro 0.4 billion accounted for in net income.
The operations affected by these transactions will be treated as discontinued operations in AXA’s 2016 consolidated financial statements. As a consequence, their earnings will be accounted for in Net Income until the closing date.
Photo: Ennor. Alvaro Morales Appointed New Head of the Santander Global Private Banking Team
Santander is currently experiencing an overhaul of its Private Banking division. Amongst the most important changes is Alvaro Morales’ promotion to Head of Santader’s Global Private Banking team. He will continue to be based out of Miami, where up until now, he served as Head of Santander International Private Banking.
According to an internal memo by Angel Rivera, Head of Retail and Commercial Banking for Banco Santander, to which Funds Society had access, “The Retail and Commercial Banking division will also play a central role in the development of the Group’s Private Banking business, in the direct management of International Private Banking and in the support given to domestic private banks in the various geographies, taking greater advantage of the synergies of our international platform and all of the countries.”
The aim, according to the memo, is to continue improving the specialization of Santander Private Banking’s advisory service model with a segmented offer and a personalized specialist service model that provides each customer tailored solutions.
Morales has been working close to Santander since 1999 when he joined the group as Regional Director for Banco Banif. In 2007 he moved to London to run the UK’s Private Banking business of the bank. By 2009 he became Head of Santander International Private Banking and moved to Miami.
Carlos Díaz will remain in charge of products and market intelligence and will work with Álvaro in managing this unit. Blanca Vilallonga will now will be responsible for coordinating the division’s activities, implementing new ways of working, monitoring projects, ensuring compliance with work plans and measuring the impact they have on the organization.
Through the same internal memo Rivera signaled the following appointments:
Angel Rivera will directly assume leadership of Digital Transformation coordinating with the area of Innovation and with each country. It is a shared responsibility throughout the Group. Alberto Fernández Tomé will lead the Digital Solutions team, and Julián Colombo will continue to head the CRM and Business Intelligence team.
Fernando Lardies will be in charge of the new Network Banking project, wheras Javier Castrillo will be in charge of the Commercial Strategy and Best Practices team which includes:
Ignacio Narvarte who will be in charge of Means of Payment (issuing and acquiring).
Francisco del Cura who will remain in charge of Insurance
Frederico Bastos who will remain in charge of Businesses
Ignacio Gomez-Llano who will remain in charge of Quality and Customer Satisfaction
The memo also included Rivera’s appreciation to Gonzalo Algorri, former group director of Global Private Banking Santander, “for his contribution to the development of the Private Banking business and to all our colleagues who have left the Bank in recent weeks, for their contributions.”
