Pershing, a BNY Mellon company, has announced the launch of new mutual fund and exchange-traded fund solutions, offered by its affiliate, Lockwood Advisors. These will meet the needs of investors starting to build wealth and help registered reps navigate the Department of Labor’s (DOL) fiduciary rule requirements.
Pershing’s new Lockwood WealthStart Portfolios mutual fund and ETF offering, along with new solutions provided by third-party providers, both feature a diverse range of asset allocation strategies and a minimum balance of $10,000.
These portfolios include a number of asset allocation strategies targeted at investors with varying risk profiles. The strategies can be accessed through diversified risk-based model portfolios from some of the industry’s leading firms, including Pershing affiliate Lockwood.
“These flexible mutual fund and ETF solutions demonstrate our ongoing commitment to providing financial professionals with the tools they need to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and grow their business,” said Joel Hempel, chief operating officer of Lockwood. “They may also assist registered reps who are considering a transition from a commission-based brokerage model to fee-based advisory relationships.”
The new offering is fully integrated into Pershing’s flagship NetX360 professional platform, and advisors can access them through Lockwood’s turnkey managed account solution, Managed360 or by using Pershing’s managed investments platform.
“Emerging and mass-affluent investors can now have greater access to professionally managed investment solutions,” said Hempel. “These investors represent a large, often underserved market. By offering a suite of diversified risk-based portfolios to this segment, advisors and registered reps can serve new clients and take advantage of cross-generational opportunities.”
Looking ahead, Lockwood will continue to evaluate managers to participate in its third-party offerings to provide more opportunity for financial professionals to grow their business and for investors to accumulate wealth.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Elanaspantry, Flickr, Creative Commons. Morgan Stanley IM Launches Global Balanced and Global Balanced Defensive Funds
Morgan Stanley Investment Management has announced the launch of two new multi-asset funds, the Morgan Stanley Investment Funds (MS INVF) Global Balanced Fund and the MS INVF Global Balanced Defensive Fund.
The underlying investment process for the two funds mirrors that of the existing Global Balanced Risk Control (GBaR) strategy, which is designed to maintain a stable risk profile. The funds are the first in the GBaR suite to incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into the process.
The chief difference between the funds is their targeted volatility. The Global Balanced Fund targets a volatility range of 4 to 10%. The Global Balanced Defensive Fund has a lower target volatility range of 2 to 6%.
Both funds will be managed by Andrew Harmstone and Manfred Hui in London. “The new funds will be based on our established GBaR process, which in our view is the most effective way for investors to participate in rising markets whilst providing strong downside protection,” said Mr. Harmstone, managing director and lead portfolio manager. “We expect the integration of ESG considerations into the process to further improve potential returns and enhance risk management.”
“Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s extensive multi-asset capabilities are reinforced by the addition of these two new funds,” said Paul Price, global head of Client Coverage, Morgan Stanley Investment Management. “Clients now have greater choice in the implementation of GBaR’s risk-controlled approach and their preferred level of volatility.”
The MS INVF Global Balanced Fund and the MS INVF Global Balanced Defensive Fund, registered in Luxembourg, are not yet widely available for sale and are awaiting registration in various markets. They are intended for sophisticated and diversified investors or those who take investment advice.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: peasap
. Samuel Nunez joins Bolton´s San Diego Office
Bolton Global Capital announced this week that Samuel Nunezhas joined the firm. Nunez has spent the last 23 years as a financial advisor with Merrill Lynch, compiling a client book of $125 million with annual revenues of $1 million. His clients are primarily located in Mexico and the US.
Nunez will be joining Bolton’s San Diego office, which was opened recently under the name TransAtlantic Investment Partners. James Jiao, a former Merrill Lynch complex manager and FA who left the firm last year after working 18 years, established this office. Jiao began his career in 1990 with Deutsche Bank in Germany as a portfolio manager and then transferred to Deutsche Morgan Grenfell in New York as a Private Bank Manager in 1994.
Over the last year, Bolton has recruited 8 teams from Merrill Lynch with client assets totaling approximately $1.5 billion. Typically, advisors who join Bolton operate under their own brand name using Bolton to provide compliance, back office, trading and technology support with client assets held by BNY Mellon-Pershing and other custodians.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Lain. China: How Serious is the Debt Issue?
Emerging Markets (EMs) continue to drive global growth, with China still accounting for the lion’s share. However, China’s increasing debt remains a significant concern for global investors. Pioneer Investments’ Economist Qinwei Wang, takes a closer look at China’s debt situation.
After reviewing the recent developments around the debt issue, Pioneer has not changed their view that China can still avoid a systematic crisis in the near term, “as the issue remains largely a domestic problem and in the state sector.”
“Looking into the composition, China’s debt issues are largely within the country, unlike typical cases in EMs. Its external balance sheet still looks relatively resilient as China continues to run current account surpluses. China has also been building up net foreign assets over the last decade, and is one of the largest net lenders in the world and domestic savings remains high enough to fund investments.”
In addition, looking at domestic markets, Pioneer believes the situation still looks manageable. In fact, the borrowers have been largely in the state sector, directly or indirectly, through various government entities or SOEs. The lenders are also mainly state-linked, with banks (state dominant) making loans, holding bonds or channelling a big part of shadow activities.
The People’s Bank of China has prepared plenty of tools to avoid a liquidity squeeze, with capital controls still relatively effective, at least with respect to short-term flows. Ultimately, the government has enough resources to bail out the banking sector or major SOEs if necessary to prevent systemic risks.
The private sector does not appear to present big concerns, at least for now. In particular, on the property side, following the major correction since 2013, the health of the sector looks to be improving, although there is still a long way to go in smaller cities. Households have been leveraging up, but their debt levels are still relatively low with saving rates remaining high.
“We are not too concerned about existing troubled debt, as there are possible solutions to clean it up while avoiding a systemic crisis, and the implementation process has already started. The more challenging issue is how to prevent the generation of new bad debt.” Says Wang.
He believes that a first step in this direction is to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. Ongoing financial reforms, including the liberalization of interest rates, bond markets, IPOs, private banking, a more flexible FX regime as well as the opening of onshore interbank markets over the last couple of years are positive attempts in his view.
Continued efforts to shift towards a more market-driven monetary policy transmission mechanism is also helping. In addition, the anti-corruption campaign has also effectively added relatively better supervision of the state sector. That said, SOE reforms have been relatively slow, with mixed signals, although we see certain positive developments, such as individual defaults allowed and a pledge to remove their public functions.
Preventing new problematic debt levels from rising again in the future will also require strengthened financial regulations. We think a large part of the new forms of finance, or so-called shadow banking activities, are the result of financial liberalization. The current segmented regulation system is unlikely to keep pace with the rapid financial innovation across sectors and products. This will be an issue to monitor going forward.
“From an investment perspective we keep our preference for China’s “new economy” sectors, which could benefit from the move towards a more service-driven economy.” Wang concludes.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: fancycrave1 / Pixabay. La clase media-alta de Reino Unido se decanta por la banca online
Research by financial services research and insight firm Verdict Financial has found that the UK’s mass affluents, compared to non-mass affluents, are heavier users of online and mobile banking, are more likely to favor these channels for routine activities, and are more satisfied with the performance of digital banking channels.
The company’s latest report finds that among those who use online banking, 89% of mass affluents accessed this channel at least once a week, compared to 83% of non-mass affluents. For mobile banking, the equivalent weekly usage figures were 83% and 79%, respectively.
Furthermore, mass affluents are slightly more inclined to use digital channels to carry out activities such as checking their balance, paying bills, and managing their direct debits.
Daoud Fakhri, Principal Analyst for Retail Banking at Verdict Financial, states: “Mass affluents are more confident about financial management than other consumers, finding it easier, for example, to keep track of their day-to-day spending. As such, they are more at home using digital self-service channels and less reliant on speaking to bank staff, whether in-branch or in a call center.”
Verdict Financial’s report also found that mass affluents were more satisfied than other consumers with the functionality, usability, and security of digital channels, especially mobile. For example, while only 36% of non-mass affluents were very satisfied with mobile banking security, this rose to 45% of mass affluents.
Fakhri continues: “The high level of enthusiasm for digital banking among mass affluents is good news for the banking industry. Banks are trying hard to migrate their customers to their online and mobile banking platforms, which incur far lower operational costs than branch networks and call centers, and it appears that mass affluents are happier than non-mass affluents to go along with this.
“Given that mass affluents are a highly attractive demographic in terms of their revenue-generating potential, there is clearly a strong incentive for banks to continue developing their digital channels by adding new functionality and improving ease of use.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: Gideon Benari. Los precavidos inversores de renta fija europea podrían estar sacrificando el rendimiento
Tom Ross, Co-Manager of the Henderson Horizon Euro Corporate Bond Fund, and Vicky Browne, Fixed Income Analyst, look at the impact of the European Central Bank’s corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP).
What is the CSPP?
The corporate sector purchase programme (or CSPP as it is commonly known) was established by the European Central Bank (ECB) and began purchasing bonds on 8 June 2016. The CSPP is a form of monetary policy, which aims to help inflation rates return to levels below, but close to, 2% in the medium term and improve the financing conditions of economies within the Eurozone.
Purchases can be made in both the primary and secondary market. By the end of July 2016 – eight weeks into the programme – secondary market purchases formed 94% of purchases with only 6% being made in the primary market according to data from the ECB.
Which bonds are eligible for purchase?
Bonds purchasable under the scheme must be investment-grade euro-denominated bonds issued by non-bank corporations established (or incorporated) in the euro area. In assessing the eligibility of an issuer, the ECB will consider where the issuer is established rather than the ultimate parent. Thus an issuer incorporated in the Euro area, but whose ultimate parent company is not established in the Euro area, such as Unilever, is deemed eligible for purchase.
How have markets responded to CSPP so far?
To date the ECB has bought 478 bonds totalling approximately €11.85bn from 165 issuers (UniCredit as of 27 July 2016). The list of these bonds (but not the quantities purchased) is available on the websites of the national central banks performing the buying. Analysing these holdings would suggest that, on an industry sector basis, considerable CSPP purchasing has occurred in utilities and consumer non-cyclicals.
In June non-financial credit spreads initially responded positively to the CSPP purchases. However, excess credit returns over the month (returns over equivalent government bonds) detracted from total returns as market volatility increased as a result of the UK voting to leave the EU. Concerns surrounding the vote led to a temporary pull-back in demand for credit and this negative headwind overpowered the positive technical effect from CSPP.
July proved to be a stronger month for credit market performance. The European investment grade market – as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch Euro Corporate Index – delivered a total return of +1.68% in July in euro terms and excess credit returns of +1.61% (source: Bloomberg at 31 July 2016). Undoubtedly, these positive movements have been partly driven by CSPP purchases as illustrated by the graph below. It reveals how spread performance – a declining spread indicates stronger returns – of the iBoxx Euro Corporate Index has been more pronounced in eligible bonds than non-eligible or senior bank assets.
However July’s returns are not just attributable to the technical support provided by the CSPP. An improvement in market sentiment driven by reduced fears about Brexit, together with a rise in flows into bond funds, has helped to increase demand for the asset class at a time when there is a lack of European investment grade supply.
How has the fund benefited from CSPP?
The Henderson Horizon Euro Corporate Bond Fund was positioned long credit and duration risk versus the index throughout June. Although the fund still trades with a long beta bias we have lowered risk levels over the past few weeks by reducing exposure to positions that have benefited from the recent rally in credit markets. Examples of these are euro-denominated bonds from utility companies Centrica and Redexis Gas, and US real estate investment trust WP Carey.
In July, the fund added to positions from CSPP-eligible issuers on a name-specific basis such as Aroundtown Property, Telenor and RELX Group. Exposure has not just been increased in CSPP-eligible issues but also in companies we favour that are not incorporated in the euro area, such as US names AT&T (in EUR) and Comcast and CVS Health (in USD). The CSPP technical has also been apparent in the primary market. The fund benefited in July from participating in a euro- denominated new issue from Deutsche Bahn, which has performed strongly post issuance. Positive fund performance has also come from a new issue from Teva Pharmaceuticals, which has seen solid demand since coming to the market.
While CSPP should help to provide technical support to European investment grade corporates, there exist several uncertainties in the market – such as the October referendum in Italy and instability in commodity prices – that could cause weakness to arise. We therefore continue to look to reduce risk into further strength while seeking to take advantage of any attractive opportunities presented by volatility or weakness.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrMichel Rittenberg . Michel Rittenberg, in Charge of Wunderlich Miami
Wunderlich, a leading full-service investment firm headquartered in Memphis, recently announced that Michel Rittenberg has joined its wealth management team as manager of the firm’s Miami branch. Rittenberg, a 36-year veteran of the financial services industry, was previously with Raymond James & Associates.
“Michel is a well-respected industry professional who will expand our presence in Miami and Coral Gables,” said Jim Parrish, president of Wunderlich’s Wealth Management division. “Having previously been colleagues at Morgan Keegan & Co. for many years, I know that his positive management style and ability to help elevate advisors’ careers will be a tremendous asset to Wunderlich. I’m thrilled to have him join our team.”
Prior to Raymond James, Rittenberg was a branch manager for Morgan Keegan & Co. in Miami from 2005 to 2012. Before that, he was New York City complex manager for H&R Block Financial Advisor and a managing director for Prudential Global Derivatives in New York. He began his career at Merrill Lynch. Rittenberg is a graduate of Beloit (Wisconsin) College and received his MBA from the Thunderbird School of Global Management at Arizona State University.
“Wunderlich is an impressive firm with a bright future, and I’ll be working with a group of true professionals in the Miami branch,” said Rittenberg, who will oversee the branch that was once part of Dominick & Dominick before being acquired by Wunderlich in 2015. “I am proud and happy to be here and look forward to growing our presence in the greater Miami area in the months ahead.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: RonKikuchi, Flickr, Creative Commons. Lombard Odier expande sus capacidades de distribución a través de un acuerdo con Novia
Lombard Odier Investment Management continues to develop its distribution capabilities by making some of its mutual funds available through the Novia Financial and Novia Global Platforms for the first time.
The 17 Lombard Odier IM funds available through Novia Global include some of the group’s most well-known strategies, such as the Convertible Bond fund and Golden Age fund, which invests in equities globally that are expected to benefit as populations grow older.
The inclusion of the 17 funds, many of which are already available on Hargreaves Lansdown’s and Cofunds investment platforms, further builds the group’s distribution footprint.
Novia Global is a multi-currency wealth management service which was launched to the market in October 2015. The platform is available to advisers dealing in the international market, private banks, trust companies and their clients as well as certain other professional investors. Supporting residents (individuals and trusts) based in the Channel Islands, Isle of Man, Switzerland and Europe, Novia Global recently announced the extension of jurisdictions.
“We want to make our diverse range of differentiated funds more readily available to advisers and their clients, and our latest partnership with Novia Group is a reflection of this aim,” said Dominick Peasley, head of Third Party Distribution at Lombard Odier IM.
“We are thrilled to be continually adding to the burgeoning selection of assets on the Global platform and we now offer over 1500 funds on the platform from 67 fund managers and we recently announced the launch of a new DFM service,” said Dave Field, head of Customer Service at Novia Global.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: Dafne Cholet. Qué esperar del último trimestre del año en los mercados
The summer, while investors turned their attention to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, the Olympics in Brazil trading has been light.
But what can be expected for the rest of the year? According to Edward J. Perkin, Chief Equity Investment Officer at Eaton Vance Management, “the second half of the year is chock full of likely market catalysts, including potential Brexit fallout, the upcoming presidential election, Fed meetings and more. Against this uncertain backdrop, we continue to believe that equity investors should remain focused and opportunistic.”
For the specialist these are the dates to keep in mind:
September
September is likely to be a busy month. Post-Labor Day is when many voters will begin to pay close attention to the presidential election. Having skipped August, the Fed will meet again on September 21 to make a decision on rates.
There are also a large number of industry conferences, where company management teams will give updates on their businesses. One of these, the “Back to School” conference, held each year in Boston, involves the largest consumer companies.
September is also important in that it is the third month of the quarter. Many companies have “blackout” periods in the final weeks of each quarter and into the early part of the next quarter, when they report earnings. During these blackout periods, companies suspend their share buyback programs in order to avoid accusations of trading on material, nonpublic information. Given how important corporate buybacks have become to the market, this temporary removal of demand for equities has coincided with several of the market’s pullbacks in the past two years.
October
Like July, October is a busy month for corporate earnings releases. With three quarters of the year complete, companies and investors will begin to think about 2017 and the trajectory of earnings into the approaching year. We will likely have a presidential debate in October, perhaps the only debate of this cycle. Television ratings may well set records.
November 8 – Election Day
At the November 2 Fed meeting, Janet Yellen and her colleagues are likely to take no action in order to avoid roiling markets six days prior to Election Day. We expect the market to be focused on the election throughout the summer and into autumn. If the likely result appears clear, Election Day may not produce much of a market reaction. Regardless of who wins the presidency, the equity market may prefer to see the same party capture the House of Representatives and the Senate. The reasoning would be that a new president will be more effective if he/she has the support of Congress.
Under either party, increased fiscal stimulus in 2017 seems likely. This could include corporate tax reform (lowering rates, reducing deductions and encouraging companies to repatriate overseas cash) and an infrastructure spending bill. If modest regulatory relief is also part of the agenda, then the economic outlook for 2017 may be stronger than many currently believe.
November 30 – OPEC meeting in Vienna
OPEC typically meets twice a year, with its next meeting to be held six days after Thanksgiving. At its November 2014 meeting, OPEC surprised global oil markets by maintaining an elevated level of production, which exacerbated the already-falling price of crude. “We expect supply and demand to continue to rebalance between now and the end of 2016. A production cut at the November meeting would be supportive of oil prices, but is unlikely, in our view.” He notes.
December 14 – Final Fed meeting of 2016
In December 2015, the Fed raised the federal funds rate by 0.25%, which led, in part, to market volatility in early 2016. The expectation at the beginning of 2016 was that the Fed had embarked on a path to normalize the level of interest rates. In the first half of the year, however, the Fed failed to follow through with further rate increases. The market has begun to doubt the Fed’s will: At around midyear, the implied probability of a rate increase on or before the December 14 meeting stood at less than 11%.
December is also the month when many investors choose to conduct tax loss harvesting, selling losers in their portfolios to take advantage of the tax benefit that comes from booking the loss before the end of the year. This activity sometimes puts further pressure on stocks that have performed poorly earlier in the year.
Stay focused and opportunistic
The second half of 2016 is full of potential catalysts – including not only the specter of further Brexit turmoil, but also Fed meetings, a presidential election, corporate earnings and incoming economic data. There will likely be a few surprises along the way. “In our equity portfolios at Eaton Vance, we are staying focused on the long-term prospects of our holdings and will look to take advantage of any opportunities thrown our way by the uncertainty of these events.” He concludes.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrFoto: AdamSelwood, Flickr, Creative Commons. La inversión en ETFs de smart beta crecerá un 25% en los próximos tres años
The amount of assets invested in smart-beta ETFs, which are not based on traditional, market capitalization-weighted indexes, could grow by 25% over the next three years, according to new research from Ignites Distribution Research, a Financial Times service.
“Smart beta” (also known as strategic beta, factor-based indexing and other names) has become one of the hottest concepts in asset management, and especially in ETFs. As of mid-2016, the U.S. market featured over $460 billion in assets invested in more than 600 smart-beta ETFs, according to Morningstar.
Of the 740 financial advisors surveyed by Ignites Distribution Research across broker-dealer and registered investment advisor (RIA) channels, 35% are currently using smart-beta ETFs. “That’s significant, but it’s a notably lower percentage than those using traditional ETFs — which suggests plenty of room to grow”, says the report.
“Our growth expectation is based on the fact that once advisors start using smart-beta ETFs they’re very likely to boost allocations to them. Among the smart-beta ETF users we surveyed, 78% of them plan to increase their overall AUM in smart-beta strategies over the next three years. Of the 78% planning an increase, 14% of advisors are considering increasing their overall AUM in smart-beta ETFs by 11% or more. Extrapolating those dollars to the broader advisor universe suggests more than $100 billion in net new flows to smart-beta ETFs over the next three years even if no new advisors start using them”.
However, more advisors are expected to start using smart-beta ETFs. Of the advisors Ignites surveyed who don’t use smart-beta ETFs, 17.5% are considering using them. Meanwhile, 52% of advisors don’t have plans to use smart-beta ETFs but are open to learning more.
Those findings are contained in Ignites Distribution Research’s new report, The Opportunity in Smart-Beta ETFs, which examines not just the potential for smart-beta ETFs but how advisors are using them and how asset managers can best address this burgeoning market.
“The payoff can be big for purveyors of active management because smart-beta ETFs can command significantly higher fees than traditional ETFs. Already a number of fund firms that typically eschew passive products have drawn on their active expertise to enter the smart-beta ETF market,” says Loren Fox, the director of Ignites Distribution Research and a co-author of the report. “As additional firms add to an increasing number of smart-beta ETFs, it becomes more important to understand how advisors are deploying these products and where there are genuine openings in the market.”
One of the key findings of the report is that financial advisors using smart-beta ETFs view the concept — taking a rules-based approach to gain exposure to a single factor, multiple factors, or even a strategy — as somewhere between active and passive management. The report reveals how often advisors use smart-beta ETFs to complement active or passive allocations in portfolios, or to replace active or passive allocations. Ignites Distribution Research found that asset managers aren’t always attuned to advisors’ use of smart-beta ETFs within portfolios, overemphasizing certain aspects of the products.
Ignites Distribution Research surveyed the Financial Times 400 Top Broker-Dealer Advisors, a list of top broker-dealer advisors from across the U.S. managing, on average, $1.7 billion in client assets; the Financial Times 300 Top Registered Investment Advisors, a list of elite, independent RIA firms managing, on average, $2.8 billion in client assets; and midsize financial advisors in the broker-dealer and RIA channels that manage, on average, $300 million in client assets.
