Companies Risk Suffering More Acute Supply Chain Failures in 2025

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

In this 2025, organizations face an increased risk of suffering acute supply chain failures as a result of growing global geopolitical tensions and protectionist trade strategies, according to a new report published by Marsh.

According to its analysis, in addition to the risks associated with the reconfiguration of global trade and geopolitics, the report concludes that changing market and policy dynamics present both challenges and opportunities for organizations in the energy transition, especially regarding carbon credit markets (CCMs) and debt-for-nature swaps (DFNSs).

One of the findings highlighted in the report is that organizations trading with connector countries to circumvent existing or anticipated trade controls, or that have suppliers doing so, may be more exposed to disruptions induced by trade policies in the months and years ahead. “As a result of deteriorating relations between major trading partners, governments may also impose trade barriers on goods coming from connector countries, especially those that include components from the originally targeted country, which could create significant volatility in the global supply chain,” it notes.

What Can Companies Do?

To improve their resilience to supply chain shocks arising from the current geopolitical landscape, the report recommends that organizations review China’s commitment to its trade strategy and the underlying objectives of U.S. trade policy, and consider to what extent the current connector model will persist in relation to their business models.

The Political Risk Report states that changing market and policy dynamics present both challenges and opportunities in the energy transition, echoing the findings of the World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2025, in which environmental risks dominate the 10-year horizon.

While global CCMs made significant progress at COP29 and DFNSs have also gained momentum, challenges remain in both areas regarding political risk and the possibility of default. Additionally, the growing climate compliance obligations, especially those stemming from new European Union regulations, may present operational risk challenges for organizations.

“Increased risks around the economy, geopolitics, and climate change are creating an incredibly complex operating environment, unlike anything organizations have experienced in decades. Those who build their ability to understand, assess, and mitigate the risks facing their operations are likely to be better positioned to identify opportunities where others only see ambiguity and to gain a competitive advantage in these uncertain times,” said Robert Perry, Global Head of Political Risk and Structured Credit at Marsh Specialty, in light of these findings.

BBVA Global Wealth Advisors Appoints Juan Carlos de Sousa as Head of Wealth Planning

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Photo courtesy

BBVA Global Wealth Advisors has named Juan Carlos De Sousa as its new Head of Wealth Planning. The first announced the leadership change as an effort to strengthen its commitment to serving ultra-high-net-worth families with cross-border financial needs. 

With more than 20 years of experience in global wealth structuring and estate planning, De Sousa brings another perspective to the role. He previously held leadership positions at CISA Latam and Amerant Bank, where he focused on developing strategies for international families. 

At BBVA GWA, De Sousa will oversee a Wealth Planning service designed to act as a central coordination hub for UHNW families. 

“I am excited to join the BBVA GWA team”, said Juan Carlos De Sousa. “Modern global families face a complex web of financial considerations. Our primary goal is to serve as a central resource, helping clients coordinate with their advisors all the pieces of their financial lives to build a cohesive, multigenerational plan”, he added.

While BBVA GWA’s Wealth Planners provide educational guidance and facilitate collaboration, they do not offer tax or legal advice. Instead, the firm refers clients to a network of independent professionals, referred to as “BBVA’s Allies”, who deliver specialized services directly to clients.

De Sousa’s appointment emphasizes BBVA GWA’s continued focus on offering a structure, client-centered framework for navigating the challenges of global wealth management. 

Balanz Positions Itself in Uruguay as a Full Investment House, Expanding Its Reach and Services

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Following approval by the Central Bank of Uruguay and the Montevideo Stock Exchange, Balanz announced in a statement the completion of the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Corporación de Inversiones Uruguay Sociedad de Bolsa S.A. (CIU). With this, the firm founded in Argentina marks a new milestone in 2025, the year in which it reached $10 billion in assets under management.

“This acquisition marks a milestone in Balanz’s expansion strategy in the country, establishing itself as a Full Investment House offering a comprehensive range of financial services,” the statement added.

With this integration, its operational capacity is expanded by incorporating the licenses of Securities Broker, Portfolio Manager, and Stockbroker. This structure enables the firm to provide comprehensive solutions in financial advisory, investment management, and brokerage operations, both locally and internationally.

Additionally, the firm has intensified its expansion in Uruguay through the enlargement of its offices and the hiring of local talent.

“It is a great pleasure and joy to share this news, which undoubtedly reflects the teamwork we’ve been doing in Uruguay,” said Juan José Varela, CEO of Balanz Uruguay.

Balanz is a company that, in recent years, has made significant investments in technology: “This focus has been key to democratizing access to investments and offering financial solutions tailored to each client’s needs. In Uruguay, its consolidation as a Full Investment House is expected to drive the full evolution of the investment market, through improvements in infrastructure and adaptability to user needs,” the company stated.

Balanz has over 20 years of experience in the capital markets, with a presence in Argentina, the United States, the United Kingdom, Panama, and Uruguay. It serves more than 1,000,000 clients and recently achieved a historic milestone by surpassing $10 billion in assets under management (AUM).

Foreign Investors Sold Nearly $41 Billion in Treasury Bonds Following Trump’s Tariff Announcement

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

On April 2, an exuberant Donald Trump announced that the United States was imposing tariffs on the entire world. That same month, Treasury bonds experienced weeks of historic volatility, and foreign investors sold a net total of $40.8 billion in U.S. bonds and notes with maturities longer than one year—the largest amount sold since December. The data comes from the latest Treasury report.

Part of that selloff was offset by $6.042 billion in purchases by foreign central banks, according to a Barron’s report. As a result, foreign holdings totaled over $9 trillion for the month, the second-highest amount ever recorded.

Treasury bonds went through a historic wave of selling in April, with the 30-year yield posting its biggest weekly gain since 1987, while the 10-year yield saw its largest weekly gain since the end of the 2001 recession, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

Recent estimates indicate that foreign investors hold about 30% of publicly held Treasury debt, down from nearly 50% in 2008. The U.S. public debt market is valued at $28.6 trillion. Foreign holdings have seen a near-constant increase since 2022. Japan and the United Kingdom are the largest holders, followed by China. The first two countries increased their holdings in April, while China reduced theirs.

“The safe-haven status of these assets is increasingly being questioned, and our data clearly reflects this trend,” said John Velis, macro strategist for the Americas at BNY, according to an article in Market Watch.

According to BNY data, foreign sales were recorded on eight of the last eleven trading days since April 4. The 10-year Treasury yield nearly reached 4.5% on April 11, when foreign investors exited the market, according to the same source.

Trump’s trade policy is joined by other factors explaining these movements in the U.S. bond market. According to Jay Barry, Global Rates Strategist at J.P. Morgan, hedge funds placed large leveraged bets early in the spring that were forced to unwind, which could be one reason for the wave of selling. Investors may also simply be rebalancing their portfolios, as market confidence in international assets, such as German government bonds, has improved.

High-Net-Worth Families Around the World Are Accelerating the Transfer of Wealth to Their Heirs

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

The “Great Wealth Transfer” is underway, and inheritance patterns are changing, with significant implications for the distribution of wealth and financial markets. A study by Capital Group, a firm specialized in active investments with approximately $2.8 trillion in assets under management, indicates that high-net-worth (HNW) families around the world are accelerating the transfer of wealth to their heirs.

The study surveyed 600 high-net-worth individuals from Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the U.S. to understand their approach to inheritance and their own succession planning.

“It is estimated that in the coming decades, baby boomers in the United States, Europe, and developed countries in Asia will transfer trillions of dollars to younger generations. Millennials and Generation Z are receiving larger inheritances at a younger age and could benefit from a financial advisor’s market knowledge and long-term investment perspective. At Capital Group, we have built lasting partnerships with wealth managers based on the belief that expert financial advice and strong long-term investment performance drive better outcomes for asset holders and their beneficiaries,” says Guy Henriques, President of Distribution at Capital Group in Europe and Asia.

Attracting the Next Generation of High-Net-Worth Individuals
According to the study, nearly half of all respondents (47%) inherited directly from their grandparents, and the majority (55%) received between $1 million and $25 million. Millennials are more likely to turn to social media and “finfluencers” for investment advice when inheriting (27%) than to financial advisors (18%). Furthermore, 65% of Generation X and Millennial heirs who participated in the study say they regret how they used their inheritance money, and nearly two in five wish they had invested more.

In the case of Spaniards, they are more likely to invest their inheritance: 37% compared to the 33% global average.

Maximizing the Potential of Inheritance
According to a recent study, three quarters of respondents say they have difficulty communicating their inheritance plans, and the majority turn to lawyers (61%) or accountants (49%) to manage them, while only 20% turn to financial advisors.

Additionally, 79% do not specify how the inherited capital should be used, which contributes to much of that money remaining idle or underutilized: only 22% is invested in funds and just 11% is allocated to pension plans.

This lack of strategy is reflected in the dissatisfaction of asset holders: 60% are unhappy with how they used their inheritance, and one third regret not having invested enough. In Spain, 54% of high-net-worth individuals wish they had directed more of their inheritance toward investment.

“Our study reveals that most of these asset holders wish they had used their inheritance differently and invested more. At Capital Group, our mission is to improve people’s lives through successful investing. We believe that if they consider investing part of their newly acquired capital, individuals with substantial wealth could build long-term prosperity. As a company with 94 years of experience, we have partnered with clients to invest across multiple generations, and as markets rise and fall, it is important to remember the value of staying invested for the long term,” concludes Guy Henriques, President of Distribution at Capital Group in Europe and Asia.

Active ETFs Will Gain Ground at the Expense of Mutual Funds and Structured Notes

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

The active ETF industry is undergoing rapid global expansion, and this growth is expected to continue for several years, driven by the advantages these investment vehicles offer to markets. This was the consensus view at the ETFs Summit organized by S&P Dow Jones and the Mexican Stock Exchange (BMV). It was discussed during the event that active ETFs may eventually take market share from instruments such as mutual funds and structured notes.

The summit addressed the future of ETFs, their role alongside other investment tools, and the factors that make them attractive—factors that are fueling the momentum of exchange-traded vehicles worldwide.

During the panel titled “The Evolution of Wealth Management in Mexico: Current Landscape and Future Direction,” moderated by Alicia Arias, Commercial Director at LAKPA and co-founder of Mujeres en Finanzas, Mexico chapter, with participation from Nicolás Gómez, Managing Director and Head of ETF (iShares) and Index Investments for Latin America at BlackRock, and Juan Hernández, Managing Director of Vanguard Latin America, the future of ETFs took center stage.

“Active ETFs are going to grow significantly, but not as substitutes for index ETFs—they will grow at the expense of the active mutual fund industry and the structured notes industry,” explained Gómez.

“I believe the reason for the strong growth of active ETFs comes from the world of Wealth Management, because the most important feature of mutual funds—the retrocession—is no longer necessary. So, if this is no longer needed, it’s possible to compare an institutional-class, clean-class active mutual fund with the same strategy in an active ETF,” he added.

What becomes apparent are the advantages of ETFs, the main one being intraday pricing. That is, they can be purchased at the quoted price at any moment. In contrast, with a mutual fund, it is impossible to know the purchase price at the time of the transaction, as it is neither the current price nor the end-of-day price, but rather the price on the next day. In this context, considering market volatility, trading mutual funds becomes extremely complex—essentially, trading blind, noted both panelists.

“That’s why, with retrocession no longer required, we’re going to see the active mutual fund industry shift toward active ETFs, as well as the structured notes industry—where with an ETF that replicates the same strategy, you have liquidity because it can be sold at any time,” added the BlackRock executive. He also pointed out that there is no counterparty risk, since “owning an ETF means owning the underlying assets—that is, the beta inside plus the listed options.”

Another relevant issue is mobility and market regulation. Currently, there are between $1.5 and $2 trillion in inflows to ETFs, compared to $400 million in outflows from mutual funds. Part of this involves conversions: managers have already converted millions of dollars from mutual funds into ETFs, including firms represented on the panel—iShares and Vanguard.

Of the 600 ETFs launched last year, 400 were active ETFs. The active management industry is innovating through ETFs, and experts pointed out that regulators are likely to approve the launch of new ETF series from within mutual funds. Once this happens, the vast majority of active mutual funds with commercial value will also offer an ETF version.

Crypto World and ETFs Also Expanding

In the cryptoasset industry, the growth outlook is also positive. This includes ETFs linked to this space. “Three dynamics are taking place: first, continued adoption by what we call the ‘whales’—people who have already made fortunes in crypto and, for example, hold bitcoin, and who are now beginning to prefer keeping their assets within an ETF alongside their bonds, stocks, etc.,” said Gómez.

“Second, the advisory world, which knows that bitcoin’s market capitalization stands at $2.2 trillion, is interested in incorporating bitcoin cryptoassets in portfolios to monetize them. The third dynamic is that the traditional financial industry increasingly understands bitcoin’s role in portfolios and its fundamentally different characteristics from the rest of the market. The supply is limited, for instance. It’s been a long journey, but various asset managers are now defining their strategies,” the panelist explained.

Thus, portfolio models must focus on behavioral aspects, wealth management, and financial planning, enabling financial advisors and asset managers to concentrate on activities that bring more value to investors.

Vanguard closed the panel with a figure that supports the trend, stating that in the United States, around 50% of all ETF flows originate from model portfolios—either proprietary or from different asset managers. This is a trend that will continue, and in this context, the presence and growth of the ETF market are undeniable.

The Future of Alternatives

Undoubtedly, the alternatives industry also has a promising future. Technology has driven its rise, and some semi-liquid funds are already appearing in the portfolios of individual investors. As highlighted at the S&P Dow Jones and BMV summit, these strategies have ceased to be almost exclusively for large investors. To put this in perspective, the industry is already worth nearly $20 trillion, with private equity accounting for 40%—up from $5 trillion just five years ago.

“It’s very important to note, however, that this is a different asset class. It has illiquidity. We’ve already seen this in the United States, and there is a liquidity premium. But just as important is the fact that there’s a significant dispersion in returns between the top managers, the average ones, and the lowest-performing ones,” said Hernández, Director of Vanguard Latin America.

“So yes, I would say alternatives are viable—but with careful allocation, because there is a liquidity premium, and investors must also ensure they have access to the best managers and products,” the executive concluded.

41% of Global Asset Owners Use Multiple Benchmarks for Their Investments

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

41% of global asset owners use multiple benchmarks, while 59% continue to use only one. These are the findings from the “Asset Owner Performance Survey According to GIPS Standards,” conducted by the GIPS Standards Asset Owner Subcommittee and CFA Institute Research, the global association of investment management professionals, in 2024.

“Benchmarks based on asset allocation weighting are the most widely used, with 61% of asset owners employing this type of benchmark. For target returns, the most prevalent is the benchmark based on the actual weightings of asset classes,” explains Hugo Aravena, President of CFA Society Chile.

The GIPS standards are ethical guidelines for calculating and presenting investment performance, based on the principles of fair representation and full disclosure. In recent years, more asset owners have opted to follow these standards. 24 of the 25 most prominent managers in the world state that they comply with the GIPS standards in full or in part when presenting their returns.

The survey shows that 93% of respondents are at least somewhat familiar with the GIPS performance standards, and 67% of the sovereign funds surveyed are in compliance with the GIPS standards, “which demonstrates that the GIPS standards are of utmost importance to sophisticated investors managing large volumes of assets globally.” According to the study, more than two-thirds (68%) require or inquire about GIPS compliance when selecting external managers of liquid asset classes, and 19% require a declaration of compliance for selection.

“Compared to the 2020 report, more asset owners now state that they comply with the GIPS standards, plan to do so in the future, or inquire about compliance when hiring firms to manage their investments. This shows a growing demand for financial performance to be presented in a transparent and fair manner,” says Aravena. Additionally, 8% require their external managers of illiquid assets to declare GIPS compliance, while 41% of them either require or inquire about GIPS compliance when selecting external managers.

Finally, 59% of investors indicate that they already present the returns required by the GIPS standards (i.e., net of fees and costs) to their supervisory body. “We are aware of the need to advance in presenting risk and return indicators that comply with international standards, so that investors have access to more transparent, complete, and standardized information, making it easier to compare among similar investment alternatives,” concludes Aravena.

U.S.: Most 401(k) Plan Participants Organize Their Retirement Without the Help of an Advisor

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Most 401(k) Plan Participants Are Planning Their Retirement Without the Help of an Advisor, According to The Cerulli Report—U.S. Retirement End-Investor 2025. The international consulting firm states that there is an opportunity for recordkeepers to step in and play a larger role in guiding participants’ decisions, especially for those who do not have access to financial advice.

63% of active 401(k) plan participants, many of whom belong to the upper-middle-income segment, do not have a financial advisor, according to the study. Many of these participants would like to hire one in the future. In the meantime, 52% of active participants without an advisor from the upper-middle segment indicate that their retirement savings account provider is their primary source of retirement planning and financial advice.

“There is an opportunity for recordkeepers to establish themselves as trusted advisors during the accumulation phase, in order to retain and capture assets,” said Elizabeth Chiffer, research analyst at Cerulli, based in Boston.

“Recordkeepers must guide participants to help them determine their optimal retirement savings goal, target retirement date, or overall retirement lifestyle vision,” she added.

The development of personalized messaging that encourages participants to reassess their goals, track progress, and update their information at least once a year drives engagement and establishes a foundation for participant conversations. In addition, they can apply lessons from the benefits enrollment process to promote active decision-making by participants each year, the specialist explained.

401(k) plan participants often find retirement planning confusing and difficult. For example, fewer than 30% of active participants feel very confident in their ability to make future decisions about the decumulation phase and the tax implications of distributions without the help of an advisor. Participants seek advice in order to share the responsibility of retirement preparation and financial planning with a professional who can guide them through the process and assist with complex decisions.

Cerulli acknowledges that offering advice to participants presents significant challenges for recordkeepers. Although this may be ideal, there are innovative solutions that require less investment and should be considered by recordkeepers, advisors, and plan sponsors, such as: reconfiguring the 401(k) plan as a gateway to financial planning, engaging with participants as they consider other benefits, and helping them document their retirement plan.

“This approach and the inclusion of advisory solutions within the plan could maximize participants’ use of available financial benefits and help providers retain assets and secure future rollovers,” concluded Chiffer.

With Sentiment in the Negative, Family Offices Focus on Risk Management and Increasing Diversification

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Geopolitical uncertainty has become the primary concern for family offices (FOs) globally, significantly influencing capital allocation decisions. At the same time, overall sentiment has turned negative, driven by growing concerns over trade disruptions and increasing geopolitical fragmentation. In this environment, allocations to private credit and infrastructure are rising, and there is growing interest in partnering with external managers, particularly in private markets.

These are the key findings of BlackRock’s Global Family Office Survey 2025, titled “Rewriting the Rules”, with the subtitle: Family Offices Navigate a New World Order.

“Investors are increasingly turning to private markets as a way to achieve greater diversification with the potential for higher returns,” the report states, adding that the global alternative assets industry is expected to exceed $30 trillion in assets under management by 2030, according to Preqin.

The report states that FOs are “in risk management mode.” 84% highlight the current geopolitical environment as a key challenge and an increasingly critical factor in their investment decisions; 68% are focused on increasing diversification, and 47% are increasing the use of various sources of return, including illiquid alternative assets, equities outside the U.S., liquid alternative assets, and cash.

“Family offices globally entered 2025 cautiously, a stance expected to continue through 2026, as geopolitical tensions, policy changes, and market fragmentation affect overall sentiment,” said Armando Senra, Head of Institutional Business for the Americas at the firm.

“With 60% of family offices pessimistic about global prospects, confidence has been further impacted by the new U.S. tariffs. They are now prioritizing diversification, liquidity, and a structural reassessment of risk to build resilience in their investment portfolios,” he added.

This cautious economic outlook—but relatively optimistic view regarding their ability to meet return objectives—shifted after “Liberation Day,” when the U.S. administration announced tariffs on all its trading partners.

Before these announcements, the majority (57%) of family offices were already pessimistic about the global outlook, and many (39%) were concerned about a potential U.S. economic slowdown. After April 3, those figures rose to 62% and 43%, respectively, and FOs expressed greater concerns about higher inflation, rising interest rates, and slower growth in developed markets.

A significant majority of FOs had already made or planned to make allocation changes prior to the tariff announcements. Nearly three-quarters (72%) have made or plan to make portfolio allocation changes, and nearly all (94%) are either making changes or seeking opportunities to do so.

The survey was conducted by BlackRock and Illuminas between March 17 and May 19, polling 175 single-family offices that collectively manage over $320 billion in assets.

Alternative Investments Step Forward

To meet the goal of building resilient portfolios, alternative assets are “more important than ever,” according to BlackRock. The survey shows that this type of investment now represents 42% of family office portfolios, compared to 39% in the 2022–2023 survey.

Within this segment, private credit and infrastructure are the most preferred alternative assets. According to the 2025 survey, nearly one-third of family offices plan to increase their allocations to private credit (32%) and infrastructure (30%) in 2025–2026. Within private credit, the preferred strategies are special situations/opportunistic and direct lending.

Infrastructure is gaining momentum. 75% of respondents have a positive view of its outlook. These types of investments are attractive for their ability to generate stable cash flows, act as portfolio diversifiers, and offer resilience.

Over the next year, respondents plan to increase allocations to both opportunistic (54%) and value-add (51%) strategies, due to their higher return potential, favorable momentum, and flexibility.

“The sustained demand and interest in private credit and infrastructure from family offices reflects the illiquidity premium and differentiated return opportunities in today’s environment. Access to the right opportunities and strategies is becoming increasingly important as these assets move from niche strategies to core pillars of client portfolios,” said Francisco Rosemberg, Head of Wealth and Family Offices for BlackRock in Latin America.

However, 72% of family offices cited high fees as a major challenge for investing in private markets, a significant increase from 40% in the previous survey. For many families, the issue lies not so much in the compensation model itself but in the relationship between cost and value received. FOs remain willing to commit to partners and strategies they trust and that are well-positioned to seize specific opportunities.

On the other hand, fewer than one in five are taking on risk, while many more are diversifying and managing liquidity as much as possible, including building up cash positions, moving to the front end of the yield curve, and exploring secondary markets.

BoE, BoJ, and Fed: Three Meetings That Highlight the Divergence Among Central Banks

  |   For  |  0 Comentarios

Pixabay CC0 Public Domain

Central banks take center stage this week, as the Bank of England (BoE), the Bank of Japan (BoJ), and the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) will hold their respective meetings. These three monetary institutions have been less active than the European Central Bank (ECB), which has cut interest rates by 25 basis points at each meeting since last September, so expectations for further changes are low.

How have these central banks behaved so far? The BoE’s monetary policy has positioned itself between that of the Fed and the ECB. “Rates have been lowered by 25 basis points per quarter, but concerns about inflationary pressures—exacerbated by rising regulated prices and increases in employment-related taxes—have slowed a faster pace of monetary easing, amid divided opinions among BoE policymakers. A more decisive rate cut is likely approaching, given signs of declining employment, unfilled vacancies, and wage growth, but a cut as early as June would surprise the market,” notes Sean Shepley, senior economist at Allianz GI.

In contrast, the BoJ remains a case apart: while other central banks have hesitated to lower rates in a persistent inflation environment, the BoJ has been reluctant in recent months to raise rates from its current ultra-loose policy, despite inflation exceeding its target. “The institution remains focused on shifting domestic inflation expectations away from levels close to zero and sees risks to growth as potential obstacles to achieving that goal. All indications suggest that, for now, this inaction will remain the BoJ’s prevailing stance,” adds Shepley.

Since December, the Federal Reserve has kept its monetary policy unchanged, after swiftly reducing its target rate from 5.25% to 4.25% over the last four months of 2024. For this meeting, it is expected to maintain the status quo, as it has shown reluctance to take new action.

According to Erik Weisman, Chief Economist at MFS Investment Management, the only point of interest may come from the new set of forecasts in the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), which could point to slightly slower growth, combined with slightly higher inflation.

“We’ll also be watching the dots—the Fed’s interest rate forecasts—which could shift to indicate only one rate cut this year. Overall, none of this is likely to surprise investors. The Fed will probably acknowledge that the backdrop remains uncertain, and that the best course is to do nothing. As for potential rate cuts, it’s fair to assume they’ve been delayed, and none is likely before the fourth quarter of this year,” Weisman argues.

Focus on the Fed

Although no changes or cuts are expected from the Fed, investment firms agree that the pressure on Powell and the central bank has increased. “One of the hallmarks of U.S. President Donald Trump’s two terms has been his willingness to publicly challenge the Fed Chair whenever he believed interest rates were too high or that the institution had acted too slowly. In fact, Trump has claimed he should participate in monetary policy decisions and has attempted to undermine the central bank’s authority. Moreover, before taking office, U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent even said that if the government announced in advance who the next Fed Chair would be, it could weaken the current chair’s power,” notes the senior economist at Allianz GI.

These pressures are compounded by the complex geopolitical environment. “If not for exogenous shocks, tariffs, and oil, it seems the Fed has successfully concluded the post-pandemic monetary policy cycle, to borrow Christine Lagarde’s phrasing about the ECB two weeks ago. May’s U.S. CPI data was particularly encouraging. While it’s highly likely that the Fed will reaffirm its ‘wait and see’ stance this week, the FOMC’s dot plot for 2026 and 2027 could show some divergence among members, with hawks and doves emerging, divided over the risks of persistent inflation in the U.S. We wouldn’t be surprised if only one rate cut is shown in the new dot plot. However, we believe the longer-term dots will be more interesting,” says Gilles Moëc, Chief Economist at AXA IM.

According to his estimate, assuming the median projection remains unchanged from March, three cuts (to 3.37%) are expected in 2026. “However, the dispersion around the median might be more telling than the median itself. In fact, we could see a group of doves pushing for quicker cuts and faster convergence toward neutrality,” he adds.

Will the Fed Make More Cuts?

Philip Orlando, Senior Vice President and Chief Market Strategist at Federated Hermes, sees potential for the Fed to cut rates twice this year. “CPI and PCE inflation indicators have declined year-to-date through April and are now at four-year lows. The Fed’s June 18 monetary policy meeting includes an updated summary of economic projections. Officials will need to reconcile their restrictive monetary policy—since the upper bound of the federal funds rate is currently at 4.5%—with the fact that nominal CPI is only 2.3% year over year,” he explains.

In his view, there is significant room to lower rates to 3% over the next 12–24 months, and he expects two quarter-point cuts later this year: “The most likely timing would be September and December, and we expect the Fed to set the stage for these cuts at its June and July 30 FOMC meetings, as well as at its Jackson Hole summit in Wyoming from August 21 to 23. With the prospect of lower rates and no recession on the horizon, we maintain our target of 6,500 for the S&P 500 this year and 7,000 in 2026,” he says.

Markets Watch the Dot Plot

Finally, Harvey Bradley, Co-Head of Global Rates at Insight Investment, notes that beyond Fed Chair Powell’s press conference, markets will closely watch the Fed’s quarterly dot plot for signals on how and when the central bank might resume its cutting cycle.

“In both March and December, the median projection was for two rate cuts by year-end, which is roughly what markets are currently pricing in. Given the uncertainty facing markets, it’s difficult to predict whether the forecasts will change significantly. On one hand, Fed members may now factor in a higher effective tariff rate, with early signs of tariff-related inflation beginning to show. On the other hand, less volatile—or ‘stickier’—sources of inflation, especially in major categories like rent, are showing impressive and potentially sustainable signs of disinflation. The labor market is also showing some cracks, with continuing jobless claims at cycle highs. This could help the Fed continue normalizing its monetary policy. Altogether, the projections may remain largely unchanged,” he argues.

Insight’s base case is for two cuts this year, followed by further reductions in 2026 toward a terminal rate of 3%, driven by below-trend growth outcomes—a landing zone the Fed would likely describe as “broadly neutral.” “In any case, while the Fed remains on hold, we believe this could be a good opportunity for investors to lock in relatively high yields in fixed income while they are still available,” concludes Bradley.