DWS: “Despite uncertainty in Europe, weak economic growth, financial crisis, the European high yield market has had a lower default rate than the US “

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

DWS: “Pese a la incertidumbre en Europa y el crecimiento débil, el mercado europeo de high yield ha tenido una tasa de default menor que el americano"
Foto cedidaPer Wehrmann. Head European High Yield DWS. DWS: “Despite uncertainty in Europe, weak economic growth, financial crisis, the European high yield market has had a lower default rate than the US "

At a time when the threats of Brexit and Italian finances are flying over the European economy, Per Wehrmann CFA, Head of European High yield in DWS, is confident that Europe will not enter into a recession although he expects a period of lower growth.

Lower growth but not a recession

As such, in an interview with Funds Society during his recent visit to Santiago de Chile, Wehrmann confirms that he expects a GDP growth for the Euro area of 2% for 2018 and a moderate slowdown during 2019 to 1,8%. The main risk drivers for Wehrmann are Brexit and the situation in Italy.

Regarding Brexit , specifically about UK’s exit terms for leaving Europe, he expects that the deal agreed with the European Union, that implies a broader free trade zone will be approved as it has limited impact in the economic relationship. For Wehrmann: “Clearly UK needs this deal more than the other way around, as it is dependent on having access to the European markets. At the end, and even if we expect some volatility and headline risk, we expect the most important terms of the deal to be agreed upon.”

As per the situation in Italy, whose government has already confirmed a disappointing third quarter growth figure, they expect that eventually an agreement will be reached with the EU, although there are chances that the actual government will not succeeded and new elections taking place in the near future are highly likely. Nonetheless, “ at some point we will see some improvement there and less uncertainty”, declares Wehrmann.

Germany is another country that has had a negative impact in the European economy, showing a negative growth during the 3rd quarter, due mainly because of the auto industry. “The auto industry has had problems to bring cars to the market because there is a new way to measure the consumption and pollution that have caused bottlenecks”, explains Wehrmann although he specifies that this impact is less important than the future of the Chinese economy : “More serious is of course the situation in China, we have seen a slowdown in autos and that is something that could have a negative impact on the auto industry.”

On a positive note, he mentioned that the German economy is rebalancing, towards a greater contribution of the domestic investment expending, thanks to mainly the construction sector, making it less dependent on trade balances.

He also points out, as a positive aspect, the role that Spain is playing, that to his view, has “changed the camp”:  Previously it was a low growth country camp and now it is in the fast growing country camp” and adds “when we have seen Italian government spreads widen significantly, Spanish and Portuguese spreads were not much affected by it. So much less contagion effect to what you saw in 2011”

European high yield market: Lower growth since 2015

“The European high yield market is a relatively young market that has grown significantly in the last years and specially since Lehman crisis due to the “falling angels,” in other words, companies that have been downgraded from the Investment grade spectrum, explains Wehrmann. Another important factor in the evolution of this market, has been the downgrade of subordinated bank debt and its inclusion in the high yield market, that implied that 25% of the benchmark came from financials when it represented zero up until that moment.

Since then, it has had an stable growth up until 2015 but, “ =in the last two years we have seen a decline in the market volume because of the part of the cycle we are in, and as  the economy has recovered we have seen more raising stars, companies upgraded from high yield to IG, than the other way around in Europe,” explains Wehrmann that stated that the size of the market is currently aprox. 1 billion euros.

In regards to the geographical exposure of the high yield issuers, Italy is the predominant country although countries as France, Germany, UK and US also have a significance presence in the European high yield market.

As per sectors is concerned, the European high yield market it is broadly diversified and it includes sectors such as: the basic industry sector, which includes chemicals, paper packaging, raw materials, steel companies; TMT; capital goods, or services.

In terms of the financial sector, Wehrmann points out that when the financial issues started being part of the benchmark they decided not to invest in financials. As such they don’t invest in banks or insurance companies, although they can invest in financial services, so their portfolios are maid mainly corporates.

European High Yield more stable than the US High yield market

If compared to the US High yield market, Wehrmann states that the European one has mostly been more stable after 2011. “Despite uncertainty in Europe, weak economic growth, financial crisis, the European high yield market has had every year a lower default rate than the US high yield market,” that is currently situated at 1% versus 2.5% of the American market. In addition, he adds that the credit quality of the European market has improved significantly and states that: “ European High yield market is very much dominated by BB ratings which may add up to 70% of the European High yield market. To put it into comparison with the US high yield market it has less than 50%.”

For Wehrmann the main reason for the lower volatility are the smaller exposure of the European High yield to the energy and commodities sector and the better average credit quality which is reflected in the lower default rate and the better average rating. The US high yield market on the other hand still benefits from the more stable investor base which is more value orientated and which is willing to enter the market when spreads widen.

Positive outlook for 2019

In terms of the market outlook, in DWS they are positive from a fundamental point of view although they remain cautious in credits with significant exposure to Italy, Brexit related risk as well as some cyclical sectors, such as automotive or construction. In DWS view, “as dispersion across credits increases credit selection becomes more important.”

From a market momentum and valuation point of view, the recent spread widening observed during the last few months, implies it is a good moment to overweight the European high yield asset class bearing in mind its high average rating quality.

As per rating preference, DWS prefer B rated credits over BB as tend to show lower interest rate sensitivity and they expect these issuers to benefit from a more positive market environment. In regards to maturities DWS prefer short term maturities from solid credits as their market risk is lower.

43% of Worldwide AUM Are Managed by 20 Companies

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

El 43% del total de activos bajo gestión en el mundo está en manos de 20 gestoras
Pixabay CC0 Public Domain. 43% of Worldwide AUM Are Managed by 20 Companies

Total assets under management (AuM) of the world’s largest 500 managers grew to $93.8 trillion in 2017, representing a rise of 15.6% on the previous year, according to the latest Global 500 research from leading global advisory, broking and solutions company Willis Towers Watson’s Thinking Ahead Institute. In addition, the concentration of assets managed by the 20 largest managers reached the highest level since inception (in 2000) and now account for over 43% of the top 500 managers’ total AuM.

The research shows North America-based managers represent the majority of assets (58.1%), though their share fell slightly in 2017, the first fall since 2008. European managers represent 31.8% of assets managed (the U.K. being 7.4%), Japan 4.8% and the rest of the world 5.2%. Assets in each region grew in 2017. While the majority of assets (77.6%) are managed actively, the share of passive assets has grown from 19.5% to 22.4% in the last five years. In 2017 passive assets grew 25%.

BlackRock remains the largest asset manager in the rankings, a position it has held since 2008; Vanguard and State Street complete the top three for the fourth successive year.

“Once again, total assets have increased; the rate of growth in 2017 is the biggest since 2009,” said Bob Collie, head of Research at the Thinking Ahead Institute. “The names at the top of the ranking are familiar ones. There’s greater concentration in the biggest names. On the surface, the numbers might appear to tell a story of steady growth and stability. But when you look at broader developments within and beyond the industry, there are signs the industry is facing significant change.”

In an indication of future areas of focus, more than four out of five (81%) managers surveyed reported an increase in client interest in sustainable investing, including voting, while nearly three-quarters (74%) increased resources deployed to deal with technology and big data. Nearly two-thirds of firms surveyed had increased the number of product offerings during 2017, while 60% reported an increase in the level of regulatory oversight according to the research.

“It’s not just a focus on technology. There is a confluence of global trends — including demographic, economic, environmental and social pressures — that are combining to create a period of potentially massive disruption for the industry. The implications go well beyond the investment process. These changes affect business models, people models, operating models and distribution models. They will be felt in every corner of the organization.”

“Firms will choose to respond to these challenges in different ways. Successfully responding to these new industry realities may prove to be as much a test of character and culture as it is a test of traditional business and investment skills,” added Collie.

Over Half Of Fine Art Collectors Have Purchased A Piece Online Sight Unseen

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

En EE.UU., más de la mitad de los coleccionistas de arte han comprado una pieza en línea, sin verla antes
Photo: spencer hickman. Over Half Of Fine Art Collectors Have Purchased A Piece Online Sight Unseen

UBS Global Wealth Management released a report that unveils the majority of art collectors are going online and using social platforms to stay at the forefront of the art market year round. Released during Art Basel in Miami Beach, this special Investor Watch Pulse Report, titled “Art in Motion,” studies the attitudes and behaviors of fine art collectors in the U.S. with at least $5m+ in investable assets. The percentage of art collectors who have purchased art online before they’ve seen it in person has more than doubled in the past year (26 percent in 2017 vs. 58 percent in 2018), while 63 percent of collectors polled have gone on the internet to participate in an online auction.

What’s more, art collectors are beginning to feel the pull of social media, using it as a resource to help them follow the art market closely. Among the collectors, 67 percent follow an artist on social media, while 65 percent have seriously considered buying art after first seeing it through their social media platforms.

“The technological trends changing the economy are increasingly changing the art market,” said Karl Ruppert, Market Head of Florida Private Wealth Management at UBS Global Wealth Management. “There are potential opportunities presented through future growth of the online art market to attract new buyers at different price levels, which is beneficial to the health of the overall market. For gallerists, fairs, auction houses, artists and collectors, digital tools will be a key area of growth over the next five years.”

Women artists on the rise, and so are the investments in them

Women artists are increasingly being recognized for their standout contributions along with breaking their sales records — which hasn’t gone unnoticed among collectors. Almost three-in-five collectors see the artist’s gender as a determining factor when purchasing a piece, and 70% plan on purchasing works by women in the next year.

“While male artists continue to lead overall sales within the market, we found clients are increasingly recognizing that women artists are undervalued,” said Ruppert.

Collectors ready to buy, but cautious to sell

Collectors are eager to grow their art collection with half stating they’re always looking to add new pieces, and 34 percent are opportunisitically searching. Moreover, 58 percent are ready to make an addition in the upcoming calendar year, while 64 percent of fine art collectors are gearing up to spend more than $100k on their new additions in 2019.

More than half (58 percent) of these wealthy art enthusiasts view their collections as their most prized possessions. Not surprisingly, collectors are only willing to sell up to a third of their collection.

Passing along the passion: Concerns for art inheritance

When it comes to passing along their passion pursuit to the next generation, 58 percent of art collectors are worried their heirs won’t know how to care for the collection and 57 percent are concerned about taxes when passing on to the next generation.

Lázaro de Lázaro to Lead Santander AM’s European Hub, While Luis García Izquierdo Will be in Charge of LatAm

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Lázaro de Lázaro liderará el nuevo hub de Santander AM para Europa y Luis García Izquierdo el de Latinoamérica
Foto cedidaLázaro de Lázaro. Lázaro de Lázaro to Lead Santander AM's European Hub, While Luis García Izquierdo Will be in Charge of LatAm

Santander Asset Management is changing its organizational structure. As confirmed by Funds Society, the firm has created two hubs, with the aim of strengthening coordination efforts as well as relationships with banks and local customers.

In charge of the European hub will be Lázaro de Lázaro, and Luis García Izquierdo is to lead the Latin American one.

Lázaro de Lázaro was until now responsible for the Santander AM in Spain position that will go to Miguel Ángel Sánchez Lozano, until now responsible for Structured Products of Santander Spain.

Looking for a new CIO

Gonzalo Milans del Bosch, until now the global CIO, is leaving the firm for personal reasons and his position will be temporarily co-filled by Jacobo Ortega Vich, until now CIO of Santander Spain, and Eduardo Castro, CIO in Brazil, until a full time replacement is appointed.

All these changes come within Mariano Belinky‘s first year as head of the company.

Olivia Watson and Jess Willliams Bolster Columbia Threadneedle’s RI team

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Columbia Threadneedle refuerza su equipo de inversión responsable con la incorporación de Olivia Watson y de Jess Willliams
Foto cedidaOlivia Watson and Jess Williams. Courtesy photo. Olivia Watson and Jess Willliams Bolster Columbia Threadneedle's RI team

Columbia Threadneedle Investments appoints Olivia Watson and Jess Williams for its Responsible Investment team. With the appointments, they have 12 investment professionals in the unit. They will report to Chris Anker, lead analyst for the EMEA region.

Iain Richards, global head of Responsible Investment said: “Investors are increasingly seeking to capture the value of effective ESG integration and understand the wider consequences of their investment choices. Olivia and Jess both join with strong experience of sustainable finance and knowledge of social and ethical issues, and will help us to continue to meet our clients’ needs through providing valuable support to our portfolio managers.”

Olivia Watson, who has been hired as senior analyst, will be in charge of responsible investment research and engagement on environmental, social and governance issues, as part of the company’s stewardship activities in EMEA.

Jess Williams, hired as portfolio analyst, will be responsible for research and analysis on client portfolios from a responsible investment point of view. She previously worked at S&P Global Ratings, where she developed sustainable finance products. She also worked on the Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance at the Climate Policy Initiative in Venice.

Watson joins Columbia Threadneedle from the Principles for Responsible Investment, where she was responsible for overseeing the development of collaborative investor initiatives and investor engagement on environmental and social issues. Prior to that, she worked in corporate sustainability consultancy and in corporate governance research.

Columbia Threadneedle’s responsible investment team supports portfolio manager through oversight of stewardship relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in their portfolios, as well as portfolio construction through the identification of investment opportunities aligned to eight thematic outcome areas.

 

 

Mexico’s Largest Pension Fund Changes CEO

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

La afore más grande de México cambia a su director general
Courtesy photo. Mexico's Largest Pension Fund Changes CEO

The Board of Directors of Afore XXI Banorte has appointed Felipe Duarte Olvera as their new CEO, position he started on Monday, December 10. He replaces Juan Manuel Valle Pereña, who for almost two years led Mexico’s largest pension fund.

According to a statement from the firm, “the appointment is made as an agreement between the partners to promote and strengthen the professional management of Afore XXI Banorte, for the benefit of savers and customers, as well as investors and employees… The mandate for the new CEO is to protect and increase worker’s savings, while generating value for investors.”

Duarte Olvera had been working since January 2016 as Deputy CEO of Infrastructure and Energy at Grupo Financiero Banorte. Between 2013 and 2015, also within the Banorte Financial Group, he was Deputy CEO of Customer Experience. Previously, he was the Undersecretary of Transportation of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation (SCT), Undersecretary of Competitiveness and Regulations of the Ministry of Economy, and Technical Secretary of the Mexican President’s Economic Cabinet.

He holds a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Harvard Business School; He holds a degree in Administration and a Public Accountant from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.

SEC is Still Undecided About Bitcoin ETFs While Bipartisan Bills Look to Strenghten US’ Position

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Estados Unidos busca regular el uso de criptomonedas y sigue indeciso sobre autorizar sus ETFs
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainPhoto: Dave McBee CC0. SEC is Still Undecided About Bitcoin ETFs While Bipartisan Bills Look to Strenghten US' Position

Two US congressmen have introduced pieces of legislation designed to prevent the manipulation of cryptocurrency prices as well as ensuring the US becomes a leader in the crypto sphere.

Democratic Representative Darren Soto of Florida and Republican Representative Ted Budd of North Carolina have introduced The Virtual Currency Consumer Protection Act of 2018 and the U.S. Virtual Currency Market and Regulatory Competitiveness Act of 2018. The bills are designed to protect retail investors from price manipulation while also positioning the US at the forefront of the developing industry.

In a joint statement eleased on December 6, the two congressmen emphasized the “profound potential” of cryptocurrencies and blockchain in their ability to drive economic growth.

“Virtual currencies and the underlying blockchain technology has a profound potential to be a driver of economic growth. That’s why we must ensure that the United States is at the forefront of protecting consumers and the financial well-being of virtual currency investors, , while also promoting an environment of innovation to maximize the potential of these technological advances” the congressmen stated.

 One bill directs the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to describe how price manipulation could happen in virtual markets, then recommend regulatory changes. Another seeks to keep the U.S. competitive in the global industry. They ask the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to come up with recommendations.

On the same day, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) posted an update regarding the approval process for a rule change proposal for the allowance of a bitcoin exchange traded fund (ETF).

The ETF in question is the VanEck SolidX Bitcoin Trust, created in a team up between money management firm VanEck and blockchain company SolidX. The attempt is VanEck’s third at creating a bitcoin ETF. In the update, the SEC said it was delaying its decision until Feb. 29, 2018.

“The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider this proposed rule change,” Eduardo A. Aleman, assistant secretary in the SEC, said in the release.

The last time the SEC postponed the decision on the VanEck SolidX bitcoin ETF, over $9 billion was wiped off the value of bitcoin.Back in the summer, Jan van Eck, chief executive officer of VanEck said: “I believe that bitcoin has emerged as a legitimate investment option, as a type of ‘digital gold’ that may make sense for investors’ portfolios,” since then bitcoin has lost nearly half of its value.

More than Love, Mass Affluents Rank Money as Most Important When Tying the Knot

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

A la hora de casarse, los estadounidenses prefieren la seguridad a la loca pasión
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainFoto: Michael Morse / Pexels CC0. More than Love, Mass Affluents Rank Money as Most Important When Tying the Knot

Is financial security the new happily ever after? According to the Fall 2018 Merrill Edge Report it could be so.

57% of Americans say they prefer a partner who provides financial security more than “head over heels” love. The survey conducted with over a thousand mass-affluent respondents shows that this preference is true for men and women, whereas today’s youngest generation, Gen Z, is the only generation to prioritize love over money.

The report also finds that Americans are contributing more annually to their savings and investments, than they spend in a year on their mortgage, children’s education and travel.

However, as Aron Levine, Head of Consumer Banking & Merrill Edge while explains, “While an endless pursuit for financial security may be prompting Americans to save at record rates, it’s clear that saving does not mean planning.” The majority of respondents say they have no monetary goal in mind when it comes to many major life milestones, including having a baby (67 percent), getting married (64 percent), sending children to college (54 percent), and putting a down
payment on a house (50 percent).

Could emerging technologies be the solution to these planning shortfalls?

Respondents are increasingly embracing artificial intelligence (AI) in their financial lives, with the majority already comfortable with AI providing financial guidance, managing day-to-day finances and making investments. And, nearly half of Americans admit social media impacts their finances on a daily basis, including their spending habits, budget, and savings.

Merrill concluded that many Americans are clearly in need of well-defined plans to help pursue their goals with more autonomy and confidence.

John Stopford (Investec AM): “We Are Finding Value in Government Bond Markets where Central Banks Have Tighter Interest Rates”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

How to invest in a post-QE world? According to John Stopford, Head of Multi-Asset Income at Investec Asset Management, investors may be concerned about how different asset classes are going to react when the effects of the quantitative tightening begin to be felt. “Ten years ago, the global financial crisis hit, and the central banks responded by flooding the system with liquidity. Markets have been a rush ever since. Investor did not have to think too hard about what they owned. All asset classes have gone up. But what would happen when quantitative easing begins to turn and unwind? Is there a risk that bonds and equities will sell-off together? The answer is probably yes,” explained Stopford.  

“Most of us got used to an investment world where movements in the US equity market were negative correlated to movements in US bond market. This has been the norm for the last 20 years or so. But, from 1984 to 1998, the correlation between the S&P 500 Index and the US 10 Year Future was positive. During that period, bonds and equities went up and down together. Investors need to understand that if there is a common driver that pushes both bonds and equities in the same direction, then both will tend to have a positive correlation behavior. In this decade, the common driver has been the monetary stimulus, that essentially pushed all the assets up. Investors need now to be more selective and look for mispriced assets rather than assuming that owing big pockets of beta is going to win the day”, he continued.     

In developed markets bonds there are some areas that are starting to look more attractive and are more likely to offer at least some protection if equities sell-off. “Essentially, it is about valuation and finding government bond markets with reasonable yields in real and nominal terms. We are beginning to find some value in government bond markets in US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, where central banks have begun to tighten or already have tighter interest rates. The Fed’s tightening is being felt mostly elsewhere rather than in the US, which is dangerous because it allows the Fed to fall into a false sense of security and continue to ratchet monetary policy tighter”.

The Fed usually tightens until something breaks

In the past, the Federal Reserve has typically tightened interest rates until they reach a point in which they have tightened too much. This point is usually when the yield curve gets inverted. “The Fed looks at the US economy, which is booming, they look at US inflation, that is in line with target inflation, they look at unemployment, that at 3,9% is well below the sustainable rate of unemployment and they decide to go tightening. Meanwhile, the pressure is happening outside the US, for example in Turkey and Argentina. Emerging markets are beginning to feel the pressure of the liquidity tightening, but as long it is not yet impacting in the US, there is nothing that will stop the Fed from carrying on,” he stated.

Over the next year, investors should not be worried about a recession. Typically the latest stages of an economic expansion in a bull market are very rewarding. By the second half of 2020 though, the market outlook may get more complicated.

“Now, the Fed is tightening interest rates and they may be the cause of a bear market. But other central banks have just started tapering their quantitative easing programs. They are tightening liquidity, but they are not rising rates yet. They are not giving themselves ammunition to fight the next battle. In the typical recession, central banks cut rates by 4% to 5%. What are central banks going to do now? The one-month deposit rate in Europe is still negative and the European Central Bank is talking about raising rates after the summer of 2019. If a recession may hit in 2020, how high will be European rates by then? Meanwhile Japan is still pursuing quantitative easing but tapering a bit. There is a big question mark about what policy makers are going to do. In the past, they came out with creative ways of adding liquidity, but there will be less ammunition to fight the next crisis”.  

Regarding credit vulnerability and the rising uncertainty in the markets, Stopford believes that the risk premiums are compressed at this point in the cycle, but this is something that it is beginning to change. “The yield premium offered by the US High Yield in terms of spreads, a compensation for credit uncertainty, and the equity volatility measure of VIX have typically moved together. But due to the higher level of uncertainty, it seems that they may decouple a bit. Equity volatility is going to remain suppressed for much longer and credit spreads will start to increase as the market is beginning to worry more and more about future defaults.  

A challenging environment makes selectivity crucial

The US dollar remains the world reserve currency, even if there are some currencies like the renminbi, the euro or the sterling pound that are candidates to become reserve currencies, but they all have some flaws. “The dollar remains the principal world currency. Trade is still around 80% denominated in dollars. It is not surprising that the US remains the most liquid capital market and it is the place where borrowers go if they want to borrow. The quantitative easing has facilitated an explosion in debt outside the US denominated in dollars. The problem is that dollar funding conditions are now tightening, and lot of that monies are just stock in the US because that is where the economic growth is and where the returns are. Borrowers finance themselves through global trade. When the global economy is expanding, borrowers that are earning dollar revenues can service their debt tend to have excess of dollars at that point and diversify their investments, generating reserves and putting downward pressure on the dollar. On the contrary, when global trade goes into recession, there is a shortage of dollar revenues, dollars are used to fund borrowings and the price of the dollar goes up. By now, global trade is under pressure, with new protective policies and tariffs.”

On the other hand, the Japanese yen is easily the cheapest developed market currency in the world. “Japan has been running an aggressive quantitative program for some time. Japan is essentially a capital exporter. The Japanese have excess of savings and they tend to send those excess savings to other markets to earn a return. When they hit a crisis, they stop sending their capital abroad, therefore, the yen tends to have very good defensive characteristics. If equity markets collapse, Japanese investors temporarily become more cautious and the yen will tend to go up. We need to think more cleverly about how to diversify investors exposure in the current environment”, he concluded. 

David Herro (Harris Associates): “Active Managers Need to Be Grateful for Passive Investing”

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

According to David Herro, Portfolio Manager and Chief Investment Officer of International Equities at Harris Associates, an affiliated of Natixis Investment Managers, active managers need to be grateful for passive investing. As more money flows into passive investments, more investment decisions are made irrespective of price and value and more market inefficiencies are created.

“As an active investor, I actually need passive investors to have a field on which to play. When market inefficiencies are created, I can exploit these opportunities as a long-term value investor by taking advantage of these market distortions, and that is why I am very grateful to passive investing. This means there may be some short-term pain and our challenge as an active investor is to spend more time with clients while we are going through these periods. We have to explain to clients that they do not have to act irrationally based on short-term pricing events,” said Herro.

“If you are an active manager, you are not going to match the performance of the index quarter to quarter. If clients want someone who is going to match the performance quarter to quarter, that is not us. There is always a trade-off between trying to match the index and achieving long-term results. As an equity investor, I can invest in businesses that theoretically have an extremely long duration, and I am trying to take advantage of the shelf prices, knowing that the fundamentals are not changing anywhere near the prices. I need more than one or two quarters to do that, sometimes maybe a year or two. The active manager has to be out front and communicate that active management needs time to work. Additionally, transparency with clients is key. Each manager is kind of a tool in a tool box and clients need to know what type of tool you are as a manager and how you are intended to be used. Active managers need to be who they profess to be, so clients know how to use your skills properly,” he added.  

As Herro explained, when active managers do not resist the temptation of performing short-term, they start becoming quasi-passive managers and start taking short cuts, despite collecting an active fee. As a result, when the cycle turns, those managers are not going to obtain their alpha back.

“We utilize discipline and patience in our strategies. This is something that is lagging in the investment world because some of the clients are short-term oriented. But I am glad that at our company we take the time to achieve long-term returns. Our system is designed to significantly and measurably outperform over 5, 10 or 15 years. We always try to take advantage of market dislocations, when share prices move in a vastly different direction or speed than the underlying intrinsic business value. When volatility comes back, it provides more dislocation to markets, which enables us to exploit future return possibilities. For example, on the last day of the third quarter this past September, the Italian government proposed a budget that significantly deviated from commitments agreed upon by all euro zone members. In general, there was an extreme dislocation in the European financial sector. The next day of trading, the European financial stocks were trading at an average down of 2% to 3%, and even quality Italian financial institutions were down 7% to 8%. Clearly, in our view, the business did not magically become worth 8% less, but because of some political discourse there was an extreme volatility in prices in a very narrow sector and we were able to take advantage of it.”

The hidden costs of passive investment

When securities are bought and sold, just in the dealing and exchange of the investment instruments, there is a margin between the bid-ask spread alone. Money is made just in the business of buying and selling spreads. “Whether it is through hidden costs, bid-ask spreads or not being able to get investments at the right price, these are all forms of hidden costs that might make ETFs less competitive,” said Herro.

New disruptive players  

Herro believes that eventually tech giants like Amazon or Google will possibly get into financial services. “They will probably offer all kinds of products. They may offer passive products, but they may even offer some artificial intelligence type of product. To me, as an active manager, the more players the better because they create market inefficiencies. They have money chasing certain characteristics in size, location or industry, instead of value characteristics. As long as they can not develop a model that delivers long-term value returns, this is additive to our business,” he concluded.