. William Lopez Joined Jupiter as Head of Latin America and US Offshore
William Lopez joined Jupiter on 18 June as Head of Latin America and US Offshore. He will lead the distribution efforts in Latin America and US Offshore markets, working closely with Matteo Perruccio, Head of Global Key Clients and Strategic Partners, with a view to developing strong coverage across the region and driving growth in sales.
He will also lead and manage third party relationships for the region.
Jupiter mentioned that William is the first appointment dedicated to the region, as stated above he will be supported by the Global Key Client and Strategic Partners team which Matteo leads.
“I am very pleased to have joined Jupiter to lead the distribution effort for Latin America and US Offshore. I feel that Jupiter is a hidden gem in Latin America and there is a lot of scope to build on following a solid start in this very diverse market. The range of high alpha strategies which are targeted at both wholesale and institutional clients differentiate Jupiter’s offering to the investment community across Latin America.” William told Funds Society.
Lopez joins Jupiter following four years at Columbia Threadneedle where he was responsible for US Offshore and Mexico.
CC-BY-SA-2.0, FlickrPhoto: Jörg Schubert. Bolton to Open a New York Office
Bolton Global will open, next September, an office on Fifth Avenue to facilitate the transition of wealth management teams in the New York City area to the independent business model.
The independent broker dealer established presence in New York City through the signing of two teams with more than 500 million dollars in client assets: that of Ruben Lerner and Manuel Uranga, who came from Morgan Stanley in New York , and that of Michel Dejana and Adelfa Rosario, who arrived from Safra Bank also in the Big Apple.
Bolton will provide ready-to-work offices for the teams of the main banks and wirehouses to migrate from the traditional employee model to one in which they acquire the ownership and control of their business book, operating under their own brand.
The firm will place the firms’ premium office space, technology infrastructure, brand development and legal support for the NYC-based teams that are transitioning to the independent model.
Bolton successfully implemented this strategy in Miami, where it opened its own offices before recruiting more than 20 teams with client assets worth 3.5 billion dollars from Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan and Citi.
Growth of assets
Bolton has capitalized on the growing migration of equipment from the main wirehouses to the independent business model in recent years. Recruitment by the firm has been concentrated in leading teams that serve international clients and has been successful with the transition of several high profile teams. Bolton’s comprehensive transition strategy has produced growth in AUM of more than 22% per year during the last 5 years.
Clients’ assets are held by BNY Mellon Pershing as custodian and clearing house, and Bolton offers a full range of wealth management products and services along with the security of financial institutions, with considerably improved compensation.
The firm’s new offices in Manhattan are located at 489 Fifth Avenue, where they will occupy the entire 21st floor.
Photo: Finizio. Schroders Launches Argentine Bond Fund for the International Market
Schroders has launched the Schroder Alternative Solutions (Schroder AS) Argentine Bond Fund – a strategy focused on investing across Argentina’s full credit spectrum. The Fund will provide access to bond issuers in a large, growing economy with the aim of delivering investors a high yield, total return strategy.
The strategy will take a research driven, bottom-up approach in order to build a diversified portfolio of issuances across Argentina’s over USD 300 billion investment universe, whilst also managing downside risk. The team will search for opportunities in sovereign debt, provincial debt, corporate debt and local currency. The Fund launched on 29 June 2018.
The strategy will be managed by Fernando Grisales and James Barrineau and the 10 strong emerging market debt team in New York, and advised by the Argentina investment desk, led by Pablo Albina. Pablo is Country Head, Argentina and has 26 years of investment experience, including 20 years as a fixed income fund manager. The investment team is backed by Schroders’ global expertise, with a strong emphasis on local knowledge. The team has an on-the-ground presence in Argentina and local specialists to cover regional issuers in Argentina’s 23 provinces and the City of Buenos Aires.
Nicolas Giedzinski, Head of LatAm Intermediary & Discretionary US Offshore, said: “We have seen strong interest from international clients to have an Argentine bond product that can provide a compelling yield story in a country that moved from a frontier market into an emerging market category. The fund offers our clients a professionally managed, one-stop solution and the opportunity to invest in a specialised, high yield strategy. We have already been implementing this strategy in a local vehicle for a number of years, and now we are bringing our expertise packaged in an international vehicle.”
Fernando Grisales, the Fund Manager, said: “With an International Monetary Fund (IMF) agreement in hand and a stable policymaking framework in place, we believe that a single country fund for Argentina could be a great choice for investors seeking to capitalize on these structural improvements.”
Schroders has had a presence in Argentina since 1932 and is the number one independent asset manager in the country. It has the largest position in the Argentine debt market, currently managing more than USD 1.2 billion in Argentina long-only debt.
Victor Arakaki . Victor Arakaki has Joined Morgan Stanley Investment Management
Victor Arakaki has joined Morgan Stanley Investment Management as Vice President, Latin America and Offshore Client Engagement.
Based in Brazil, he will be responsible for relationship management across Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Chile (intermediary clients). Victor will be based out of the Sao Paulo office reporting directly into Carlos Andrade, Head of MSIM’s Latin America and Offshore Client
Engagement.
Prior to joining the firm, Victor was at Deutsche Asset Management/DWS and was previously at HSBC Global Asset Management as Senior Product Specialist for Latin American Equities & Business Development in Latin America for both the institutional and intermediary channels. He has fourteen years of industry experience.
Photo: WCM Investment Management . Natixis Investment Managers to Acquire Stake in WCM Investment Management
Natixis Investment Managers (Natixis) signed an agreement to acquire a minority stake in WCM Investment Management (WCM) and become their exclusive third-party distributor, subject to limited exclusions. The agreement establishes a long-term partnership that will allow Natixis to distribute WCM’s investment strategies globally, which in turn enhances WCM’s ability to grow and create opportunity for its clients and employees while upholding its focus on its culture and investment process.
Under the terms of the agreement, Natixis Investment Managers will acquire a 24.9% stake in WCM and enter into a long-term exclusive distribution agreement, subject to limited exclusions. WCM will retain its independence and autonomy over the management of its business, its investment philosophy and process, and its culture, while benefitting from a strong global partner. Paul Black and Kurt Winrich will remain as co-CEOs, and there will be no changes to management or investment teams. The impact of the transaction on Natixis’ CET1 ratio is estimated to be approximately -15 basis points (bps).
“We are pleased to become the global third-party distributor for WCM, whose strong track record and proven investment process make them an excellent partner and strong addition to our global offering,” said Jean Raby, CEO of Natixis Investment Managers. “Our investment in WCM exemplifies our commitment to adding high-conviction, highly active investment managers to our multi-affiliate platform in order to provide our clients with a wide range of unique investment opportunities.”
“We’re really excited to enter into this partnership with Natixis,” said Paul Black, Co-CEO of WCM Investment Management. “After a lot of thought and collective input, we concluded the smartest way to enhance our stability, and to guard our investment temperament, was to partner with a world-class global distribution platform. For some time now we’ve known that diversifying the product mix within the firm – by raising the profile of our global strategy, our emerging markets strategy, and various other investment strategies – is the key to making this happen.”
“Our culture starts with kindling an entrepreneurial spirit, driven by empowerment and transparency,” said Kurt Winrich, Co-CEO of WCM Investment Management. “We try hard to pay attention, seize opportunity, be smart, stay humble, and stay hungry. While working hard and caring for your people is essential, we strongly believe it doesn’t explain everything, and that success also involves being given some opportunities. Today, we have another opportunity placed before us. This partnership will allow us to stay focused on what we do best; namely nurturing and growing a vibrant, robust culture, and generating superior performance for our clients.”
With $29 billion of assets under management (as of May 31, 2018), employee-owned WCM is best known for managing low-turnover, alpha-generating equity portfolios with a focused, global growth approach.
Heather Brilliant, CFA. CFA Institute Reaches Milestone As Women Elected to Board Leadership Positions
Heather Brilliant, CFA, has been elected the new chair and Diane C. Nordin, CFA, the vice chair of the Board of Governors of CFA Institute, the global association of investment management professionals. The election marks a significant milestone in the organization’s history with women elected to the top two leadership positions on the Board, the highest governing authority of CFA Institute. In total, five of the 15 Board positions (30%) for fiscal year 2019 will be filled by women – a goal CFA Institute set in 2016 and realized ahead of schedule in 2017. Brilliant will assume the chair on Sept. 1, 2018, succeeding Robert Jenkins, FSIP, who will continue on the Board, which is staffed by volunteers.
“Heather’s depth of experience in the investment management industry and her passion for the mission of CFA Institute are a powerful combination,” said Paul Smith, CFA, president and CEO of CFA Institute. “Building a better world for investors involves challenging industry norms and closing the gender gap, as well as raising standards in our profession. That sounds like a tall order but with Heather at the helm of our board, supported by Diane Nordin as vice chair and the rest of the Board, I am confident that we will continue to make meaningful progress.”
“I am honored to serve as chair of the Board and am proud of the organization’s dedication to building our industry on a foundation of ethics and integrity,” Brilliant said. “Investment management faces many headwinds: business models are changing; client demographics are shifting and products are increasingly commoditized. As chair, my goal is to ensure CFA Institute and our members are ready for the challenges they face and are equipped to take advantage of the opportunities they bring.”
Brilliant is managing director, Americas, of First State Investments where she is responsible for expanding First State’s market presence across the Americas. She was previously CEO of Morningstar Australasia, and was global director of equity and corporate credit research for seven years prior. Before joining Morningstar, Brilliant spent several years as an equity research analyst for boutique investment firms. Brilliant is co-author of “Why Moats Matter: The Morningstar Approach to Stock Investing” (John Wiley & Sons, 2014), a book on sustainable competitive advantage analysis. She has served on the CFA Institute Board of Governors for five years, and is a member of the CEO Search Committee, Compensation Committee, and Executive Committee. Brilliant holds a bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University and a master’s degree from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
Diane Nordin brings more than 35 years of experience in the investment industry to her position as vice chair. She is a director of Fannie Mae, where she serves as chair of the Compensation Committee and member of the Audit Committee. Recently, she was named to the Principal Financial Group Board, and is also on the Board of Antares, a spinout of GE Capital. Nordin is a former partner of Wellington Management Company LLP, where she held numerous global leadership positions, including director of fixed income, director of global relationship management, and director of fixed income product management. She has served on the CFA Institute Board for two years and is chair of the Audit and Risk Committee and CEO Search Committee. She holds a bachelor’s degree from Wheaton College.
Board of Governors Roster
The 2019 CFA Institute Board of Governors will comprise a diverse group of 15 members who reside in seven countries, namely: Australia, China, India, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and the United States. The CFA Institute membership elects officers for a one-year term and governors for a three-year term that runs from Sept. 1 to Aug. 31. The full list of Board members for the new term is:
Heather Brilliant, CFA, (United States), First State Investments
Diane Nordin, CFA, (United States), Wellington Management Company (retired)
Quim Abril, Courtesy photo. "The Only Way To Truly Stand-Out Is By Real Active Management, Uncorrelated To Market Indices"
Independent asset management in Spain is currently booming and most of these newly-focused funds are either set up as UCITS or structured as hedge funds. At the recent ForoMed Cap in Madrid, an annual event that brings together European investors and small and medium cap companies that are prime investment candidates for these independent funds, we caught up with Quim Abril, Founder and Hedge fund manager of the Global Quality Edge Fund, a project that just celebrated its 1st year anniversary.
In this interview with Funds Society, Quim Abril, Founder and PM takes a look back at his 1st year experience since launching the fund, the advantages it offers investors and the goals he has outlined for himself in the year ahead; including his on-going search for “extraordinary companies overlooked by the markets” and “growing the fund size to 10 million euros to start to attract institutional investors”.
The fund has recently celebrated its 1st year anniversary: What is your assessment of these months gone by and how has your fund performed?
I think my assessment could not be more positive. In the last 12 months, I successfully managed to set up and launch the fund, I have spoken to and met up with the senior management of our portfolio companies while also continued to raise funds by travelling in and out of Spain; visiting and privately talking to would-be investors in other main European capitals. In terms of total return, the fund has grown by 6.6% since inception or 4.5% year-to-date – even though our strategy is aimed at mid-to-long term growth.
Why should an investor choose Global Quality Edge Fund?
Global Quality Edge fund offers some unique characteristics that are not common in other funds in Spain or in the rest of Europe, outside the UK market: Firstly, Portfolio Concentration (UCITS do not allow for this); secondly, it invests in small companies overlooked by the market but nonetheless qualify as extraordinary investment opportunities; thirdly, it’s less correlated to equity market indices and lastly, we hedge our portfolio of shares when the economy begins to show signs of recession through tail hedging strategies.
Setting yourself apart from competition is one of your top priorities, why would you say this is even more relevant in today’s context?
ETFs have grown exponentially and their lower commissions are putting the banking sector under a lot of pressure; especially when the larger players sell passive-like management products under the impression that they are actively managed. The only way to truly stand-out is by real active management, uncorrelated to market indices. This is what Global Quality Edge Fund has set out to propose.
Would you define yourself as a value investor?
I’m not sure if I am but what I would say is that quality companies with sustainable competitive advantages do not trade at a 7-8x price to earnings, let alone in today’s economic cycle. Global Quality Edge fund therefore differentiates itself by buying true quality companies, below 15x its earnings in today’s environment and perhaps 10x during an economic recession.
In what type of companies do you invest? Why are the mostly small and mid cap?
The fund largely invests in extraordinary companies with solid and long-standing competitive advantages that are leaders in their niche markets with low or null competition threats, low broker analyst coverage, proven sound capital management, high ROIC and a clear interest alignment between the company and its shareholders. In terms of size, we do mostly invest in micro&small and mid&cap stocks. The reasoning behind this can be broken down into 10 points:
Firstly, 80% of the investable equity universe across the world is made up by companies with a market cap below 2.5 billion euros. These businesses are easier to understand, analyze and monitor given the fact that they focus and operate in niche markets. Thirdly, they are more approachable and you have a greater chance of speaking to their top and most senior management (the CEO) than you would do in a larger cap company. They also offer higher earnings growth and longer term returns that don’t always have to be at the expense of higher volatility. Their lower or non-existent broker analyst coverage, their uncorrelated price performance against benchmark indices, their higher percentage of insider trading, their increased likelihood of being M&A targets and the positive effect they experienced from the recent U.S. tax reform are other reasons why we draw our attention to these companies.
You state you do not invest in all sectors, which of these do you leave out and what advantages does this decision bring to the fund?
Even though now some value investors have commodity-driven businesses in their portfolios, I can categorically state that Global Quality Edge Fund will not invest in them. The reason behind it is because these companies are cyclical businesses, where the company has no control or pricing power on their products and services, since the supply and demand of these commodities (oil, copper, gold…) largely influences and dictates the companies’ performance. The fund only invests in anti or low-cyclical companies, achieving a higher forecasting certainty when mapping out the evolution of future earnings and lower expected volatility. The main goal is to be capable of analyzing the results of a company across an entire economic cycle, not only during current periods of bonanza. Airlines and restaurants are other industries in which we do not foresee investing.
You have a concentrated portfolio of companies, would you say this is an advantage or an inconvenience in asset management?
Portfolio concentration is one of 2 reasons why we chose to operate as a hedge fund, ruling out the UCITS structure – a more commonly adopted approach in Spain. To explain our reasoning, I always say that ‘a fund manager may have 5, 10 or 15 good investment ideas but never 50 or 60 good ideas. For that matter, you might as well choose an ETF’. At the same time, a concentrated portfolio allows for a better understanding and knowledge of the companies in a fund, reducing the likelihood of mistakes, as well as volatility. The American gurus in the business all have funds with 5 or 10 shares only but in Europe this level of concentration is hardly seen. Global Quality Edge Fund will invest in up to 25 different shares and the top 10 and 20 holdings will represent more than 50% and 80% of the fund’s capital. There are a number of academic papers that highlight how adding one more stock to a fund with more than 20 different investments [that do not necessarily have any sectorial correlation between them] does not substantially reduce the fund’s volatility.
You also insist on avoiding red accounting flags when investing, what are these red flags?
After reading and analyzing 10-Ks (ie: annual reports), you can clearly identify potential risks and creative accounting practices that could diminish or conceal the true earnings potential or the cash flow position of a company. The difficulty lies in the fact that these filings are long and complex to understand and without a solid knowledge base in accounting, these could be overlooked. They, therefore, require a detailed and manual analysis to uncover them. To quote an example, one of the most common red flags is an impaired goodwill adjustment, when the company is forced by its auditor to recognize the loss on its income statement after the acquired asset or business failed to meet the company’s expectations. In order to see if there is an underlying risk or red flag of this sort, we would have to determine if there is a direct high relation between ‘Goodwill’ and the company’s market cap. If there is one, we would immediately refer ourselves to the company’s 10-K filing to read up on the Goodwill and estimate the value of the adjustment – for example – check to see how cash flow projections were calculated; how the business units are split and reported on; how the macro hypothesis are implicit in the cash flow forecasts; see if there are any changes in methodology and analyze the transaction price composition on their material recent transactions.
Some other accounting Red Flags could be: Delay the earnings report date, change from conservative accounting policies to a more aggressive ones, extend an asset’s depreciation period life or increase residual value, too much off-balance sheet assets and not computing off-balance sheet assets like operating lease as a real debt , aggressive revenue recognition policies, not taking in account restricted cash, capitalize cost to the balance sheet (interest cost, software development and inventory),not threat pension deficit as more debt, etc.
One of your differentiating factors is how you choose to hedge, could you explain how these work and the benefit?
The idea behind hedging through options is to protect the tail-risk of the market, a practice that is also known as Tail-hedging. Throughout history, most drops in equity indices above 20% have been recorded when the economy enters into recession. Our most recent evidence of this is the dot-com bubble in 2000 and the financial crisis in 2008. To avoid or diminish the drop, we buy out-of-the-money put options on market indices to protect our fund from market downturns greater than 20-25% whenever there is a significantly high chance of this occurring throw the reading of US Conference Board indicators (Leading, Coincident and Lagging indicators).
Reaching out to companies is key when deciding to add them to your portfolio, why would you say this is a necessary step and how many companies do you meet throughout the year?
The main reason behind getting in touch with companies is to get a deeper understanding of the business and a broader sense of their market. In order to achieve this, you have to speak to the CEO; especially when a small cap sized company has low analyst coverage and information about their business is limited. Once we make contact, we gather useful insights that are not widely known. We find that they tend to share more information about themselves than a larger and more guarded listed company would. The lower the market cap, the higher the chance we have to speak to the CEO. However, reaching out to them requires preparation beforehand. We would only do this after running our own thorough analysis on the company’s numbers ensuring we make the most out of the call, listing a specific set of questions and doubts we may have come across. In 2017, we spoke to 45 companies’ senior management teams and during the first half of 2018, we are slightly ahead, compared to last year, on a year to date period.
Would you be able to tell us about a company you have invested in your fund?
Victrex plc is a British specialty chemicals company and global leader in engineering thermoplastics. Their signature polymer solution, PEEK, is an essential value-added component and key material used in different manufacturing industries. Their competitive advantage could not be beaten with a 65% market share; well ahead of the second, third and even from the rest of the players (25%) that make us this fragmented market, allowing Victrex to continue growing organically and inorganically. In terms of entry barriers, these come in the form of research and development investment (6% of Victrex’s total revenue) and, above all, high switching costs. Victrex’s clients would find it hard to replace PEEK with a substitute of lesser quality that would not compromise the quality of their own products. Their client retention is therefore very high helped by the fact that they personalize each of their products for their clients. To this day, Victrex continues to produce new products and uncover even more critical use cases where this material can prove essential for other industries. This has led the company to increase their market share even further, particularly in those segments where margins are higher and price increases are not hard to deliver. We bought Victrex at an average price of £18.5 in June last year and we sold it in January 2018 at £27, after reaching our target price and finding other investment opportunities with a higher safety margin.
Where and how to you find new investment ideas?
There are different ways to generate new investment ideas, from the most common approach by building out a screen and narrowing down to a list of companies to more interesting options like participating in investment forums and idea exchanges with other fund managers, especially those in the U.S.
In today’s environment, how do you deal with volatility and how do you react to it?
Our exposure to volatility is low, given the fact that our fund is made up of mostly small companies that are not as liquid and have low analyst coverage. In terms of liquidity, whenever there is a correction in the market (a downturn less than 20%), fund managers tend to sell their most liquid stock because most of the time there are very few securities available in the market. On the broker analyst front, earnings releases have little or no effect on the small companies’ share price, compared to larger listed companies that are exposed to higher volatility when broker estimates fail or exceed broker consensus expectations. If we look at our fund, the last twelve month volatility is 7% and the downside risk is below 5; numbers that are ways below comparable funds in the global market.
There is always a ‘but’ and in this case, an economic recession hits smaller companies the hardest, making their share price drop even further than bigger listed companies. Global Quality Edge Fund therefore uses Tail Hedging strategies to protect and preserve the total return of the fund compared to others that do not and find themselves immersed in significant losses during recession periods of the economy.
What are you objectives for next year?
Firstly, find extraordinary companies overlooked by the markets and the general public and patiently wait until they come across an adverse situation that temporarily drops their share price, making the point of entry of our investment more attractive with a reasonable margin of safety. I will also continue holding private discussions with would-be Global Quality Edge Fund investors, highlighting the reasons why they should invest in our fund; not only under the current macro-environment but under our broader and longer term view full economic cycle. Thirdly, I want to grow the fund size to 10 million euros to start to attract institutional investors by the end of this year.
Pixabay CC0 Public DomainPhoto: Monsterkoi. Convertible Bonds Gain Popularity Given Volatility’s Return
During the first quarter of the year, convertible bonds were one of the most attractive assets, especially after seeing the first signs of the return of volatility to the market. In this second quarter of the year, this type of asset has continued to please investors.
As explained by Arnaud Brillois, Head of Convertibles at Lazard Asset Managementand and manager of its long-term convertibles, the main advantage of this asset is that it allows investing in attractive and volatile stocks, limiting risks.
“The greater the volatility of the underlying stock, the greater the value of the convertible bond. In addition, due to its main virtue, convexity, convertible bonds increase their exposure to equity with a rise in the underlying, and market exposure decreases with the fall of the underlying,” says Brillois.
Undoubtedly, the return of volatility and the investor’s certainty that it has come to stay, drives the popularity of this fixed income asset. According to RWC Partners, “the market has been assessing a level of volatility that is too low for the current level of stock valuations and the point in the economic cycle.”
Finally, Brillois points out as another positive characteristic of this asset that they have a short average life of 2.5 years and, consequently, “the impact of interest rate hikes is limited”.
More Issuances
Convertibles are among the very few asset classes that offer positive exposure at increasing levels of volatility. According to RWC Partners, this has also led to increased issuances within the convertible bond market.
“This increase in issuance is a trend now and is expected to continue as rates increase further. January 2018 saw spectacular increase of 120%, compared to the same period last year,” he says.
Photo: Naro2, FLickr, Creative Commons. “The Quantum Revolution Fund"; The First European Investment Fund for the Quantum Technology Industry
Private Advisors VC has launched the Luxembourg based “The Quantum Revolution Fund” to invest in industrial applications of the second quantum mechanics revolution. It is the first private specialized, thematic, European VC fund for new applications of quantum technologies.
The fund invests in different stages of the quantum industry, from research to direct investment in new start-ups. It follows the model outlined by the European Commission for the quantum industry, that plans to invest 2 billion Euros in the next decade. Quantum is the next technology wave, but in fact there are already multiple examples of current applications of quantum physics in fields such as quantum chemistry; the pharmaceutical sector, with breakthroughs in the fight against diseases such as cancer; finance analytics with advances in quantitative analysis and the training of deep artificial neural networks; molecular simulation of new materials for aerospace design; optimization of scheduling problems for advanced logistics and flow management of people and goods; and finally advanced computing for disruptive cryptographic solutions side by side to truly private communications.
“Our professional and institutional clients will find the best specialized strategic investments focused on frontier scientific technology. We’ll look for long-term results that will place our investors in a privileged position in the context of the geopolitical and technological race that the main world powers are quietly undertaking. There is no doubt that applied quantum technologies will change the world as we know it today. Staying out of this race is not an option” says Jaume Torres, CEO of the promoter company.
The Quantum Revolution Fund is structured as a RAIF SICAV of Luxembourg exclusively directed to qualified investors (minimum ticket of 125K) and is managed by the ManCo (AIFM) Selectra Management. The fund’s promoter is the Barcelona based company Private Advisors VC, and the Investment Advisor is its subsidiary in London Quantum Ventures. There is a specialized investment committee of international experts under the coordination of economist Marta Areny and physics PhD Samuel Mugel. The fund is supported by professional partners KPMG, Amicorp and ING Bank and has a European commercialization passport.
According to the company, the Quantum Revolution Fund’s team has deep scientific expertise, proven industry knowhow and strong funding mechanisms credentials for innovative projects. It works with an extensive network of advisors and experts among which are José Ignacio Latorre, PhD and Professor of Physics at both the University of Barcelona and at the University of Singapore, and Víctor Canivell, MBA and Physics PhD with a wide management experience in the international high tech industry. The objective is to raise 150M Euros to invest in new applications of quantum technologies without geographical restrictions, investing between 100K and 3.000K per project. “The approach is for our network of experts to work closely with the invested start-ups, whatever the stage of development they are in. Without a doubt, the future is quantum.” They conclude.
Photo: David Wheler. EMD in Local Currency Should Remain Resilient in the Coming Quarters
According to Daniel Wood, Senior Portfolio Manager EMD Local Currency at NN Investment Partners, after an eventful start of the year, it is a good time to review how Local Currency has performed both on a stand-alone basis and against the other sub-asset classes in emerging markets. In his view, this year can be divided in two sentiments:
31 December – 25 January: an optimistic start to the year
Inflows into Emerging Markets Debt (EMD) were strong in this period. Optimism was high, driven by synchronized global growth and elevated investor appetite for EM exposure. During this period LB returned 5.1% in USD unhedged terms, compared with 3.3% for LC and 0.25% for HC. To him, two things stood out during this period:
LB yields were remarkably resilient even as US Treasury yields increased substantially.
Narrowing spreads offset the rise in Treasury yields.
In a risk-on environment, LC enjoyed strong positive returns over the period, with the FX component of the return only narrowly lagging that of LB. “At this stage, investors in both LB and HC were not punished excessively for holding higher duration, in spite of rising developed markets (DM) rates risk signalled by the higher US Treasury yields across the curve.” He says.
26 January – 31 May: markets turn sour
As market fears began to grow about rising trade and geopolitical risks and as economic surprise indices in both Europe and EM tracked lower, asset prices began to fall. During this period HC spreads widened from 263bp to 344bp, contributing to year-to-date total losses of 4.06% for the asset class. Having previously demonstrated strong resilience, yields on LB also tracked higher, rising by over 35bp to 6.41% at the end of May. From its 25 January peak, LB dropped more than 9%, bringing total year-to-date losses to 4.55%. Emerging market equities also registered heavy losses, falling more than 10% from their January peak. In contrast, LC ended May down only 1.81% year-to-date, again demonstrating resilience to a more volatile global market environment.
Why has LC been so resilient to recent market dislocations?
Wood believes that the low duration of the LC benchmark would insulate the asset class from the growing risk of rising developed market bond yields and that the more favourable, higher quality currency composition of the LC benchmark would deliver strong returns in favourable market conditions while offering some protection to investors if risk sentiment deteriorated. This has been for three main reasons:
LC has a lower exposure to the twin deficit countries (Turkey and Argentina).
LC has a higher exposure to Asia.
The more representative nature of LC has added to its stronger risk adjusted returns.
“We continue to believe that the low duration and more favourable currency composition of LC will enable it to continue outperforming LB over the coming quarters. The sensitivity of both HC and LB duration risk to rising rates has picked up significantly in recent months as interest rate differentials with US Treasuries have narrowed. With upward inflation surprises in European data it is only a matter of time before the ECB begins to halt its QE program leading to higher bund yields, buttressing an upward trend in DM yields. Evidence of this year supports our case for strong returns in LC when risk appetite is positive and limited drawdowns when the risk environment shifts. With an estimated average rating of A-, a large benchmark weighted current account surplus, strong growth and a set of central banks generally looking to raise rates we believe the currency composition of LC will drive strong returns for investors over the coming quarters without the need to take duration risk.” Wood concludes.