CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrHelmer Arizmendy, foto cedida. Lombard International abre oficina en Miami
Lombard International, a global leader in wealth structuring solutions for the high net worth market, recently announced the opening of its office in Miami, FL, located at 801 Brickell Avenue. The new office will be a hub for Lombard International’s sales team to reach high net worth individuals, families and institutions in Latin America.
“The Miami office serves as a gateway for us to engage with and educate advisors of the Latin American high net worth community,” said Helmer Arizmendy, Senior Managing Director and Latin America Region Head for Lombard International. “With this new expansion, we look forward to raising awareness of our solutions available to help protect and preserve wealth.”
This office opening comes shortly after Lombard International’s expansion into Bermuda with the appointment of Phil Trussell as Senior Managing Director to lead the growth of its life insurance operations in the region. In addition, earlier this year Lombard International opened a representative office in Paris and two brokerage offices in Asia, expanding the firm’s global footprint into other key financial markets.
“As the number of ultra-high net worth individuals and families continues to grow, Latin America is a key market for Lombard International,” said Ken Kilbane, Executive Vice President and Head of Global Distribution at Lombard International. “The opening of this new office further cements our position as a global leader in wealth structuring solutions for the high net worth market.”
Yesterday night Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump faced each other in their first Presidential Debate at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. The apparent winner was Hillary Clinton. While she calmly and eloquently touched many policy areas in detail, Trump’s lack of preparation had him ranting in a sloppy pattern of interruption after the first half hour, and the markets noticed. For example the Mexican peso – dollar parity went from 19.89 pesos per dollar at the beginning of the debate, to 19.54 towards the end.
Amongst the more memorable quotes are:
From Hillary:
“I think Donald just criticized me for preparing for this debate. And, yes, I did. You know what else I prepared for? I prepared to be president. And I think that’s a good thing.”
“Well, Donald, I know you live in your own reality,” Clinton responding to Trump’s trade attack.
From Donald:
That makes me smart,” Trump said in response to Clinton saying he might not pay federal income taxes.
“I was going to say something extremely rough to Hillary, to her family, and I said to myself, ‘I can’t do it. I just can’t do it.’ It’s inappropriate. It’s not nice,’ ” Trump told CNN after the debate.
During the debate they engaged in an occasionally raw series of clashes on topics from trade policy to the Iran deal to Trump’s taxes. It is clear the presidential candidates don’t often see eye to eye, but they both agree that the US needs to fix its crumbling infrastructure. Allianz Global Investors created an infographic that shows how infrastructure spending could pay off for the economy – and how investors could take advantage.
According to Kristina Hooper, US Investment Strategist at Allianz Global Investors “The US presidential election has the potential to negatively affect markets in the short term. Depending on the outcome of the Congressional races, the new president may not be able to see much of his or her platform come to fruition. However, both candidates are likely to increase fiscal spending, which should be positive for the US economy – particularly since it’s unclear how effective monetary policy still is. Investors may want to take a ‘wait-and-see‘ approach to making sector bets – except for infrastructure, which is likely to benefit regardless of who wins in November. Either way, investors should also expect greater volatility as we get closer to the election.”
Photo: MIth, Flickr, Creative Commons. In Spain, A Third Election Could Result in a Fiscal Cliff
Spain has been without a government for almost a year. Moreover, given the current political impasse, there is a rising risk that it might not have one before the end of the year. So far, the economic performance has not been obviously affected, but, according to Fabio Balboni, european economist at HSBC, the fiscal performance has been.
Despite strong growth, the deficit has been broadly in line with the previous year, which at 5.1% of GDP was worryingly high.
“Low inflation and temporary job creation are all behind the disappointing revenue growth and difficulties cutting spending in real terms, but there have also been some tax giveaways. In total, we estimate the fiscal stimulus is adding about 1% to GDP growth this year.”
But the lack of a government might have more serious economic consequences from here. If the 2017 budget cannot be approved by the end of the year, all of the main spending items will be frozen at current levels, including wages and pensions. That would be equal to spending cuts of about 1% of GDP. This might help to reduce the deficit, but it would also have negative consequences for growth. This risk should also provide a strong incentive for the political parties to avoid a third election.
In October, Spain also faces a new round of negotiations with Brussels. The biggest risk is the suspension of the EU’s structural funds, worth about 1% of GDP. But given the anti-austerity mood prevailing in Europe at the moment, and the political situation, we don’t think the European Commission will be too tough. However, once a government is in place, Brussels will want to see more progress made on the deficit reduction.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: 2Tales
. SS&C Acquires Wells Fargo's Global Fund Services Business
Wells Fargo Securities, the investment banking and capital markets business of Wells Fargo & Company, announced that SS&C Technologies Holdings, a global provider of financial services software and software-enabled services, has agreed to acquire its fund administration business, Wells Fargo Global Fund Services (GFS). Pending regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter. The terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
GFS administers more than $42 billion in alternative assets, covering a wide range of complex strategies traded by global portfolio managers including fixed income, credit, distressed, structured credit, macro, equity, commodities, CDO, CLO, private equity, private debt, real estate and hybrid structures. Wells Fargo’s fund administration business services its clients through its global network of offices in, Hong Kong, London, New York, Minneapolis and Singapore.
“We believe GFS clients will benefit from SS&C’s industry-leading position, proprietary technology and depth of expertise in fund administration,” said Dan Thomas, head of Institutional Investor Services at Wells Fargo Securities. “Wells Fargo Securities will continue to provide financial solutions to our alternative asset manager clients in core areas such as Prime Services, Futures and OTC Clearing and Futures Execution.”
As part of the acquisition, SS&C will acquire GFS’ operations and team members in New York, Minneapolis, Singapore, Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Wells Fargo will work closely with SS&C to provide GFS clients a seamless experience and continuity of services. Additionally, Wells Fargo will continue to provide access to its suite of financial products and services to GFS clients after closing.
“Wells Fargo’s Global Fund Services is well known for its expertise in administering real estate equity and credit strategies. The acquisition of GFS will create a compelling advantage for our customers as they access and manage sophisticated asset classes,” said Bill Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, SS&C Technologies. “This transaction will expand our capabilities in the global fund market, reinforcing SS&C at the forefront among fund administration and extending our strong cloud-based platform for future growth.”
“Joining with SS&C will allow us to dramatically accelerate our global growth plans and pace of innovation,” said Chris Kundro, head of GFS. “SS&C’s innovations in cloud, mobility and fund technology are transforming investment management. This acquisition will create even more value for our customers and will benefit employees as they become part of one of the largest and most reputable fund administrators.”
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Images Money
. Standard Life Investments to Reopen the Suspended UK Real Estate Fund
Standard Life Investments has announced its intention to reopen the suspended UK Real Estate Fund (and associated feeder funds) from 12.00 noon on Monday 17 October 2016.
The SLI UK Real Estate Fund was one of a number of funds to suspend trading on 4 July 2016. This decision was taken in order to protect the interests of all investors in the Fund following an unprecedented level of redemptions.
They subsequently implemented a controlled and structured asset disposal programme in order to raise sufficient liquidity to meet future redemptions and work is ongoing to ensure the Fund is well positioned for markets in the long-term. “We now believe the commercial real estate market has stabilised and that the adequate level of liquidity achieved will allow the suspension to be lifted.” Standard Life stated on a press release.
By lifting the suspension, dealing in the Fund and Feeder Funds, purchases and redemptions of shares, will return to normal on 17 October 2016, with the first valuation point being 12.00 noon on that date. Dealing instructions to purchase or redeem shares will be accepted from Wednesday 28 September 2016, in a written or faxed format only, ahead of the fund re-opening.
Providing advanced notice will enable investors in the fund to make any preparations required ahead of the re-opening.
David Paine, Head of Real Estate at Standard Life investments said: “In the immediate aftermath of the EU referendum result redemptions from retail investor property funds increased dramatically whilst property transactions reduced significantly. During the period of suspension the fund has been able to restore liquidity through an orderly disposal of assets. We are pleased with the progress made and the removal of the Market Value Adjustment, and able to announce the reopening of the fund next month. The Standard Life Investments UK Real Estate Fund invests in a diverse mix of prime commercial property. Its lower risk positioning should therefore be beneficial for performance at times of market stress and uncertainty and continues to offer a stable and secure income, with a distribution yield of 4.04%*. In our opinion, as the search for yield intensifies within a world of low interest rates and nominal growth, the outlook for UK commercial real estate returns and income remains attractive.”
CAIA Miami Event- Courtesy photo. Photos of the Successful CAIA Miami Event
Last Thursday, September 22, the CAIA Miami Chapter hosted its fall networking event at Novecento in Brickell. Executive Committee members Karim Aryeh, Eddy Augsten and Gabriel Freund welcomed CAIA Charterholders (Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst) in the Miami area as well as CAIA Candidates and guests from the Alternative Investment industry.
At the start of the evening, Eddy Augsten -from Vega & Oprandi Wealth Partners- spoke to the group about the activities of the Miami Chapter. “Our role in the AI community is to encourage networking and growth through events like this and to stimulate thought leadership through our educational events. Our next event will in November covering Private Debt and the investment opportunities in that space.”
The CAIA Miami event included participants from Hedge Funds, Private Equity firms, Family Offices, Private Banks, Asset Managers and other investment firms. “We are creating a platform for individuals in Miami and Latin-American to meet and share ideas regarding innovative investments strategies” said Karim Aryeh, who recently left Santander Private Bank and is starting up a Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) focusing on Alternative Investments.
“The event was a success. We had to close registration due to the number of attendees, and that validates the increased interest in the CAIA certification from all sectors of the investment community. From students to junior analysts to seasoned professionals” said Gabriel Freund.
You can see the pictures of the event following this link.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: John Bennett, Head of European Equities. John Bennett: No Ordinary Cycle in Europe
In this interview, John Bennett, portfolio manager of Henderson European Absolute Return Fund and Head of the European Equities, explains his view about european equities and the influence of the central banks policies in the stocks markets.
Do European equities offer value?
I’ve always been wary of the value versus growth thing. I think these are convenient labels. Value is in the eye of the beholder. For me, value is about the price you pay for cash flow. What I would say about value is that the old definition of value and growth no longer applies, because this is no ordinary cycle. This has not been an ordinary cycle since the financial crisis. It cannot be an ordinary cycle because of the debt mountain that built up. We are still dealing with the threat of debt deflation – that is really what central bankers are fighting.
In the old days of buying value, you might have looked at cement, banks, steel, cars or aluminium – traditional value sectors. This is not a good idea now, because of deflationary risks, and because of central banks’ response to deflationary risks, namely the QE experiment. You have overcapacity in so many industries that you used to call value. Until we get a change in the inflation dynamic, this probably won’t change.
Are European banks rightly unloved?
Banks have been the poster children of the value trap. Value is never in a ratio. Fund managers have become inured to the many calls from strategists on the sell side who have suggested that it is time to buy the banks. It has been a spectacularly wrong since 2008 because the banking model has been severely disrupted, if not broken, by QE.
What are your post-Brexit concerns for Europe?
I have been less worried about the FTSE 100 and the UK economy than the European periphery in the immediate aftermath of Brexit; because of course Britain flexed its currency, devaluing sterling significantly. I worried about the effects of that more on the European periphery, an already fairly uncompetitive area, where the euro has arguably been too strong since it was launched.
The euro in my view has been too weak for Germany and too strong for everyone else. I thought it was wrong that people were panicking on UK house builders, for example. I haven’t said ‘panic about the periphery’, rather ‘worry about the periphery’. I think it’s a patient that is still healing. Recent GDP numbers from Italy hasn’t been that good, which threatens Italian Prime Minster Matteo Renzi in the upcoming referendum – yet another noisy political event in Europe. I doubt I’ll ever stop worrying about the economies in the periphery.
How is the healthcare sector performing?
Pharma hasn’t really participated in the defensives rally. At best pharma has been dull; in some cases worse than dull. I went into 2016 thinking that this was a year for stocks, not markets. I was trying to say I’m not convinced that this would be an ‘up’ year for market indices. So far, unless you have been based in sterling, you haven’t had an up year in European equities. I would extend that to say even stocks not sectors (from stocks not markets). So, we have nuanced our pharmaceuticals view to say it is not just so much about buying the whole sector. You are now seeing clear stock dispersion within pharma, with pricing pressure in some clinical areas in the US.
Look at the news from Sanofi on its diabetes insulin product. And look at the news from Novo Nordisk. Yes; pricing is beginning to be a problem in the US – a headwind for some pharmaceutical companies, but not all. Where I take an issue with the ‘one size fits all’ approach was that, if you have innovative medicine meeting unmet clinical needs, you will have pricing power. This is why our names are big names in pharma like Roche and Novartis, and also Fresenius in healthcare. I think stock dispersion is back, even within sectors.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Martin Fish. Investment Fund Assets Worldwide See 4% Increase in Q2 2016
The European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) has recently published its latest International Statistical Release, which describes the developments in the worldwide investment fund industry during the second quarter of 2016.
The main developments in Q2 2016 can be summarized as follows:
Investment fund assets worldwide increased by 4 percent in the second quarter of 2016. In U.S. dollar terms, worldwide investment fund assets increased by 1.4 percent to stand at USD 42.3 trillion at end Q2 2016.
Worldwide net cash inflows increased to EUR 206 billion, up from EUR 154 billion in the first quarter of 2016.
Long-term funds (all funds excluding money market funds) recorded net inflows of EUR 217 billion, compared to EUR 192 billion in the first quarter of 2016.
Equity funds recorded net outflows of EUR 17 billion, against net inflows of EUR 50 billion in the previous quarter.
Bond funds posted net inflows of EUR 130 billion, up from net inflows of EUR 72 billion in the first quarter of 2016.
Balanced/mixed funds registered net inflows of EUR 58 billion, up from net inflows of EUR 35 billion in the previous quarter.
Money market funds continued to register net outflows in Q2 2016 (EUR 11 billion), compared to net outflows of EUR 38 billion in Q1 2016.
At the end of the second quarter of the year, assets of equity funds represented 39 percent and bond funds represented 22 percent of all investment fund assets worldwide. Of the remaining assets, money market funds represented 12 percent and the asset share of balanced/mixed funds was 18 percent.
The market share of the ten largest countries/regions in the world market were the United States (47.1%), Europe (33.8%), Australia (3.8%), Brazil (3.6%), Japan (3.5%), Canada (3.1%), China (2.7%), Rep. of Korea (0.9%), South Africa (0.4%) and India (0.4%).
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Wansan Son
. Department of Labor Conflict of Interest Rule Expected to Boost Advisors' Allocation to ETFs by 65%
Financial advisors are likely to recommend that their clients increase allocations to exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by 65 percent as a result of the recent Department of Labor (DOL) Conflict of Interest Rule, according to a white paper by BNY Mellon.
The survey results indicated that advisors in the study currently have 23 percent of their assets under management in ETFs, and they plan to boost that allocation to 38 percent over the next two years as assets are transitioned to ETFs from other products. That would increase the percentage of assets allocated to ETFs by 65.2 percent. Approximately 55 percent of the 170 advisors polled by BNY Mellon said they plan to increase their investments to ETFs because of the rule, which becomes effective in April 2017.
“The rule requires financial advisers to recommend investments that are in the best interests of their clients when they offer guidance on 401(k) plan assets, individual retirement accounts or other qualified monies saved for retirement,” said Frank La Salla, chief executive officer of BNY Mellon’s Global Structured Products and Alternative Investment Services business. “This includes emphasizing financial services products such as ETFs that tend to have lower fees than other types of investments.”
The advisors said they will increase their use of both actively managed ETFs and passively managed ETFs. They also said they expect to increase their use of separately managed accounts and decrease their use of unit investment trusts and annuities. Funding for the growing products is likely to come at least in part from the declining products, according to the survey.
La Salla noted that cost will not be the only factor determining the types of assets that advisors recommend. “The advisor and the client might be looking to fill a need in an investment portfolio, such as obtaining exposure to a particular asset class or country,” he said. “The best product might be an ETF, or it might be a mutual fund or some other financial product.”
While the respondents indicated they expect continuing rapid growth of ETF assets, they said that changes in three areas are needed to facilitate this growth. First, the majority of defined contribution programs will need to upgrade their technology to trade ETFs, as many do not have this capability. The DOL rule could accelerate the introduction of the necessary technology as plan sponsors and advisors will be more motivated to offer these products.
The other two areas are education and information access.
“The ETF industry will need to accelerate the educational efforts about ETFs and the DOL rule among industry participants to smooth the way for projected growth,” said Steve Cook, managing director and business executive for BNY Mellon’s Structured Product Services. “As to accessing information, ETF-oriented advisors tend to favor accessing research in small bites rather in long documents. They prefer to learn about new offerings via virtual webcasts rather than attending conferences or attending sales meetings.”
LaSalla concludes that registered investment advisors (RIAs), like brokers, are likely to give ETFs serious consideration. “Given the fee-based nature of RIAs, their level of sophistication and willingness to adopt new strategies to help their investors to optimize their investments, it would seem natural for them to embrace ETFs even more.”
The white paper, Accelerating Growth: The Department of Labor Conflict of Interest Rule and its Impact on the ETF Industry, produced by BNY Mellon in association with ETF Trends, can be read here.
While 2015 was a weak year for the global offshore financial market, with growth slowing to 1.6% over the previous year, there are notable differences between offshore centers and their propositions and performances, and wealth managers need to understand these differences to service customers more effectively, according to financial services research and insight firm Verdict Financial.
The company’s latest report found that safe havens, such as the US and Switzerland, are rising in prominence, while more traditional offshore destinations, such as the Bahamas, are experiencing declines in offshore assets.
Heike van den Hoevel, Senior Analyst at Verdict Financial, notes: “Understanding the unique selling points of each offshore center is key to determine not only their performance, but also future prospects, and the reasons why investors will want to invest there.”
For example, the Bahamas, which is mainly known as a tax haven, has struggled in recent years. In light of recent scandals, in particular the Panama Papers, as well as increased media attention on tax evasion, investors and wealth managers are turning away from traditional offshore centers to avoid being tainted by association.
Switzerland, one of the world’s largest safe havens, represents another interesting example. Traditionally known for banking secrecy and numbered accounts, the Alpine state felt the full brunt of the increased pressure on offshore centers after the 2008 crisis, and retail non-resident deposits declined by 24% between 2008 and 2013. However, the tide is turning, and the Swiss government has made efforts to increase transparency and end bank secrecy in recent years, most notably committing to the automatic exchange of tax information as part of the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard, which will begin in 2018.
Van den Hoevel continues: “These efforts combined with the country’s safe haven status have seen non-resident deposits return in recent years. Various international developments – including Britain leaving the EU, the coup in Turkey, continuous unrest in the Middle East, slowing economic growth in China, and uncertainties surrounding Russia’s geopolitical ambitions – have all contributed to funds flowing back into Switzerland as investors seek a safe haven for their money.”
